"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

Margaret Mead

Original article
peer-reviewed

High Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Causing Surgical Site Infection in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Northeast India



Abstract

Background and objective

Surgical site infections (SSI) are the most common healthcare-associated infections in low- and middle-income countries associated with substantial morbidity and mortality and impose heavy demands on healthcare resources. We aimed to study the microbiological profile of SSI pathogens and their antibiotic-resistant patterns in a tertiary care teaching hospital serving mostly rural population

Methods

A prospective, hospital-based cross-sectional study on pathogen profile and drug resistance was conducted from January 2015 to December 2016. Study subjects were the patients who developed signs of SSI after undergoing surgical procedures at three surgical wards (General Surgery, Orthopedics, and Obstetrics & Gynecology). The selection of the patients was based on CDC Module. Standard bacteriological methods were applied for isolation of pathogens and antibiotic-susceptibility testing based on CLSI (Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute) guidelines.

Results

Out of 518 enrolled subjects, 197 showed growth after aerobic culture yielding 228 pathogen isolates; 12.2% of samples showed polymicrobial growth. Escherichia coli (22.4%) and Klebsiella species (20.6%) were the predominant isolated bacteria followed by Staphylococcus species (18.4%), Pseudomonas species (12.3%), and Enterococcus species (6.6%). Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) were highly resistant to ampicillin (90.1%) and cefazolin (85.9%). High resistance was also observed to mainstay drugs like ceftriaxone (48.4%), cefepime (61%), amoxycillin-clavulanic acid (43.4%), and ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin (37.7%). Among the Gram-positive cocci, Staphylococcus aureus showed 85-96% resistance to penicillin and 65-74% to ampicillin. But GPCs were relatively less resistant to quinolones (16-18%) and macrolides (21.5%). S. aureus was 100% sensitive to vancomycin and clindamycin but vancomycin-resistant Enterococci was encountered in 3/15 (20%) isolates.

Conclusion

GNBs were responsible for more than two-thirds of aerobic-culture positive SSI and showed high resistance to the commonly used antibiotics thus leaving clinicians with few choices. This necessitates periodic surveillance of causative organisms and their antibiotic-susceptibility pattern to help in formulating hospital antibiotic policy. The antibiotic stewardship program is yet to be adopted in our hospital.

Introduction

Modern surgery has proved to be a great boon to mankind which took its roots in the nineteenth century after Lister introduced the aseptic treatment of wounds. Following the discovery of antibiotics in the twentieth century, it was further revolutionized, when complicated, life-saving, and reconstructive surgeries became possible. But following the emergence of drug-resistant organisms, surgical site infections (SSI) posed a major challenge to the advancement in the surgical field.

An SSI is an infection that occurs after surgery, in the part of the body where the surgery took place, within 30 days of operation or after one year if an implant is placed [1,2]. It can range from superficial infections involving the skin only to severe forms involving tissues under the skin, organs, or implanted material [1,2]. SSIs are classified into incisional SSIs, which can be superficial or deep, and organ/space SSIs, which affect the rest of the body other than the body wall layers [2].

SSIs are the most frequent of all healthcare-associated infections (HCAI) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and second most frequent in Europe and the USA and are a major contributor to morbidity and mortality due to HCAI [3,4]. The proportion of SSI was reported to be as high as 29% of all health-care-associated infections [4]. Incidence rates of SSI in LMICs vary widely ranging from 1.2 to 23.6 per 100 surgical procedures and despite the high level of heterogenicity in studies from LMICs, the pooled incidence was estimated at 11.8% [3-5]. About 39-51% of pathogens causing SSI in the USA were documented to be resistant to standard prophylactic antibiotics [5]. But robust data defining the burden of SSI and the pattern of micro-organisms responsible for causing SSI in LMICs remain scarce compared to high-income countries [3,4,6]. Moreover, the suspected estimate of cases can be higher as many minor cases are unreported and undertreated. SSI surveillance and timely feedback of results are strongly recommended by the World Health Organisation as part of the core components of effective infection prevention and control programs. Conducting regular and high-quality SSI surveillance is crucial in the preparation of hospital antibiotic policy and monitoring strict adherence to it [5]. Cases getting inadequate antimicrobial treatment (mostly with a combination of wide-spectrum antibiotics with inadequate dosing) pose a threat to the community as it may result in the emergence of multi-drug resistant strains of bacteria [7].

