The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology notes that pregnant athletes require more supervision due to their involvement in strenuous training schedules throughout pregnancy. Currently, rowing is not mentioned in the guidelines despite its increasing popularity, high cardiovascular demands, and risk for abdominal trauma.
This study aimed to elicit information from competitive female rowers regarding exercise, training, and competition during pregnancy. We administered a survey consisting of 122 items to female Masters rowers in the United States, aged 21 to 49 years, from June to December 2013.
A total of 224 recreational and elite rowers met the inclusion criteria. Pregnant rowers self-reported high levels of exercise engagement: 85.2% (n/N = 98/115) exercised during any past pregnancy; exercise adherence decreased throughout pregnancy with 51.3%, 42.4%, and 15.7% meeting and/or exceeding national guidelines during the first, second, and third trimesters, respectively. Rowers were significantly (p < 0.001) more likely to state that an activity at a specified intensity and trimester was unsafe if they were younger, had less rowing experience, or were nulliparous. Decreased perceived rowing safety was associated with on-water training, higher intensity exercise, competition, and increasing gestational age. Primary safety concerns were the risk of oar-induced abdominal trauma and physiological effects due to high intensities required by the sport. Novel barriers to exercise in pregnancy included guilt towards the team and a mental barrier due to decreased performance. Healthcare providers are the number one information source for rowers regarding exercise during pregnancy.
Pregnant rowers are a relevant obstetrics population and have barriers and sport-specific safety concerns not previously identified in the literature. Rowers consider exercising in pregnancy to be important and struggle to meet exercise guidelines like the general population, indicating the need for healthcare providers to provide prenatal and antenatal education and interventions to support exercise during pregnancy even amongst athletes.
The United States (US) Department of Health and Human Services encourages healthy pregnant and postpartum women to engage in at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity per week , where moderate-intensity corresponds to a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) of 12-14 on the 15-grade Borg RPE Scale . In the absence of medical complications or contraindications, regular exercise during pregnancy helps maintain or advance physical fitness, improves mental health, assists with weight management, and reduces the risk of gestational diabetes in obese women [3-7].
Pregnant athletes are a special population for consideration because they maintain training and competition during pregnancy and the postpartum period [8-9]. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) notes that pregnant athletes require “frequent and closer supervision” due to their involvement in strenuous training schedules throughout pregnancy, which may be continued in healthy pregnancies (p. 139) . Although there is no definitive upper limit of safety, recent studies demonstrate abnormal changes in fetal heart rate, umbilical artery Doppler measurement, and uterine artery blood flow at intensities higher than 85%  and 90%  of maximum maternal heart rate (MHR).
Currently, rowing is not mentioned in guidelines despite its increasing popularity in the U.S., in addition to the existence of several considerations for pregnant rowers, including an increased theoretical risk for abdominal trauma. When a rower is unable to match boat speed, her oar may become caught by the water, a phenomenon known as “catching a crab,” which can result in the oar being forcefully reversed towards the face, trunk, and/or abdomen. Pregnant rowers must also be especially cognizant of environmental exposure, thermoregulation, and hydration, given that crew (rowing) is an outdoor water activity. Rowers experience extreme physiologic demands during training and competition , with physical endurance and power demands comparable to cross-country skiing, cycling, running, speed skating, and swimming . Athletes expend anaerobic effort for 20-30% of a sprint race, and the proportion of anaerobic activity expenditure increases with shorter rowing distances .
Pregnant rowers are further specialized due to the uniqueness of the rowing stroke. The gravid abdomen restricts knee-to-chest compression necessary for a powerful stroke, placing physical limitations on the athletic ability that worsen throughout pregnancy and eventually prevent participation by most pregnant rowers in the sport (Figure 1). The primary aims of this research are to bring attention to the sport of rowing and to determine the existence of an athletic population engaging in competitive and recreational rowing during pregnancy. This study examines the self-reported behaviors, barriers to exercise, and safety concerns of rowers during pregnancy.
