"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

Margaret Mead

Case report
peer-reviewed

A Ruptured Spetzler and Martin Grade V Arteriovenous Malformation in a Child Treated With Radiotherapy Followed by Embolization: A Case Report and Literature Review



Abstract

Treatment of ruptured high-grade Spetzler-Martin (S&M) arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary treatment approach. Here, we report a case of ruptured giant callosal Grade V AVM in a child initially treated with stereotactic radiotherapy followed by endovascular embolization with Onyx; a management approach recently described in a few reports on the “postradiosurgical embolization” method. Complete obliteration was achieved 20 months after stereotactic radiotherapy and embolization. In this article, we discuss the usefulness and significance of postradiosurgical embolization, particularly for high-grade AVMs. To our knowledge, this is the first case with a giant Spetzler-Martin Grade V AVM treated with a postradiosurgical embolization method.

Introduction

The treatment of ruptured pediatric high-grade AVMs is challenging, and until now, there are no agreed-upon protocols for its management. A multidisciplinary approach with the combination of radiotherapy, embolization, excision, and clinical follow-up is commonly practiced [1,2]. In high-grade AVMs, the larger the size, the lower the occlusion rate, and the more it becomes difficult to treat [3]. Volume-reductive embolization followed by radiotherapy, so-called preradiosurgical embolization, is the standard treatment method for high-grade AVMs unsuitable for surgery. While the efficacy of preradiosurgical embolization has been reported in several studies [4,5], other studies have described lower obliteration rates with this technique compared to the radiation-only method [6,7]. Various factors of lower obliteration rates after preradiosurgical embolization have been reported, including incomplete targeting of the nidus due to embolic material artifacts [4], energy attenuation caused by embolic material [5,8], and recanalization of non-irradiated embolic sites [9].

Recently, a few reports suggested a different approach to manage AVMs, the postradiosurgical embolization method, where embolization is performed after radiation therapy. This approach has been developed to overcome the disadvantages of preradiosurgical embolization [10]. Here, for the first time, we report a successful complete occlusion of ruptured giant callosal AVM in a child treated with stereotactic radiotherapy followed by postradiosurgical embolization.

Case Presentation

Clinical presentation and diagnosis

A 12-year-old girl presented with headaches and mild disorientation [Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS): E3V5M6]. A plain brain CT scan showed an intraventricular hemorrhage (Figure 1A), and the contrast-enhanced CT confirmed a large AVM mainly in the corpus callosum (Figures 1B-1C).

Cerebral angiography showed that the main feeder was from the left anterior cerebral artery (Lt. ACA). Furthermore, flow came from the right anterior cerebral artery (Rt. ACA) and left posterior cerebral artery (Lt. PCA). The drainer was deep, mainly towards the inferior sagittal sinus and basal vein of Rosenthal. The AVM’s maximum diameter was 7.5 cm, and its Spetzler-Martin (S&M) grade was V (large size, eloquent area, deep venous drainage) (Figure 2).

Because of the AVM location, which is widely extended to a large area of the corpus callosum, surgical excision was expected to cause a significant neurological deficit for the patient. Furthermore, with a nidus volume up to 17.3 ml, achieving a complete cure by radiotherapy alone was expected to be challenging. Therefore, we decided to treat the patient with CyberKnife M6 ((Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) radiotherapy followed by Onyx embolization, the so-called postradiosurgical embolization method.

Treatment

After 135 days from the onset of symptoms, stereotactic radiation of the AVM was done with a gross tumor volume (GTV) of 17.3 ml using CyberKnife M6 with 35 Gy in five fractions and an isodose line 77%. In order to reduce the blood flow to the nidus, we applied 35 Gy focusing on the area where the feeder flows into the nidus (Figure 3).

Fifteen days later, we performed the endovascular embolization with Onyx. We guided the extra-compliant balloon microcatheter (Scepter XC, Microvention, Tustin, CA, USA) into the main feeder, the Lt. ACA, and injected Onyx18 (ev3, Irvine, CA, USA) while the balloon of the microcatheter was inflated (Figure 4). In the early stages of Onyx embolization, the Onyx filled the nidus smoothly. However, in the later stages of embolization, the injection resistance gradually increased. To counter this, we increased the injection pressure. Consequently, some of the Onyx material refluxed through the balloon and the vessel wall gap. Thus, accidentally, a distal branch of Lt. ACA was occluded, and therefore we immediately terminated the procedure at that stage (Figure 4).