The objectives of the study were to show the distribution of SSI in a tertiary care center of northeast India serving mostly rural population of lower Assam, over a two years period; and to study the microbiological profile of SSI pathogens and their antibiotic-resistant patterns, isolated from three surgical wards.

Materials & Methods

This is a hospital-based cross-sectional study, conducted over a period of two years from January 2015 to December 2016 at a tertiary care teaching hospital. The study was approved after it was ethically reviewed by the Institutional Ethics committee of our institute (FAAMCH/Ethical Committee/128/2012/5704; dated 4.12.2015). All surgical patients admitted in the Department of General Surgery, Obstetrics & Gynecology, and Orthopedics department, who had been operated on during the study period and had developed any signs of SSI during the period of hospitalization was considered to be eligible for the study. Any patients who had presented the clinical signs of SSI like purulent drainage from the superficial incision, developed localized pain or tenderness, localized swelling, erythema, malodor or heat, or had developed fever within 30 days of surgery were included in the study [8]. Surgical wounds were divided into clean, clean-contaminated, contaminated, and dirty (CDC classification), based on the type of surgery and intraoperative events mentioned in the surgeon’s operation and anesthesia notes in the patient’s medical chart. Patients with incomplete data were excluded from the study [1]. Patients with minor day-care surgeries were also excluded from the study.

Two swabs were collected from the visibly infected area of the subjects by gently introducing them into the wound sites and rotating the swab tips in the wound, taking care to avoid contamination of specimens with commensals from the skin. These swabs were sent immediately to the Microbiology Laboratory of our institute in sterile containers. The swabs were inoculated in blood agar, MacConkey agar, and Sabouraud dextrose agar media and incubated aerobically at 37°C. Plates were checked for growth of organisms after 24 hours (overnight) and 48 hours of incubation. If there was any visible growth, it was identified by standard phenotypic methods and was subjected to antibiotic-susceptibility testing (Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method) as described in the CLSI (Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute) guidelines [9]. Socio-demographic data and clinical information concerning all patients with wound infections after surgery were retrieved from the medical records maintained in the department.

The collected data were entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet by two researchers independently. Each chart was manually reviewed and checked for accuracy by the third researcher. Tables and graphs were prepared using MS office and Excel table functions. Descriptive statistics like arithmetic mean were calculated using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics

Samples of 518 included subjects, who underwent surgery and had evidence of SSI, were tested for the presence of micro-organisms. The age of the included cases ranged from 15 years to 71 years with a mean age of 31.57 years; 56.56% (n=293) cases were females while the rest 43.44% (n=225) were males. The mean age in the case of females was 29.4 years but the mean age for males was higher at 37.6 years. The majority of the cases (86.1%) came from rural areas while 13.9% dwelled in towns. Co-morbid health conditions like diabetes mellitus, hypertension, bronchial asthma, cardiovascular disease, HIV/AIDS, other infections, multiple co-morbidities, etc. were found to be associated with 28.38% of cases mostly in the age group of >50 years. Among the co-morbid conditions, hypertension (28.6%) and diabetes mellitus (26.5%) were the most common. The majority of the procedures had non-clean wounds, mainly contaminated (34%) and clean-contaminated (30%). Only 9% of the clean wounds developed symptoms of SSI (Table 1).

Characteristics   N %
Age <30 years 167 32.24
30-50 years 202 39.00
>50 years 149 28.76
Gender Male 225 43.44
Female 293 56.56
Place of Residence Rural 446 86.10
Urban 72 13.90
Religion Hindu 181 34.94
Muslim 334 64.48
Others 3 0.58
Co-morbidity* Present 147 28.38
Absent 371 71.62
Admission ICU/semi ICU 77 14.86
Wards 441 85.14
Wound class Clean 47 9.07
Clean contaminated 154 29.73
Contaminated 176 33.98
Dirty 141 27.22

Types of surgeries conducted in patients who had developed signs of SSI are tabulated in Table 2. In males, the majority of the cases followed orthopedic surgeries (33.8%) like an open reduction of fractures and multiple fractures in road traffic accidents. While in females almost one-third (33.1%) of the cases occurred after cesarean section. Both upper and lower gastrointestinal surgeries followed next in both the gender; however, a number of cases were more in males than in females (26.2% versus 17.7% in hepatobiliary surgeries and 12% versus 10.6% in appendicectomy).

