Coronary artery disease (CAD) constitutes a significant health hazard in middle-aged individuals in Saudi Arabia. We sought to assess the level of knowledge of cardiovascular risk factors and describe the perception of coronary intervention among the general population in the city of Jeddah in the western part of Saudi Arabia.
A cross-sectional study was conducted in the city of Jeddah during the period from April 2019 to September 1, 2019, by using a structured online questionnaire to assess the participants’ awareness of risk factors for CAD and coronary intervention. The survey included questions about socio-demographic data, risk factors of cardiovascular diseases, symptoms of heart attack, knowledge of coronary catheterizations, as well as resources of knowledge about coronary heart disease.
The study included 984 participants. The majority of the participants had university diplomas (78.1%). Only 38.5 % were healthcare workers. Dyslipidemia and smoking were identified by 70.5% and 66.7%, respectively, as a recognized risk factor for CAD. Diabetes was mentioned by 32.1%. Participants without CAD risk factors had a significantly lower level of knowledge regarding the strong association between diabetes mellitus (DM) II and CAD (p-value=0.02). Healthcare professionals had a significantly lower level of knowledge regarding cardiac catheterization as compared to non-healthcare professionals. A higher percentage of healthcare professionals would agree to have cardiac catheterization if indicated (p-value=0.003). Awareness campaigns were the most common source of information for the public.
The current level of knowledge of CAD in the western part of Saudi Arabia is fair. National awareness campaigns are required to improve the level of healthcare education.
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are considered the leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. They are regarded as the primary cause of extended hospital stays and increased healthcare costs [1-5]. More people die annually from CVDs than from any other cause. An estimated 17.9 million people died from CVDs in 2016, representing 31% of all global deaths. Of these deaths, 85% were due to heart attacks and stroke. Over three-quarters of CVD deaths take place in low and middle-income countries. Based on epidemiological data, cardiovascular diseases will remain the leading cause of mortality and morbidity throughout the next decade [2-7]. The mean age for developing CAD in the Middle East is 10 years younger than the mean age of their western counterparts [2-8]. The prevalence of CAD risk factors among Saudi patients with established CAD is alarming; however, many of these are modifiable risk factors [9-11]. In Saudi Arabia, despite the widespread availability of hospitals with a catheterization laboratory, there are fewer patients treated with a primary percutaneous intervention . The baseline knowledge about CVD among the general population has a significant public impact in developing targeted educational programs . Knowledge of CVDs, its symptoms, and its risk factors have been studied worldwide in various populations . Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of data in Saudi Arabia on the perception of the Saudi public of coronary artery disease (CAD) and coronary catheterization. Therefore, this study aims to examine the level of knowledge and perception of the public towards coronary artery disease and its treatment in an attempt to generate educational programs to reduce the CVDs burden.
Materials & Methods
This was a cross-sectional study conducted at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, during the period from April 2019 to September 1, 2019. This was achieved through voluntary participation in an online survey questionnaire that was constructed in the Arabic language. Participants were asked to distribute the survey to their friends and relatives.
The sample size was calculated assuming that we are targeting a sample from only the city of Jeddah, which has an estimated total population of four million inhabitants, with a 99% confidence level and a 5% margin of error; the sample size was determined to be 665 respondents. All volunteer participants who were able to complete the online survey were included. Participants younger than 18 years of age and who could not or did not complete the survey were excluded. The questionnaire was adapted and modified from a previous survey by Almalki et al. . We collected sociodemographic characteristics, assessments of awareness of CAD risk factors, coronary angiography, and CAD treatment. Socioeconomic variables were participants’ age, sex, nationality, marital status, employment, education, and income. Family and personal medical histories, such as diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, and dyslipidemia (high cholesterol or triglycerides levels) were collected as well. Awareness of CAD risk factors was assessed through yes or no questions asking whether or not the participants believed certain factors were considered risk factors for CAD. The survey also included questions on symptoms of a heart attack, information about cardiac catheterization, and resources of information about coronary artery disease (See Table 1 for complete survey questions). The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki. It received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of King Abdullah International Medical Research Center.
