The incidence of intracranial meningiomas increases with age. The standard of care treatment is complete surgical excision, followed by radiation therapy (RT) if indicated. However, six weeks of RT can be challenging for elderly or frail patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if short course RT is safe and effective in elderly patients with meningioma.
We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with meningioma treated with short course beam RT (5-15 fractions) at a single institution. Seventeen patients (94%) received 4005 cGy over 15 fractions and one patient (6%) received 2500 cGy over five fractions. Study endpoints were treatment toxicity (edema), progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Eighteen patients with histologically proven (n = 12) or radiologically presumed meningioma (n = 6, presumed grade I) were identified. Median age at treatment was 85 years (66-95 years). There were eight, eight and two patients with grade I, II and III tumours, respectively. Eight patients (44%) had radiologic edema prior to RT. Six (33%) required dexamethasone treatment during RT and the dose was increased during RT for two patients. Fourteen patients had reduced or no edema post-RT and 13 patients had stable or improving symptoms post-RT. Six patients had disease progression (five in-field, one out-of-field). Median PFS was 3.3 and 0.9 years for grade I and II/III tumours, respectively (p = 0.014). Median OS was 3.3 and 2.5 years for grade I and II/III tumours, respectively (p = 0.12).
Short course RT for elderly patients with meningioma is well-tolerated and can offer disease control for some patients, particularly those with grade I tumours.
Intracranial meningiomas originate from the meninges and are classified into three grades according to the World Health Organization (I, II or III) . Grade I tumors are slow-growing and are often found incidentally by CT or MRI [2,3]. The incidence of meningiomas increases with age, with the highest incidence in individuals age 80 or older [4,5].
The standard of care treatment for meningiomas is complete surgical excision, followed by radiation therapy (RT), which is indicated in cases of higher-grade histology, subtotal resection, and/or recurrence [6,7]. For unresectable lesions or lesions with high expected morbidity with a surgical approach, definitive RT is the standard treatment . However, neurosurgical intervention or fractionated radiation treatment (up to six weeks) can be challenging for elderly or frail patients. A systematic review of hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) revealed high local control of 90% or higher, as well as a low probability of late toxicities (10%) . However, there is little reported data regarding hypofractionated RT in elderly or frail patients with meningioma.
The primary objective of this study was to determine if hypofractionated external beam RT treatment is well tolerated in elderly patients with meningioma and to report early clinical outcomes of this treatment.
Materials & Methods
This was a retrospective, single-institution cohort study of patients with a histologically proven or radiologically diagnosed intracranial meningioma treated with short course, hypofractionated external beam radiotherapy (5-15 fractions) at the Princess Margret Cancer Centre in Toronto, Canada from 2006 to 2019. Patients who received conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (1.8-2 Gy) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for meningioma were excluded. Eligible patients were identified using the clinical radiotherapy record-and-verify system. The study was approved by the research ethics board of the University Health Network.
Elderly or frail patients who were deemed intolerant of conventionally fractionated RT over six weeks and also unsuitable for SRS (large tumour size >3 cm or atypical/anaplastic histology) were offered hypofractionated RT. Photon external beam therapy was used for all patients. Patients were simulated using CT with MR registration. The gross tumour volume included all viable tumour and tumour bed (if post-operative). A clinical target volume of 0-5 mm was applied (0 mm if no surgery, 5 mm if post-operative). A planning target volume of 3 mm was used with daily cone-beam CT image guidance, or 5 mm without. RT was delivered using inverse-planned intensity modulated radiotherapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy. Almost all patients received 40 Gy in 15 fractions (one patient received 25 Gy in five fractions).
The study database was closed on August 1, 2019 for analysis. Study endpoints were treatment toxicity (radiologic or symptomatic edema), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Baseline characteristics and frequencies were reported descriptively. Comparison of continuous values was done using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Median follow-up was determined by reversing the censoring variable. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS from the first day of hypofractionated RT. Survival comparisons were made using the log-rank test. Cumulative incidence of local failure (LF) was estimated, after stratifying by tumor grade; deaths without known disease progression were treated as a competing event. Comparisons of LF were done using Gray’s test. Living patients or those lost-to-follow-up were censored. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (Cary, NC, USA). Calculations for equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) were done using the linear-quadratic equation with the RBApp tool .
Eighteen patients were included in the analysis (Table 1); there were nine females and nine males. All patients received hypofractionated, short course radiotherapy (RT), as part of definitive treatment of histologically proven meningioma (n = 12) or radiologically presumed meningioma (n = 6). The median age at the time of RT was 85 years (range 66-95). Twelve had previous surgery while four had previous radiotherapy, all for primary intracranial meningioma. Most individuals received 40 Gy in 15 fractions; one patient received 25 Gy in five fractions due to advanced age (95 years), as this individual desired a shorter treatment regimen.
