"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

Margaret Mead

Original article
peer-reviewed

Association of Major Depressive Disorder on Heart Failure With Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Analysis of National Readmission Database 2018



Abstract

Introduction

The effect of major depressive disorder (MDD) on heart failure types is unclear. We aimed to assess the association of depression in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) readmissions using the Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) 2018. 

Methods 

We identified hospitalizations with a primary discharge diagnosis of HFrEF and HFpEF by appropriate ICD-10-CM codes. We acquired mortality and readmission data with and without MDD at 30 days. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR).

Results 

Among 102,997 patients admitted with heart failure as a primary diagnosis, 11% had MDD. We found a similar prevalence of HFpEF with MDD compared to HFrEF at 13.9% and 10%, respectively. Both HFrEF and HFpEF patients with MDD had similar combined outcomes of 30-day mortality and rehospitalization compared to patients without MDD with aOR 0.94 (95% CI: 0.85-1.04) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.81-1.07), respectively. Both types of HF with MDD were associated with lesser mortality.

Conclusion

MDD was associated with similar combined 30-day mortality and readmissions for both HFrEF and HFpEF. However, MDD was associated with decreased 30-day mortality in both groups of heart failure (HF) patients. Further studies with robust medications and treatment data are needed to verify the results of our study.

Introduction

Depression has shown to be associated with worsening outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients since early 2000. A meta-analysis in 2006 showed a 22% prevalence of depression in HF patients. The prevalence of depression in this meta-analysis was higher in studies that used the questionnaires (e.g., Beck Depression Scale, Geriatric Depression Scale, etc.) to diagnose depression compared to clinician diagnosis. The depressive disorder was also associated with a greater than a two-fold risk of mortality and associated clinical events [1]. This result was similar to the prevalence studies done during 2007 to 2010 in the United States that showed nearly a two-fold higher risk of hospital admission and emergency department visits and a four-fold increase in mortality in HF patients with moderate to severe depression [2]. However, data from 2010 to 2014 from the Nationwide Readmission Database, which included approximately 60% of hospitalized patients in the United States, showed only a modest increase in readmission rates in patients with depression after adjusting for other comorbidities [3]. Similarly, a Danish database from 1995 to 2014 showed a modest increase in mortality in heart failure patients with depression [4]. Given this significant risk of poor outcome in HF patients with depression, psychosocial intervention and pharmacological treatment were studied for depression in HF patients. Major antidepressant trials using sertraline in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and escitalopram in HF reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were performed but, results suggested that it did not significantly reduce depression, mortality or rehospitalization [5,6].

Cognitive-behavioral therapy reduced symptoms of depression and improved HF-related quality of life, but no data on mortality and readmission was noted [7]. In 2016, the European Society of Cardiology guidelines for diagnosing and treating acute and chronic heart failure included depression as significant comorbidity contributing to the development of HF, especially in the elderly [8]. Since then, depression had become well-established comorbidity of HF. However, HFrEF and HFpEF have different etiological profiles and prognoses. In addition, guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) with ACEI, ARB, or beta-blockers has proven beneficial in HFrEF, but not HFpEF [9]. Compared with HFrEF, patients with HFpEF are older, more often, women, and more commonly have a history of hypertension and AF [10].

The effect of depression on rehospitalization and mortality between HFrEF and HFpEF is limited to date. We aim to determine the outcome of readmission and mortality in HF patients with and without depression in the current era. We also aimed to identify the prevalence of depression in HF patients using the Nationwide Readmission Database 2018.

Materials & Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Readmission Database (NRD) for the year 2018. The NRD is a database developed for the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality through a Federal-State-Industry partnership. In 2018, the NRD contained data from 28 geographically dispersed states, accounting for ~60% of the total US resident population and 58.7% of all US hospitalizations [11]. It contains reliable, verifiable patient linkage numbers that could track a patient across hospitals within a state while adhering to strict privacy guidelines. The NRD comprises more than 100 clinical and non-clinical variables for each hospital stay. Each discharge is weighted (weight = total number of discharges from all acute care hospitals in the United States divided by the number of discharges included in the 20% sample) to calculate the national estimates. NRD has been previously used to provide reliable national readmission estimates in heart failure [12,13]. The NRD 2018 contains patient and hospital-level data with up to 40 diagnoses and 25 procedures collected for each patient using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD10-CM). We did not obtain institutional review board (IRB) approval due to the data’s de-identified nature.

