"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

Margaret Mead

Review article
peer-reviewed

Predicting Amputation in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review



Abstract

Foot ulcers are a leading cause of morbidity in diabetics. One of the known complications of diabetic foot ulcers is lower limb amputation which makes it a major socioeconomic problem. Currently, there’s a lack of knowledge on the predictors of amputations in diabetics with foot ulcers. We performed a systematic review of studies that identified risk factors of amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. This systematic review aims to identify the predictors of amputation in order to optimize the management strategy and care plan. Medline database was searched and inclusion criteria were implemented for the selection of studies. The risk factors extracted were part of four categories: (i) history and physical examination, (ii) ulcer characteristics, (iii) lab results, and (iv) co-morbidities. The data extracted were in the form of odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and predictive values. The mean values with standard deviations of the included risk factors were recorded, and the incidence of risk factors among the amputation groups was identified or calculated when the data were sufficient. Seven articles were selected reporting on 3481 patients. This review identified peripheral arterial disease, neuropathy, high Wagner’s grade, osteomyelitis, postprandial glucose level, white cell count, c-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, low hemoglobin, and albumin as the most significant predictors of amputation.

Introduction & Background

Diabetes mellitus is one of the most prevalent metabolic disorders that cause significant morbidity among the population. The global burden of diabetes can be estimated by its mortality rate of which most is attributed to the complications it causes; including cardiovascular, renal, and gestational problems. According to the International Diabetes Federation, 4.6 million diabetes-related deaths were recorded in 2011, accounting for 8.2% of all-cause mortality [1]. Among the leading causes of morbidity in diabetics are foot ulcers, usually preceded by peripheral arterial disease, neuropathy and trauma, or by a combination of all three along with other factors. Nearly a quarter of the population of diabetics develop a foot ulcer at some point in their life [2], making it a serious inevitable health and socioeconomic problem considering that 12% of those require an amputation [3]. Diabetics with foot ulcers have an eight-fold higher risk of a lower extremity amputation compared to non-diabetics [4], and about 50% of diabetics who undergo amputations die within five years [5]. This adds a heavy burden on both individual and social scales; it increases disability, reduces the quality of life, generates undesirable psychological impacts, increases medical costs, and creates a massive economical load on the healthcare system [6]. Therefore, the indicators of progression of an ulcer to a mandatory amputation must be discovered at an early stage, and several aspects should be considered for saving the limb before attempting amputation. The main focus of this systematic review is to identify the factors that can predict an increased risk of amputations and to determine the most common/strongest predictor among all in order to ensure early identification of risk. It is highly crucial for these predictors to be recognized as many patients undergo unnecessary amputations due to lack of diagnostic efficiency and inadequate clinical judgment, thus needlessly endure an unfortunate experience [7]. These predictors are essential to optimize the management strategy and care plan for these patients, and they can be very helpful in preserving the limb and avoiding disastrous circumstances. Few systematic reviews have been conducted to tackle similar issues, and most of them focus on the risk of amputations in terms of one variable only, e.g., the effect of peripheral arterial disease [8]. Our systematic review reports different variables as the risk factors vary inconsiderably among patients. Furthermore, there’s a lack of a standardized predictive model used among healthcare professionals to predict the risk of amputation, and the current guidelines for prevention do not incorporate the predictors found in different studies and articles [9]. This systematic review aims to predict the strongest factors that can anticipate the risk of amputation in diabetic foot ulcers, for it to be treated and reversed before permanent damage occurs.

Review

Methods

Search Strategy and Study Selection

This systematic review was performed based on the guidelines in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist [10]. An electronic search strategy was implemented; MEDLINE database was searched for English articles reporting risk factors of amputations in diabetic foot ulcers published in the past 10 years. First, three searches were conducted in MEDLINE using different search phrases, then the results of all three were combined (Figure 1). After the removal of duplicates, the remaining articles were assessed by screening titles to determine the potentially relevant studies. The abstracts of the identified studies were evaluated for eligibility through the inclusion criteria by two reviewers independently. At last, the final studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for quality using Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for non-randomized controlled trials (Tables 1, 2). Articles that received less than 5/9 in the quality assessment were excluded; all the other articles were included in the systematic review.

