Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is a common injury among young and physically active persons. Evaluating surgical outcomes clinically and radiographically is widely accepted, but it is not known which clinical tests or radiological indicators are the most important. Our hypothesis is that there is a significant correlation between clinical and radiological findings and outcomes after the early surgical treatment of Tossy type III ACJ dislocation.
Materials and methods
A retrospective study was conducted on 23 patients who underwent early surgical treatment after Tossy type III ACJ dislocation. We used the constant score (CS) and the simple shoulder test (SST) to measure the outcomes. For clinical evaluation, Paxinos, O’Brien’s, Bell-van Riet’s, and horizontal adduction tests were used. Standard A-P view radiographs were evaluated for redislocation, ACJ arthrosis, coracoclavicular (CC) space ossification, and for the presence of osteolysis.
The mean time of follow-up was 16 months (range, 12-22 months). During the follow-up, all patients had one or more pathological radiological signs. All clinical tests were negative in 12 patients, seven had one positive test, three had two positive tests, and one had three positive tests. The mean CS result at the follow-up was 93.44 ± 4.90 (range, 84-100), and the mean SST result was 10.78 ± 1.51 (range, 6-12). There was no statistically significant association between the CS results and either shoulder tests or radiological findings. The SST results were statistically significantly lower for patients with positive O’Brien’s test compared to those with a negative one. In contrast, the SST results were statistically significantly higher for patients with CC space ossification, compared to those who did not have this radiological sign. Other clinical tests and radiological findings did not have any associations with the SST results.
We found that positive O’Brien’s test was associated with worse outcomes of early surgical treatment after Tossy type III ACJ dislocation. Despite the presence of pathological radiological signs, patients may have good or even perfect clinical outcomes after the early surgical treatment of a Tossy type III injury.
Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is a common injury among young people between 20 and 40 years old who practice sports, and it has an incidence of between 9% and 17% of all shoulder injuries [1-6]. The pattern of this trauma is a direct force to the acromion with the arm in an adducted position . ACJ dislocations were classified for the first time in 1963 by Tossy from type I to type III according to the injury pattern of the acromioclavicular (AC) and coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments [8,9]. Later, the classification was expanded by Rockwood and Green to types I to VI [4,9-11]. It is widely accepted that type I-II injuries should be treated conservatively, and type IV-VI surgically [3-5,12-15]. The treatment of Rockwood type III injuries remains an object for debate: some studies advocate surgical treatment whilst others do not see a significant difference between surgical and conservative approaches, and highlight that each case should be treated individually [13,14,16]. At the time of writing this article no single surgical technique is accepted as a standard for the treatment of ACJ dislocation. Moreover, there are more than 100 surgical procedures described in the literature which makes it more difficult to compare clinical results . There is evidence in the literature that clinical tests are a valuable tool to investigate the ACJ pathology [17,18]. However, it is not known which of the clinical signs are associated with worse outcomes after the early surgical treatment of ACJ dislocation.
The aim of the present study is to investigate which clinical and radiological findings are the most important for evaluating the outcomes of early surgical treatment after Tossy type III ACJ dislocation. Our hypothesis is that there is a significant correlation between clinical and radiological findings and outcomes after early surgical treatment.
Materials & Methods
Patients and clinical assessment
Over a one-year period, 29 patients with acute complete ACJ dislocation were admitted to the Republican Vilnius University Hospital in Vilnius, Lithuania, and were included in this retrospective study after the approval of the Ethics committee of the hospital. Informed consent was obtained from each study participant. All of the patients had a Tossy type III injury and underwent open ACJ fixation. The characteristics of the Tossy and Rockwood classifications are presented in Table 1.
In all cases, the time between trauma and surgery was less than three weeks. In cases of ACJ fixation with metal implants, all patients were investigated after the hardware had been removed.
