Implantable pacemakers have been the mainstay of therapy for patients with severely decreased left ventricular ejection fractions and recurrent arrhythmias, among other cardiac pathology. Twiddler’s syndrome (TS) is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening complication of pacemaker therapy, defined as pacemaker malfunction in the setting of device lead dislodgment due to physical manipulation. Traditionally, there are three distinct TS variants (reeling, ratchet and coiling). This case offers evidence of a unique and new variant of TS, severe recurrent erosive subtype with pacemaker externalization.
Implantable pacemakers have been the mainstay of therapy for patients with severely decreased left ventricular ejection fractions, recurrent arrhythmias and other cardiac pathology since their initial implementation in the late 1950s . Shortly after, Twiddler’s syndrome (TS) was first described; it is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening complication of pacemaker therapy . TS is defined as pacemaker malfunction in the setting of device lead dislodgement due to physical manipulation . The majority of these patients, regardless of TS variant (reeling, ratchet or coiling), are diagnosed within the first year of implantation . This case offers evidence of a unique and new variant of TS, severe recurrent erosive subtype with pacemaker externalization, which resulted in multiple pacemaker insertion site adjustments.
The patient is a 56-year-old man with a pertinent past medical history of non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction of 46.4%, recovered from 10%) secondary to uncontrolled permanent atrial fibrillation status post failed direct cardioversion and pharmacologic rate control, requiring atrioventricular node ablation and biventricular pacemaker placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy (October 2017).
Shortly after pacemaker implantation, the patient experienced discomfort with significant pruritus at the insertion site. Persistent picking at the site eventually led to mild cellulitis, which was treated with a course of oral clindamycin and cephalexin. Unfortunately, after total resolution of the soft tissue infection, the patient continued to experience discomfort at the pacemaker site. The patient described an aching, burning, cramping and sharp shooting pain in the left anterior chest wall. Eventually, due to significant persistent symptoms, not improved with physical therapy and pharmacologic therapies, the patient underwent pacemaker pocket revision (March 2018). Again, the patient continued to experience pruritus at the site, persistently picking at the pacemaker daily, leaving large excoriations throughout the anterior chest wall. Over the coming months, the patient was admitted again for anterior chest wall cellulitis, eventually discharged with an oral course of doxycycline and experiencing total resolution of all cellulitic changes. The patient's picking behaviors persisted throughout the year, leading up to presentation at an urgent care center (October 2018) for significant erythema and pain at the pacemaker site. The urgent care physician placed the patient on oral clindamycin, with instructions to follow up with his primary care provider within the coming days to ensure resolution.
Soon after, the patient then presented to the emergency department with concerns over a “ruptured boil” and possible exposure of the pacemaker (November 2018). On presentation, the patient reported significant rubor, calor and dolor at the pacemaker site, with intermittent fevers and chills, over the past one month. The patient denied any other symptoms, including chest pain, shortness of breath, palpitations, lightheadedness and syncope. The patient was afebrile and otherwise hemodynamically stable. The patient's cardiac rhythm was paced, with no obvious pacemaker malfunction. Serologic studies only revealed mild leukocytosis. Examination was striking, revealing total cutaneous erosion and pacemaker exposure, with surrounding cellulitic changes and purulent discharge (Figure 1).
The patient was started on broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotic therapy with vancomycin and piperacillin/tazobactam. Infectious disease and cardiology were promptly consulted. The pacemaker was explanted and replaced in the right anterior chest wall (Figure 2).
Blood and wound cultures returned positive for pan-sensitive Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antibiotic therapy was narrowed to intravenous cefazolin 2 g three times daily, and eventually transitioned to oral cefadroxil 500 mg twice daily for 14 days. The patient experienced a full recovery and was documented as doing well at an outpatient follow-up appointment, although picking behaviors continue and the patient refuses to follow up with psychiatry or psychology.
TS was first described in 1968, only one decade after the first implantable pacemaker [1,2]. Although TS is uncommon, presenting in 0.07%-7% of patients, it is described as a catastrophic malfunction of implantable permanent pacemaker (PPM) therapy and should be considered in all patients [4,5]. As stated above, TS is defined as pacemaker malfunction in the setting of device lead dislodgement due to physical manipulation . In most cases, whether unintentional or deliberate, this is due to the rotation of the pacemaker within the skin pocket causing coiling and/or retraction of the leads. Patients who are elderly, obese, female or have existing psychiatric illness are at increased risk [4,6,7]. The relative size of the subcutaneous pocket compared to the implanted device, PPM or implantable cardioverter defibrillator, is also critical.
Many subtypes of TS have been described in the literature. Reel syndrome is a variant characterized by the winding or reeling of a pacemaker, eventually causing lead displacement and extraction. It is identified by the repetitive rotational movement about the Z-axis. Reel syndrome has typically been associated with increased subcutaneous pacemaker pocket size and repetitive manipulation [8,9]. Ratchet syndrome, like reel syndrome, involves rotational movement about the Z-axis; however, it is suspected that an oscillating movement is implicated in the gathering of pacer leads, as opposed to continuous rotational forces . Others have also described a coiling variant, with rotation about the Y-axis within the pacemaker pocket. Combination of these variants has also been reported . In the case detailed above, lead dislodgement and pacemaker failure were not present. Pacemaker extraction and replacement were primarily due to persistent patient picking of the pacemaker, eventually causing subcutaneous erosion and soft tissue infection. We have termed this severe variant erosive TS. It is important to note that although it is common for pacemaker leads to become extracted during pacemaker manipulation, lead advancement is also possible . TS has also been noted with other implantable devices, like spinal cord and vagal nerve stimulators [13-15].