Study Score Included/excluded
Selection Comparability Outcome Total no. of points
Representation of exposed patients (no. of points) Selection of unexposed patients (no. of points) Ascertainment of exposure (no. points) Outcome was not present at start (no. of points) Symptoms are controlled (no. of points) Therapy of patients controlled (no. of points) Assessment of outcome (no. points) Follow-up long enough for outcome to occur (no. of points) Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts (no. of points)
Yesil et al. 2009 [11] 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 7/9 Included
Sun et al. 2012 [12] 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 6/9 Included
Namgoong et al. 2016 [13] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 7/9 Included
Jiang et al. 2015 [14] 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 6/9 Included
Zubair et al. 2012 [15] 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 6/9 Included
Li et al. 2011 [16] 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 6/9 Included
Study Score Included/excluded
Selection Comparability Exposure Total number of points
Is the case definition adequate? Representativeness of the cases Selection of controls Definition of controls Comparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysis Ascertainment of exposure Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls Non-response rate
Pemayun et al. 2015 [17] 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 6/8 Included

Criteria for Including Studies

The studies were included based on the following criteria: (1) published observational studies (cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional); (2) English articles; (3) published in the past 10 years; (4) type 1 or 2 diabetic population; (5) all patients must present with an ulcer at the time of the study; (6) primary outcome: amputation; (7) all studies tested risk factors for amputation; and (8) sample size: any.

Data Extraction

Certain data were selected from every section of the included studies. From the front page/abstract - the title, date, and the country of the study were identified. From the methods section, the study type, sample size, the measured variables, and the methods of measurements were collected. The risk factors extracted from the results section were part of the following four categories: (i) history and physical examination, (ii) ulcer characteristics, (iii) lab results, and (iv) co-morbidities. All of the data extracted were in the form of odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and predictive values. The mean values with standard deviations of the included risk factors were recorded when available, and the incidence of risk factors among the amputation groups was identified or calculated when the data were sufficient. The data were either presented in graphs or extracted following a detailed evaluation of the text. The number of amputations, overall amputation rate, mean age, and predominant gender of the amputation group were documented in every study.

Data Analysis

The data were presented in the form of odds ratios with p-values and confidence intervals. Risk factors with p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. A forest plot of the most common predictors was performed. Data were analyzed using the application Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 3 (Frederick, MD: Biostat, Inc.).

Results

Search Results

The study selection strategy was applied on 832 articles as shown in Figure 1. A total of 11 articles met the inclusion criteria and were further evaluated by the Newcastle-Ottawa score. Finally, seven articles were selected for the systematic review by two reviewers. Disagreements between reviewers were resolved by discussion. Quality assessment of the non-randomized controlled trials was done using Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS).

Study Characteristics

This systematic review consists of seven articles reporting on 3481 patients. Four studies were cohort, one study was case-control and two studies were cross-sectional. All the studied population involved patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes presenting with a foot ulcer, and the sample size ranged from 94 in small studies to 837 in large studies. The mean population size was 497.2. A total of 917 patients were identified as the amputation group, the indications of amputation were classified into four categories and retrieved from this group. The mean age of the amputation group was 60 and above, with males being the predominant gender. Further data regarding the incidence of amputation and overall amputation rate were either documented or calculated from every study. The overall amputation rate ranged from 3.34% to 42.83% (Table 3). In addition, summary of the most significant characteristics of patients undergoing amputations in the included studies, along with their odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and predictive values are presented in Table 4. Also, a meta-analysis was carried out on the most significant factors (Figures 2-4).

