"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

Margaret Mead

Original article
peer-reviewed

Outcomes of Continuous Enteral Vancomycin Infusion in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Novel Treatment Modality for Severe Clostridium Difficile Colitis



Abstract

Background and objective

Severe Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) infection (CDI)-related colitis is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Current guidelines recommend oral vancomycin plus intravenous metronidazole as the first-line treatment and early total colectomy in case of medication failure. In critically ill patients at high surgical risk and with multiple comorbidities, loop ileostomy creation and enteral vancomycin infusion have been employed albeit with limited success. We hypothesized that continuous enteral vancomycin (CEV) infusion via a postpyloric feeding tube would provide a less invasive, efficacious, and safer route to treat high surgical risk patients.

Methods

All adult (>18 years) non-pregnant patients admitted to the ICU for severe CDI from October 2012 to October 2016 and received CEV after the failure of conventional therapy were included. Vancomycin was prepared as a 1-2-mg/ml enteral solution and run continuously through a feeding pump at 42 ml/hour via a post-pyloric feeding tube. The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical improvement defined as (a) decrease in stool output, (b) decreased vasopressor requirement, or (c) improved leukocytosis, and the secondary endpoint was treatment failure defined as the need for total colectomy or death due to severe CDI.

Results

Our cohort comprised 11 patients in total. The median age of the participants was 64 years, and there were more females (67%) than males (36%). Clinical improvement was seen in seven patients (63%); treatment failure documented as the need for total colectomy was observed in two patients (18%), and death attributable to CDI occurred in three patients (27%).

Conclusion

CEV resulted in clinical improvement in most patients with severe CDI who were at high surgical risk. Sustained intestinal vancomycin delivery may increase luminal concentration and bactericidal effect. The use of a feeding tube and pump provides an effective and less invasive route of vancomycin delivery in critically ill patients.

Introduction

Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) is a Gram-positive anaerobic bacteria and is the leading cause of diarrhea in hospitalized patients [1]. C. difficile infection (CDI) is a significant healthcare-associated infection, which is associated with a considerable economic burden throughout the world. In the United States alone, approximately 453,000 cases of CDI are diagnosed and 29,000 associated deaths are reported every year, translating into an economic burden ranging from $436 million to three billion dollars. The rising incidence and severity of CDI could be attributed to the increased use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, patients with comorbid conditions, and the emergence of hypervirulent C. difficile strain. The increase in the prevalence of fulminant C. difficile colitis has reached alarming proportions in the past few decades [2-4]. As CDI is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, a high degree of suspicion of infection is required in susceptible patient populations for early diagnosis and treatment. CDI commonly presents as diarrhea; however, it ranges from a case of mild diarrhea to the patients having fulminant colitis or small bowel enteritis and recurrent CDIs [5]. Laboratory diagnosis of C. difficile requires the detection of C. difficile-associated toxin production, which allows for prompt treatment and implementing sufficient precautions so that the spread of further nosocomial infections could be avoided [6].

There are several methods readily available for the diagnosis of CDI in laboratories. The culturing of stool for isolating the C.difficile and then applying cytotoxin assay on the isolate is regarded as the gold standard method [7]. However, this method is labor-intensive, subjective, time-consuming, and hence not widely used in the clinical setting. Other diagnostic tests including enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based molecular assays have shown promising results [8]. The treatment of choice for CDI continues to be antibiotic therapy. Although antibiotics including metronidazole, fidaxomicin, and vancomycin have been described to be quite effective for this condition [9,10], recent studies that isolated the C. difficile suggest reduced susceptibility and increased resistance to these antibiotics, which raises a serious concern in terms of continuing the usage of these antibiotics for the treatment of CDI [11]. Hence, developing new antibiotics and alternative treatment strategies along with devising novel approaches in diagnosing CDI have become significantly important. In this study, we present a case series and report the clinical outcomes in 11 patients admitted to the ICU and suffering from severe CDI, who were treated with continuous enteral vancomycin (CEV) as the main therapy after treatment failure with conventional oral vancomycin treatment.