Study population

We included all patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of heart failure. We used appropriate ICD-10 CM codes to identify HFrEF and HFpEF as utilized in the previous study (Table 1) [14]. We identified patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) in the secondary diagnosis field. Patients were excluded if they were <18 years old or if the admission was elective. We also excluded patients admitted in December because the NRD captured admission based on a calendar year (i.e., January 1 through December 31) without a link to the previous or following year. We also excluded the readmissions caused by traumatic causes (Figure 1).

Variables ICD-10 codes
Heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction I501, I502, I504, I5082
Heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction I503
Major depressive disorder (MDD) F32, F33
Atrial fibrillation I480, I4811, I4819, I4891, I482
Coronary artery disease I20, I21, I22, I23, I24, I25
Essential hypertension I10, I11, I12, I13, I14, I15, I16
Diabetes mellitus E08, E09, E10, E11, E13
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease J41, J42, J43, J44
Obesity E66, Z683, Z684
Obstructive sleep apnea G4733
Chronic kidney disease ≥ Stage III N183, N184, N185, E082, E132, I12, I13
End-stage renal disease on hemodialysis N186, Z992, Z4931, Z4901
Hypothyroidism E03
Alcohol-related disorders F10
Anemia D50, D51, D52, D53, D55, D56, D57, D58, D59, D60, D61, D62, D63, D64, D460, D461, D462, D464, O990
History of stroke I693, Z8673
Peripheral artery disease E085, E095, E105, E115, E135, I73, T82856, Z9862, Z95820, I252, I2583
Nicotine dependence F17, Z87891
Cocaine abuse F14, R782
Schizophrenia F20
Bipolar disorder F31
Generalized anxiety disorder F41
Post-traumatic stress disorder F431, F432
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder F90

Study outcomes

The primary outcome was the composite outcome of all-cause readmission and mortality rate at 30 days for HFrEF with MDD compared to HFrEF without MDD, and then the composite outcome of all-cause readmission and mortality rate at 30 days for HFpEF with MDD compared to HFpEF without MDD. The secondary outcomes were to (a) compare all-cause readmission rate at 30 days for HFrEF and HFpEF with MDD and without MDD; (b) compare all-cause mortality rate at 30 days for HFrEF and HFpEF with MDD and without MDD; (c) compare resource utilization including total hospitalization charges, cost, and length of stay in HFrEF and HFpEF with MDD and without MDD.

Definition of variables

We used variables available in the NRD to identify baseline characteristics, including age, gender, median household income for patient’s zip code, primary expected payer, admission type, admission day of the week, discharge status, and hospital characteristics (such as bed size and teaching status). The patient comorbidities were identified using the ICD10-CM codes (Table 1). The comorbidity burden was assessed using the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Readmission was defined as a non-traumatic admission with any principal diagnosis within 30 days of the index admission. If patients had multiple readmissions within 30 days of discharge, only the first readmission was counted. We used the patient’s vital status at discharge for the in-hospital mortality rate, which was directly coded in the database. The three most common reasons for readmission were determined by tallying the principal diagnosis for each readmitted patient. Total hospitalization charges represent the amount that the hospital billed for the entire hospital stay.

Statistical analysis

The NRD is based on an intricate survey design that includes stratification, clustering, and weighting. The variable “discwt” was used to generate national estimates. Standard error calculations were made considering stratification (“nrd_stratum”) and hospitals defining the clusters (“hosp_nrd”). Categorical data were presented as frequency (%) and were compared using the chi-square test. Continuous data were presented in mean ± standard deviation (SD) and were compared using the Student’s t-test. Unadjusted odds ratio (OR) was calculated by univariate logistic regression for primary and secondary outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression was used to calculate the adjusted OR. Variables that were deemed important determinants of the outcomes based on literature were included in the models. In addition, multiple covariates were built into the model if p < 0.2 in univariate analysis. A two-tailed p-value of 0.05 was designated as statistically significant. We adhered to the methodological standard of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) [15] and followed the checklist provided by the HCUP [16]. Stata SE, version 16.1 (College Station, Texas: StataCorp.) was used for all statistical analyses.