Study author Yesil et al. 2009 [11] Sun et al. 2012 [12] Namgoong et al. 2016 [13] Jiang et al. 2015 [14] Zubair et al. 2012 [15] Li et al. 2011 [16] Pemayun et al. 2015 [17]
Country of study Turkey Taiwan Korea China India China Indonesia
Type of study Prospective cohort Cross-sectional Prospective cohort Cohort Prospective cohort Cross-sectional Case-control
Population size 510 789 837 669 162  420  94
Number of amputations 213 338 28 133 46 112 47
Overall amputation rate 37.11% 42.83% 3.34% 19.88% 28.4% 21.54% Not mentioned
Study No. of amputations Predominant gender Average age of amputation group Most significant predictors of lower extremity amputation found in the study
Factor Mean Incidence OR 95% CI p-Value
Yesil et al. 2009 [11] 213 72.3% male (154) 64.60±9.69 years PAD - 80.8% 6.174 4.149-9.188 <0.001
Osteomyelitis - 62.4% 4.55 3.172-6.526 <0.001
High WBC (103/mcL) 12.56±5.55x103/mcL - 4.504 2.371-8.556 <0.001
ESR (mm/h) 73.87±32.41 mm/h - 3.871 2.208-6.787 <0.001
CRP (mg/dL) 108.76±90.22 mg/dL - 5.25 2.801-9.842 <0.001
High Wagner grade - 58.3% 23.959 14.043-40.878 <0.001
Neuropathy - 77.5% 0.466 0.296-0.732 0.001
Low Hb (g/dL) 11.13±19 g/dL - 1.843 1.095-3.102 0.021
Low albumin (g/dL) 3.55±0.54 g/dL - 2.255 1.247-4.067 0.007
Smoking - 45.5% 1.412 1.003-1.986 0.048
Sun et al. 2012 [12] 338 56.2% male (190) 66.55 years Low ABI 0.86 - 0.42 0.27-0.67 0.0002
Low serum albumin 2.985 g/dL - 0.60 0.42-0.86 0.0046
Low Hb 9.45 mg/dL - 0.90 0.83-0.98 <0.01
High WBC (103/mcL) 13750x103/mcL - 1.15 1.11-1.19 <0.0001
High-grade Wagner classification - 88% 13.10 8.74-19.65 <0.0001
Neuropathy - 84.02% - - 0.004
Namgoong et al. 2016 [13] 28 Male - Dialysis - - 8.683 2.834-26.601 <0.001
GI disorders - - 6.740 1.175-38.66 0.032
Ulcer invasion to bone - - 11.673 1.425-95.619 0.022
Ulcer on hind foot area - - 6.158 1.808-20.974 0.004
Low Hb - - 0.641 0.472-0.871 0.005
High FBG - - 1.007 1.001-1.013 0.030
Neuropathy - - 0.394 0.170.06-0.882 0.023
Nephropathy - - 2.536 1.189-5.408 0.016
High WBCs - - 1.098 1.034=1.167 0.002
ESR - - 1.014 1.001-1.027 0.038
CRP - - 1.006 1.003-1.01 <0.001
Low albumin - - 0.23 0.098-0.541 0.001
High creatinine - - 1.188 1.078-1.308 0.001
Postprandial blood glucose - - 1.005 1-1.01 0.034
Jiang et al. 2015 [14] 133 Male 62.25 years Foot deformity - 20.3% 1.973 1.025-3.800 0.042
Ulcer history - 39% 1.973 1.009-46.209 0.049
Revascularization history - 14.2% 2.662 1.115-6.352 0.027
Infection - 84.9% 2.323 1.028-5.251 0.043
Low postprandial blood glucose 13.5 - 0.941 0.885-0.999 0.048
Increased duration of diabetes 126.5 months - 1.004 1.000-1.007 0.026
High WBC 9.85x109 - 1.250 1.002-1.559 0.048
Low albumin 11.5 mg/dL - - - 0.006
Low Hb 11.5 mg/dL - - - 0.006
Smoking - 46.6% - - 0.018
Zubair et al. 2012 [15] 46 80.4% male (37) 49.8±13.6 years Hypertension - 73.9% 2.83 1.33-6.01 0.009
Neuropathy - 69.5% 3.01 1.45-6.24 0.002
Nephropathy - 58.6% 2.24 1.18-4.49 0.02
PAD - 10.6% 6.95 1.2-37.2 0.02
High ulcer grade≥2 (Texas grade) - 63% 3.7 1.43-9.7 0.007
High WBC (103/mcL) 9.59±3.4x103/mcL 58.6% 2.80 1.39-5.66 <0.004
High cholesterol (>150 mg/dL) 183.6±36.4 mg/dL 54.3% 3.74 1.82-7.68 0.0003
High triglycerides (>200 mg/dL) 164.6±102.5 mg/dL 58.6% 5.44 2.6-11.4 <0.005
Biofilm infection - 84.7% 4.52 1.87-10.9 <0.0008
Previous antibiotics use - 76% 9.12 4.11-20.1 <0.001
High Creatinine (>1.5 mg/dL) 1.45±0.67 mg/dL 50% 3.46 1.67-7.4 <0.0004
Increased duration of diabetes 13.3±5.7 years - - - <0.001
Li et al. 2011 [16] 112 64.2% male (72) 65.7±10.7 years High WBC (109/L) 10.8±6.5x109/L 99.1% 1.146 1.075-1.222 <0.001
CRP (mg/L) 9.95±7.45 mg/L 91.9% 1.041 1.002-1.082 0.037
PAD - 93.7% 4.529 1.500-13.676 0.007
Low triglycerides (mmol/L) 1.16±0.60 mmol/L 96.4% 0.614 0.433-0.869 0.006
Low Hb (g/L) 10.78±18.4 g/L 100% - - 0.002
High cholesterol (mmol/L) 4.21±0.92 mmol/L 96.4% - - ≤0.001
Pemayun et al. 2015 [17] 47 59.6% female (28) 52.6±7 years Hypertension - 65.9% 3.67 1.14-11.79 0.028
Presence of PAD - 61.7% 12.97 3.44-48.88 <0.001
FPG≥126 mg/dL - 97.8% 8.67 0.74-101.11 0.085
Triglycerides≥150 mg/dL - 70.2% 5.58 1.74-17.91 0.004
HbA1c≥8% 11.3±2.8% 95.7% 20.47 3.12-134.31 0.002
High Wagner grade (≥3) - 95.7% 25.88 6.97-96.13 <0.001