Materials & Methods

This study was conducted at the Methodist Hospital, an 802-bed Indiana University-affiliated tertiary-care academic medical center. Patients were identified using electronic medical records. A patient who received CEV therapy was defined as a case patient for C. difficile colitis. Medical records were evaluated to confirm that the selected patients were diagnosed with C. difficile colitis and received CEV therapy for CDI. Data was gathered retrospectively and included demographic characteristics, past medical history, history of surgery, and radiographic information. All adult (>18 years), non-pregnant patients admitted to the ICU for severe CDI between October 2012 and October 2016 who received CEV were included. The decision regarding the initiation of the CEV regimen was made by the respective physician and was started in patients who were poor surgical candidates and had failed the initial conventional treatment. After describing the benefits and side effects of the treatment, verbal consent was obtained from the patient or the legally authorized representative. Continuous treatment included a 1-2-mg/ml enteral solution of vancomycin, which was run continuously through a feeding pump at 42 ml/hour via a post-pyloric feeding tube.

The treatment outcomes were as follows: clinical improvement (decrease in stool output, decreased vasopressor requirement, or improved leukocytosis, survival) and complications such as bowel perforation, readmission to the hospital in case of a recurrent CDI within 30 days after the completion of the treatment for infection, need for surgery, and death due to severe CDI.

Results

The median age of the patients was 64.8 years, and the majority of them were females [7/11 (63%)]; there were four (36%) males in the cohort, as shown in Table 1.

Demographics Comorbidities; 0=no, 1=yes
Patient Age, years Sex; 0=male, 1=female DM HTN CAD CVA AKI CKD/ESRD Malignancy Immune suppression
1 80 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0
2 73 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
3 86 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
4 65 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
5 83 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0
6 50 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
7 86 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0
8 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 44 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
10 76 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0
11 36 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

The medical histories of the patients included diabetes [n=3, (27%)], hypertension [n=6, (54%)], coronary artery disease [n=2, (18%)], cerebrovascular accident [n=1, (9%)], acute kidney injury [n=6, (54%)], chronic kidney disease/end-stage renal disease [n=6, (54%)], and malignancy [n=1, (9%)]. Only one patient was found to have malignancy located intra-abdominally. Furthermore, among those treated with vancomycin, only one patient was immunosuppressed. During the initial management of CDI, 10/11 patients were treated with oral vancomycin with a minimum dose of 125 mg and a maximum dose of 500 mg with an average duration of 101 hours, as shown in Table 2.

Patient Conventional Rx Duration of conventional Rx (hours) PO vancomycin dose, mg WBC, x 109/L Shock Lactic acidosis Toxic megacolon Ileus Surgical contraindication
1 1 48 250 22.3 1 0 0 0 0
2 1 48 250 28.4 0 0 0 1 0
3 1 144 250 29.6 1 0 1 0 0
4 1 192 500 15.6 1 0 0 0 1
5 0 N/A N/A 47.6 1 1 0 0 0
6 1 168 250 60.5 0 1 0 1 0
7 1 N/A N/A 11.3 1 1 0 0 0
8 1 48 250 24.4 1 0 0 1 0
9 1 60 125 35.7 1 1 0 0 1
10 1 Unknown 250 31.5 1 0 0 0 0
11 1 Unknown 500, 250 33.7 1 1 0 0 0

The average WBC count measured during the initial treatment was 31 x 109/L. Of all the patients who were initially treated with conventional oral vancomycin, nine (81%) experienced shock, four (45%) developed lactic acidosis, one (9%) had toxic megacolon, and three (27%) had ileus; and of these patients, two (18%) were not candidates for surgery. After the treatment failure with conventional oral vancomycin, these patients were transitioned to CEV. Each patient was given enteral vancomycin for an average duration of 168 hours, and the outcomes of this novel treatment are shown in Table 3.

