Coronoid fractures are less frequent injuries seen in around one-tenth of patients with elbow dislocation. Any injury to the coronoid process can be associated with elbow instability, in which injury to collateral ligaments co-exists, resulting in a loss of congruency of the elbow joint. However, there is a scarcity of evidence regarding patients' management with elbow dislocation and associated coronoid fractures. So, our aim is to assess the functional outcome of the elbow after operative fixation in patients with any type of coronoid fracture with associated elbow dislocation. A total of six patients with closed coronoid fracture of the elbow, with associated elbow dislocation, without any other associated trauma or previous surgery to the same limb, were included in our study. After closed reduction, patients with an incongruent reduction of the elbow joint were operated. The injured structures were repaired in an inside-out sequence: the coronoid fragment was first reduced by using a lasso-type suture. The larger fragments of the coronoid were fixed with either a screw or a plate when deemed necessary. Then, the lateral collateral ligament was repaired either using a suture anchor or transosseous (No. 2 Arthrex; Naples, Florida) sutures.
After repair, the elbow was examined for stability radiologically using the hanging arm test; a concentric reduction of the elbow in lateral view during this test indicates a stable elbow. All patients showed a good to excellent outcome on the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) at the final follow-up (three patients had an excellent score while three had a good score). At the final follow-up, mean elbow flexion was 124º, loss of extension was 10º in only one patient, mean supination was 80º, and mean pronation was 72º. Isolated fractures of the coronoid associated with elbow dislocation require appropriate evaluation and management. Closed reduction and immobilization alone in young and active patients may not be sufficient, especially in patients with incongruent ulnohumeral joint. Surgical fixation of the coronoid fragment and repair of the collateral ligament, whenever indicated, can provide good functional outcomes.
Coronoid fractures are less frequent injuries, which are seen in around one-tenth of patients with elbow dislocation [1-2]. They are commonly affiliated with soft tissue damage around the elbow joint . The coronoid process is a segment of the proximal ulna and stabilizes the elbow joint against forces directed posteriorly . It further provides restraint to varus stress in combination with the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) complex . The coronoid process has three soft tissue insertions: the anterior joint capsule of the elbow, the brachialis muscle, and the medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) [6-7]. MUCL is the principal element in providing elbow stability against valgus stresses [8-9].
Along with the medial and lateral ligament complexes, the coronoid has been recognized as one of the principal components responsible for maintaining elbow stability . Any injury to the coronoid process can be associated with elbow instability, in which injury to these ligaments co-exists, resulting in a loss of congruency of the elbow joint [11-13]. However, there is a scarcity of evidence regarding the management of patients with elbow dislocation and associated coronoid fractures.
So, our aim is to assess the functional outcome of the elbow after operative fixation in patients with any type of coronoid fracture with an associated elbow dislocation, in view of the important role of the coronoid process in maintaining elbow stability.
Materials & Methods
All patients presenting to the tertiary care center between February 2017 and January 2019 with closed elbow dislocation and an associated coronoid fracture were considered for inclusion. After local and neurovascular examination, anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs of the elbow were performed. A total of six patients with a closed coronoid fracture of the elbow with associated elbow dislocation without any other associated trauma or previous surgery to the same limb were included in our study. All demographic data (age, handedness), injury (timeline, mechanism, associated dislocation), and radiographic data (Regan Morrey classification, degree of displacement) were recorded . All six patients underwent closed reduction of the elbow under anesthesia, showed an incongruent reduction of the elbow joint, were unstable on stress testing, and were considered for surgical fixation. Stability was checked in extension and 30 degrees of flexion, and varus and valgus stress were applied.