History and Physical Examination

All of the included studies tested the influence of age, gender, smoking, and duration of diabetes on the outcome of foot ulcers. Most of the amputated patients were in the age group of 60 and above. According to the odds ratio and p-value, only two studies provided evidence that the risk of amputation increased with age, with the highest odds ratio being (OR: 1.732, 95% CI: 1.099-2.730) in the study of Yesil et al., in the age group of 64.6 (±9.69 SD) [11]. As to gender, the number of males among the amputation group exceeded the number of females as they were predominant in six out of seven studies. The prevalence of males in the amputation groups ranged from 8.4% to 64.2%, and the factor of gender was considered significant in the study of Zubair et al. only according to the p-values (0.006) [15]. Pemayun et al. was the only study that stated a higher number of females [17]. A statistical significance of both smoking and the duration of diabetes was displayed in two studies only, the prevalence of smoking was approximately 45.5% in the study of Yesil et al. and 46.6% in Jiang et al. while the duration of diabetes in the amputation group ranged from five to 17 years [11,14]. The duration of diabetes was considered significant in Sun et al. (p=0.03) and Zubair et al. (<0.001) [12,15]. On the other hand, the BMI of the patients was calculated in one study only by Yesil et al., and it appeared to be significantly lower in the amputation group (p=0.002) with mean BMI of 25.56±3.73 [11]. The remaining studies had no data regarding BMI.