Results

From a total of 35,460,557 hospitalizations, 99,817 index admissions of HF were included. Of which, 66,403 admissions were due to HFrEF and 36,594 due to HFpEF. The prevalence of MDD in HFrEF patients was 10%. The prevalence of MDD in HFpEF patients was 13.9%.

Baseline characteristics

Complete data of baseline characteristics of HFrEF and HFpEF cohort are presented in Table 2. Most of the HFrEF cohort patients were older than 75 years in the MDD and non-MDD groups. The mean age of HFrEF without MDD was 66.8 years compared to 64.4 years in the MDD group. More females were observed in the MDD cohort (51% vs 36.4%). The most common primary expected payer was Medicare/Medicaid in both groups (81.5% vs 79.6%). MDD patients were admitted to teaching hospitals more than the non-MDD group (72.2% vs 64.9%). Non-MDD patients had a higher amount of subjects in the 0-25th percentile group than MDD patients (32.8% vs. 28.8%). More significant facilities and home healthcare discharges were noted in the depression group than the non-depression group (41.0% vs 36.2%). Patients with MDD had a more significant comorbidity burden with a mean Elixhauser Comorbidity Score (6.3 vs 4.8). The HFrEF with MDD group had higher comorbidity of obesity, OSA, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), anemia, hypothyroidism, and anxiety disorder compared to the non-MDD group.

Variables HFrEF HFpEF
  Depression (N = 6642) No depression (N = 59,761) p-Value Depression (N = 4643) No depression (N = 31,951) p-Value
Age (years) (mean) 64.4 66.8 <0.01 71.2 74.5 <0.01
 18-49 18.6 (%) 15.5 (%)   7.3 (%) 5.6 (%)  
 50-64 28.3 (%) 27.1 (%)   21.9 (%) 17.3 (%)  
 65-74 22.7 (%) 20.3 (%)   25.2 (%) 19.7 (%)  
 >75 30.4 (%) 37.0 (%)   45.5 (%) 57.3 (%)  
Indicator of gender     <0.01     <0.01
 Male 48.7 (%) 63.6 (%)   30.2 (%) 41.0 (%)  
 Female 51.2 (%) 36.4 (%)   69.8 (%) 58.9 (%)  
Admission day     0.33     0.68
 Weekday 76.9 (%) 76.0 (%)   75.7 (%) 76.0 (%)  
 Weekend 23.1 (%) 24.0 (%)   24.3 (%) 23.9 (%)  
Primary insurance     <0.01     0.22
 Federal/statea 81.5 (%) 79.6 (%)   89.3 (%) 88.2 (%)  
 Private 16.2 (%) 15.6 (%)   9.5 (%) 10.3 (%)  
 Uninsured 2.2 (%) 4.7 (%)   1.1 (%) 1.4 (%)  
Hospital bed sizeb     0.06     0.11