The results of this survey are mainly descriptive of the perception and knowledge of CAD and cardiac catheterization in a contemporary sample from Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. In this survey, data were reported mostly in the form of frequencies and the percentage of respondents. Categorical variables were analyzed by χ2 (chi-square) or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for ordinal variables. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher exact test to evaluate the significance of some of the survey results. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant. All statistical analysis and assessment of the model’s performance were conducted using the R-Software, version 3.3.0 (R Project for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) .
There were 984 responders to the study survey. The participants were well-educated and relatively young. There were 54.5% females. The majority had university diplomas or higher (78.1%). Two-thirds of the participants were younger than 45 years of age. The prevalence of CAD risk factors among the study group was low; 9.6% had type two diabetes, 9.2 % had hypertension, 7.7% had dyslipidemia, and 18.2 % were smokers. Only 3.9% of the study group had CAD; 38.5% of the cohorts were health care workers (Table 2).
The following responses to the questions on heart attack were obtained; 92.2% had heard of the term. Most participants (almost 82%) were able to differentiate between heart attack and cardiac arrest. Three-quarters mentioned that patients who suffered a heart attack could live normally. Almost two-thirds of the participants would not wait for emergency services arrival and would immediately drive themselves to the nearest hospital if they suffered a heart attack. Nearly three-quarters of the participants (72%) believed that a heart attack could occur in a person younger than the age of 30 (Table 3).
Responses to the coronary artery disease risk factors were as follows: 70.5% of the participants agreed that dyslipidemia is a risk factor for coronary artery disease, followed by smoking (66.7%), while diabetes was recognized by only 32.22% of the respondents. Five percent of the participants did not know CAD risk factors, as shown in Figure 1.
The participants’ perception of the symptoms of a heart attack is shown in Figure 2. Of the responders, 74.3% revealed that chest pain or heaviness is a common symptom of a heart attack, followed by dyspnea (59.1%), loss of consciousness (59.1%), sweating (39.4%), palpitations (34%), and jaw pain (36.2%). Other associated symptoms like nausea and vomiting were mentioned. Only 13% of responders did not know the common symptoms of a heart attack.
Figure 3 shows the perception of the diagnostic tests by the participants. Sixty-four percent mentioned that an electrocardiogram is the best test, followed by a stress test, imaging, and coronary angiography. Fifty-six percent of the cohort agreed that cardiac catheterization and coronary intervention are the best treatment for CAD, followed by anticoagulants (51.8%) and then thrombolytics (44.9) while only 17.2% were unaware of any treatment options (Figure 4).
Thirty percent were able to know the difference between diagnostic and therapeutic catheterization. Out of the 984 participants, 47.3% thought that cardiac catheterization is performed by a cardiac surgeon and 16.5% thought that it is done by an interventional cardiologist. Contrast use during the procedure was mentioned by 61.7%. Catheterization access was reported to be the arm or thigh blood vessels by 60.8%. Five percent thought it is done through the chest wall directly into the heart and 3.4% thought it was through the mouth. The majority of the participants (78.3%) would agree to have a cardiac catheterization if needed while 4.5% did not agree and 17.0% were ambivalent about whether to accept or not (Table 4).
We attempted to assess the difference in perception of cardiac disease risk factors and symptoms between respondents who had at least one cardiac risk factor (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, or smoking) as compared to respondents who had no cardiac risk factors. It was counterintuitive to notice that more participants who had CAD risk factors had poor knowledge of heart attack symptoms, as shown in Table 5. Interestingly, when assessing common cardiac risk factors, there were no differences between the two groups except that respondents who had no cardiac risk factors were less likely to think that diabetes is a recognized risk factor for cardiac disease (p-value=0.012). When we evaluated the knowledge of respondents on the most common cardiac symptoms, there were no differences except in nausea and vomiting. Respondents who had at least one cardiac risk factor were more likely to consider nausea and vomiting as a symptom of cardiac disease (p-value= 0.002) (Table 5).
