"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

Margaret Mead
Original article
peer-reviewed

Presentation, Management, and Outcomes of Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas: An Experience from a Developing Country



Abstract

Objective

The goal of this study was to evaluate the presentation, management, and clinical outcome of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) in a tertiary care setup.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of patient records of 157 patients with the diagnosis of NFPA managed at Aga Khan University Hospital, a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017. We collected data on basic demographic characteristics, signs, and presenting symptoms, management, and outcomes. Data analysis was performed by using Stata, Version 12 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX).

Results

Most patients in the study were men (59%), and the mean age of the study population was 48 ± 14 years. The main presentations of NFPA were visual disturbance (77%) and headache (55%). In 78% of patients, the tumor was >1 cm on MRI. Most (87%) of patients underwent surgical resection, and of those, 93% received transsphenoidal surgery that was well tolerated. In the study population, 31% of patients had transient, 9% had permanent diabetes insipidus, and 25% developed hyponatremia. Of those in the study, 53% had low cortisol, 57% had hypothyroidism, and 27% needed sex hormone replacement after surgery. Residual tumor was confirmed in 43% of patients by postoperative MRI. Tumor recurrence and regrowth occurred in 17 patients and required repeat resection or radiosurgery.

Conclusion

In Pakistan, patients with NFPAs are more likely to present during the later stage, with larger adenoma and compressive symptoms compared to patients in developed countries. For the detection of residual disease and tumor recurrence, close screening and a multidisciplinary approach are needed after surgery.

Introduction

Adenomas of the pituitary gland are mostly benign neoplasms constituting 5% to 20% of all intracranial tumors [1]. The annual estimated incidence rate of pituitary adenoma is approximately 20 cases per 100,000 population, making these adenomas the third most common among primary intracranial tumors after gliomas and meningiomas [2].

Nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) account for approximately 15% to 30% of all adenomas of the pituitary gland [3,4]. NFPAs are characterized by the absence of biochemical and clinical evidence of pituitary hormonal overproduction [5]. The clinical presentation of NFPAs varies from completely asymptomatic to symptoms caused by the mass effect by the tumor resulting in a headache, visual disturbances, and pituitary apoplexy or with symptoms pituitary hormone deficiency. 

Transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) is recommended as the first-line treatment for patients with symptomatic NFPAs, especially in patients with visual field defects, as it leads to long-term tumor control in approximately 80% to 90% of patients and carries a low rate of mortality when performed by skilled surgeons [6-8]. Tumor resection rate after TSS is variable from 20% to 83%; approximately 50% of patients retain residual disease after surgery and need repeat surgery or radiation to decrease residual disease size, tumor regrowth, and recurrence [9].

The data regarding NFPAs in our population are inconsistent, and, to the best of our knowledge, there are no local data on the mode of presentation, endocrinal status, and management outcomes. The current study aims to evaluate the presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with NFPAs who presented to a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan.

Materials & Methods

This was a retrospective study conducted in Aga Khan University Hospital Karachi, one of the largest tertiary care hospitals in Pakistan. We reviewed the medical records of patients who were diagnosed with NFPAs and underwent surgery for pituitary adenoma at our hospital from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2017. The study protocol was approved by the ethics review committee of the university (ERC number 5379-Med-ERC-2018). To preserve confidentiality, we coded each patient and removed their original identification. Data were collected by the primary author and noted in a predefined questionnaire.

We started the file review from the most recent case and recorded the demographic data, including age and gender. We then evaluated medical records and collected data on the presenting concerns, preoperative MRI and biochemical workup, clinical indications for surgery, postoperative hemodynamic status, and hormonal deficiencies. For the outcomes, we reviewed inpatient and outpatient notes, presurgery and postsurgery laboratory results, and scans of patients’ follow-up at our hospital after their surgical procedures.

To be included in our study, patients had to be 18 years old or older, of either sex, with radiologically reported pituitary adenomas in the absence of any clinical and biochemical signs of hormone excess. We excluded all patients with the diagnosis of pituitary adenomas and with any of biochemical activity on hormonal workup.

Statistical analysis

Mean with standard deviation was reported for symmetrically distributed continuous variables while median with interquartile range was reported for asymmetrically distributed continuous variables. The normality of the continuous variable was assessed through histogram by plotting a normal density plot on the graph. Frequencies with percentages were reported for all categorical variables. All analyses were performed on Stata, Version 12 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX).