Department Type of surgery Female n,% Male n,% Total n,%
General Surgery Cholecystectomy, choledocholithotomy, choledochal cyst excision Liver resection, or other bile ducts/GB related operations 52 (17.7) 59 (26.2) 111 (21.4%)
Appendicectomy 31 (10.6) 27 (12) 58 (11.2)
Hepatico-jejunostomy, gastrectomy, gastrojejunostomy, truncal vagotomy, hernia 12 (4.1) 20 (8.9) 32 (6.2)
Other surgeries (lipoma, cyst excision, breast surgeries, etc.) 11 (3.8) 9 (4) 20 (3.9)
Obstetrics & Gynecology Caesarean section 97 (33.1) 0 97 (18.7)
Other gynecological surgeries (hysterectomy, myotomy, colporrhaphy, etc.) 39 (13.3) 0 39 (7.5)
Orthopedics Fractures (ORIF)/RTA 25 (8.5) 76 (33.8) 101 (19.5)
Other orthopedic surgery (arthroplasty) 28 (9.6) 32 (14.2) 60 (11.6)
Total   293 225 518

Microbiological findings

Out of the 518 samples, 197 samples showed growth of microorganisms (bacteria, n=189; fungi, n=12; 4 samples showed growth of both bacteria and fungus) after aerobic culture at 37°C (38% aerobic culture positivity). The frequency of occurrence of different pathogens is shown in Table 3. Single bacterial isolates were recovered from 173 samples (87.8%) whereas 24 cases (12.2%) had polymicrobial infections. Thus, 197 culture-positive samples yielded a total of 216 bacterial isolates and 12 fungal isolates (total 228 isolates). More than two-thirds of the isolates were Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) (n=151, 69.74%) (Table 3). Escherichia coli was the predominant isolates (22.37%) followed by Klebsiella spp. (20.61%). Among the Gram-positive cocci (GPC) Staphylococcus spp. constituted 18.42% (n: 23+19=42).

Type of microorganism Frequency (N)  (%)*
Total Gram-negative bacilli 159 69.74
Escherichia coli 51 22.37
Klebsiella spp. 47 20.61
Enterobacter spp. 9 3.95
Proteus species 7 3.07
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 28 12.28
Acinetobacter spp. 10 4.39
Other GNBs 7 3.07
Total Gram-positive cocci 65 28.51
Staphylococcus aureus 23 10.09
CoNS 19 8.33
Enterococcus spp. 15 6.58
Streptococcus spp. 8 3.51
Fungi 12 5.26
Candida spp. 11 4.82
Other fungus 1 0.44

Resistance pattern of the isolated organisms

Drug resistance of overall Gram-negative bacilli irrespective of species was 90.1% to ampicillin, 22% to piperacillin-tazobactam, 43.4% to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, 85.9% to cefazoline, 48.4% to ceftriaxone, 61% to cefepime 28.9%, to ceftazidime, 29.6% to cefoperazone, 5.7% to imipenem/meropenem, 43.4% to gentamicin; 13.8% to amikacin, 49.6% to tetracycline, 37.7% to ciprofloxacin/levofloxacin and ofloxacin, 43.5% to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Figure 1). Resistance patterns exhibited by individual species are listed in Table 4.