Laboratory Results

The studies included in the review evaluated several serological and biochemical markers for the prediction of amputation. Both glucose and non-glucose-related markers were included to assess the outcome including hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) which was only significant in the study of Pemayun et al., as 95.7% of the amputation group had a high HbA1c (mean value 11.3±2.8%) [17]. Both fasting plasma glucose and two-hour postprandial glucose (PPG) were significant in two studies only. On the other hand, The most significant variables identified in this systematic review out of the laboratory results category were as follows: (1) albumin, five out of seven articles demonstrated the efficacy of albumin in predicting amputations among diabetics. Most patients undergoing amputations had a lower level of albumin (<2.9 g/dL). (2) Hemoglobin (Hb), It was evident in 6/7 articles that the amputation group had lower levels of Hb, which correlates significantly to the strength of Hb measurement in predicting amputations (<13.5 g/dL). (3) White cell count (WCC), 6/7 studies displayed that the amputation group had high WCC with the highest odds ratio in the study of Yesil et al. with a mean WCC of 12.56±5.55x10000/mcL (OR: 4.504, p=0.001, 95% CI: 2.371-8.556). On the other hand, the predictive value of triglycerides, cholesterol, c-reactive protein (CRP), and creatinine was significant in 3/7 studies. High triglycerides were acknowledged as an essential predictor of amputation in two studies by Zubair et al. and Pemayun et al., while in one study, Li et al. found that the levels of triglycerides correlate negatively with the prediction of amputation [15-17]. CRP levels were measured in three studies only of which all three identified high levels of CRP (above 5 mg/L) as a predictive marker of amputation. Data regarding CRP in other studies were not found. In contrast, the same studies also measured the levels of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) which was found significant in two. Finally, the level of creatinine was used to assess the renal function and diagnose nephropathy as high creatinine corresponds to the presence of renal insufficiency in the studied population. Three studies recognized higher levels of creatinine in the amputation group in comparison to the non-amputation group (Figure 5).

Ulcer Characteristics

The features of the ulcers in all the patients were evaluated in order to determine the predictive significance of each and every one of them. Ulcer size was measured in diameter and was identified as significant in predicting amputation in two studies. The bigger the ulcer size, the higher the risk of amputation (mean size of more than 3 cm, p=0.001). The ulcer site was assessed in one study only which revealed that the patients who developed an ulcer on the hind foot had a higher risk of amputation with an odds ratio of (OR: 6.158, p=0.04, 95% CI: 1.808-20.974). The Wagner grade was used as a universal tool to assess the depth of the ulcer. Four studies identified Wagner grade of >3 as a predictive sign of amputation (Figure 5). Most incidences of amputation were in patients with a grade 4 ulcer. Furthermore, an ulcer complicated by osteomyelitis was a significant predictor of lower-extremity amputations (LEA) in three studies.

Co-morbidities

The included studies measured the interactions of different co-morbidities in patients with diabetic foot ulcers, and their impact on the risk of amputation. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) was found significant in five studies making it one of the most predictive signs of amputation. Neuropathy and hypertension were significant in four studies. However, retinopathy was assessed in all seven studies and recorded poor predictive performance in all of them (Figure 5).

Discussion

Foot ulcers are a dreaded complication of diabetes as it conveys huge social and health restrictions. This systematic review inspects the performance of several risk factors in predicting amputations in diabetic foot patients, aiming to create a predictive model that contributes to the decision-making process in clinical practice. Following detailed evaluation of seven articles, the odds ratios of 28 variables were identified, of which nine were acknowledged as the strongest predictors of amputations: elevated WCC, low Hb, low albumin, high CRP and ESR, PAD, neuropathy, osteomyelitis, and Wagner grade >3. Evidence regarding other risk factors was insufficient to derive a definite association.