Because almost 40% of the respondents were health care workers, we sought to determine whether they have a better knowledge of coronary catheterization as compared to the general public. Table 6 demonstrates the responses to the questions with regard to coronary catheterizations. Non-healthcare workers had better knowledge on several points. Health care workers had a higher rate of choosing the “Do not Know” answer (Table 6). Additionally, more healthcare professionals will agree to have a cardiac catheterization if indicated (p-value= 0.005).
Finally, participants were required to choose the source of information about CAD and cardiac catheterization. Fifty-three point five percent received their knowledge from health awareness campaigns while only 6.9% received their information from books, as shown in Figure 5.
The young population of Saudi Arabia is undergoing significant economic changes that have translated into the adoption of a Western dietary lifestyle that has led to a significant increase in the burden of cardiovascular diseases . However, adequate baseline knowledge of CAD risk factors is lacking. Improved public awareness is associated with greater personal awareness and increased actions to lower CVD risk . Knowledge related to heart disease has been associated with health promotion behaviors [19-20]. The study demonstrated fair knowledge of CAD risk factors and the role of coronary catheterization.
The majority of participants with or without CAD risk factors assumed that DM is the least likely to lead to the development of CAD. Participants without risk factors had significantly lower knowledge of the association between DM and CAD (p-value= <0.05). In contrast, many have recognized that dyslipidemia, hypertension, and smoking are risks for developing CAD. The study demonstrated poor knowledge of heart attack symptoms among patients with risk factors for CAD. While healthcare workers are more likely to accept undergoing coronary catheterization when required, they, had lower knowledge of aspects of cardiac catheterization as compared to non-healthcare professionals. Awareness campaigns seemed to be the most favorable source of information when learning about coronary heart disease and coronary catheterization among the population studied.
Almalki et al., in a recent study from Jeddah, reported a deficient level of awareness of CAD risk factors, DM, smoking, and lack of physical activity were identified by only 12%, 26%, and 39% of participants, respectively .
De Oliveira et al., in a small study, showed that patients were perplexed in differentiating between therapeutic and diagnostic coronary angiograms. They have reported heightened fear and anxiety among patients who had coronary catheterization; this was attributed to a lack of adequate knowledge of the procedure .
On the other hand, Tait et al., in a study that included 151 patients who underwent a pre-catheterization educational program, reported an improved understanding of the procedure, which resulted in better patient experience . It is clear that educational programs are needed to spread knowledge and enhance the public awareness of the risk factors of CAD and its treatment in order to be effective in reducing the overwhelming burden of this devastating disease.
The present study has many limitations: voluntary self-reporting of risk factors, lack of questioner validation, and high response from the younger age group with a high level of education, which might not be representative of the entire social spectrum. All these factors limit the generalizability of the survey.
CAD disease is a significant health issue globally. Prevention can be achieved through the better control of the risk factors of atherosclerosis. Improved public knowledge will favorably contribute to the adoption of a better lifestyle that lessens the burden of CAD. Our study showed an explicit limited knowledge of CAD risk factors, symptoms, methods of diagnosis, and treatment among the Western population of Saudi Arabia. Additionally, it showed a lack of proper awareness of the role of coronary angiography and coronary interventions. Decision-makers in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia are required to enhance public awareness through campaigns and screening programs.
- Sanchis-Gomar F, Perez-Quilis C, Leischik R, Lucia A: Epidemiology of coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndrome. Ann Transl Med. 2016, 4:256. 10.21037/atm.2016.06.33
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Prevalence of coronary heart disease-United States, 2006-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011, 60:1377-1381.
- Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al.: Heart disease and stroke statistics—2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017, 135:e146-e603. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485
- Berry JD, Dyer A, Cai X, et al.: Lifetime risks of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2012, 366:321-329. 10.1056/NEJMoa1012848
- Nsour M, Mahfoud Z, Kanaan MN, Balbeissi A: Prevalence and predictors of nonfatal myocardial infarction in Jordan. East Mediterr Health J. 2008, 14:818-830.