  Escherichia coli n (%) Klebsiella spp. n (%) Pseudomonas spp. n (%) Acinetobacter spp. n (%) Enterobacter spp. n (%) Proteus spp. n (%) Other GNBs n (%)* Overall GNB (%)**
Amp 47 (92.2) 45 (95.7) - - 8 (88.9) 5 (71.4) 4 (57.1) 90.1
PipT 11 (21.6) 9 (19.1) 9 (32.1) 3 (30) 1 (11.1) 0 (0) 2 (28.6) 22.0
AmClv 21 (41.2) 18 (38.3) 17 (60.7) 6 (60) 2 (22.2) 3 (42.8) 2 (28.6) 43.4
Czol 42 (82.4) 44 (93.6) - - 5 (55.6) 7 (100) - 85.9
Ctri 24 (47.1) 20 (42.6) 17 (60.7) 7 (70) 0 (0) 4 (57.1) 5 (71.4) 48.4
Cpim 35 (68.6) 31 (65.9) 14 (50) 6 (60) 3 (33.3) 3 (42.8) 5 (71.4) 61.01
Czdm 15 (29.4) 10 (21.3) 12 (42.8) 5 (50) 0 (0) 1 (14.3) 3 (42.8) 28.9
Cpera 17 (33.3) 14 (29.8) 9 (32.1) 6 (60) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (14.3) 29.6
Imi/Mero 3 (5.9) 1 (2.1) 2 (7.1) 3 (30) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 5.7
Gen 23 (45.1) 22 (46.8) 12 (42.8) 3 (30) 3 (3.33) 2 (28.6) 4 (57.1) 43.4
Amk 5 (9.8) 4 (8.5) 7 (28) 2 (20) 1 (11.1) 1 (14.3) 2 (28.6) 13.8
Tetra 26 (51) 22 (46.8) - 4 (40) 4 (44.4) 4 (57.1) 5 (71.4) 49.6
Cip/Lev 20 (39.2) 19 (40.4) 11 (39.3) 4 (40) 2 (22.2) 2 (28.6) 2 (28.6) 37.7
Ofl 19 (37.3) 13 (27.7) 9 (32.1) - 2 (22.2) 3 (42.8) 4 (57.1) 33.6
Co-tri 19 (37.3) 21 (44.7) - 6 (60) 4 (44.4) 4 (57.1) - 43.5

Among GPC isolates, maximum resistance was observed to penicillin (76.9) and ampicillin (56.9%) followed by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (45.2%), chloramphenicol (44.6%), tetracycline (33.8%), gentamicin (30.9%), doxycycline (27.7%), the macrolides (21.5%), the quinolones (18.0%), vancomycin (5.3%), and clindamycin (6%). Individual species drug resistance patterns are given in Table 5. A comparison of the resistance pattern exhibited by Gram-positive bacteria and Gram-negative bacteria is depicted in Figure 1.

  Staphylococcus aureus n (%) CoNS- n (%) Enterococcus spp. n (%) Streptococcus spp. n (%) Overall GPCs*
Pen 20 (86.96) 18 (94.74) 10 (66.67) 2 (25) 76.9
Amp 15 (65.23) 14 (73.68) 8 (53.33) 0 56.9
Gen 9 (39.13) 4 (21.05) - - 30.9
Azi/Cl/E 5 (17.85) 3 (15.79) 5 (33.33) 1 (12.5) 21.54
Tetra 6 (26.09) 7 (36.84) 7 (46.67) 2 (25) 33.8
Dox 5 (21.74) 7 (36.84) 6 (40) 0 27.7
Cip/Lev/Mox 5 (21.74) 4 (21.05) 2 (13.33) 1 (12.5) 18.46
Oflo 5 (21.74) 2 (10.53) - 1 (12.5) 16
Clin 0 (0) 3 (15.79) - 0 (0) 6
Cotri 10 (43.48) 9 (47.36) - - 45.2
Chlo 11 (47.83) 10 (52.63) 4 (26.67) 4 (50) 44.6
Van 0 0 3 (20) - 5.3

Discussion

Despite improvements in infection control measures, post-surgical infection of wounds remains a significant problem that could be associated with any surgical procedures but commoner in contaminated surgeries as was observed in our current work. Studies show that the incidence of SSI in hepato-biliary, colo-rectal surgeries, cesarean section, and orthopedic surgeries is higher [4-6,10]. Gender differences in SSI exist and are procedure-specific [11]. We found a lesser number of females to be affected in orthopedic, biliary, and gut surgeries compared to males.