Eight patients (44%) had radiological edema prior to radiotherapy. A total of six patients required dexamethasone treatment before, during or after RT. In two patients, the dose of dexamethasone was increased during RT to control neurologic symptoms of edema. Fourteen patients had reduced or no edema post RT. Thirteen patients had stable or improving symptoms post RT. Median disease volume was 75 cc and 28 cc in those who did or did not require dexamethasone at any time (p = 0.14). There was no clear association between parafalcine location and edema post RT.
Six patients had disease progression (five in-field, and one out of-field recurrence). The crude rate of disease progression was 33%. Upon progression, two patients were observed, two patients had surgery, one was referred to palliative care, and one who had out of field progression received another course of RT; this individual (patient 7) remains alive without evidence of disease, 3.7 years after the first course of RT. All patients completed the prescribed course of irradiation; however, patient 2 died after the last fraction of RT in the context of a lower gastrointestinal bleed with concomitant thrombocytopenia and suspected immune thrombocytopenia.
Median follow-up was 3.5 years. Median time-to-progression after RT was 3.3 and 0.9 years for those with grade I and II/III tumours, respectively (p = 0.014; Figure 1). One-year PFS was 88% and 50% for grade I and II/III tumours, respectively.
At the time of database closure, 10 patients were alive; none were lost to follow-up. Eight were living without disease while two remained alive with disease progression after RT. Median survival for patients with meningioma grade I and II/III after RT was 3.3 and 2.5 years, respectively (p = 0.12), with one-year OS of 100% and 70% for grade I and II/III tumours (Figure 2). Three-year OS was 60% and 28% for grade I/II tumours, respectively. Two patients died due to meningioma; one patient died of stroke. Cause of death was not available for five remaining patients. All deceased patients except one patient had disease volume of at least 36 cc. Both patients with anaplastic (grade III) meningioma had died.
Estimates of local failure are presented in Figure 3. There was a higher cumulative incidence of local failure with grade II/III tumours, but this did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.20).
This study evaluated the outcomes of frail or elderly patients treated with hypofractionated, short-course RT for histologically proven or radiologically presumed meningioma. Patients with grade II/III experienced poor PFS and OS, while those who had RT for grade I meningioma experienced longer PFS. Individuals with grade II/III histology may have a higher incidence of local failure, but this did not achieve statistical significance due to our small sample size. Nonetheless, we believe that hypofractionated RT had temporary, palliative benefit for those with grade II/III tumours in this challenging-to-treat patient subgroup. The data from this study are valuable because they demonstrate the efficacy of short course, hypofractionated RT radiotherapy in preventing symptom progression and achieving disease control in a majority of elderly patients, particularly those with grade I tumours.
There are limited prior reports on the use of hypofractionated RT for meningioma, though none have focused exclusively on the elderly subgroup and most had evaluated 5-fraction regimens. Nguyen et al. performed a systematic review of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and found low rates of late toxicity and high grades of crude local control . Radiologic response was reported; 96% of tumors treated remained stable or decreased in size, while an increase in size occurred in 4%. However, duration of follow-up, like the present study, was short. Chung et al. reviewed and compared stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for grade I meningioma; they found that both treatments were comparable, with a correlation between tumor volume and probability of complications . There was a lack of consensus regarding the best dose-fractionation regimen for meningioma, as there have been no prospective randomized trials comparing different dose fractionations. Thus, we have based decisions about RT dose-fractionation on tumor and patient factors that include: age and performance status, previous irradiation, comorbidities, tumor volume, and intent of treatment.
The hypofractionated regimens used for the patients in this study provide a slightly lower or similar biologically effective dose as compared to conventional dose schedules, such as 50 Gy in 25 fractions or 54 Gy in 30 fractions. A comparison of the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) is shown in Table 2. Assuming an alpha/beta (α/β) ratio of 2 or 3 for a slow growing, indolent tumor such as meningioma, the abbreviated regimens appear to have slightly lower or similar EQD2.
To our knowledge, this is the first published study of short course, hypofractionated RT focused on elderly patients with meningioma. In elderly patients with glioblastoma, 40 Gy in 15 fractions was non-inferior to 60 Gy in 30 fractions . A summary of selected studies on hypofractionated RT for meningioma is provided in Table 3. Haghighi et al. demonstrated that hypofractionated radiotherapy was safe, with low rates (3%) of cranial nerve (CN) deficit, and the possibility that RT could improve pre-existing CN deficit in patients with meningioma . Maranzano et al., in an update of previous work published by Trippa et al. , suggested that moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy was a reasonable treatment in patients with recurrent and inoperable meningioma ; moreover, their finding of poorer outcomes with atypical meningiomas is consistent with our present work.
