"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

Margaret Mead

Case report
peer-reviewed

Intestinal Perforation as a Paradoxical Reaction to Tuberculosis



Abstract

Paradoxical reactions (PR) to tuberculosis (TB) treatments are characterized by an initial improvement of the clinical symptoms followed by a clinical or radiological deterioration of existing TB lesions or by the development of new lesions. PR in the gastrointestinal system is a rare phenomenon. Moreover, intestinal perforation is an uncommon but potentially fatal complication of intestinal TB. We report the case of a 29-year-old female who presented with fever and abdominal pain that was associated with watery diarrhea. She was diagnosed as a case of intestinal TB. During her stay, she developed intestinal perforation following the initiation of anti-TB treatment. She was eventually managed as a case of intestinal perforation as a PR to TB.

Introduction

For the last 25 years, tuberculosis (TB) has been deemed a global public health emergency and is the leading cause of death from infectious diseases among adults around the globe [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates suggest that 9.9 million individuals developed TB in 2020, and the majority of these people were residents of South-East Asia. However, only 6.4 million of these approximately 10 million people were given a diagnosis and an official notification about their illness. Each year, 1.3 million people die due to TB [2].

The sixth most frequent form of presentation of TB is gastrointestinal, representing 3-19% of extrapulmonary TB cases [3]. The gastrointestinal tract, spleen, liver, pancreas, lymph nodes, and peritoneum are involved in abdominal TB [4]. Obstruction, intestinal perforation, and fistula formation are some of the complications of gastrointestinal TB [5]. Intestinal perforation due to gastrointestinal TB occurs in 4-7.6% of cases, with an associated mortality rate of 30% [6].

The perforation may occur at the beginning of or before the initiation of treatment and, on average, it occurs nine months after the appearance of initial symptoms [6]. A paradoxical reaction (PR) is suspected in cases where intestinal perforation occurs during or after the treatment [7]. In a PR to TB treatment, clinical symptoms initially improve, but later a clinical or radiological deterioration of existing TB lesions or the onset of new lesions is observed [8,9]. Of note, 6-30% of patients receiving anti-tubercular therapy suffer from PR. We present a case of intestinal perforation occurring in a patient with normal immunity who was being treated for intestinal TB with anti-tubercular drugs.

Case Presentation

A 29-year-old female patient presented to the emergency department at our hospital; she had been unwell for the past one month with a fever and abdominal pain, which was associated with watery diarrhea. She had lost 15 kg of weight since the symptoms started. Her medical and surgical history was unremarkable, and she denied any recent travel. On physical examination, she was cachectic, dehydrated, tachycardia [heart rate (HR): 130 bpm], hypotensive (BP: 66/18 mmHg), with a temperature of 39 °C, and was maintaining a SpO2 of 92% on room air. A chest examination revealed scattered crepitation on auscultation; she denied coughing or shortness of breath. The rest of the systemic examination was unremarkable. Her initial blood test showed anemia with hemoglobin (Hb) of 8 mg/dl, but other baselines were within normal limits. Chest X-ray revealed bilateral inhomogeneous faint lung opacities (Figure 1). Three consecutive early-morning sputum samples were sent for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) culture, in which the first two samples were negative.

High-resolution CT (HRCT) was done, which suggested active TB infection (Figure 2). Gamma interferon and TB polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were positive, and hence anti-TB medications were initiated with a once-daily regimen of isoniazid (400 mg), rifampin (600 mg), ethambutol (800 mg), and pyrazinamide (1500 mg).

During her hospital stay, she had repeated hematemesis that caused a massive drop in Hb to 3 mg/dl. Oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (OGD) showed focal scarring of D1, suggestive of a healed duodenal ulcer. Subsequently, she had severe lower abdominal pain. Abdominal erect X-ray (Figure 3) and abdominal CT (Figure 4) were done, and both showed pneumoperitoneum. The surgeon was consulted, and she underwent laparoscopic exploration for intestinal perforation, which was converted to an open laparotomy for perforated viscous. A small perforation was seen 150 cm from the ileocecal valve, and during manipulation and adhesiolysis, a second perforation occurred near the first one.

Biopsies from perforated viscus showed chronic granulomatous appendicitis suggestive of TB (Figure 5). Only one month after admission, the third AFB sample returned positive. Anti-TB medications were continued for another nine months, and the patient's condition improved; she was sent home with oral medications. The patient has been followed up for one year after the surgery and has remained asymptomatic. She has provided informed consent for the use of her medical information in this case report.

Discussion

The pleura, lymph nodes, central nervous system, bones, and abdomen can be affected by extrapulmonary TB. Gastrointestinal TB accounts for 17% of all extrapulmonary cases and is the most common presentation of abdominal TB [5]. Intestinal perforation occurs in an estimated 1-15% of all intestinal TB patients [6].