Most of the studies included in the review displayed an absence of any valid association between demographic factors and amputation. However, the results of some other studies not included in this review contradicted this finding, as factors like age and male gender were proven to be predictive of amputation. This finding could be attributed to the fact that they are both associated with a higher incidence of PAD [10]. In the laboratory results category, six factors appeared to be effective in predicting amputations. High WCC, ESR, and CRP as markers of infection and inflammation are strong indicators of amputation; high levels appeared to be associated with treatment failure in diabetic foot ulcers [18]. Moreover, factors like low albumin and low Hb indicate poor nutritional status and delayed wound healing therefore aggravated risk of amputation [19]. Further information regarding high HbA1c and FBG was inadequate, this is supported by a study conducted in Turkey which also found no evidence of high HbA1c as a predictor [20]. In contrast, the results of another study conducted in Malaysia revealed a great potential of high HbA1c in predicting amputations [21]. High levels of triglyceride and cholesterol were significant in three studies only, and it was attributed to the strong influence of these factors on causing cardiovascular complications like PAD. Furthermore, the levels of creatinine did not disclose any statistical significance in this review, this is explained by the use of creatinine to assess kidney function and diagnose nephropathy, which also had no predictive validity among the group of co-morbidities. These findings were consistent with other studies too [22]. PAD and neuropathy were the most effective predictors of amputation; similar results were reported in other studies [10,23-24]. Many factors were considered as predictors of amputation due to their contribution to causing PAD rather than their direct influence on the risk of amputation. Finally, nearly all of the included studies emphasized on the credibility of Wagner grade and osteomyelitis (equivalent to Wagner grade 3) in predicting amputation. The incidence of amputation was highest in Wagner grade 3 (37.6%) and Wagner grade 4 (43.92%). Wagner grade 5 had a lower incidence rate in amputations, partly due to the fact that patients must have underwent an amputation before reaching that grade. Furthermore, ulcers complicated by osteomyelitis (also equivalent to Wagner’s grade 3) had an increased risk of LEA (OR=4.04). Wagner grade provides information regarding the extent of tissue damage thus anticipates the outcome of the ulcer. This was furthermore supported by many other articles (not included in this systemic review) that were screened during the production of this review [25].

The shortcomings of this review included missing data; other factors such as the cause, location, site and size of the ulcer, alcohol, BMI, and foot deformity were not included in the analysis because the data were insufficient. Furthermore, there wasn’t enough information to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio of the predictors and diagnostic tests. Heterogeneity was evident as the studied populations differed in their size and characteristics. Finally, the review did not take psychological and behavioral factors into consideration in terms of their influence on the patient’s progression.

Conclusions

This review aimed to establish the major predictors of lower extremity amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. The evidence provided regarding certain demographics such as age and gender, as well as other glucose-related tests such as the HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG), was inconsistent and insufficient to be considered as strong predictors of LEA, according to this review. The strongest predictors found were as follows: peripheral arterial disease (PAD), diabetic neuropathy, a high Wagner’s grade, and osteomyelitis. Other useful predictors include: elevated white cell count (WCC), c-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and decreased levels of hemoglobin (Hb) and albumin.