Our cohort included patients with larger tumour volumes (median 30 cc) in comparison with the other studies listed in Table 2. The cohorts by Haghighi et al.  and Gorman et al.  included very small median tumor volumes and had the highest PFS; on the other hand, Maranzano et al.  included bigger tumor volumes and had lower PFS, which is consistent with our results. The relation between tumor volume and symptom control demonstrated an inverse relationship in all studies except one (Maranzano et al. ). Thus, hypofractionated RT may be best suited to patients with small tumors, as this may optimize disease control while keeping the risk of toxicity low. Although our study is limited by a small sample size and few patients with long-term follow-up, our data nonetheless demonstrate early safety and feasibility of hypofractionated RT in very elderly patients, as the median age of patients in our study is at 20-30 years older than the median ages in other studies. Future work should aim to better determine clinical factors that make patients most suited to hypofractionated RT (as compared to surgery or conventionally fractionated RT), as well as inclusion of data from multiple institutions to increase generalizability of study findings.
In conclusion, we demonstrate that hypofractionated RT is a feasible treatment option for elderly patients with meningioma to minimize the burden of repeated treatment visits. This treatment was well tolerated and can offer disease control for many patients, particularly those with grade I tumors.
- Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et al.: The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016, 131:803-820. 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1
- Butts AM, Weigand S, Brown PD, Petersen RC, Jack CR Jr, Machulda MM, Cerhan JH: Neurocognition in individuals with incidentally-identified meningioma. J Neurooncol. 2017, 134:125-132. 10.1007/s11060-017-2495-8
- Islim AI, Kolamunnage-Dona R, Mohan M, et al.: A prognostic model to personalize monitoring regimes for patients with incidental asymptomatic meningiomas. Neuro Oncol. 2020, 22:278-289. 10.1093/neuonc/noz160
- Walker EV, Davis FG: Malignant primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in Canada from 2009 to 2013. Neuro Oncol. 2019, 21:360-369. 10.1093/neuonc/noy195
- Nakasu S, Hirano A, Shimura T, Llena JF: Incidental meningiomas in autopsy study. Surg Neurol. 1987, 27:319-322. 10.1016/0090-3019(87)90005-x
- Brastianos PK, Galanis E, Butowski N, et al.: Advances in multidisciplinary therapy for meningiomas. Neuro Oncol. 2019, 21:i18-i31. 10.1093/neuonc/noy136
- Rogers L, Zhang P, Vogelbaum MA, et al.: Intermediate-risk meningioma: initial outcomes from NRG Oncology RTOG 0539. J Neurosurg. 2017, 129:35-47. 10.3171/2016.11.JNS161170
- Moraes FY, Chung C: Radiation for skull base meningiomas: review of the literature on the approach to radiotherapy. Chin Clin Oncol. 2017, 6:3. 10.21037/cco.2017.06.08
- Nguyen EK, Nguyen TK, Boldt G, Louie AV, Bauman GS: Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial meningioma: a systematic review. Neurooncol Pract. 2019, 6:346-353. 10.1093/nop/npy053
- Tsang DS, Townsend C, Cao X, Szumacher E: RBApp: creation and patterns of use of an educational mobile application for radiobiology calculations in radiation therapy. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2015, 46:215-222. 10.1016/j.jmir.2015.03.001
- Chung LK, Mathur I, Lagman C, et al.: Stereotactic radiosurgery versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in benign meningioma. J Clin Neurosci. 2017, 36:1-5. 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.10.009
- Roa W, Brasher PM, Bauman G, et al.: Abbreviated course of radiation therapy in older patients with glioblastoma multiforme: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004, 22:1583-1588. 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.082
- Haghighi N, Seely A, Paul E, Dally M: Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for benign intracranial tumours of the cavernous sinus. J Clin Neurosci. 2015, 22:1450-1455. 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.03.026
- Trippa F, Maranzano E, Costantini S, Giorni C: Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial meningiomas: preliminary results of a feasible trial. J Neurosurg Sci. 2009, 53:7-11.
- Maranzano E, Draghini L, Casale M, Arcidiacono F, Anselmo P, Trippa F, Giorgi C: Long-term outcome of moderate hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for meningiomas. Strahlenther Onkol. 2015, 191:953-960. 10.1007/s00066-015-0915-2
- Gorman L, Ruben J, Myers R, Dally M: Role of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in treatment of skull base meningiomas. J Clin Neurosci. 2008, 15:856-862. 10.1016/j.jocn.2007.05.020
- Kaul D, Budach V, Wurm R, Gruen A, Graaf L, Habbel P, Badakhshi H: Linac-based stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery in patients with meningioma. Radiat Oncol. 2014, 9:78. 10.1186/1748-717X-9-78
Short Course Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Frail or Elderly Patients With Meningioma
Ethics Statement and Conflict of Interest Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent was obtained by all participants in this study. University Health Network issued approval 18-5741. This retrospective study was reviewed and approved by the University Health Network research ethics board. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: Nasim Sarhan received partial salary support from King Hussein Cancer Center (Amman, Jordan). Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Cite this article as:
Sarhan N, Abduljabbar L, Laperriere N, et al. (June 13, 2020) Short Course Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Frail or Elderly Patients With Meningioma. Cureus 12(6): e8604. doi:10.7759/cureus.8604
Received by Cureus: May 22, 2020
Peer review began: May 28, 2020
Peer review concluded: June 06, 2020
Published: June 13, 2020
© Copyright 2020
Sarhan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.