A total of 9 ml of Onyx18 agent was injected into the AVM, and approximately 50% of the nidus was embolized. The residual lesions of AVM nidus were on the anterior-inferior, right-center, and left posterior (Figure 5).

Post-embolization MRI showed partial infarction at the medial part of the left primary motor cortex extending anteriorly to the supplementary motor area. The radiological finding was manifested clinically as a manual muscle testing Grade 3 right lower limb weakness (Figure 6).

Rehabilitation was performed for the right lower limb weakness, and six months later, the patient was fully recovered. No other neurological deficit was detected. At 20 months after embolization, cerebral angiography showed complete resolution of the large callosal AVM (Figure 7).

Five years after radiation and embolization, no recurrence was seen on follow-up MRI. The left lower extremity weakness has recovered, with no sequelae or new complications.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first report to describe the management of an S&M Grade V AVM that is completely resolved and managed by radiation therapy followed by endovascular embolization (postradiosurgical embolization).

In a meta-analysis of 3923 cases of cerebral AVMs, a history of hemorrhage, deep brain localization, drainage only into deep veins, and presence of aneurysm were shown statistically predominant risk factors for bleeding [11]. In our case, the following risk factors for rebleed existed: prior hemorrhage, deep AVM location, exclusively deep venous drainage.

Although there is a lack of a guideline, several reports recommend a multimodality approach treatment for large AVM [1,12]. Chang et al. studied 53 large AVM cases with a maximum diameter greater than 6 cm. Most of the patients were treated with combined treatment (embolization followed by surgery in five cases, embolization followed by radiosurgery in 23 cases, and embolization, radiosurgery, and surgery in 23 cases). Nineteen cases had a complete occlusion, four cases had 90% occlusion, 29 cases had less than 90% occlusion, and the treatment-related morbidity rate was 15%. The clinical prognosis at 37 months was excellent in 51%, good in 28%, poor in 6%, and 15% mortality [12]. Other reports described poor outcomes after microsurgery for high-grade AVM was found to be 31% for Grade IV and 37% for Grade V [1,13]. In our case, the maximum diameter of the AVM was 7.5 cm, and it was expanding through the corpus callosum. Accordingly, surgical excision was judged to have a high risk of morbidity. Therefore, we chose the combined radiotherapy and endovascular approach.

Various radiotherapy methods have been reported large and challenging to treat AVM. The commonly used methods are single-stage stereotactic radiosurgery (SS-SRS), volume staged SRS (VS-SRS), and dose staged SRS (DS-SRS). The most common radiotherapy methods for large AVM are VS-SRS and DS-SRS. For VS-SRS, a gamma knife is basically used, and the mean marginal dose varies from 15 to 20 Gy, and the number of stages of irradiations is often reported to be two to four stages [14,15]. For dose staged SRS, a linear accelerator (LINAC) is used, and the mean total dose varies from 26 to 50 Gy, and the number of stages of irradiation varies from two to 12 stages [16,17]. The mean complete occlusion rate was 32.3% for DS-SRS and 41.2% for VS-SRS [15]. However, the same report mentioned that VS-SRS was associated with a more extended treatment period and risk of rebleeding (10.6% with DS-SRS, 19.5% with VS-SRS). In the current case, we chose DS-SRS.

Veznedaroglu et al. compared the outcome of seven AVM cases with a mean nidus volume of 23.8 ml who received 42 Gy in six fractions of 7 Gy with 23 AVM cases with a mean nidus volume of 14.5 ml of nidus who received 30 Gy in six fractions of 5 Gy. The complete occlusion rate obtained after more than five years of embolization was 83% in the 7 Gy group versus 22% in the 5 Gy group. However, complications associated with irradiation were 28% in the 7 Gy group and 4.3% in the 5 Gy group. This study concluded that for large AVM, high conformality is necessary for fewer complications and higher cure rates [16]. A margin dose of 17 Gy or more for volume staged stereotactic radiosurgery more than doubles the partial response rate, reduces the time to complete occlusion by less than half, and increases the probability of complete or nearly complete occlusion [18]

The current case’s AVM was 7.5 cm in diameter. Accordingly, we irradiated it with a 35 Gy in five fractions, 77% isodose line, with a minimum marginal dose of 30 Gy. Firlik et al. introduced the method of staged volume radiosurgery for giant AVM, and irradiation was performed from at feeder side to avoid pressure rise in the nidus [19]. The same method was applied in our case. 