The present study observed an aerobic culture positivity rate of 38% and multiple pathogens were found to be implicated in causing SSI. The most striking finding of the current study was that almost half of the isolates belonged to Enterobacteriaceae. E. coli and Klebsiella spp. were found to be the commonest organisms and together constituted 43% of the total isolates. Staphylococcus aureus has been documented as the commonest pathogen causing SSI with rates as high as 30.4% [3,12,13]. Few other studies from India also reported S. aureus as the commonest isolate [14,15]. But some studies corroborate our findings. Borse et al., Dessie et al., and Amare et al. found E. coli to be the commonest organism (32.58%, 23.1%, and 24.3%, respectively) causing SSI [16-18]. The predominance of GNBs in our study which covered almost two-thirds of the total isolates points towards a difference in organism profile in LMIC compared to high-income countries, especially in resource-scant healthcare facilities. Poor knowledge of personal hygiene of the patients, high environmental burden of GNBs, inadequate infection control practices like especially in the post-surgical wards might play an important role in the development of SSI. Moreover, increased rates of intrinsically resistant bacteria like Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas (together 16.6% of isolates) are a major concern. In many cases of SSI, the responsible pathogen arises from the patient’s own endogenous flora (both anaerobic and aerobic). But pathogens might also originate from exogenous sources like incompletely sterilized devices or instruments, the caregivers, etc. (mostly comprises aerobic GPC like Staphylococcus spp.) [12]. E. coli has been implicated as a major pathogen in abdominal surgeries [19,20], and the source can be both endogenous (patient’s gut flora) or exogenous (unhygienic surroundings, poor personal hygiene, or post-procedural contamination) [12,21]. Source of non-fermenters like Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas is usually exogenous like hospital surroundings or contaminated devices or dressings [12]. Overall Gram-negative bacilli are also more resistant to disinfectants compared to Gram positives [19,21]. The greater complexity of the structure of the GNB cell wall renders intrinsic resistance to most disinfectants and antibacterial agents used in the hospitals. The efficacy of the commonly used disinfectants and antiseptics towards resistant organisms is another area that needs to be explored.

In-vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed that the isolated bacteria reacted differently to different antibiotics. Enterobacteriaceae like E. coli and Klebsiella showed very high resistance to ampicillin (92.2% and 95.7%) and first-generation cephalosporins like cefazolin (82.4% and 93.6%) similar to findings of other studies [13,19,20]. They also showed high resistance to amoxycillin-clavulanic acid (38-43%), gentamicin (45-48%), tetracycline (46-51%), and co-trimoxazole (37-45%). High resistance exhibited to third-generation cephalosporins like ceftriaxone (42-48%) and quinolones like ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin (39-41%) is a matter of grave concern as they are widely used as mainstay drugs and leave clinicians with few choices. Striking resistance of 65-69% to fourth-generation cephalosporins like cefepime is alarming. High resistance to many of these drugs was also reported by other studies conducted elsewhere [18,20,21,22].

Another matter of concern is the emergence of glucose non-fermenting bacteria like Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter as causative agents of SSI as they are intrinsically resistant to many antibiotics. In this study, they showed high resistance to amoxycillin-clavulanic acid (60%), ceftriaxone (60-70%), cefepime (50-60%), gentamicin (32-43%), and quinolones (40%). Even anti-Pseudomonal drugs like ceftazidime and cefoperazone showed high resistance of 42-50% and 32-60%, respectively. A similar concern was also expressed by other authors [23,24].

Among the GPCs, Staphylococcus spp. (S. aureus and CoNS) showed very high resistance to penicillin (87-95%) and ampicillin (65-74%). However, low resistance was reported against clindamycin (0-15%) and macrolides (15-17%). Isolated Staphylococcus spp. showed 100% susceptibility to vancomycin. Isolation of another GPC Enterococci spp. which is also a normal gut-flora, again points towards fecal contamination due to poor hygiene. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci were detected in three out of 15 isolates (20%). However, compared to GNBs, the GPCs were relatively more susceptible to quinolones, gentamicin, and tetracycline (Figure 1). A similar study from Kolkata observed a decreasing trend of drug-resistant Staphylococcus and reported low resistance to quinolones and doxycycline and 100% sensitivity to vancomycin, linezolid, and tigecycline [23].