Patient Duration (hours) Clinical improvement Surgery (tx failure) Perforation* Death (2/2, C.diff) LOS (days) Readmission to ICU Readmission to hospital Death at 28 days
1 192 1 0 0 0 16.8 0 1 0
2 360 1 1 0 0 23.9 0 0 0
3 264 1 0 0 0 33 1 0 1
4 384 1 0 1 0 57.3 0 0 0
5 120 1 0 0 0 15.9 0 0 1
6 48 1 0 0 0   0 1 0
7 48 0 0 0 1 3.1 0 0 1
8 24 0 1 1 1 5.1 0 0 1
9 7 0 0 0 1 3.4 0 0 1
10 336 1 0 0 0 23 0 0 0
11 72 0 1 0 0 25.4 0 0 0

Of these 11 patients, seven (63%) showed signs of improvement. Three (27%) patients underwent surgical intervention. Only three (27%) out of the 11 patients succumbed to death secondary to CDI; the additional two deaths were unrelated as either the patients had “do not resuscitate” (DNR) status or were shifted to comfort care after discussion with the patients or family members. The average length of stay (LOS) was 21 days with only one (9%) patient readmitted to the ICU and two (18%) readmitted to the hospital. At 28 days, five (45%) deaths were recorded.

Discussion

A case of C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD)-like disease process was initially reported in 1892 in a 22-year-old female patient treated for the resection of the tumor in the gastric pylorus by Dr. William Osler at the Johns Hopkins University [12]. During the postoperative period, she developed diarrhea, resulting in her death on the 15th postoperative day. The postmortem report showed a pseudomembranous “diphtheritic membrane” seen in the small bowel, which, on cytological examination, showed key inflammatory features of CDAD. After the introduction of antibiotics in the late 1940s and early 1950s, case reports on pseudomembranous enterocolitis became more frequent [13,14]. In the early 1970s, an evolutionary understanding of pseudomembranous colitis emerged after the introduction of the anti-microbial agent clindamycin by Upjohn. In 1974, Tedesco published a study that discussed the association between the drug clindamycin and severe diarrhea in multiple patients after receiving treatment for anaerobic infections [15]. The researchers in the United Kingdom and at the University of Michigan have described the toxigenic nature of pseudomembranous colitis [16]. Eventually, several investigators were able to isolate C. difficile from the stool of patients with pseudomembranous colitis [17,18]. CDI can range from diarrhea (usually watery but can be bloody in fulminant cases) to toxic megacolon and severe systemic sepsis. It can be fatal as well due to septic shock and multiorgan failure. The risk factors that can lead to fulminant disease include old age, immunosuppressive therapy, autoimmune disease, and AIDS.

Clinical history and laboratory tests play an important role in the diagnosis of CDI. Consideration of risk factors such as recent antibiotic use, exposure to hospital environments and high-risk patients, and diarrhea for over three days without an identified causative agent is an important prerequisite for the submission of stool for diagnosis. The laboratory-related diagnosis of CDI is still evolving but can include bacterial culture and detection of bacterial toxins or toxin genes from the stool. The most commonly used laboratory methods include toxigenic culture (TC), EIAs for toxins (TcdA or TcdB) or common antigen [glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH)], and real-time PCR [19,20].

The treatment and management of CDI can vary and are based on the clinical presentation, the severity of the illness, and the number of recurrences. Metronidazole and oral vancomycin have been the mainstay of treatment for many years. In addition to these drugs, the new treatment options include novel drugs such as fidaxomicin and nitazoxanide, as well as fecal microbiota transplantation [21]. The use of probiotics either in the treatment or prevention of CDI to restore colonic microflora has been the topic of study in numerous articles. However, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Infectious Diseases Society of America (SHEA/IDSA) guidelines do not recommend the use of probiotics in CDI due to limited data and concern that the potential risk of bloodstream infection may outweigh the benefits [22]. Vancomycin was the first drug approved by the FDA for the treatment of CDI. SHEA/IDSA guidelines recommend the use of oral vancomycin for severe CDI and a combination of vancomycin and metronidazole for severe-complicated infection [10], although response rates in mild to moderate disease are similar for both metronidazole and vancomycin. However, the preferred treatment is vancomycin in severely ill patients due to higher cure rates in these patients (97% versus 76%), although there were no significant differences in the subsequent relapse rates between these two treatments [23].