 Small/Medium 44.1 (%) 46.6 (%)   50.7 (%) 53.0 (%)  
 Large 55.9 (%) 53.4 (%)   49.2 (%) 46.9 (%)  
Hospital teaching statusc     <0.01     0.03
 Non-teaching 27.8 (%) 35.1 (%)   37.2 (%) 40.2 (%)  
 Teaching 72.2 (%) 64.9 (%)   62.8 (%) 59.8 (%)  
Median household income by zip-code, percentiled     <0.01     0.03
 0-25th 28.8 (%) 32.8 (%)   25.2 (%) 26.3 (%)  
 26-50th 29.1 (%) 29.7 (%)   29.7 (%) 32.2 (%)  
 51-75th 24.7 (%) 22.8 (%)   26.4 (%) 24.3 (%)  
 76-100th 17.4 (%) 14.7 (%)   18.5 (%) 17.1 (%)  
Disposition     <0.01     <0.01
 Home/self-care 55.3 (%) 59.2 (%)   42.5 (%) 46.8 (%)  
 Short-term hospital 1.6 (%) 1.9 (%)   1.1 (%) 1.1 (%)  
 Facilitye 16.9 (%) 14.1 (%)   26.5 (%) 23.5 (%)  
 Home health care 24.1 (%) 22.1 (%)   28.7 (%) 27.4 (%)  
 Against medical advice 1.9 (%) 2.6 (%)   1.0 (%) 1.0 (%)  
Elixhauser Comorbidity Index Score     <0.01     <0.01
 1 0 (%) 2.1   0 0.9  
 2 1.1 (%) 7.8   0.7 5.1  
 3 5.4 (%) 15.4   3.4 12.3  
 >4 93.4 (%) 74.6   95.8 81.5  
Mean Elixhauser Comorbidity Score 6.3 4.8 <0.01 6.4 5.2 <0.01
Comorbiditiesf            
 Atrial fibrillation 37.3 (%) 37.6 (%) 0.74 43.9 (%) 48.6 (%) <0.01
 Obesity 24.3 (%) 17.1 (%) <0.01 35.8 (%) 26.2 (%) <0.01
 OSA 19.2 (%) 10.5 (%) <0.01 24.2 (%) 16.3 (%) <0.01
 Hypertension 34.0 (%) 31.3 (%) 0.01 38.6 (%) 38.1 (%) 0.67
 Diabetes mellitus 35.2 (%) 31.5 (%) <0.01 38.5 (%) 34.2 (%) <0.01
 CAD 51.3 (%) 51.5 (%) 0.85 35.8 (%) 37.4 (%) 0.17
 Prior stroke 11.2 (%) 8.5 (%) <0.01 11.9 (%) 9.9 (%) <0.01
 CKD stage >3 25.9 (%) 24.6 (%) 0.16 24.7 (%) 26.2 (%) 0.15
 ESRD 2.7 (%) 2.0 (%) 0.02 2.1 (%) 2.6 (%) 0.22
 Peripheral vascular disease 19.9 (%) 19.0 (%) 0.23 14.8 (%) 13.1 (%) 0.03
 Anemia 28.8 (%) 24.3 (%) <0.01 33.8 (%) 31.3 (%) 0.01
 Hypothyroidism 19.5 (%) 13.2 (%) <0.01 24.5 (%) 19.9 (%) <0.01
 Alcohol 6.5 (%) 6.8 (%) 0.51 3.4 (%) 2.8 (%) 0.18
 Smoking 50.3 (%) 46.2 (%) <0.01 45.1 (%) 39.3 (%) <0.01
 Cocaine use 2.4 (%) 2.4 (%) 0.82 0.6 (%) 0.5 (%) 0.60
 Schizophrenia 1.3 (%) 1.0 (%) 0.09 1.0 (%) 0.8 (%) 0.27
 Bipolar disorder 0.3 (%) 1.5 (%) <0.01 0.4 (%) 1.7 (%) <0.01
 Anxiety disorder 34.9 (%) 8.4 (%) <0.01 35.3 (%) 9.2 (%) <0.01
 PTSD/adjustment disorder 3.4 (%) 0.9 (%) <0.01 2.2 (%) 0.7 (%) <0.01
 ADHD 1.9 (%) 0.3 (%) <0.01 0.4 (%) 0.1 (%) <0.01