When treating patients with TS, it is important to evaluate for psychiatric conditions, as many correlations have been documented with OCD and other picking disorders [16,17]. Implantable device shape should be considered, as elongated devices have been linked with spontaneous rotation . When re-implantation of a device is necessary, the addition of antimicrobial therapy to the device pouch or envelope may reduce rates of infection . Some have also suggested a dual anchoring technique, along with non-absorbable sutures .
TS was initially defined as pacemaker malfunction in the setting of device lead dislodgement, as a result of physical manipulation. It is now known that any accessible subcutaneous implantable device can be affected. Known TS variants (reeling, ratchet and coiling mechanisms) have been well documented throughout the medical literature, and have the potential for occurring in combination. We have presented an additional variant related to persistent pacemaker site picking, which we have termed erosive TS. When evaluating any patient with TS, it is essential to evaluate for comorbid psychiatric conditions, as it has been known to be associated with obsessive-compulsive disorder and other picking disorders. Treatment typically includes device extraction and re-implantation. During re-implantation, additional measures can be taken to reduce recurrence, including dual anchoring and use of non-absorbable sutures, along with antimicrobial device envelopes.
- Chardack W, Gage A, Greatbatch W: A transistorized, self-contained, implantable pacemaker for the long-term correction of complete heart block. Surgery. 1960, 48:643-654.
- Bayliss C, Beanlands D, Baird R: The pacemaker-Twiddler's syndrome: a new complication of implantable transvenous pacemakers. Can Med Assoc J. 1968, 99:371-373.
- Sharif M, Inbar S, Neckels B, Shook H: Twiddling to the extreme: development of Twiddler syndrome in an implanted cardioverter-defibrillator. J Inv Cardiol. 2005, 17:195-196.
- Fahraeus T, Hijer C: Early pacemaker Twiddler syndrome. Eurospace. 2003, 5:279-281. 10.1016/s1099-5129(03)00032-1
- Hill P: Complications of permanent transvenous cardiac pacing: a 14-year review of all transvenous pacemakers inserted at one community hospital. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1987, 10:564-570. 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1987.tb04521.x
- Castillo R, Cavusoglu E: Twiddler’s syndrome: an interesting cause of pacemaker failure. Cardiology. 2006, 105:119-121. 10.1159/000090213
- Gupta R, Lin E: Twiddler syndrome. J Emerg Med. 2004, 26:119-120. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2003.05.003
- Khalilullah M, Khanna S, Gupta U, Padmavati S: Pacemaker twiddler’s syndrome: a note on its mechanism. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1979, 20:95-100.
- Terzi R, Hutchin P: The migrating electrode. Complication of transvenous electrical pacing of the heart. Ann Thorac Surg. 1968, 6:458-462. 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)66053-5
- Iftikhar H, Saleem M, Nadeem M, Caplan J, Kaji A: A presentation of Twiddler's syndrome with underlying ratchet mechanism. Cureus. 2019, 11:e4060. 10.7759/cureus.4060
- Carrizo A, Hong P, Amit G, Healey J: Double Twiddle trouble, a new variant of Twiddler syndrome. J Arrhythm. 2016, 32:236-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joa.2016.02.008
- Ahmed F, Luckie M, Goode G: An unusual case of combined classic and reverse Twiddler's syndrome. Can J Cardiol. 2013, 29:1015.e9-1015.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2012.12.006
- Al-Mahfoudh R, Chan Y, Chong H, Farah J: Twiddler's syndrome in spinal cord stimulation. Acta Neurochir. 2016, 158:147-154. 10.1007/s00701-015-2627-x
- Byung-chul S, Jin-gyu C, Sang-woo H: Twiddler's syndrome: a rare hardware complication in spinal cord stimulation. Asian J Neurosurg. 2018, 13:403-406. 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_147_16
- Trout A, Larson D, Mangano F, Gonsalves C: Twiddler syndrome with a twist: a cause of vagal nerve stimulator lead fracture. Pediatr Radiol. 2013, 43:1647-1651. 10.1007/s00247-013-2736-8
- Moliz N, Katati M, Iañez B, García A, Yagui E, Horcajadas Á: Twiddler's syndrome in a patient with obsessive-compulsive disorder treated with deep brain stimulation. Neurocirugía. 2015, 26:196-199. 10.1016/j.neucir.2014.11.001
- Jaafari N, Bachollet M, Paillot C, et al.: Obsessive compulsive disorder in a patient with Twiddler's syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009, 32:399-402. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.02251.x
- Gul E, Boles U, Haseeb S, et al.: Spontaneous Twiddler's syndrome: the importance of the device shape. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017, 40:326-329. 10.1111/pace.12974
- Osoro M, Lorson W, Hirsh J, Mahlow W: Use of an antimicrobial pouch/envelope in the treatment of Twiddler's syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018, 41:136-142. 10.1111/pace.13259
- Sobstyl M, Ząbek M, Brzuszkiewicz-Kuźmicka G, Pasterski T: Dual anchor internal pulse generator technique may lower risk of Twiddler's syndrome: a case series and literature review. Neuromodulation. 2017, 20:606-612. 10.1111/ner.12581
Erosive Twiddler’s Syndrome: A Severe Case with Externalization of the Pacemaker
Ethics Statement and Conflict of Interest Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent was obtained by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
The authors thank Oscar Valencia for text formatting and Rosaria Jordan for image manipulation.
Cite this article as:
Stuart R, Gilbert Z, Valencia D N (March 29, 2020) Erosive Twiddler’s Syndrome: A Severe Case with Externalization of the Pacemaker. Cureus 12(3): e7458. doi:10.7759/cureus.7458
Received by Cureus: March 16, 2020
Peer review began: March 18, 2020
Peer review concluded: March 26, 2020
Published: March 29, 2020
© Copyright 2020
Stuart et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.