Mizumura et al. have studied continuous vancomycin administration through a long intestinal tube as a treatment option for CDI. They presented a case of a 76-year-old male patient who had been previously healthy but experienced severe diarrhea (8,000 mL per day) and was diagnosed with CDI after postoperative laparotomy for small bowel obstruction. He was successfully treated with CEV through a long intestinal tube placed in the terminal ileum. This method ensured the reliable delivery of vancomycin to the colon [24]. In our study, we used CEV as a treatment for patients with severe CDI admitted to ICU. All patients were started on CEV after they failed to respond to conventional oral vancomycin. At the time of starting CEV, 80% of the patients were in shock and 20% had been deemed unfit for surgery due to their very frail condition. Post-pyloric continuous vancomycin was given through a feeding pump for an average duration of 168 hours for all patients and improvement was seen in seven (68%) of them.

Our study was limited by its retrospective design, and we also did not confirm the eradication of the production of cytotoxin for each patient. Although some complications like perforation, the need for surgical intervention, and death occurred in a few patients, we were unable to determine the attributable risk associated with CEV from these observational data. In addition, because of the retrospective nature of the data, we failed to observe issues related to the efficacy, toxicity, and safety of the therapy.

Conclusions

Based on our observations, high clinical response rate, and favorable outcomes, CEV can be used as a treatment option in patients with severe CDI who are not responsive to conventional oral vancomycin treatment. However, further prospective studies are required to gain more insights into the significance of CEV treatment.