Materials & Methods
An invitation to share and/or complete a 122-item online survey was emailed to representatives of National and local Masters US rowing organizations and shared on various rowing and social media forums (Figure 2).
The email contained a link to a secure and confidential website where prospective participants could view a study explanation form and access the online survey, which remained open from June to December 2013. Inclusion criteria were female, Masters and/or Elite rower, and 21 to 49 years of age. Age minimum is defined by the definition of a Masters rower . Age maximum is capped at 49 years, allowing women of childbearing age--identified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as 21 to 44 years--the opportunity to report pregnancies within the past five years . Our two initial hypotheses were as follows: (1) Rowers have unique safety concerns regarding exercise during pregnancy, and (2) pregnancy positively and/or negatively affects rowers' perceptions regarding exercise during pregnancy. As such, we chose to survey pregnant, non-pregnant, and never-pregnant rowers due to our interest in gaining all female rowers’ perspectives on rowing during pregnancy and/or with a pregnant teammate. The Institutional Review Board at the University of Central Florida approved this study prior to participant recruitment (approval #SBE-13-09282). All rowers provided informed consent for this study.
Data were collected using a Qualtrics-generated survey (Qualtrics, Provo, UT) consisting of items in the following domains: (1) demographics; (2) rowing background; (3) obstetrical and gynecological history; (4) maternal beliefs about the barriers to physical activity during pregnancy; (5) maternal exercise information sources; (6) rowers’ beliefs regarding the importance of physical activity in pregnancy; (7) rowers’ beliefs regarding safety of moderate and vigorous exercise, erging, and rowing during pregnancy; and (8) rowers’ beliefs regarding the safety of competition during pregnancy. Domains 1 and 2 were modeled after the US Census Bureau categories and standard medical history questionnaires. Exercise is defined as, “Physical activity that is usually performed on a repeated basis over an extended period of time (exercise training) with a specific external objective, such as improvement of fitness, physical performance, or health” (p. 571) . As such, “physical activity” and “exercise” will be used interchangeably. Note that rowing is a specific type of sport, exercise, physical activity, and competition. Therefore, athletes may identify as rowers but not compete, just like a runner may run but never race. See Table 1 for definitions of additional rowing- and study-specific terms.
Barriers to exercise during pregnancy and maternal exercise information sources were assessed using a list of common responses modeled after Evenson, et al.  and Clarke, et al. . We assessed the perceived importance of physical activity using a four-item scale taken from the study of Clarke, et al. . Questions on rowers’ perceptions about the safety of activities during pregnancy (general exercise, erging, rowing, head race, and sprint race) were adapted using a scale taken from Mudd, et al. . Definitions for moderate and vigorous exercise intensity were selected based on a lactate threshold (LT) training method developed by Concept2, Inc., Morrisville, VT, which relates the percentage of 2k power to percentages of heart rate reserve (HRR) . Moderate intensity exercise is defined as “45 - 60% of 2k power; 70 - 80% of MHR” and vigorous intensity is defined as “greater than 90% of 2k power; greater than 90% of MHR” corresponding to a steady-state pace just below LT and to a pace in the anaerobic training zone, respectively. We selected 90% MHR specifically because of the Salvesen study . Note that the term “vigorous” in this study is not the same as that defined by Borg and used in past studies . The survey was validated using cognitive interviewing and debriefing with past collegiate and Masters rowers and coaches .