Regarding the time to treat an AVM, Maruyama et al. found that there was no benefit in postponing treatment until hematoma resorption because the number of bleeding events was predominantly higher in patients with a median follow-up of six months or longer [20]. In our case, radiotherapy was performed 135 days and endovascular embolization 150 days after bleeding.

Large AVMs are often challenging to treat with embolization alone or radiation alone, and the traditional strategy has been first to reduce the size of the AVM with embolization and then add radiation therapy. This will help to reduce the amount of radiation exposure to surrounding structures. However, many reports show lower obliteration rates in the embolization followed by the radiotherapy group compared to the radiotherapy alone group [6,9]. In general, cases in which embolization is performed before radiation therapy tend to be larger and to have a lower radiation dose per unit volume of AVM than cases in which radiation therapy alone was performed. To overcome the disadvantages of early embolization and the bleeding rate before occlusion after radiotherapy, a strategy of embolization before radiotherapy, i.e., postradiosurgical embolization, might be useful [10]

Kim et al. compared 81 patients treated with only Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) with 17 patients treated with GKRS followed by embolization for ruptured AVM. In the ruptured S&M Grade III and IV AVM cases, the rate of occlusion was higher in the group treated with GKRS followed by embolization than in the group treated with GKRS alone [10]. In the current case, although the Onyx embolization could only obliterate about 50% of the Grade V AVM, the nidus gradually shrank due to the effect of the stereotactic radiation, and complete occlusion was achieved and confirmed on angiography 20 months later.

Conclusions

We present a ruptured giant high-grade callosal AVM in a child cured by postradiosurgical embolization for the first time. Postradiosurgical embolization can be an effective treating strategy for high-grade ruptured AVMs. This method enables accurate radiation planning, early cure, and a low recurrence rate. Further studies of postradiosurgical embolization in larger samples remain necessary to validate the usefulness and applicability of this method. 