After closed reduction, patients with an incongruent reduction of elbow joint were operated in the same sitting, except in one patient where an external fixator was applied due to poor soft tissue condition and the operation took place after seven days. All patients were operated in the supine position with elbow positioned over the arm board. The extended Kocher approach was used, utilizing the Kocher interval distally between the extensor carpi ulnaris and anconeus muscles, and proximally between the triceps and mobile wad of Henry in all cases. In addition, two cases required a separate anteromedial approach to gain access to the coronoid fragment. The injured structures were repaired in an inside-out sequence: the coronoid fragment was first reduced by using a lasso-type suture, passed through the anterior capsular attachment, and over the coronoid fragment. Then, a suture passer was used to pass the suture threads along the sides of the coronoid base and through the ulna posteriorly. The suture threads were then tightened to achieve suitable tension and tied over the posterior aspect of the ulna. Larger fragments of coronoid were fixed with either a screw or plate when deemed necessary. Then, the lateral collateral ligament was then repaired either using a suture anchor or using transosseous (No. 2 Arthrex) sutures through the bone tunnels at the isometric point on the lateral condyle. After repair, the elbow was examined for stability radiologically using the hanging arm test, performed with elbow in full extension, and in supination, with sterile towels placed underneath the arm, so that the weight of the hanging limb produces a dislocating force. A c-arm lateral view is checked to ascertain whether the elbow is reduced during this test. A concentric reduction of the elbow in the lateral view during this test indicates a stable elbow (Figures 1-3).
After determining the stability of the elbow, the wound was closed in layers and a posterior splint was given. Patients were given indomethacin 25 mg thrice daily for three weeks prophylactically to prevent heterotopic ossification.
Postoperatively, the elbow was immobilized at 90° of flexion and in a mid-prone position. The splint was retained for 10 days, and then a range of motion (ROM) brace was applied with a 30° extension limit. We encouraged the patient to perform an active range of motion exercises for one month, followed by active assisted exercises for the next two months under a physiotherapist's guidance.
Follow-up and functional evaluation
All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at two weeks, six weeks, 12 weeks, and at the final follow-up by the same operative surgeon. Patients were clinically assessed by the Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) . Radiographic evaluation of the elbow by the AP and lateral views was performed at follow-ups to check for joint congruency (Figures 4-7).
All patients showed a good to excellent outcome on the MEPS at the final follow-up (three patients had an excellent score while three had a good score). At the final follow-up, mean elbow flexion was 124º, loss of extension was 10º in only one patient, mean supination was 80º, and mean pronation was 72º. Radiographs of all patients showed a concentric reduction of the elbow, no signs of post-traumatic arthritis, and heterotrophic ossification. Superficial infection was seen in one patient but resolved with oral antibiotics. All coronoid fractures were united at the final follow-up on radiographs. The demographic and fracture characteristics of all patients are shown in Table 1, and the clinical assessment findings of all patients are shown in Table 2.
The coronoid process is one of the critical structures for maintaining elbow stability and forms an anterior buttress to prevent the elbow's posterior dislocation. It also acts as an important constraint against axial, varus, and posterolateral forces . The coronoid fracture is closely related to the capsule of the elbow joint, as well as the medial and lateral collateral ligament complexes, and hence an isolated coronoid fracture seldom occurs in isolation. They are less frequent injuries, which are seen in around one-tenth of patients with elbow dislocation . The role of the coronoid process in elbow stability against axial, posterolateral rotatory, or varus loads was studied in previous biomechanical and cadaver studies, and structures that have attached to the coronoid process play an important role in elbow stability [17-19]. According to Morrey et al., 50% of the height of the coronoid process is essential to make sure of elbow stability in the sagittal plane . Most coronoid fractures occur in patients who are involved in a high level of physical activity. Fixation of such fractures can be essential, especially in associated elbow dislocation, to achieve a congruent ulnohumeral articulation, maintain elbow stability, and reduce the chances of arthritis. A computed tomography (CT) scan is useful to assess the fracture configuration and intra-articular involvement. It gives more details than radiographs regarding the articular compression, displacement, and comminution of the fracture. Also, the presence of any intra-articular fragment is revealed, which may hinder a congruent reduction of the elbow joint.
In general, a fracture with greater than 50% of ulnar involvement can be managed surgically, to achieve an early range of motion. Fractures less than 50% of height have to be evaluated for ligament injury and elbow instability. Associated elbow dislocation and the presence of incongruent elbow reduction indicate a requirement for surgical treatment with necessary ligament repair. For larger fragments (Regan Morrey types 2 and 3), screw or mini-fragment plates can be used and for the smaller fragments (Regan Morrey types 1 and 2), Herbert screws, or repair using the lasso suture technique can be done.