Participants who did not meet the inclusion criteria were removed from all analyses. Frequencies and percentages are reported for categorical variables. Sample sizes varied per item and are presented, where necessary, as survey items were not formatted in Qualtrics for required responses. When possible, participants were separated by gravidity and parity for analysis. Descriptive statistics for continuous variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI), or as median and inter-quartile range (IQR) for non-normal continuous variables and ordinal data (i.e., Likert-type rating scale items). The Friedman test was used to assess within-subjects differences across repeated measures items (i.e., first, second, third trimester safety item series). Follow-up pairwise comparisons using Wilcoxon signed ranks tests were conducted with Bonferroni correction to control for the inflation of family-wise error rate. Instrument reliability was assessed as internal consistency using Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. For data analysis of variables associated with the safety concerns of moderate and vigorous exercise, erging, and rowing during pregnancy, ratings of perceived safety were collapsed into safe (includes very safe and somewhat safe) and unsafe (includes very unsafe and somewhat unsafe), and ratings of unsure were not included for the purposes of conducting separate analyses between groups. Comparisons between groups of ordinal variables and non-normal continuous variables were conducted with non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests, and between-group comparisons of normal continuous variables were conducted with independent samples t-tests. All tests were two-sided, and p-values < 0.05 for omnibus tests were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses of quantitative data were completed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 22.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY).
A total of 317 surveys were completed, and 224 surveys were available for analysis after excluding respondents who did not meet the inclusion criteria due to age (n = 9), lack of Masters rowing experience (n = 32), or a failure to answer questions regarding age, Masters rowing experience, or obstetrics history (n = 52). Response rate cannot be calculated since contacted research participants and rowing communities were asked to assist researchers in identifying other potential subjects through survey link sharing. Participant characteristics, including rowing experience, are presented in Table 2.
Participants’ ages ranged from 21 to 49 years old with a mean of 36.0 ± 7.6 years. Masters rowing experience included a minimum value of 0.0 due to the inclusion of national team participants who were not yet recreational Masters. Eighteen of 224 women (8.0%) rowed at the National level. Gravidity ranged from 0.0 to 10.0 with a median of 1.0 pregnancy. Eighteen women (8.0%) were pregnant during the time of the survey. Intentions for future pregnancy were measured by the item, "Do you have a desire to become pregnant?"; answers ranged from "Yes, currently" (n = 13, 5.8%), "Yes, in the future" (n = 82, 36.6%), "No, Never" (n = 79, 35.3%), to "Unsure" (n = 28, 12.5%).
The importance of exercise during pregnancy
A majority of surveyed women (N = 224) believe that it is important for a pregnant woman to exercise regularly (78.1%) and have an active lifestyle (88.8%). When asked about rowers’ familiarity with physical activity during pregnancy, 87.5% of women reported knowing someone who exercised during pregnancy and 66.1% reported knowing or hearing of someone who rowed during pregnancy.
Exercise patterns during pregnancy
Of the 115 rowers who indicated that they have had a past pregnancy, 98 women (85.2%) self-reported exercising for any amount of time in any past pregnancy. Descriptive data on exercise patterns are shown in Table 3.
Fewer than half of the rowers self-reported meeting exercise amount and intensity guidelines in the first (25.2%), second (31.3%), and third (15.7%) trimesters, respectively. A similar number of rowers exceeded guidelines by exercising at intensities of vigorous or higher for 150 minutes or more per week for the first (26.1%) and second trimesters (11.3%). A total of 32 women engaged in vigorous or higher intensity exercise of any duration in the first trimester per week. This number decreased through pregnancy with 15 women in the second trimester and six in the third engaging in higher intensity exercise. Thirty-six women (31.3%) competed in a regatta and 41 women (35.7%) competed in another sporting event. Only three of 18 women who were pregnant at the time of the study planned to compete in a regatta (16.7%) or in other athletic competitions during this pregnancy (16.7%).
Information sources for maternal exercise
The primary information sources for the pregnant rower were physician/midwife/other healthcare providers (60.2%), the internet (30.8%), and friend(s) (25.6%) (Table 4).
Women also cited personal monitoring (“listened to my body,” “how I felt”) as an exercise information source.
Barriers to exercise during pregnancy
The main barriers to physical activity during pregnancy included: (1) lack of energy, tired, sleepy (29.3%), (2) concerned for the baby (18.8%), and (3) nausea (14.3%) (Table 5).
Rowers also wrote-in barriers not previously identified. Responses underwent thematic content analysis and are shown in Table 6.