Of the 29 patients, 23 (79%, 22 men and one woman) participated in the clinical and radiological follow-up, as two patients refused to participate in the follow-up and four patients were out of reach and could not be contacted. The mean follow-up time after the initial injury was 16 months (range, 12-22 months). ACJ was remedied by suture loop in 16 cases, by hook plate in two cases, and by tension band wire in five cases. The surgeries were performed by two experienced surgeons who are not co-authors of the present study. Each patient was invited to evaluate the outcomes of these procedures using the constant score (CS, maximal result - 100) and the simple shoulder test (SST, maximal result - 12) questionnaires. A digital dynamometer (Kern & Sohn GmbH, Balingen, Germany) was used to evaluate the abduction strength of operated and healthy shoulders. Four shoulder tests were used for clinical evaluation: horizontal adduction, O’Brien’s, Paxinos, and Bell-van Riet’s [17,18]. The horizontal adduction test is performed by the examiner, who stands behind the patient on the side being tested. The examiner then grasps the patient’s arm at an elbow in a slightly distal position, passively flexes the patient’s shoulder to 90 degrees, and then maximally adducts the patient’s shoulder (bringing it across their body towards the other shoulder). For O’Brien’s test, the arm to be tested should be in 90 degrees of flexion and approximately 10 degrees of adduction. The patient then internally rotates the arm, pronating at the elbow and essentially pointing the thumb to the ground. The examiner provides a downward force distally on the arm, while the patient resists with an upward force. Bell-van Riet’s test is performed similarly to O’Brien’s test, with the key difference being that the patient’s arm is in full adduction (as far as possible across the chest). The Paxinos test is performed with the patient sitting with the symptomatic arm by their side. The examiner's thumb is then placed under the posterolateral aspect of the acromion, and the index and middle fingers of the same (or contralateral) hand are placed superiorly to the mid-clavicle. Pressure is then applied to the acromion in an anterosuperior direction with the thumb, while also applying pressure in an inferior direction to the mid-clavicle with the index and middle fingers. All of the above described tests are considered to be positive if pain is provoked.
Each patient underwent a postoperative radiographic examination. Standard A-P radiograms were performed and evaluated for recurrent dislocation (according to Tossy), osteolysis of the acromial end of the clavicle, ossification of the CC space, and ACJ arthrosis (Figures 1, 2).
IBM SPSS Statistics v23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) software was used for statistical analysis. MS Excel software was used for additional calculations. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess the normal distribution of SST and CS results. For the comparison between groups, the two tests were employed. Student’s t-test was used for parametric variables, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for non-parametric variables.
Of the 23 patients that participated, 22 (96%) were male and one (4%) was female. The mean age was 35.43 ± 10.45 years. During the follow-up, all patients had one or more radiological signs. Eight patients had Tossy type I dislocation, seven patients had Tossy type II, and one patient had Tossy type III. Additionally, 11 had signs of ACJ arthrosis, in seven cases osteolysis of the distal clavicle was present, and six patients had radiological signs of CC space ossification (Table 2).
All clinical shoulder tests were negative in 12 patients, seven had one positive test, three had two positive tests, and one had three positive tests. The mean CS result at the follow-up was 93.44 ± 4.90 (range, 84-100), and the mean SST result was 10.78 ± 1.51 (range, 6-12). The mean abduction power in a healthy shoulder was 11.85 ± 1.81 kg (range, 7.88-15.00 kg), compared to 10.37 ± 2.11 kg (range, 6.17-14.90) in injured shoulder. There were no statistically significant differences in CS results between positive and negative clinical shoulder tests and radiological findings (Table 3).
SST results were statistically significantly lower for patients with positive O’Brien’s test compared to a negative one (8.33 ± 2.52 vs. 11.15 ± 0.93, respectively, p = 0.046). In contrast, SST results were statistically significantly higher for patients with CC space ossification compared to those who did not exhibit this radiological sign (11.29 ± 1.07 vs. 10.00 ± 1.80, respectively, p = 0.016). The differences of SST results between other positive and negative clinical shoulder tests and radiological findings were not statistically significant. More detailed results are presented in Table 4.
The differences of both CS and SST results between Tossy types at the time of the follow-up were not statistically significant.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report about the relationship between specific shoulder tests and the outcomes of operative treatment after Tossy type III ACJ dislocation. The present study showed that positive O’Brien’s test was associated with worse outcomes in SST scores only, while other clinical shoulder tests did not reveal such an association. Moreover, the presence of CC space ossification was associated with better outcomes in SST scores, whereas the presence of other pathological radiological signs was not correlated with significant changes in outcomes. In fact, despite the presence of pathological radiological signs patients may have good or even perfect outcomes after early surgical treatment. This finding is consistent with similar phenomena described in the literature (Table 5).
Furthermore, the presence of CC space ossification was found to increase the stiffness of the surgical reconstruction, and is associated with better clinical outcomes as higher grade ossification possibly increases the stiffness of ACJ fixation [4,15,22]. The same phenomenon was observed in the present study. However, the influence of redislocation and osteolysis of the acromial end of the clavicle on the treatment outcomes remains unclear.