In the HFpEF cohort, patients without MDD were older, with a mean age of 74.5 years compared to 71.2 years. Female patients were more prevalent in the MDD group than without depression (69.8% vs 58.9%). HFrEF with and without MDD had non-significant differences in day of admission, primary insurance, and hospital bed size. Facility discharge and discharges with home healthcare were higher in the MDD group (55.2% vs 50.9%: p <0.01). HFpEF patients with MDD had a more significant comorbidity burden with a mean Elixhauser comorbidity score (6.4 vs 5.2: p <0.01). Hospitalizations with MDD had higher comorbidity of obesity, OSA, diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, smoking, and anxiety.

Primary outcome: composite of all-cause readmissions and mortality in 30 days

In the HFrEF cohort, a total of 6642 indexes HFrEF with MDD hospitalizations were discharged alive. The composite outcome of all-cause readmission and mortality at 30 days occurred in 20.1% HFrEF patients with MDD compared to 20.0% in patients without MDD. Adjusted OR was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.85-1.04) (Table 3).

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Outcome Depression (n = 6642) No depression (n =59,761) Unadjusted odds ratio a p-Value Adjusted odd ratioa,b p-Value
Primary outcomec 1335 (20.1%) 11996 (20.0%) 1.00 (0.92-1.09) 0.97 0.94 (0.85-1.04) 0.27
30 day all-cause readmission 1146 (17%) 9759 (16.3%) 1.07 (0.97-1.17) 0.16 0.94 (0.85-1.05) 0.27
30-day mortality 241 (3.6%) 2778 (4.8%) 0.75 (0.60-0.94) 0.01 0.79 (0.62-1.00) 0.05
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
Outcome Depression (n = 4643) No depression (n =31,951) Unadjusted odds ratioa p-Value Adjusted odd ratioa,b p-Value
Primary outcomec 861 (18.5%) 5928 (18.5%) 1.00 (0.88-1.12) 0.99 0.93 (0.81-1.07) 0.32
30-day all-cause readmission 774 (16.6%) 4942 (15.4%) 1.09 (0.96-1.23) 0.15 0.93 (0.81-1.07) 0.32
30-day mortality 87 (1.9%) 985 (3.0%) 0.60 (0.44-0.82) <0.01 0.69 (0.50-0.95) 0.02

For the HFpEF cohort, a total of 4643 indexes HFpEF with MDD hospitalizations were discharged alive. The composite outcome of all-cause readmission and mortality at 30 days occurred in 18.5% on both HFpEF with and without MDD. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.81-1.07). Lower median household income, leaving against medical advice, and higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index Score were identified as major predictors of readmission and mortality in HFrEF and HFpEF groups (Table 4).

Variables HFrEF HFpEF  
Unadjusted odds ratio p-Value Unadjusted odds ratio p-Value
Age 1.0 0.56 0.99 0.32
Gender
 Male Reference Reference
 Female 0.9 <0.01 1.00 0.81
Admission day 1.05 0.11 1.08 0.06
Primary insurance
 Federal/state Reference Reference
 Private 0.68 < 0.01 0.77 < 0.01
 Uninsured 0.76 < 0.01 0.94 0.75
Hospital bed size
 Small/medium Reference   Reference  
 Large 1.00 0.80 1.12 < 0.01
Hospital teaching status
 Non-teaching Reference   Reference  
 Teaching 0.93 0.05 0.94 0.22
Median household income category for patient’s zip-code
 0-25th Reference   Reference  
 26-50th 0.83 < 0.01 0.92 0.11
 51-75th 0.85 < 0.01 0.89 0.04
 76-100th 0.78 < 0.01 0.80 < 0.01
Disposition
 Home Reference   Reference  
 Short-term hospital 1.19 0.11 1.84 < 0.01
 Facility 1.04 0.38 1.15 < 0.01
 Home health care 1.11 < 0.01 1.19 < 0.01
 Against medical advice 2.76 < 0.01 1.94 < 0.01
Elixhauser Comorbidity Index Score
 1 Reference   Reference  
 2 0.85 0.27 1.16 0.58
 3 1.08 0.56 1.31 0.30
 >4 1.45 < 0.01 1.99 < 0.01
Co-morbidities
 Atrial fibrillation 1.08 < 0.01 1.18 < 0.01
 Obesity 0.88 < 0.01 0.92 0.06
 OSA 0.91 0.05 1.00 0.95
 Hypertension 1.10 < 0.01 1.07 0.09
 Diabetes mellitus 1.14 < 0.01 1.13 < 0.01
 CAD 1.18 < 0.01 1.18 < 0.01
 Prior stroke 1.16 < 0.01 1.14 0.04
 CKD stage >3 1.36 < 0.01 1.40 < 0.01
 ESRD 1.81 < 0.01 1.54 < 0.01
 Peripheral vascular disease 1.20 < 0.01 1.13 0.02
 Anemia 1.31 < 0.01 1.24 < 0.01
 Hypothyroidism 1.13 < 0.01 1.09 0.05
 Alcohol 0.92 0.18 0.95 0.68
 Smoking 0.91 < 0.01 0.97 0.42
 Cocaine use 1.30 < 0.01 1.49 0.08
 Schizophrenia 1.55 < 0.01 0.86 0.54
 Bipolar disorder 1.06 0.58 1.21 0.16
 Anxiety disorder 1.15 <0.01 1.05 0.40
 PTSD/adjustment disorder 1.10 0.42 0.77 0.20
 ADHD 0.74 0.21 1.03 0.94

Secondary outcomes

All-Cause Readmission Rate at 30 Days

In the HFrEF cohort, 17% of patients with MDD were readmitted within 30 days. The three most common principal diagnoses for readmissions in the MDD cohort were acute heart failure (44.9%), sepsis (4.5%), and acute kidney failure (2.9%). HFrEF without MDD had a 16.3% rate of readmission. Comparing HFrEF patients with MDD and without MDD, the adjusted OR was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.85-1.05) (Table 3).