Perceptions about safety when exercising during pregnancy
The primary reported rowing-specific safety concerns were: (1) abdominal trauma from the oar handle (37.9%) and physiological effects due to high intensities required by the sport (37.9%); (2) thermoregulation (8.0%); and (3) compression on and strain of the abdomen and pelvis at the catch, during the drive, and at the finish (6.3%). These and other novel concerns specific to pregnant rowers are shown in Table 7.
Median ratings of the perceived risk of participating in any of the specified physical activities during pregnancy increased significantly from first to third trimesters (p < 0.001); all follow-up pairwise comparisons between trimesters for each activity were also significant (all p < 0.001). Moderate intensity exercise of any activity during any trimester was perceived to be safer than vigorous intensity. General exercise was perceived to be the safest, whereas competing in a sprint or head race was felt to be most unsafe. Unsafe feelings toward a physical activity at a specified intensity and trimester were associated with a younger age, less rowing experience, and a gravidity of 0 (Tables 8-10). In general, rowers associated increased risk with on-water training and higher intensities.
This is the first study to examine the self-reported behaviors, barriers to exercise, and safety concerns regarding exercise during pregnancy in a rowing population. Importantly, this research definitively demonstrates that a population of competitive pregnant rowers exists.
Exercise patterns during pregnancy
This research demonstrates that rowers have higher levels of exercise adherence than the general population with 85.2% (n/N = 98/115) of rowers indicating that they exercised in a past pregnancy. Comparatively, a recent study reported rates of 12.7 to 45.0% of women exercising in pregnancy (n = 247), depending on the inclusion of lower physical activity thresholds, defined as greater than or equal to 100 minutes of physical activity . Despite increased participation, only 51.3%, 42.4%, and 15.7% of pregnant rowers met and/or exceeded exercise guidelines (exercising at moderate intensity or higher for 150 minutes or more a week) in the first, second, and third trimesters, respectively, compared to the 17.0% of first-trimester, 14.1% of second-trimester, and 7.5% of third-trimester women in a general US study . Comparing this paper's results to a study by Tenforde, et al. , our surveyed rowing population had higher rates of self-reported exercise engagement during pregnancy than their competitive running population. Rowers demonstrated a declining exercise trend from the first to third trimesters similar to past studies in the general population [26-28] and competitive athletes [8-9]. Table 11 summarizes the methods for past studies that examined exercise behavior in pregnancy.
Such reduced rates of exercise adherence in the pregnant rowing athletic population emphasize the need to deliver prenatal and antenatal education and interventions to promote exercise during pregnancy even amongst athletes. Training regimens reported in this study suggest that some rowers perform high-intensity exercise (vigorous, very hard, and maximum intensity) during pregnancy that may potentially be unsafe when the duration of activity is considered based on the Syzmanski  and Salvesen  studies.
Barriers to exercise during pregnancy
This study provides evidence for the prevalence of some common conditions and complaints in pregnancy identified in Part 1 of the International Olympic Committee's (IOC) evidence summary that may interfere with exercise and competition during pregnancy . The main self-reported barriers to exercise during pregnancy identified by rowers are nausea, concern for the baby, and lack of energy. Rowers also reported musculoskeletal complaints (i.e., diastasis recti abdominis) and reduced rowing range of motion due to the gravid abdomen. While the exact prevalence of these concerns was not measured, this study suggests that such barriers are significant enough to reduce exercise involvement during pregnancy. This could also explain the reduced rates of exercise engagement during pregnancy self-reported by rowers.
While this study demonstrates that rowers experience barriers to exercise in pregnancy similar to those in the general population, write-in responses reveal a unique perspective on the reasons why exercise adherence is difficult in pregnancy. Both the categories “guilt towards team” and “mental barrier due to decreased performance” demonstrate that some rowers are unwilling to engage in a particular exercise activity if they perceive a certain level of personal incompetence. This finding is very interesting because it indicates that rowers may make decisions regarding exercise during pregnancy that do not include concerns about their health or the health of their baby. Instead, rowers may make decisions about exercise in pregnancy based on concerns about their athletic identity. Follow-up interviews with survey participants and/or future research will be necessary to explore this idea further.