References

  1. Garey KW, Jiang ZD, Yadav Y, Mullins B, Wong K, Dupont HL: Peripartum Clostridium difficile infection: case series and review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008, 199:332-7. 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.05.001
  2. Peng Z, Ling L, Stratton CW, Li C, Polage CR, Wu B, Tang YW: Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile infections. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018, 7:15. 10.1038/s41426-017-0019-4
  3. Shin JH, Chaves-Olarte E, Warren CA: Clostridium difficile infection. Microbiol Spectr. 2016, 4:3. 10.1128/microbiolspec.EI10-0007-2015
  4. de Curraize C, Rousseau C, Corvec S, et al.: Variable spectrum of disease and risk factors of peripartum Clostridium difficile infection: report of 14 cases from French hospitals and literature review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018, 37:2293-9. 10.1007/s10096-018-3372-x
  5. Napolitano LM, Edmiston CE Jr: Clostridium difficile disease: Diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment update. Surgery. 2017, 162:325-48. 10.1016/j.surg.2017.01.018
  6. Kelly CP, LaMont JT: Clostridium difficile--more difficult than ever. N Engl J Med. 2008, 359:1932-40. 10.1056/NEJMra0707500
  7. Reller ME, Lema CA, Perl TM, Cai M, Ross TL, Speck KA, Carroll KC: Yield of stool culture with isolate toxin testing versus a two-step algorithm including stool toxin testing for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol. 2007, 45:3601-5. 10.1128/JCM.01305-07
  8. Ryder AB, Huang Y, Li H, et al.: Assessment of Clostridium difficile infections by quantitative detection of tcdB toxin by use of a real-time cell analysis system. J Clin Microbiol. 2010, 48:4129-34. 10.1128/JCM.01104-10
  9. Leffler DA, Lamont JT: Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med. 2015, 372:1539-48. 10.1056/NEJMra1403772
  10. Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, et al.: Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults. Cambridge Core. 2015, 31:431-55.
  11. Spigaglia P: Recent advances in the understanding of antibiotic resistance in Clostridium difficile infection. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2016, 3:23-42. 10.1177/2049936115622891
  12. Classic articles in colonic and rectal surgery. John Miller Turpin Finney 1863-1942. Gastro-enterostomy for cicatrizing ulcer of the pylorus. Dis Colon Rectum. 1986, 29:218-21.
  13. Hummel RP, Altemeier WA, Hill EO: Iatrogenic Staphylococcal enterocolitis. Ann Surg. 1964, 160:551-7. 10.1097/00000658-196409000-00016
  14. Wakefield RD, Sommers SC: Fatal membranous staphylococcal enteritis in surgical patients. Ann Surg. 1953, 138:249-52. 10.1097/00000658-195308000-00011
  15. Tedesco FJ: Clindamycin-associated colitis. Review of the clinical spectrum of 47 cases. Am J Dig Dis. 1976, 21:26-32. 10.1007/BF01074135
  16. Larson HE, Price AB: Pseudomembranous colitis: presence of clostridial toxin. Lancet. 1977, 2:1312-4. 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)90363-4
  17. George W L, Sutter V, Finegold S: Toxigenicity and antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium difficile, a cause of antimicrobial agent-associated colitis. Curr Microbiol. 1978, 1:55-8.
  18. Larson HE, Price AB, Honour P, Borriello SP: Clostridium difficile and the aetiology of pseudomembranous colitis. Lancet. 1978, 1:1063-6. 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)90912-1
  19. Deshpande A, Pasupuleti V, Rolston DD, Jain A, Deshpande N, Pant C, Hernandez AV: Diagnostic accuracy of real-time polymerase chain reaction in detection of Clostridium difficile in the stool samples of patients with suspected Clostridium difficile Infection: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2011, 53:e81-90. 10.1093/cid/cir505
  20. Badger VO, Ledeboer NA, Graham MB, Edmiston CE Jr: Clostridium difficile: epidemiology, pathogenesis, management, and prevention of a recalcitrant healthcare-associated pathogen. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012, 36:645-62. 10.1177/0148607112446703
  21. Khanna S, Pardi DS: Clostridium difficile infection: management strategies for a difficult disease. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2014, 7:72-86. 10.1177/1756283X13508519
  22. Pillai A, Nelson R: Probiotics for treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated colitis in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008, 1:CD004611. 10.1002/14651858.CD004611.pub2
  23. Zar FA, Bakkanagari SR, Moorthi KM, Davis MB: A comparison of vancomycin and metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, stratified by disease severity. Clin Infect Dis. 2007, 45:302-7. 10.1086/519265
  24. Mizumura N, Demura K, Kawasaki M, et al.: Continuous administration of vancomycin through a long intestinal tube for Clostridium difficile infection. Intern Med. 2015, 54:1559-62. 10.2169/internalmedicine.54.4026

Original article
peer-reviewed

Outcomes of Continuous Enteral Vancomycin Infusion in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Novel Treatment Modality for Severe Clostridium Difficile Colitis


Author Information

Haley Peters

Critical Care Pharmacy, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, USA

Arslan Iqbal

Critical Care Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA

Emily Miller

Department of Pharmacy, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, USA

Sana Khalid

Critical Care, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, USA

Omar Rahman Corresponding Author

Pulmonary & Critical Care, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA


Ethics Statement and Conflict of Interest Disclosures

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Indiana University Institutional Review Board issued approval 1705634252. The Indiana University (IU) Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved the conduct of this study and deemed it exempt (IRB study number 1705634252 ). Informed consent was waived, and de-identified data were analyzed. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.



Original article
peer-reviewed

Outcomes of Continuous Enteral Vancomycin Infusion in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Novel Treatment Modality for Severe Clostridium Difficile Colitis


Figures etc.

SIQ
5.6
RATED BY 4 READERS
CONTRIBUTE RATING

Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. Learn more here.