Human factors and systems factors can affect surgical performance, including the operating room (OR) environment, teamwork and communication, technology and equipment, tasks and workload factors, and organizational variables.
Patient safety is a new healthcare discipline that emphasizes the reporting, analysis, and prevention of medical errors that often lead to adverse healthcare events.
We are highlighting a potential error and hazardous situation, which may occur due to the difficulty in reading the embossed letters of some ampoules because of the typeface of these ampoules. This problem is particularly important in the ORs, which require special sterile conditions.
We are adding a simple step to help in the differentiation between plastic, embossed ampoules. This simple and easy-to-do step makes it possible for accurate and correct identification, without jeopardizing the safety of the patients and health care professionals.
Historically, surgical outcomes have been attributed primarily to the technical skills of the surgeon and the medical condition and comorbidities of the patients. Recently, many studies have reported that the surgical outcome is not only affected by these two factors and that other factors can contribute to the outcome of the surgery, such as the work system factors, the human factor, the operating room (OR) environment, teamwork, and communication .
While the precise incidence and epidemiology of medical mistakes still elicit debate, all can agree that human errors are inevitable in any endeavor. Errors typically have little to no consequence and often go unnoticed, but, occasionally, they translate into an adverse event. In the medical setting, this may be reflected in prolonged hospital stays, morbidities, or mortalities .
One potential mistake is to use the wrong medication because of similar ampoule shapes and colors. A wide range of plastic, embossed ampoules, including those containing local anesthetics, potassium, and saline, have poor contrast between the typeface and background, presenting a challenge for accurate and easy identification. Here, we propose a simple step to help in the differentiation between these ampoules.
Medicine labels must be clear, legible, and easily read to prevent mistakes . Local anesthetics are commonly used agents in surgery and radiological procedures. They are usually administered in a sterile or aseptic environment, with the scrub nurse holding the ampoule for the surgeon to crosscheck its expiry date and content.
As a consequence of poor visibility, the ampoule is typically held close to the surgeon. What follows thereafter is not uncommon: the scrub nurse will fidget with the ampoule to enable the label to be read, or the surgeon will want to hold the ampoule, which is usually not sterile. This is a potentially risky situation where it presents the opportunity for a sharps injury or infection.
We find that dipping the clear plastic, embossed ampoule in a readily available povidone-iodine antiseptic solution at the start of the procedure, or when needed, improves contrast and reading (Figure 1) and renders the vial sterile. This conveniently improves the ampoule’s readability and reduces the potential for error.
Improving patient safety is an increasing priority for surgeons and hospitals, as sentinel events can be catastrophic for patients, caregivers, and institutions. The World Health Organization (WHO) is making a great effort to put updated guidelines to ensure patient safety in the OR.
The administration of a wrong medication is a known source of error. This has resulted in devastating consequences to the patients and has affected the health care professionals and hospitals.
One of the reasons for this common and potentially fatal error is using the wrong medication because of similar ampoule shapes and colors. A wide range of plastic, embossed ampoules, including those containing local anesthetics, potassium, and saline, resulting in poor contrast between the typeface and background, presenting a challenge for accurate and easy identification.
In the OR, the surgeons and medical staff are responsible for ensuring the administration of the correct medication to the patients. However, similar ampoules and difficult-to-read typefaces increase the risk of compromising the sterility of the surgical table as well as injury to the personnel. By adding a simple step to help in the differentiation between ampoules and improve the visualization of the script, we could help avoid this common error.
Safety in the OR is an important issue in any hospital, as it involves the safety of the working personnel facing occupational hazards in the OR as well as the safety of the patients. We find that dipping the clear, plastic, embossed ampoule in readily available povidone-iodine antiseptic solution at the start of the procedure, or when needed, improves contrast and reading and renders the vial sterile. This conveniently improves the ampoule’s readability and reduces the potential for error.
- ElBardissi AW, Sundt TM: Human factors and operating room safety. Surg Clin North Am. 2012, 92:21-35. 10.1016/j.suc.2011.11.007
- Shouhed D, Gewertz B, Wiegmann D, Catchpole K: Integrating human factors research and surgery. A review. Arch Surg. 2012, 147:1141-1146. 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.596
- James RH, Rabey PG: Illegibility of drug ampoule labels. BMJ. 1993, 307:658-659. 10.1136/bmj.307.6905.658
Simple Step Add-in to Improve Patient Safety: A Technical Note
Ethics Statement and Conflict of Interest Disclosures
Human subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve human participants or tissue. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Cite this article as:
Elgabaly E A, Alshryda S, Alfuqaha H, et al. (January 07, 2020) Simple Step Add-in to Improve Patient Safety: A Technical Note. Cureus 12(1): e6592. doi:10.7759/cureus.6592
Received by Cureus: December 30, 2019
Peer review began: December 31, 2019
Peer review concluded: January 04, 2020
Published: January 07, 2020
© Copyright 2020
Elgabaly et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 3.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.