Rowers’ safety concerns for rowing during pregnancy
Rowers associated increased risk with on-water training, higher intensities, and increasing gestational age. Rowers in this study were significantly more likely to state that a physical activity at a specified intensity and trimester was unsafe if they were younger, had less rowing experience, or were nulliparous. This finding is consistent with the study by Mudd, et al. in which nulliparity was associated with feeling unsafe/unsure about vigorous physical activity . Thus, rowers new to child-bearing may need more guidance and close follow-up during pregnancy in order to alleviate concerns and balance their reproductive and athletic goals.
Rowers reported many safety concerns for rowing during pregnancy, including those discussed in ACOG’s committee opinion on exercise in pregnancy . We will thus discuss only those concerns that have not previously been mentioned in the literature.
While it is reasonable to consider the risks of abdominal trauma in rowing, there are no such cases in the literature. In addition, “catching a crab” is already a rare occurrence and has varying severity, so further research would need to be done to measure the actual risk that “catching a crab” confers to the developing fetus
Compression On and Strain of the Abdomen and Pelvis at the Catch, During the Drive, and at the Finish
Maximum knee-to-chest compression with maximum dorsiflexion and perpendicular shins is required to optimize rowing stroke power and length. While this action may be uncomfortable, if not impossible, depending on the size of a rower’s abdomen as well as their flexibility, the authors were primarily concerned about the risk of musculoskeletal injury secondary to technique changes made in an attempt to maintain adequate rowing length.
Musculoskeletal Injury - Due to Changes in Technique Induced by a Growing Pregnancy
Pregnant rowers who experience limitations on knee-to-chest compression by the gravid abdomen may try to compensate by externally rotating the hips, which would place significant varus knee strain. Rowers may make other changes to their technique to compensate for the physical changes of pregnancy. As such, it may be important for providers to encourage pregnant rowers to work with their coach and/or teammates to ensure proper technique and injury prevention.
Lack of Available Help When on the Water
This is a reasonable concern that may be easily mitigated by requesting that a coach or other individual accompany the pregnant rower through the use of a safety or coach's launch. Such boats are customary in rowing practices and required at rowing competitions.
Lifting the Boat In and Out of the Water
Providers may inform pregnant rowers of center of gravity changes in pregnancy, and encourage them to request help if they feel unsteady when launching a boat or returning from a row.
An Athlete's Need to "Push" Themselves
Rowers described their need to "push" themselves as a safety concern during pregnancy. Highly competitive pregnant athletes who are unable to suppress their drive to train may overexert themselves during pregnancy. Pivarnik, et al. noted a similar concern, warning that athletes “may have a no pain no gain mentality and may not listen to their bodies as well as they should” (p. 618) . Interestingly, three rowers in this study reported the contrary, stating that personal monitoring served as their information source on maternal exercise. Ours is a similar finding to that of Fieril, et al. who reported four strategies in which women adapted exercise to pregnancy, one of which included being “extra attentive during exercise” (p. 1141) . The authors noted that instant bodily feedback helped the woman know whether or not to modify and continue or stop the exercise. Therefore, we conclude that athletes have a strong understanding of their bodies, and thus, it is important for providers to be aware that pregnant athletes may at times be self-aware enough to modify exercise but may also be unable or unwilling to listen to physical warning signs during pregnancy.
Information sources regarding exercise during pregnancy
In this study, rowers cite healthcare providers as the primary information source regarding questions about exercise during pregnancy. Recent research on prenatal exercise counseling demonstrates that providers continue to recommend reducing exercise intensity and/or duration or advise pregnant women to maintain a heart rate below an arbitrary maternal heart rate (e.g., 140 bpm) based on old guidelines . Providers also continue to cite a lack of sufficient knowledge regarding antepartum exercise guidelines . Given our participants’ priority of seeking antenatal exercise advice from a healthcare provider, we emphasize the importance of including education on exercise during pregnancy in undergraduate and graduate medical education. While pregnant rowers primarily sought education from healthcare providers, rowers also reported asking a coach and/or teammate for advice. Healthcare providers of obstetric populations should, therefore, consider asking their pregnant athlete patients about any concerns or comments from the coach and/or team.