In the HFpEF cohort, the 30-day all-cause readmission rate for patients with MDD was 16.6% compared to 15.4% in the non-MDD group. The three most common principal diagnoses for readmissions in HFpEF with MDD were acute heart failure (41.0%), sepsis (7.2%), and acute and chronic hypoxic respiratory failure (4.9%). Adjusted OR was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.81 - 1.07) when compared HFpEF with MDD to without MDD.

All-Cause Mortality Rate at 30 Days

 In the HFrEF cohort, the 30-day mortality rate in the MDD and non-MDD groups was 2.8% and 3.6%, respectively. MDD was associated with lower mortality than non-MDD in HFrEF with an adjusted OR of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.62-1.00). In the HFpEF cohort, the 30-day mortality rate in the MDD group was 1.9% and 3% in the non-MDD group. HFpEF patients with MDD had lower mortality than those without MDD, with an adjusted OR of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.5-0.95).

Resource utilization

In the HFrEF cohort, patients with MDD had a longer mean length of stay (6.7 vs 5.7 days; p <0.01) (Table 5). HFrEF with MDD had higher mean total initial hospitalization charges compared to those without MDD (USD $69,810 vs $62,935; p = 0.03). Readmission cost was higher in both HFrEF with and without MDD compared to the index admission.

Resource outcomes HFrEF HFpEF
Depression No depression p-Value Depression No depression p-Value
Mean total charges ($)  
 Index (initial admission) 69,810 62,935 0.03 44,512 42,165 0.13
 Readmission 74,591 66,230 0.10 58,794 59,529 0.87
Mean LOS (±SD) (days) 6.6 (±8.9) 5.7 (±7.6) <0.01 5.6 (±5.5) 5.3 (±5.5) <0.01

In the HFpEF cohort, patients with MDD had a longer length of stay than the non-MDD group (5.6 vs 5.3 days; p <0.01). The mean total hospitalization charges were not statistically different between MDD and non-MDD groups ($44,512 vs $42,165; p = 0.13).

Discussion

This is the first study investigating the association of MDD and HF in terms of HFrEF and HFpEF. Using NRD 2018, a large US national database, we found a total prevalence of 11% for all types of HF patients with MDD. Patients with HFrEF had less prevalence of MDD (10%) compared to HFpEF (13.9%). The combined rate of all-cause readmission and mortality at 30 days was not statistically different in both types of HF patients (HFrEF and HFpEF) with or without MDD. Both types of heart failure with concomitant depression were not associated with all-cause 30-day readmissions but were associated with decreased mortality rates in both groups.

Heart failure patients with MDD were younger and more likely to be female than the group without MDD. Patients in the heart failure with preserved ejection fraction group were older than HFrEF with an average age of 72-75 years compared to 64-67 years. HFrEF with MDD had more comorbidity of obesity, OSA, hypothyroidism, tobacco use, anemia, and a higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index Score than those without MDD. This pattern was similar to HFpEF with MDD, except that the HFpEF without MDD group had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation. These comorbidities were associated with increased HF mortality and rehospitalization, except for obesity [17-20]. Obesity is highly prevalent in HF groups and interestingly associated with lower mortality in HF patients [18]. In our study, obesity was more commonly associated with the MDD group, which could have contributed to lesser mortality in the MDD group for both types of HF. In our study, underlying diseases involving psychiatric issues, such as anxiety disorder and PTSD, were more prevalent in HF with MDD than patients without MDD. Lin et al., had shown that anxiety was not associated with readmission or mortality at an 18-month duration in the HFrEF group but had increased readmission and mortality in the HFpEF group [21]. Similarly, in our study, anxiety disorder was more prevalent in MDD groups and did not result in a higher readmission rate. However, we noticed lower mortality in MDD groups. This difference could be related to the shorter 30-day follow-up period in our study. Patients with HFrEF with MDD were less likely to be discharged to home compared to those without MDD. On the contrary, HFpEF patients with MDD were likely to discharge home compared to those without MDD. These comorbidities affected outcomes differently across all HF patients, both with and without MDD. Therefore, we used multivariate regression analysis to adjust for all the comorbidities to find the actual impact of MDD on HF.