- Zeidan RK, Farah R, Chahine MN, Asmar R, Hosseini H, Pascale Salameh P, Pathak A: Prevalence and correlates of coronary heart disease: first population-based study in Lebanon. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2016, 12:75-84. 10.2147/VHRM.S97252
- World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). (2017). Accessed: November 27, 2019: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds).
- Mendis S, Puska P, Norrving B: Global Atlas on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Control. World Health Organization, Geneva; 2011.
- Traina MI, Almahmeed W, Edris A, Tuzcu EM: Coronary heart disease in the Middle East and North Africa: current status and future goals. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2017, 19:24. 10.1007/s11883-017-0659-9
- Al Habib KF, Hersi A, Al Faleh H, et al.: Baseline characteristics, management practices, and in-hospital outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes: results of the Saudi project for assessment of coronary events (SPACE) registry. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2011, 23:233-239. 10.1016/j.jsha.2011.05.004
- Bugami SA, Rana B, Raneem H, et al.: Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention among patients with coronary artery disease in Saudi Arabia (single center study). J Cardiol Curr Res. 2019, 12:55-58.
- Alhabib KF, Kinsara AJ, Alghamdi S, et al.: The first survey of the Saudi Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Program: main results and long-term outcomes (STARS-1). PLoS One. 2019, 14:0216551. 10.1371/journal.pone.0216551
- Jafary FH, Aslam F, Mahmud H, et al.: Cardiovascular health knowledge and behavior in patient attendants at four tertiary care hospitals in Pakistan - a cause for concern. BMC Public Health. 2005, 5:124. 10.1186/1471-2458-5-124
- Rahman M, Akter S, Zohora FT, Shibly AZ: Public knowledge of cardiovascular disease and its risk factors in Tangail, Bangladesh: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2019, 6:1838-1842. 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20191799
- Almalki MA, AlJishi MN, Khayat MA, Bokhari HF, Subki AH, Alzahrani AM, Alhejily WA: Population awareness of coronary artery disease risk factors in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Int J Gen Med. 2019, 12:63-70. 10.2147/IJGM.S184732
- R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2017.
- Ahmed AM, Hersi A, Mashhoud W, Arafah MR, Abreu PC, Al Rowaily MA, Al-Mallah MH: Cardiovascular risk factors burden in Saudi Arabia: the Africa Middle EastCardiovascular Epidemiological (ACE) study. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2017, 29:235-243. 10.1016/j.jsha.2017.03.004
- Bassiony MM: Smoking in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2009, 30:876-881.
- Mosca L, Jones WK, King KB, Ouyang P, Redberg RF, Hill MN: Awareness, perception and knowledge of heart disease risk and prevention among women in United States. Arch Fam Med. 2000, 9:506-515. 10.1001/archfami.9.6.506
- Mosca L, Mochari H, Christian AH, et al.: National study of women’s awareness, preventive action and barriers to cardiovascular health. Circulation. 2006, 113:525-534. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.588103
- de Oliveira Castro YT, Rolim IL, Silva AC, Silva LD: Knowledge and meaning of cardiac catheterization from the perspective of cardiac patients. Rev Rene. 2016, 17:29-35. 10.15253/2175-6783.2016000100005
- Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Chetcuti SJ, Brennan-Martinez C, Levine R: Enhancing patient understanding of medical procedures: evaluation of an interactive multimedia program with in-line exercises. Int J Med Inform. 2014, 83:376-384. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.011
The Perception of Coronary Artery Disease and Cardiac Catheterization in Saudi Arabia: “What the Public Know”
Ethics Statement and Conflict of Interest Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent was obtained by all participants in this study. King Abdullah International Research Center issued approval H-01-R-005. The study was approved by King Abdullah International Research Center; it met all required conditions. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Cite this article as:
Albugami S, Al-Husayni F, Bakhsh L, et al. (January 05, 2020) The Perception of Coronary Artery Disease and Cardiac Catheterization in Saudi Arabia: “What the Public Know”. Cureus 12(1): e6570. doi:10.7759/cureus.6570
Received by Cureus: December 29, 2019
Peer review began: January 02, 2020
Peer review concluded: January 03, 2020
Published: January 05, 2020
© Copyright 2020
Albugami et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 3.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.