Given these results, an effective antibiotic stewardship program with an evidence-based antibiotic policy is very much essential in our hospital. Unfortunately, being a relatively new hospital, such a program is yet to be adopted. We expect that our current work will help in initiating this program in our hospital. 

As there is limited local and regional data on the resistance pattern of pathogens causing SSI, this report can serve as a unique benchmark for caregivers engaged in SSI prophylaxis and formulating antimicrobial stewardship programs. However, limitation of the study is that sensitivity patterns to important antibiotics like tigecycline and cefotaxime could not be ascertained due to irregular availability of data. Also, the molecular characterization of the multidrug-resistant organisms could not be done due to the unavailability of resources and required infrastructure. As a future scope, study including more identical subjects (e.g., GI surgery or Gynaecologic surgery or orthopedic post operatives separately) would make the analysis more homogenous, and to be taken up as follow-up work. Further[L1] study evaluating the determinants and predictors that leads to the development of antibiotic resistance and strategies to control them is necessary to determine their impact on patient outcomes.

Conclusions

Despite the increased use of minimally invasive surgery and enhancement of infection control practices in surgery, SSI contributes to a substantial burden of morbidity and mortality. The emergence of gut bacilli as the predominant causative agent of SSI is indicative of the need for effective infection-control practices. A paradigm shift of bacteriological profile from Gram-positive bacteria to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli is a great threat to patient outcome and a major hindrance to progress in the field of surgery. Knowledge of the microbiology of surgical infections and regular surveillance with the feedback of appropriate data to surgeons can be an important component of strategies to reduce SSI risk.


References

  1. CDC healthcare-associated infections. (2010). Accessed: November 27, 2020: https://www.cdc.gov/hai/ssi/ssi.html.
  2. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR: Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection. Infect Control Hospital Epidemiol. 1999, 20:247-277. 10.1086/501620
  3. WHO report on the burden of endemic healthcare-associated infection worldwide - a systematic review of the literature. (2011). Accessed: November 27, 2020: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/80135/9789241501507_eng.pdf;jsessionid.
  4. Allegranzi B, Bagheri NS, Combescure C, Graafmans W, Attar H, Donaldson L, Pittet D: Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011, 377:228-241. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61458-4
  5. WHO protocol for surgical site infection surveillance with a focus on settings with limited resources. (2018). Accessed: November 27, 2020: https://www.who.int/infection-prevention/tools/surgical/SSI-surveillance-protocol.pdf.
  6. Rickard J, Beilman G, Forrester J, Sawyer R, Stephen A, Weiser TG, Valenzuel J: Surgical infections in low- and middle-income countries: a global assessment of the burden and management needs. Surg Infect. 2020, 21:478-494. 10.1089/sur.2019.142
  7. Kollef MH: Inadequate antimicrobial treatment: an important determinant of outcome for hospitalized patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2000, 31:S131-S138. 10.1086/314079
  8. CDC Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event, Procedure-associated Module SSI. (2020). Accessed: November 28, 2020: https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf.
  9. Weinstein MP, Patel JB, Bobenchik AM, et al.: CLSI M100 Performance Standards for Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing, 30th Edition. Weinstein MP (ed): CLSI, USA; 2020.
  10. Abdel Jalil MH, Hammour KA, Alsous M, Awad W, Hadadden R, Bakri F, Fram K: Surgical site infections following caesarean operations at a Jordanian teaching hospital: frequency and implicated factors. Sci Rep. 2017, 7:12210. 10.1038/s41598-017-12431-2
  11. Langelotz C, Mueller-Rau C, Terziyski S, Rau B, Krannich A, Gastmeier P, Geffers C: Gender-specific differences in surgical site infections: an analysis of 438,050 surgical procedures from the German national nosocomial infections surveillance system. Viszeralmedizin. 2014, 30:114-117. 10.1159/000362100
  12. Owens CD, Stoessel K: Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and prevention. J Hosp Infect. 2008, 70:3-10. 10.1016/S0195-6701(08)60017-1
  13. Mengesha RE, Kasa BG, Saravanan M, Berhe DF, Wasihun AG: Aerobic bacteria in post surgical wound infections and pattern of their antimicrobial susceptibility in Ayder Teaching and Referral Hospital, Mekelle, Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2014, 7:575. 10.1186/1756-0500-7-575
  14. Lilani SP, Jangale N, Chowdhary A, Daver GB: Surgical site infection in clean and clean-contaminated cases. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2005, 23:249-252.
  15. Mundhada AS, Tenpe S: A study of organisms causing surgical site infections and their antimicrobial susceptibility in a tertiary care government hospital. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2015, 58:195-200. 10.4103/0377-4929.155313
  16. Borse H, Shelke R: Study of various organisms associated with surgical site infection and their sensitivity pattern. MVP J Med Sci. 2015, 2:118-123.
  17. Dessie W, Mulugeta G, Fentaw S, Mihret A, Hassen M, Abebe E: Pattern of bacterial pathogens and their susceptibility isolated from surgical site infections at selected referral hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int J Microbiol. 2016, 2016:2418902. 10.1155/2016/2418902
  18. Amare B, Abdurrahman Z, Moges B, et al.: Postoperative surgical site bacterial infections and drug susceptibility patterns at Gondar university teaching hospital, northwest Ethiopia. J Bacteriol Parasitol. 2011, 2016:2418902.
  19. El-Saed A, Balkhy HH, Alshamrani MM, et al.: High contribution and impact of resistant gram negative pathogens causing surgical site infections at a multi-hospital healthcare system in Saudi Arabia, 2007-2016. BMC Infect Dis. 2011, 20:275. 10.1186/s12879-020-4939-6
  20. Múnez E, Antonio Ramosa A, Espejoa TA, Vaque J, Sanchez-Paya J, Pastor V, Asensio A: Microbiology of surgical site infections in abdominal tract surgery patients. Cir Esp. 2011, 89:606-612. 10.1016/j.cireng.2011.05.002
  21. Akinkunmi EO, Adesunkanmi AR, Lamikanra A: Pattern of pathogens from surgical wound infections in a Nigerian hospital and their antimicrobial susceptibility profiles. Afr Health Sci. 2014, 14:802-809. 10.4314/ahs.v14i4.5
  22. Dhar H, Al-Busaidi I, Rathi B, Nimre EA, Sachdeva V, Hamdi I: A study of post-caesarean section wound infections in a regional referral hospital, Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2014, 14:211-217.
  23. Bhattacharya S, Pal K, Jain S, Chatterjee SS, Konar J: Surgical site infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus- on decline?. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016, 10:32-36. 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21664.8587
  24. Rajkumari N, Sharma K, Mathu P, Kumar S, Gupta A: A study on surgical site infections after trauma surgeries in a tertiary care hospital in north India. Indian J Med Res. 2014, 140:691-694.

