"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

Margaret Mead
Case report

First Report of Tripled Retromolar Foramina


The retromolar foramen (RMF) is the bony entrance of the retromolar canal, through which a neurovascular bundle runs. It is essential to locate such anatomic variants in a patient in order to avoid complications in surgery, implant placement, or anesthesia of the area. To our knowledge, there has only been one case report of supernumerary RMF, which reported one bilateral doubled retromolar foramina and one doubled left RMF. We present an extremely rare case in which a right triple RMF was observed on cone beam computed tomography in a cadaver. Diameters of the RMF were 0.8 mm, 1.0 mm and 1.1 mm, respectively. Distances from the distal edge of the third molar were measured as 4.0 mm, 3.6 mm, and 0.5 mm, respectively. RMF was not found on the left side of the mandible.


A variety of accessory foramina of the mandible have been reported, such as accessory mental foramina [1], lingual foramina [2], and retromolar foramina. The retromolar foramen (RMF) is the aperture of the retromolar canal (RMC) in the mandible. It is located distal to the last molar tooth in the retromolar trigone. The significance of the RMC lies in the neurovascular bundle which runs through it [3]. The RMC is a type 1 bifidity of the mandibular canal which runs through the RMC. A bifid mandibular canal is an anatomical variation in which the mandibular canal divides into two separate parts, wherein each part may contain its own neurovascular bundle [4].

After exiting from the body of the mandible, the nerve of the RMC distributes mainly to the temporalis tendon, buccinator muscle, the most posterior zone of the alveolar process, and the mandibular third molar [5]. Thus, the contents of the RMC provide innervation and vascular supply for the third molar and mucosa of the retromolar area [6]. Injury to the neurovascular bundle of the RMC during surgical procedures, such as third molar tooth extraction, implant placement, or split sagittal osteotomy, may lead to paresthesia, excessive bleeding, or traumatic neuroma. The presence of RMC may also lead to insufficient anesthesia of the mandibular teeth [7]. It is beneficial to locate the RMF and RMC prior to surgery in this area, or in order to achieve full anesthesia.

There have been very few reports of multiple RMF unilaterally in the mandible. We present here a case of tripled RMF on the right side of the mandible in a cadaver.

Case Presentation

A mandible resected from an 84-year-old female cadaver who died from gallbladder cancer underwent cone-beam computed tomography. The scan was set at 85 kV and 6 mA. The axial images were transmitted in the digital imaging and communication in medicine (DICOM) format, and 2D images in the mandible were then reconstructed using the DICOM viewer [8]. A unique anatomical variation of triple RMF was observed at the retromolar region between internal and external oblique line on the right mandible (Figure 1).

The RMF were labeled A, B and C with diameters of 0.8 mm, 1.0 mm and 1.1 mm, respectively as shown in Figure 2. Distances from the last molar were determined by extending a horizontal line from the distal edge of the third molar. Their respective distances were measured as 4.0 mm, 3.6 mm, and 0.5 mm (Figure 2).

RMF was not found on the left side of the mandible.


The RMF is an important anatomic structure representing a variation in the branching of the mandibular canal. There exists a large variation in size, location, and frequency of the RMF in reports in the literature. To our knowledge, this is the only case of tripled right RMF reported in the extant literature. The first case of a bilateral doubled RMF as well as the first case of a doubled left RMF were described by Alves and Deana [3].

The frequency of the RMF described in human dry mandible studies is between 3.2% [9] and 72% [5]. The diameter of the RMF in the specimen reported herein falls within the lower limit of the range described in the literature of between 0.2 mm [10] and 3.29 mm [4]. Consistent with the findings of Haas [7], the RMF with a diameter greater than 1 mm was in a more anterior position. The specimen presented with a foramen with a diameter of 1.1 mm, which was located in a more anterior position compared to the other two foramina. The distances from the distal edge of the third molar to the foramen were less than that described by Bilecenoglu and Tuncer (4.23 mm) [6] and Schejtman, et al. (10.5 mm) [5].


While there have been no reports of excessive complication due to injuring the RMF, the presence of the RMF may be implicated particularly in difficulty of anesthetization. The RMF may contain nerves that innervate the temporalis or its tendon, buccinator muscle, posterior portion of the mandible, third molar teeth, gingiva of the mandibular molars and premolars, and mucosa of the retromolar pad. This extensive network may result in failure of the standard inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) block.

The unique anatomic variation reported in this case highlights the necessity to evaluate patients for the presence of RMF and canals for unexplained mandibular pains or paresthesia. An improved anatomic understanding of the various accessory foramina along with their various locations is essential prior to performing anesthesia and surgery in the oral cavity.


  1. Iwanaga J, Watanabe K, Saga T, et al.: Accessory mental foramina and nerves: application to periodontal, periapical, and implant surgery. Clin Anat. 2016, 29:493-501. 10.1002/ca.22635
  2. He P, Truong MK, Adeeb N, et al.: Clinical anatomy and surgical significance of the lingual foramina and their canals. Clin Anat. 2017, 30:194–204. 10.1002/ca.22824
  3. Alves N, Deana NF: Anatomical and radiographical study of the retromolar canal and retromolar foramen in macerated mandibles. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015, 8:4292–4296.
  4. Kang JH, Lee KS, Oh MG, et al.: The incidence and configuration of the bifid mandibular canal in Koreans by using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014, 44:53–60. 10.5624/isd.2014.44.1.53
  5. Schejtman R, Devoto FC, Arias NH: The origin and distribution of the elements of the human mandibular retromolar canal. Arch Oral Biol. 1967, 12:1261–1267. 10.1016/0003-9969(67)90127-6
  6. Bilecenoglu B, Tuncer N: Clinical and anatomical study of retromolar foramen and canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006, 64:1493–1497. 10.1016/j.joms.2006.05.043
  7. Haas DA: Alternative mandibular nerve block techniques: a review of the Gow-Gates and Akinosi-Vazirani closed-mouth mandibular nerve block techniques. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011, 142:8S–12S. 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0341
  8. Rosset A, Spadola L, Ratib O: OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images. J Digit Imaging. 2004, 17:205–216. 10.1007/s10278-004-1014-6
  9. Ossenberg NS: Retromolar foramen of the human mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1987, 73:119–128. 10.1002/ajpa.1330730112
  10. Ogawa A, Fukuta Y, Nakasato H, et al.: Evaluation by dental cone-beam computed tomography of the incidence and sites of branches of the inferior dental canal that supply mandibular third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016, 54:1116-1120. 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.08.007
Case report

First Report of Tripled Retromolar Foramina

Author Information

Puhan He Corresponding Author

Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Harvard University

Joe Iwanaga

Medical Education and Simulation, Seattle Science Foundation, Seattle, USA

Mindy K. Truong

Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Harvard University

Nimer Adeeb

Department of Neurosurgery, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, LA., Shreveport, USA

R. Shane Tubbs

Neurosurgery, Seattle Science Foundation, Seattle, USA

Koh-ichi Yamaki

Department of Anatomy, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, JPN

Ethics Statement and Conflict of Interest Disclosures

Human subjects: Consent was obtained by all participants in this study. Informed consent was obtained from patient for this study, and the protocol of the study did not require approval by ethics committees of our institutions. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.


The authors wish to thank all those who donate their bodies and tissues for the advancement of education and research.

Case report

First Report of Tripled Retromolar Foramina

Figures etc.


Scholary Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. Learn more here.