From the biomechanical aspect, all described tests produce direct or indirect compression to the ACJ, which causes pain in unhealthy joint. Only Paxinos test is based on direct compression by pushing the patient’s acromion in the anterosuperior direction with the thumb, and the clavicle in the posteroinferior direction with the index and middle fingers. Furthermore, there is evidence in the literature that a positive Paxinos test combined with a positive bone scan is the best predictor for ACJ pathology . However, we did not find this test to be associated with worse outcomes after ACJ fixation. Horizontal adduction, O‘Brien’s, and Bell-van Riet’s tests are based on indirect compression to the ACJ. The scapula is driven or rotated towards the midline by the horizontal adduction of the arm in the horizontal adduction test, and O‘Brien’s and Bell-van Riet’s tests additionally involve internal rotation and forced elevation, which creates an additional compression through the supraspinatus muscle. Since O‘Brien’s and Bell-van Riet’s tests have an additional compression, these tests have been found to have a high sensitivity to ACJ pathology . However, we found that only O‘Brien’s test was associated with worse treatment outcomes.
Our institution gives priority to the surgical treatment of Rockwood type III injury for younger and physically active individuals or manual labor workers. Considering that Tossy III consists of Rockwood III-VI and the majority of our patients are young and active, in clinical work we prefer the Tossy classification. It would probably be more beneficial to use the Rockwood classification in clinical work because recent literature defines the Rockwood classification as a gold standard for grading ACJ dislocations, and shows excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability for acute ACJ dislocations .
There is a wide spectrum of opinions regarding the point in time that defines early and delayed surgical treatment [4,20,21,23-27]. The dividing line has been described across the literature as two, three, four, or even six weeks after the injury. Song et al. performed a literature review of acute and delayed surgical treatment outcomes and concluded that three weeks is the most clinically relevant dividing line, as acute pain generally disappears between two and three weeks after the ACJ dislocation . We believe that the three-week point provides a solid foundation for further research. Were future studies to proceed on this basis, the comparability of all further work would be greatly enhanced as all references to "early" or "delayed" would refer to the same period of time.
There are some limitations of the present study. To begin, three fixation techniques were used: tensions band wire, CC interval fixation by suture loops, and hook plate. Furthermore, the surgical procedures were performed by two different surgeons. Both factors potentially had an influence on clinical outcomes. On the other hand, we did not aim to evaluate different reconstruction techniques or the performances of different surgeons. The main interest of this study was the evaluation of post-traumatic sequelae of the ACJ.
We found that positive O’Brien’s test was associated with worse treatment outcomes of early surgical treatment after Tossy type III ACJ dislocation. Despite the presence of pathological radiological signs, patients may have good or even perfect clinical outcomes after early surgical treatment of Tossy type III injury.
- Eschler A, Gradl G, Gierer P, Mittlmeier T, Beck M: Hook plate fixation for acromioclavicular joint separations restores coracoclavicular distance more accurately than PDS augmentation, however presents with a high rate of acromial osteolysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012, 132:33-39. 10.1007/s00402-011-1399-x
- Eschler A, Rösler K, Rotter R, Gradl G, Mittlmeier T, Gierer P: Acromioclavicular joint dislocations: radiological correlation between Rockwood classification system and injury patterns in human cadaver species. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014, 134:1193-1198. 10.1007/s00402-014-2045-1
- Mares O, Luneau S, Staquet V, Beltrand E, Bousquet P-J, Maynou C: Acute grade III and IV acromioclavicular dislocations: outcomes and pitfalls of reconstruction procedures using a synthetic ligament. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010, 96:721-726. 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.06.004
- Motta P, Bruno L, Maderni A, Tosco P, Mariotti U: Acromioclavicular motion after surgical reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012, 20:1012-1018. 10.1007/s00167-011-1627-5
- Rosslenbroich SB, Schliemann B, Schneider KN, et al.: Minimally invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with a flip-button technique (MINAR): clinical and radiological midterm results. Am J Sports Med. 2015, 43:1751-1757. 10.1177/0363546515579179
- Lim Y, Sood A, Riet R van, Bain G: Acromioclavicular joint reduction, repair and reconstruction using metallic buttons: early results and complications. Tech Shoulder Elb Surg. 2007, 8:213-221. 10.1097/BTE.0b013e3181578965
- Babhulkar A, Pawaskar A: Acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014, 16:33-39. 10.1007/s12178-013-9199-2
- Tossy JD, Mead NC, Sigmond HM: Acromioclavicular separations: useful and practical classification for treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1963, 28:111-119.