References

  1. Update of mortality attributable to diabetes for the IDF Diabetes Atlas: estimates for the year 2013. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015, 109:461-5. 10.1016/j.diabres.2015.05.037
  2. Boulton AJ, Whitehouse RW: The diabetic foot. Endotext [Internet]. Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al. (ed): MDText.com, Inc., South Dartmouth, MA; 2020.
  3. Greer N, Foman NA, MacDonald R, Dorrian J, Fitzgerald P, Rutks I, Wilt TJ: Advanced wound care therapies for nonhealing diabetic, venous, and arterial ulcers: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2013, 159:532-42. 10.7326/0003-4819-159-8-201310150-00006
  4. Johannesson A, Larsson GU, Ramstrand N, Turkiewicz A, Wiréhn AB, Atroshi I: Incidence of lower-limb amputation in the diabetic and nondiabetic general population: a 10-year population-based cohort study of initial unilateral and contralateral amputations and reamputations. Diabetes Care. 2009, 32:275-80. 10.2337/dc08-1639
  5. Weledji EP, Fokam P: Treatment of the diabetic foot - to amputate or not?. BMC Surg. 2014, 14:10.1186/1471-2482-14-83
  6. Price P: The diabetic foot: quality of life. Clin Infect Dis. 2004, 39:129-31. 10.1086/383274
  7. Conte MS, Bradbury AW, Kolh P, et al.: Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2019, 69:3-125. 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.016
  8. Brownrigg JR, Hinchliffe RJ, Apelqvist J, et al.: Performance of prognostic markers in the prediction of wound healing or amputation among patients with foot ulcers in diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016, 32:128-35. 10.1002/dmrr.2704
  9. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  10. Bruun C, Siersma V, Guassora AD, Holstein P, de Fine Olivarius N: Amputations and foot ulcers in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus and observed for 19 years. The role of age, gender and co-morbidity. Diabet Med. 2013, 30:964-72. 10.1111/dme.12196
  11. Yesil S, Akinci B, Yener S, et al.: Predictors of amputation in diabetics with foot ulcer: single center experience in a large Turkish cohort. Hormones (Athens). 2009, 8:286-95. 10.14310/horm.2002.1245
  12. Sun JH, Tsai JS, Huang CH, et al.: Risk factors for lower extremity amputation in diabetic foot disease categorized by Wagner classification. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012, 95:358-63. 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.10.034
  13. Namgoong S, Jung S, Han SK, Jeong SH, Dhong ES, Kim WK: Risk factors for major amputation in hospitalised diabetic foot patients. Int Wound J. 2016, 13:13-9. 10.1111/iwj.12526
  14. Jiang Y, Ran X, Jia L, et al.: Epidemiology of type 2 diabetic foot problems and predictive factors for amputation in China. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2015, 14:19-27. 10.1177/1534734614564867
  15. Zubair M, Malik A, Ahmad J: Incidence, risk factors for amputation among patients with diabetic foot ulcer in a North Indian tertiary care hospital. Foot (Edinb). 2012, 22:24-30. 10.1016/j.foot.2011.09.003
  16. Li X, Xiao T, Wang Y, et al.: Incidence, risk factors for amputation among patients with diabetic foot ulcer in a Chinese tertiary hospital. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011, 93:26-30. 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.03.014
  17. Pemayun TG, Naibaho RM, Novitasari D, Amin N, Minuljo TT: Risk factors for lower extremity amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: a hospital-based case-control study. Diabet Foot Ankle. 2015, 6:10.3402/dfa.v6.29629
  18. Hobizal KB, Wukich DK: Diabetic foot infections: current concept review. Diabet Foot Ankle. 2012, 3:10.3402/dfa.v3i0.18409
  19. Russell L: The importance of patients' nutritional status in wound healing. Br J Nurs. 2001, 10:42-9. 10.12968/bjon.2001.10.Sup1.5336
  20. Lehto S, Rönnemaa T, Pyörälä K, Laakso M: Risk factors predicting lower extremity amputations in patients with NIDDM. Diabetes Care. 1996, 19:607-12. 10.2337/diacare.19.6.607
  21. Yusof NM, Rahman JA, Zulkifly AH, Che-Ahmad A, Khalid KA, Sulong AF, Vijayasingham N: Predictors of major lower limb amputation among type II diabetic patients admitted for diabetic foot problems. Singapore Med J. 2015, 56:626-31. 10.11622/smedj.2015172
  22. Moura Neto A, Zantut-Wittmann DE, Fernandes TD, Nery M, Parisi MC: Risk factors for ulceration and amputation in diabetic foot: study in a cohort of 496 patients. Endocrine. 2013, 44:119-24. 10.1007/s12020-012-9829-2
  23. Mayfield JA, Reiber GE, Nelson RG, Greene T: A foot risk classification system to predict diabetic amputation in Pima Indians. Diabetes Care. 1996, 19:704-9. 10.2337/diacare.19.7.704
  24. Widatalla AH, Mahadi SE, Shawer MA, Elsayem HA, Ahmed ME: Implementation of diabetic foot ulcer classification system for research purposes to predict lower extremity amputation. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2009, 29:1-5. 10.4103/0973-3930.50707
  25. Ugwu E, Adeleye O, Gezawa I, Okpe I, Enamino M, Ezeani I: Predictors of lower extremity amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcer: findings from MEDFUN, a multi-center observational study. J Foot Ankle Res. 2019, 12:10.1186/s13047-019-0345-y

Review article
peer-reviewed

Predicting Amputation in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review


Author Information

Zahraa Mansoor

Pediatrics, Al Jalila Children’s Specialty Hospital, Dubai, ARE

Ali Modaweb Corresponding Author

Pediatrics, Al Jalila Children’s Specialty Hospital, Dubai, ARE


Ethics Statement and Conflict of Interest Disclosures

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.



Review article
peer-reviewed

Predicting Amputation in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Systematic Review


Figures etc.

SIQ
8.8
RATED BY 2 READERS
CONTRIBUTE RATING

Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. Learn more here.