Original article
peer-reviewed

High Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Causing Surgical Site Infection in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Northeast India


Author Information

Sangeeta Deka

Medical Microbiology, Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed Medical College and Hospital, Barpeta, IND

Medical Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, IND

Deepjyoti Kalita Corresponding Author

Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, IND

Putul Mahanta

Forensic Medicine, Assam Medical College and Hospital, Dibrugarh, IND

Dipankar Baruah

Pathology, Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed Medical College, Barpeta, IND


Ethics Statement and Conflict of Interest Disclosures

Human subjects: Consent was obtained by all participants in this study. Institutional Ethical Committee, Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed Medical College and Hospital issued approval FAAMCH/Ethical Committee/128/2012/ 5704. This is for your information that the institutional Ethics committee of Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed Medical College & Hospital in the meeting held on November 26, 2015, in the conference Hall of the Principal-cum-chief superintendent & chairman of Institutional Ethics Committee, Fakhruddin AIi Ahmed Medical College & Hospital has given Ethical clearance to the study Proposal as follows: Surgical site infections (SSI) in a newly established tertiary care teaching hospital serving a rural locality of tower Assam. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the authority of Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed Medical College and Hospital for allowing us to carry out this study in the laboratory of the Microbiology Department. We offer our sincere thanks to technicians of the Microbiology Department, FAAMCH, Barpeta for their in-state time and support.



Original article
peer-reviewed

High Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Causing Surgical Site Infection in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Northeast India


Figures etc.

SIQ
7.2
RATED BY 2 READERS
CONTRIBUTE RATING

Scholary Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. Learn more here.