- Woodmass JM, Esposito JG, Ono Y, et al.: Complications following arthroscopic fixation of acromioclavicular separations: a systematic review of the literature. Open Access J Sports Med. 2015, 6:97-107. 10.2147/OAJSM.S73211
- Fauci F, Merolla G, Paladini P, Campi F, Porcellini G: Surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular dislocation with biologic graft vs synthetic ligament: a prospective randomized comparative study. J Orthop Traumatol. 2013, 14:283-290. 10.1007/s10195-013-0242-2
- Schneider MM, Balke M, Koenen P, et al.: Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the Rockwood classification in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016, 24:2192-2196. 10.1007/s00167-014-3436-0
- Li H, Wang C, Wang J, Wu K, Hang D: Restoration of horizontal stability in complete acromioclavicular joint separations: surgical technique and preliminary results. Eur J Med Res. 2013, 18:42. 10.1186/2047-783X-18-42
- Sastre S, Dada M, Santos S, Lozano L, Alemany X, Peidro L: Acute acromioclavicular dislocation: a cheaper, easier and all-arthroscopic system. Is it effective in nowadays economical crisis?. Acta Orthop Belg. 2015, 81:161-164.
- Smith TO, Chester R, Pearse EO, Hing CB: Operative versus non-operative management following Rockwood grade III acromioclavicular separation: a meta-analysis of the current evidence base. J Orthop Traumatol. 2011, 12:19-27. 10.1007/s10195-011-0127-1
- Song T, Yan X, Ye T: Comparison of the outcome of early and delayed surgical treatment of complete acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016, 24:1943-1950. 10.1007/s00167-014-3225-9
- Beitzel K, Cote MP, Apostolakos J, et al.: Current concepts in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2013, 29:387-397. 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.11.023
- Walton J, Mahajan S, Paxinos A, et al.: Diagnostic values of tests for acromioclavicular joint pain. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004, 86:807-812. 10.2106/00004623-200404000-00021
- van Riet RP, Bell SN: Clinical evaluation of acromioclavicular joint pathology: sensitivity of a new test. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011, 20:73-76. 10.1016/j.jse.2010.05.023
- Tienen TG, Oyen JFCH, Eggen PJGM: A modified technique of reconstruction for complete acromioclavicular dislocation: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2003, 31:655-659. 10.1177/03635465030310050401
- Ejam S, Lind T, Falkenberg B: Surgical treatment of acute and chronic acromioclavicular dislocation Tossy type III and V using the hook plate. Acta Orthop Belg. 2008, 74:441-445.
- Rolf O, Hann von Weyhern A, Ewers A, Boehm TD, Gohlke F: Acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood III-V: results of early versus delayed surgical treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008, 128:1153-1157. 10.1007/s00402-007-0524-3
- Scheibel M, Dröschel S, Gerhardt C, Kraus N: Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations. Am J Sports Med. 2011, 39:1507-1516. 10.1177/0363546511399379
- Dumontier C, Sautet A, Man M, Apoil A: Acromioclavicular dislocations: treatment by coracoacromial ligamentoplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995, 4:130-134. 10.1016/s1058-2746(05)80067-9
- Kany J, Amaravathi RS, Guinand R, Valenti P: Arthroscopic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction using a synthetic ligament device. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2012, 22:357-364. 10.1007/s00590-011-0856-0
- Kovilazhikathu Sugathan H, Dodenhoff RM: Management of type 3 acromioclavicular joint dislocation: comparison of long-term functional results of two operative methods. ISRN Surg. 2012, 2012:580504. 10.5402/2012/580504
- von Heideken J, Boström Windhamre H, Une-Larsson V, Ekelund A: Acute surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation type V with a hook plate: superiority to late reconstruction. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013, 22:9-17. 10.1016/j.jse.2012.03.003
- Weinstein DM, McCann PD, McIlveen SJ, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU: Surgical treatment of complete acromioclavicular dislocations. Am J Sports Med. 1995, 23:324-331. 10.1177/036354659502300313
The Relationship Between the Clinical and Radiological Findings and the Outcomes of Early Surgical Treatment After Tossy Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation
Ethics Statement and Conflict of Interest Disclosures
Human subjects: Consent was obtained by all participants in this study. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Cite this article as:
Masionis P, Bobina R, Ryliskis S (January 16, 2020) The Relationship Between the Clinical and Radiological Findings and the Outcomes of Early Surgical Treatment After Tossy Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation. Cureus 12(1): e6681. doi:10.7759/cureus.6681
Received by Cureus: December 24, 2019
Peer review began: December 24, 2019
Peer review concluded: January 13, 2020
Published: January 16, 2020
© Copyright 2020
Masionis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 3.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.