We found that MDD was not associated with an all-cause readmission rate for both types of HF. This finding was different from a previous NRD study that used the 2010-2014 database which showed an increased readmission rate in the MDD group compared to non-MDD [2]. This difference could be related to the study's inclusion of all types of heart failure but not specific HFrEF and HFpEF ICD codes. The current expert recommendations for depression in HF patients are similar to non-HF patients however, antidepressant efficacy has not been demonstrated yet in the HF patients but the more effective therapies are psychotherapy and care management [22]. This is unfortunately not measurable in our study due to the inherent limitation of the database itself. In our study, HFrEF and HFpEF with MDD were associated with similar readmission rates and significantly lower mortality at 30 days compared to those without MDD. This finding is different from the previous studies that showed increased mortality in HF patients with depression of two to four-fold [1,2]. In theory, HF patients with MDD could have received more attention, follow-ups, and multidisciplinary care compared to HF patients without MDD. This could contribute to reduced mortality. Preliminary results of the Blended Collaborative Care for Heart Failure and Co-morbid depression trial (NCT02044211) in HFrEF patients with depression showed that collaborative care of psychiatrists, cardiologists, internists, and nurses, reduced patients mood symptoms but not mortality compared to HF patients without depression [23]. Unfortunately, NRD does not contain the medications, psychotherapy, and social support data that could influence a positive outcome. More research is needed to pinpoint the most effective treatment for HF patients with depression.

Future perspective

Prospective studies are needed to strengthen the association and establish causality for decreased mortality with patients with MDD compared to HF patients without MDD. Better screening, treatment, and management of depression could reduce the worsening outcomes in HF patients. Studies with more extended follow-up periods are needed to assess long-term readmission differences in this patient population. 

Limitations

We acknowledge several limitations in this study. First, NRD relies on administrative coding, and data depends on the rigor of the institutions involved. Second, NRD does not contain information on medications, laboratory values, echocardiographic data, and other treatment modalities like cognitive behavioral therapy, limiting our assessment of the studied association. Third, the database does not account for deaths outside the hospital, impacting the mortality association. Despite these limitations, this large population study contains half of the US rehospitalized patient population and may provide significant external validity and generalizability findings.

Conclusions

The prevalence of MDD in HFpEF was higher than HFrEF at 13.9% and 10%, respectively. Concomitant MDD in HF patients was not associated with the combined outcome of in-hospital mortality and rehospitalization at 30 days. However, the secondary outcome of 30-day mortality was significantly lower in HFrEF and HFpEF patients with MDD compared to patients without MDD. There are several inherent limitations of the NRD database which limits us from examining the factors contributing to the decreased mortality in the MDD group. Further studies are needed with a longer follow-up period and increased granularity of the data to verify the results of this study and also to determine the treatment that influences readmission and mortality in HF patients with MDD.