This study has some limitations. First, exercise intensity is defined differently than past studies. Second, it is possible that rowers under- or over-reported exercise intensity patterns during pregnancy. In addition, reliance on self-reporting presents a risk for recall bias.
This study aimed to elicit information from competitive female rowers regarding exercise, training, and competition during pregnancy. We conclude that rowers consider exercising in pregnancy to be important and struggle to meet exercise guidelines like the general population. Our research definitively demonstrates that a population of competitive pregnant rowers exists, and that rowers have relevant, sport-specific safety concerns. Of note, pregnant rowers must be cognizant of the following: the effect of high exercise intensities; the risk of abdominal trauma; thermoregulation, hydration, and environmental exposure, given that rowing is performed outdoors on the water; and the physical limitations placed on athletic ability by the gravid abdomen that eventually prevents any participation by most rowers. The concerns of rowers presented in this study raise three practical questions for future investigation: (1) Is the theoretical concern for oar-induced abdominal trauma significant?; (2) Is it possible for rowers to make modifications to equipment to maximize rowing technique as the range of motion decreases?; and (3) If rowers make decisions regarding exercise during pregnancy based on concerns about their athletic identity, is there a dichotomy between pregnancy and athletics?; and if so, are rowers, and other female athletic populations, at risk of experiencing loss of athletic identity during pregnancy? To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that examines rowers’ attitudes and self-reported behaviors regarding exercise during pregnancy. We believe that this work will guide providers on topics to be aware of when treating the pregnant rower, as well as serve as a framework for future studies on sport-specific concerns during pregnancy.
- Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. (2008). Accessed: July 7, 2017: http://health.gov/paguidelines/guidelines/.
- Borg G: Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales, 1st Edition. Borg G (ed): Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL; 1998.
- Field T: Prenatal exercise research. Infant Behav Dev. 2012, 35:397–407. 10.1016/j.infbeh.2011.10.001
- Nascimento SL, Surita FG, Cecatti JG: Physical exercise during pregnancy: a systematic review. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012, 24:387-94. 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328359f131
- Prather H, Spitznagle T, Hunt D: Benefits of exercise during pregnancy. PM R. 2012, 4:845–50. 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.07.012
- Downs DS, Chasan-Taber L, Evenson KR, et al.: Physical activity and pregnancy: past and present evidence and future recommendations. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2012, 83:485–502. 10.1080/02701367.2012.10599138
- Barrakat R, Perales M, Garatachea N, et al.: Exercise during pregnancy. A narrative review asking: what do we know?. Br J Sports Med. 2015, 49:1377-81. 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094756
- Tenforde AS, Toth KES, Langen E, et al.: Running habits of competitive runners during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Sports Health. 2015, 7:172-76. 10.1177/1941738114549542
- Beilock SL, Feltz DL, Pivarnik JM: Training patterns of athletes during pregnancy and postpartum. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2001, 72:39–46. 10.1080/02701367.2001.10608930
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee Obstetric Practice: Committee Opinion No. 650: Physical activity and exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol. 2015, 126:e135-142. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001214
- Szymanski LM, Satin AJ: Strenuous exercise during pregnancy: is there a limit?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012, 207:179.e1-6. 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.07.021
- Salvesen KA, Hem E, Sundgot-Borgen J: Fetal wellbeing may be compromised during strenuous exercise among pregnant elite athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2012, 46:279–83. 10.1136/bjsm.2010.080259
- Volianitis S, Secher NH: Rowing, the ultimate challenge to the human body - implications for physiological variables. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2009, 29:241–44. 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2009.00867.x
- Mitchell JH, Haskell W, Snell P, Van Camp SP: Task Force 8: Classification of sports. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005, 45:1364-67. 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.015
- Shepherd RJ: Science and medicine of rowing: a review. J Sports Sciences. 1998, 16:603–20. 10.1080/026404198366416
- Rules of Rowing. (2016). Accessed: October 2016: http://www.usrowing.org/rules-of-rowing/.