References

  1. Derdeyn CP, Zipfel GJ, Albuquerque FC, Cooke DL, Feldmann E, Sheehan JP, Torner JC: Management of brain arteriovenous malformations: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2017, 48:e200-24. 10.1161/STR.0000000000000134
  2. Darsaut TE, Guzman R, Marcellus ML, et al.: Management of pediatric intracranial arteriovenous malformations: experience with multimodality therapy. Neurosurgery. 2011, 69:540-56; discussion 556. 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182181c00
  3. Friedman WA, Bova FJ, Bollampally S, Bradshaw P: Analysis of factors predictive of success or complications in arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Neurosurgery. 2003, 52:296-307; discussion 307-8. 10.1227/01.neu.0000043692.51385.91
  4. Pollock BE, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD, Maitz A, Kondziolka D: Factors associated with successful arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Neurosurgery. 1998, 42:1239-44; discussion 1244-7. 10.1097/00006123-199806000-00020
  5. Blackburn SL, Ashley WW Jr, Rich KM, et al.: Combined endovascular embolization and stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of large arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 2011, 114:1758-67. 10.3171/2011.1.JNS10571
  6. Starke RM, Kano H, Ding D, et al.: Stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: evaluation of long-term outcomes in a multicenter cohort. J Neurosurg. 2017, 126:36-44. 10.3171/2015.9.JNS151311
  7. Cohen-Inbar O, Lee CC, Xu Z, Schlesinger D, Sheehan JP: A quantitative analysis of adverse radiation effects following Gamma Knife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 2015, 123:945-53. 10.3171/2014.10.JNS142264
  8. Andrade-Souza YM, Ramani M, Beachey DJ, Scora D, Tsao MN, Terbrugge K, Schwartz ML: Liquid embolisation material reduces the delivered radiation dose: a physical experiment. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008, 150:161-4; discussion 164. 10.1007/s00701-007-1482-9
  9. Schwyzer L, Yen CP, Evans A, Zavoian S, Steiner L: Long-term results of gamma knife surgery for partially embolized arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery. 2012, 71:1139-47; discussion 1147-8. 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182720280
  10. Kim MJ, Park SH, Park KY, et al.: Gamma Knife radiosurgery followed by flow-reductive embolization for ruptured arteriovenous malformation. J Clin Med. 2020, 9:1318. 10.3390/jcm9051318
  11. Gross BA, Du R: Natural history of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg. 2013, 118:437-43. 10.3171/2012.10.JNS121280
  12. Chang SD, Marcellus ML, Marks MP, Levy RP, Do HM, Steinberg GK: Multimodality treatment of giant intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery. 2003, 53:1-11; discussion 11-3. 10.1227/01.neu.0000068700.68238.84
  13. Spetzler RF, Ponce FA: A 3-tier classification of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2011, 114:842-9. 10.3171/2010.8.JNS10663
  14. Nagy G, Grainger A, Hodgson TJ, Rowe JG, Coley SC, Kemeny AA, Radatz MW: Staged-volume radiosurgery of large arteriovenous malformations improves outcome by reducing the rate of adverse radiation effects. Neurosurgery. 2017, 80:180-92. 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001212
  15. Ilyas A, Chen CJ, Ding D, et al.: Volume-staged versus dose-staged stereotactic radiosurgery outcomes for large brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review. J Neurosurg. 2018, 128:154-64. 10.3171/2016.9.JNS161571
  16. Veznedaroglu E, Andrews DW, Benitez RP, et al.: Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of large arteriovenous malformations with or without previous partial embolization. Neurosurgery. 2004, 55:519-30; discussion 530-1. 10.1227/01.neu.0000134285.41701.83
  17. Zhu S, Brodin NP, Garg MK, LaSala PA, Tomé WA: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the dose-response and risk factors for obliteration of arteriovenous malformations following radiosurgery: an update based on the last 20 Years of published clinical evidence. Neurosurgery Open. 2021, 2:okab004. 10.1093/neuopn/okab004
  18. Seymour ZA, Sneed PK, Gupta N, et al.: Volume-staged radiosurgery for large arteriovenous malformations: an evolving paradigm. J Neurosurg. 2016, 124:163-74. 10.3171/2014.12.JNS141308
  19. Firlik AD, Levy EI, Kondziolka D, Yonas H: Staged volume radiosurgery followed by microsurgical resection: a novel treatment for giant cerebral arteriovenous malformations: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 1998, 43:1223-8. 10.1097/00006123-199811000-00124
  20. Maruyama K, Kawahara N, Shin M, et al.: The risk of hemorrhage after radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352:146-53. 10.1056/NEJMoa040907

Case report
peer-reviewed

A Ruptured Spetzler and Martin Grade V Arteriovenous Malformation in a Child Treated With Radiotherapy Followed by Embolization: A Case Report and Literature Review


Author Information

Kensho Iwatate Corresponding Author

Neurosurgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, JPN

Yasuhiro Kikuchi

Neurosurgery, Southern Tohoku Research Institute for Neuroscience, Southern Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, JPN

Sonomi Sato

Neurosurgery, Southern Tohoku Research Institute for Neuroscience, Southern Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, JPN

Mudathir Bakhit

Neurosurgery, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, JPN

Akio Hyodo

Neurosurgery, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, JPN


Ethics Statement and Conflict of Interest Disclosures

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Fukushima Medical University research ethics committee issued approval 1390. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Fukushima Medical University research ethics committee. The authorization number is 1390. Informed consent was obtained from the participant and her family included in this study.

. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Acknowledgements

I want to thank Drs. Rieko Oishi, Takao Kojima, Taku Sato, Keiko Oda, Yuya Furukawa, and Kiyoshi Saito, the members of the Neurosurgical team for collaboration on this work. I am grateful to radiology technicians Masamitsu Ikeda and Kazuya Kakuta to support this work.



Case report
peer-reviewed

A Ruptured Spetzler and Martin Grade V Arteriovenous Malformation in a Child Treated With Radiotherapy Followed by Embolization: A Case Report and Literature Review


Figures etc.

SIQ
7.3
RATED BY 2 READERS
CONTRIBUTE RATING

Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. Learn more here.