PR is characterized by a radiological or clinical worsening of pre-existing lesions or the development of new lesions in patients who showed an initial improvement when receiving anti-TB treatment [8]. Typically, it is a transient, mild, and self-limiting phenomenon, but higher morbidity and mortality have been reported when the central nervous system is involved [10]. In increasing order of frequency, PR has been reported in patients with TB affecting the abdomen, lymph nodes, skin/soft tissues, respiratory system, and nervous system. One report suggests that new lesions at other sites occur in approximately 25% of the patients while worsening of primary lesions occurs in approximately 75% of the patients [9].

In previous studies, PR has been typically reported to develop within one to six months after starting anti-TB therapy [11]. Moreover, poor nutritional status has been cited as a possible factor contributing to intestinal perforation [12]. Intestinal perforation is an uncommon complication of intestinal TB that occurs due to the formation of adhesions within the surrounding tissues following a reactive thickening of the peritoneum.

A complete understanding of the pathophysiological mechanism of the PR has not yet been developed. Delayed hypersensitivity of the host is strengthened by the heightened exposure to mycobacterial antigens released from the bacilli that were killed by effective anti-tubercular therapy. PR is related to a direct effect of the host over bacterial products and is believed to be a delayed hypersensitivity reaction to bacterial antigens [10]. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) is believed to play an important role as PR cases have reportedly been associated with the cessation of biological anti-TNF-α therapies in patients with Crohn’s disease [13].

Conclusions

We described the case of a patient who experienced intestinal perforation as a PR to TB. In patients with intestinal TB, with the reappearance of symptoms or after an initial improvement with anti-TB therapy following new manifestations, a gastrointestinal PR should be suspected. The most serious manifestation of PR is intestinal perforation.


References

  1. Nathavitharana RR, Friedland JS: A tale of two global emergencies: tuberculosis control efforts can learn from the Ebola outbreak. Eur Respir J. 2015, 46:293-6. 10.1183/13993003.00436-2015
  2. Fukunaga R, Glaziou P, Harris JB, Date A, Floyd K, Kasaeva T: Epidemiology of tuberculosis and progress toward meeting global targets - worldwide, 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021, 70:427-30. 10.15585/mmwr.mm7012a4
  3. MacNeil A, Glaziou P, Sismanidis C, Maloney S, Floyd K: Global epidemiology of tuberculosis and progress toward achieving global targets - 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019, 68:263-6. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6811a3
  4. Jullien S, Jain S, Ryan H, Ahuja V: Six-month therapy for abdominal tuberculosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016, 11:CD012163. 10.1002/14651858.CD012163.pub2
  5. Golden MP, Vikram HR: Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: an overview. Am Fam Physician. 2005, 72:1761-8.
  6. Lee MJ, Cresswell FV, John L, Davidson RN: Diagnosis and treatment strategies of tuberculous intestinal perforations: a case series. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012, 24:594-9. 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328350fd4a
  7. Church LW, Chopra A, Judson MA: Paradoxical reactions and the immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. Microbiol Spectr. 2017, 5:2. 10.1128/microbiolspec.TNMI7-0033-2016
  8. Leung VK, Chu W, Lee VH, Chau TN, Law ST, Lam SH: Tuberculosis intestinal perforation during anti-tuberculosis treatment. Hong Kong Med J. 2006, 12:313-5.
  9. Cheng VC, Ho PL, Lee RA, et al.: Clinical spectrum of paradoxical deterioration during antituberculosis therapy in non-HIV-infected patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002, 21:803-9. 10.1007/s10096-002-0821-2
  10. Jung JW, Shin JW, Kim JY, Park IW, Choi BW, Seo JS, Choi JC: Risk factors for development of paradoxical response during anti-tuberculosis treatment in HIV-negative patients with pleural tuberculosis. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2011, 223:199-204. 10.1620/tjem.223.199
  11. Iwasaki H, Katakami N, Sakamoto H, et al.: A case of pulmonary tuberculosis associated with acute tuberculous perforation of the small intestine (Article in Japanese). Kekkaku. 1986, 61:351-5.
  12. Saitou M, Suzuki T, Niitsuma K: Intestinal perforation due to paradoxical reaction during treatment for miliary tuberculosis. Respirol Case Rep. 2016, 4:e00196. 10.1002/rcr2.196
  13. Unlu M, Cimen P, Ayranci A, Akarca T, Karaman O, Dereli MS: Disseminated tuberculosis infection and paradoxical reaction during antimycobacterial treatment related to TNF-alpha blocker agent Infliximab. Respir Med Case Rep. 2014, 13:43-7. 10.1016/j.rmcr.2014.09.005

Case report
peer-reviewed

Intestinal Perforation as a Paradoxical Reaction to Tuberculosis


Author Information

Mohamad B. Alebaji Corresponding Author

Pediatric Medicine, Tawam Hospital, Abu Dhabi, ARE


Ethics Statement and Conflict of Interest Disclosures

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Review Board of Tawam Hospital issued approval NA. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.



Case report
peer-reviewed

Intestinal Perforation as a Paradoxical Reaction to Tuberculosis


Figures etc.

SIQ
-
RATED BY 1 READER
CONTRIBUTE RATING

Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. Learn more here.