Only a few studies are available in the literature with isolated coronoid fractures with or without elbow dislocation. Foruria et al. studied 38 consecutive patients sustaining acute isolated coronoid fractures in which 28 were treated nonsurgically and obtained good results in most of the patients . He suggested that an isolated coronoid fracture with a congruent elbow joint, an adequate sublime tubercle, and a fractured coronoid height of less than 50% can be treated nonoperatively. However, only eight patients were associated with elbow dislocation. Also, four patients required surgery in the follow-up, and it is not clear how many patients with associated dislocation required any subsequent surgery. Another study by Kekatpure et al. evaluated the incidence of combined osteochondral and ligamentous injuries by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 24 patients with isolated coronoid fracture without elbow dislocation and detected an LCL injury in all the patients . Any injury to the coronoid, small or large, with associated elbow dislocation, has a higher likelihood of ligamentous injury and may induce an inherent instability of varying degrees, which can lead to post-traumatic arthritis. Hence, a better outcome can be expected in such patients with surgical intervention, which provides stability and allows early joint mobilization.
In our study, all patients were young and active, and the dominant limb was involved in the majority of them. The type of elbow dislocation was predominantly posterolateral, and the mode of injury was due to a fall on an outstretched hand. Post-reduction, all elbows were unstable and the joint was incongruent and, therefore, required surgical intervention. We classified the fracture based on the Regan and Morrey classification according to which two patients with type 1, three patients with type 2, and one patient with type 3 coronoid fractures were seen. As we couldn't obtain humeral subtraction views of the ulna on CT scan, the fractures were not classified according to O'Driscoll. Fixation of the coronoid fractures was done by a mini fragment plate in one patient, by screws in two patients, and by the suture lasso technique in the rest of the patients. All our cases had an LCL injury, which can be attributed to the mechanism of injury. The lateral collateral ligament was repaired by FiberWire (Arthrex) in all cases to achieve lateral stability. No operative neurovascular and postoperative complications were noted except a superficial infection in one case but did not require any further operative procedure. We initiated active ROM exercises from day one as tolerated by patients under adequate analgesia, in order to avoid a stiff elbow .
All patients showed good to excellent functional outcomes on the MEPS. Although our final follow-up was limited, with a maximum follow-up of 23 months, no signs of post-traumatic arthritis were seen in radiographs at the final follow-up. At the final follow-up, all patients showed a good functional range of motion and no residual elbow instability.
Any injury with an isolated coronoid fracture should not be overlooked, as they can appear naïve on radiographs and can be associated with the ligamentous injury. Isolated fractures of the coronoid associated with elbow dislocation require appropriate evaluation and management. Closed reduction and immobilization alone in young and active patients may not be sufficient, especially in patients with an incongruent ulnohumeral joint. Surgical fixation of the coronoid fragment and the collateral ligament repair, whenever indicated, can provide good functional outcomes.
- Regan W, Morrey BF: Coronoid process and Monteggia fractures. The Elbow and Its Disorders. Morrey BF (ed): WB Saunders, Philadelphia; 2000. 3rd:396-408.
- Selesnick FH, Dolitsky B, Haskell SS: Fracture of the coronoid process requiring open reduction with internal fixation: a case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984, 66:1304-1306.
- Adams JE, Hoskin TL, Morrey BF, Steinmann SP: Management and outcome of 103 acute fractures of the coronoid process of the ulna. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009, 91:632-635. 10.1302/0301-620X.91B5.21755
- Matzon JL, Widmer BJ, Draganich LF, Mass DP, Phillips CS: Anatomy of the coronoid process. J Hand Surg Am. 2006, 31:1272-1278. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.05.010
- Hull JR, Owen JR, Fern SE, Wayne JS, Boardman ND: Role of the coronoid process in varus osteoarticular stability of the elbow. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005, 14:441-6. 10.1016/j.jse.2004.11.005
- Neill Cage DJ, Abrams RA, Callahan JJ, Botte MJ: Soft tissue attachments of the ulnar coronoid process: an anatomic study with radiographic correlation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995, 320:154-158.