References

  1. Rutledge T, Reis VA, Linke SE, Greenberg BH, Mills PJ: Depression in heart failure a meta-analytic review of prevalence, intervention effects, and associations with clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006, 48:1527-1537. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.055
  2. Moraska AR, Chamberlain AM, Shah ND, et al.: Depression, healthcare utilization, and death in heart failure: a community study. Circ Heart Fail. 2013, 6:387-394. 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.000118
  3. Patel N, Chakraborty S, Bandyopadhyay D, et al.: Association between depression and readmission of heart failure: a national representative database study. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2020, 63:585-590. 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.03.014
  4. Adelborg K, Schmidt M, Sundbøll J, et al.: Mortality risk among heart failure patients with depression: a nationwide population-based cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016, 5:10.1161/JAHA.116.004137
  5. O'Connor CM, Jiang W, Kuchibhatla M, et al.: Safety and efficacy of sertraline for depression in patients with heart failure: results of the SADHART-CHF (sertraline against depression and heart disease in chronic heart failure) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010, 56:692-699. 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.068
  6. Angermann CE, Gelbrich G, Störk S, et al.: Effect of escitalopram on all-cause mortality and hospitalization in patients with heart failure and depression: the MOOD-HF randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016, 315:2683-2693. 10.1001/jama.2016.7635
  7. Freedland KE, Carney RM, Rich MW, Steinmeyer BC, Rubin EH: Cognitive behavior therapy for depression and self-care in heart failure patients a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2015, 175:1773-1782. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5220
  8. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al.: 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016, 37:2129-2200. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw128
  9. Borlaug BA: Evaluation and management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020, 17:559-573. 10.1038/s41569-020-0363-2
  10. Dunlay SM, Roger VL, Redfield MM: Epidemiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017, 14:591-602. 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.65
  11. Overview of the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD). (2021). Accessed: April 28, 2021: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nrdoverview.jsp.
  12. Nizamuddin J, Gupta A, Patel V, et al.: Hypertensive diseases of pregnancy increase risk of readmission with heart failure: a National Readmissions Database Study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019, 94:811-819. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.08.032
  13. Ram P, Shah M, Lo KBU, et al.: Etiologies and predictors of readmission among obese and morbidly obese patients admitted with heart failure. [In Press]. Heart Fail Rev. 2020, 10.1007/s10741-020-09920-4
  14. Arora S, Jaswaney R, Jani C, et al.: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with concurrent heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2020, 137:45-54. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.035
  15. Khera R, Angraal S, Couch T, et al.: Adherence to methodological standards in research using the National Inpatient Sample. JAMA. 2017, 318:2011-2018. 10.1001/jama.2017.17653
  16. Checklist for working with the NRD. (2020). Accessed: April 28, 2021: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nrd/nrdchecklist.jsp.
  17. Wang H, Parker JD, Newton GE, et al.: Influence of obstructive sleep apnea on mortality in patients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007, 49:1625-1631. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.12.046
  18. Ning N, Gao D, Triggiani V, et al.: Prognostic role of hypothyroidism in heart failure: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015, 94:e1159. 10.1097/MD.0000000000001159
  19. Mozaffarian D, Nye R, Levy WC: Anemia predicts mortality in severe heart failure: the prospective randomized amlodipine survival evaluation (PRAISE). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003, 41:1933-1939. 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00425-X
  20. Gustafsson F, Kragelund CB, Torp-Pedersen C, et al.: Effect of obesity and being overweight on long-term mortality in congestive heart failure: influence of left ventricular systolic function. Eur Heart J. 2005, 26:58-64. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi022
  21. Lin TK, Hsu BC, Li YD, Chen CH, Lin JW, Chien CY, Weng CY: Prognostic value of anxiety between heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019, 8:e010739. 10.1161/JAHA.118.010739
  22. Zambrano J, Celano CM, Januzzi JL, Massey CN, Chung WJ, Millstein RA, Huffman JC: Psychiatric and psychological interventions for depression in patients with heart disease: a scoping review. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020, 9:e018686. 10.1161/JAHA.120.018686
  23. Herbeck Belnap B, Anderson A, Abebe KZ, Ramani R, Muldoon MF, Karp JF, Rollman BL: Blended collaborative care to treat heart failure and comorbid depression: rationale and study design of the hopeful heart trial. Psychosom Med. 2019, 81:495-505. 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000706

Original article
peer-reviewed

Association of Major Depressive Disorder on Heart Failure With Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Analysis of National Readmission Database 2018


Author Information

Harshith S. Thyagaturu Corresponding Author

Internal Medicine, Bassett Healthcare Network, Cooperstown, USA

Sittinun Thangjui

Internal Medicine, Bassett Healthcare Network, Cooperstown, USA

Kashyap Shah

Internal Medicine, Saint Luke's University Hospital, Bethlehem, USA

Riddhima V. Naik

Internal Medicine, Bassett Healthcare Network, Cooperstown, USA

Gayatri Bondi

Internal Medicine, Bassett Healthcare Network, Cooperstown, USA


Ethics Statement and Conflict of Interest Disclosures

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Matthew Roslund, Bassett Healthcare Network’s librarian, for proofreading the manuscript and help with the extensive literature search.



Original article
peer-reviewed

Association of Major Depressive Disorder on Heart Failure With Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction: Analysis of National Readmission Database 2018


Figures etc.

SIQ
7.3
RATED BY 4 READERS
CONTRIBUTE RATING

Scholary Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. Learn more here.