- Graham L: CDC releases guidelines on improving preconception health care. Am Fam Physician. 2006, 74:1967-70.
- Bø K, Artal R, Barakat R, et al.: Exercise and pregnancy in recreational and elite athletes: 2016 evidence group meeting, Lausanne. Part 1 – exercise in women planning pregnancy and those who are pregnant. Br J Sports Med. 2016, 50:571–89. 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096218
- Evenson KR, Moos MK, Carrier K, Siega-Riz AM: Perceived barriers to physical activity among pregnant women. Matern Child Health J. 2009, 13:364–75. 10.1007/s10995-008-0359-8
- Clarke PE, Gross H: Women's behavior, beliefs and information sources about physical exercise in pregnancy. Midwifery. 2004, 20:133–141. 10.1016/j.midw.2003.11.003
- Mudd L, Nechuta S, Pivarnik J, et al.: Factors associated with women’s perceptions of physical activity safety during pregnancy. Prev Med. 2009, 49:194–99. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.06.004
- Interactive 2,000m Programme. Accessed: October 2016: https://indoorsportservices.co.uk/training/interactive.
- Campanelli P: Testing survey questions: New directions in cognitive interviewing (Article in French). BMS. 1997, 55:5–17. 10.1177/075910639705500103
- Hesketh KR, Evenson KR: Prevalence of U.S. Pregnant Women Meeting 2015 ACOG Physical Activity Guidelines. Am J Prev Med. 2016, 51:e87-89. 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.023
- Hausenblas HA, Symons Downs D: Prospective examination of leisure-time exercise behavior during pregnancy. J Applied Sports Psychol. 2005, 17:240–46. 10.1080/10413200591010111
- Borodulin KM, Evenson KR, Wen F, et al.: Physical activity patterns during pregnancy. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008, 40:1901–908. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817f1957
- Daly N, Mitchell C, Farren M, et al.: Maternal obesity and physical activity and exercise levels as pregnancy advances: an observational study. Ir J Med Sci. 2016, 185:357–70. 10.1007/s11845-015-1340-3
- Pivarnik JM, Szymanski LM, Conway M: The elite athlete and strenuous exercise in pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016, 59:613–19. 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000222
- Petrov Fieril K, Fagevik Olsén M, Glantz A, Larsson M: Experiences of exercise during pregnancy among women who perform regular resistance training: a qualitative study. Phys Ther. 2014, 94:1135-43. 10.2522/ptj.20120432
- Leiferman J, Gutilla M, Paulson J, Pivarnik J: Antenatal physical activity counseling among healthcare providers. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2012, 2:346–55. 10.4236/ojog.2012.24073
Rowers’ Self-Reported Behaviors, Attitudes, and Safety Concerns Related to Exercise, Training, and Competition During Pregnancy
Ethics Statement and Conflict of Interest Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent was obtained by all participants in this study. University of Central Florida College of Medicine Institutional Review Board issued approval SBE-13-09282. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
This research was supported by the University of Central Florida College of Medicine (UCF COM) and the UCF Department of Anthropology and funded by the Focused Inquiry and Research Experience at UCF COM. We thank members of the University of Central Florida College of Medicine for valuable comments and suggestions. We also express our extreme gratitude to all of the rowing teams and organizations who helped make this project a reality and to the many women who agreed to participate in this study.
Cite this article as:
Franklin A, Mishtal J, Johnson T, et al. (August 01, 2017) Rowers’ Self-Reported Behaviors, Attitudes, and Safety Concerns Related to Exercise, Training, and Competition During Pregnancy. Cureus 9(8): e1534. doi:10.7759/cureus.1534
Received by Cureus: January 04, 2017
Peer review began: March 10, 2017
Peer review concluded: June 29, 2017
Published: August 01, 2017
© Copyright 2017
Franklin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 3.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.