- Ablove RH, Moy OJ, Howard C, Peimer CA, S’Doia S: Ulnar coronoid process anatomy: possible implications for elbow instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006, 449:259-261. 10.1097/01.blo.0000218729.59838.bc
- O’ Driscoll SW, Morrey BF, Korinek S, An KN: Elbow subluxation and dislocation. A spectrum of instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992, 280:186-197.
- Morrey BF, An KN: Articular and ligamentous contributions to the stability of the elbow joint. Am J Sports Med. 1983, 11:315-319. 10.1177/036354658301100506
- O’Driscoll SW, Jupiter JB, King GJ, Hotchkiss RN, Morrey BF: The unstable elbow. Instr Course Lect. 2001, 50:89-102.
- Hartzler RU, Llusa-Perez M, Steinmann SP, Morrey BF, Sanchez-Sotelo J: Transverse coronoid fracture: when does it have to be fixed?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014, 472:2068-2074. 10.1007/s11999-014-3477-1
- McKee RC, McKee MD: Complex fractures of the proximal ulna: the critical importance of the coronoid fragment. Instr Course Lect. 2012, 61:227-233.
- Terada N, Yamada H, Seki T, Urabe T, Takayama S: The importance of reducing small fractures of the coronoid process in the treatment of unstable elbow dislocation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000, 9:344-346. 10.1067/mse.2000.106082
- Regan W, Morrey B: Fractures of the coronoid process of the ulna. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989, 71:1348-1354.
- Morrey BF, An KN, Chao EYS: Functional evaluation of the elbow. The Elbow and Its Disorders. Morrey BF (ed): WB Saunders, Philadelphia; 1993. 2nd:86-91.
- Wells J, Ablove RH: Coronoid fractures of the elbow. Clin Med Res. 2008, 6:40-44. 10.3121/cmr.2008.753
- Beingessner DM, Dunning CE, Stacpoole RA, Johnson JA, King GJ: The effect of coronoid fractures on elbow kinematics and stability. Clin Biomech. 2007, 22:183-190. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.09.007
- Closkey RF, Goode JR, Kirschenbaum D, Cody RP: The role of the coronoid process in elbow stability. A biomechanical analysis of axial loading. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2000, 82:1749-1753. 10.2106/00004623-200012000-00009
- Ring D: Fractures of the coronoid process of the ulna. J Hand Surg Am. 2006, 31:1679-1689. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.08.020
- Morrey BF, An KN: Stability of the elbow: osseous constraints. J Should Elb Surg. 2005, 14:174-178. 10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.031
- Foruria AM, Gutiérrez B, Cobos J, Haeni DL, Valencia M, Calvo E: Most coronoid fractures and fracture-dislocations with no radial head involvement can be treated nonsurgically with elbow immobilization. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019, 28:1395-1405. 10.1016/j.jse.2019.01.005
- Kekatpure AL, Aminata IW, Jeon IH, Rhyou IH, Lee HJ, Chun JM: Isolated coronoid fracture: assessment by magnetic resonance imaging for concomitant injuries. Indian J Orthop. 2016, 50:311-315.
Functional Outcome of Surgically Treated Isolated Coronoid Fractures With Elbow Dislocation in Young and Active Patients
Ethics Statement and Conflict of Interest Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent was obtained by all participants in this study. Departmental Review Board, Department of Orthopedics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India issued approval Clearance number: DRB/Ortho/2020/134. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Cite this article as:
Kumar D, Sodavarapu P, Kumar K, et al. (October 10, 2020) Functional Outcome of Surgically Treated Isolated Coronoid Fractures With Elbow Dislocation in Young and Active Patients. Cureus 12(10): e10883. doi:10.7759/cureus.10883
Peer review began: September 25, 2020
Peer review concluded: October 06, 2020
Published: October 10, 2020
© Copyright 2020
Kumar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.