Results

The mean age of study participants with NFPAs was 48 ± 14 years (Figure 1). Most participants (59%) were men, and 55% presented with headache and 77% presented with visual disturbances. Several patients (11%) presented with symptoms of hypothyroid, while 10% were diagnosed with pituitary apoplexy, and 6% had symptoms of hypocortisolism. A small portion of the study population (1%) had symptoms of growth hormone deficiency, and 6% had symptoms of gonadotrophic deficiency.

On imaging, 78% of our total study population had macroadenoma (> 1.0 cm). Preoperative replacement of steroid, thyroxine, growth hormone and sex hormone among patients with nonpituitary adenomas was required in 17%, 29%, 1%, and 3%, respectively. A total of 137 (87%) study participants underwent surgical management for their pituitary adenomas. Among them, 127 (93%) underwent TSS while 10 (7%) had transcranial surgery-a decision based on the large size of the adenoma and consultation with the surgeon. Of 121 study participants who had visual disturbances, 83 (69%) had an improvement in their visual disturbances.

Most patients who underwent surgical management (n = 137; 87%) had some postoperative complications. Among them, 55 study participants (40%) had diabetes insipidus (DI; 31% had transient, and 9% had permanent), 34 (25%) had hyponatremia, 22 (16%) had leakage of cerebrospinal fluid, 17 (12%) had cranial nerve palsy, 73 (53%) had hypocortisolism, 78 (57%) had hypothyroidism, and 37 (27%) needed sex hormone replacement after surgery.

There were two postoperative mortalities within eight weeks of surgery as a result of pulmonary embolism. Among 137 participants who underwent surgery, 58 (43%) had a residual tumor. In addition to this, 77 study participants (57%) had no residual tumor, and 17 (22%) had tumor recurrence or regrowth. Of 75 cases who had a residual tumor and recurrence, 29 (39%) had their first repeat surgery while other patients refused further intervention. Among these 29 study participants, nine (31%) had their second repeat surgery. Of the 75 cases who had a residual tumor and recurrence, 13 received external radiation therapy (17%). Among 62 study participants who did not receive conventional radiation therapy, 10 (16%) underwent cyber/gamma knife procedure (Table 1).

S. No Variables Study participants with NFPAs (N =157) (%)
Presentation
1. Age (years)* 48 ±14
2. Gender Male = 93 (59%)
Female = 64 (41%)
3. Presenting with Headache Yes = 86 (55%)
No = 71 (45%)
4. Presenting with Visual Disturbances Yes = 121 (77%)
No = 36 (23%)
5. Pituitary Apoplexy Yes = 16 (10%)
No =141 (90%)
6. Presenting with Symptoms of Hypothyroid Yes = 17 (11%)
No = 140 (89%)
7. Presenting with Symptoms of Hypocortisolism Yes = 9 (6%)
No = 148 (94%)
8. Presenting with Symptoms of Growth Hormone Deficiency Yes = 2 (1%)
No = 155 (99%)
9. Presenting with Symptoms of Gonadotrophic Deficiency Yes = 9 (6%)
No = 148 (94%)
10. Tumor Size on Imaging Micro adenoma (< 1.0 cm) = 35 (22%)
Macro Adenoma (> 1.0 cm) = 122 (78%)
11. Steroid Replacement (Preoperative) Yes = 26 (17%)
No = 131 (83%)
12. Thyroxine Replacement (Preoperative) Yes = 46 (29%)
No = 111 (71%)
13. Growth Hormone Replacement (Preoperative) Yes = 1 (1%)
No = 156 (99%)
14. Sex Hormone Replacement (Preoperative) Yes = 5 (3%)
No = 152 (97%)
Management
15. Surgical Management Yes = 137 (87%)
No = 20 (13%)
16. Type of Surgery Trans sphenoidal Surgery = 127 (93%)
Trans cranial Surgery = 10 (7%)
Outcomes
17. Improvement in Visual Disturbances Yes = 83 (69%)
No = 38(31%)
18. Postoperative Complications
I. Diabetes Insipidus Yes = 55 (40%)
No = 82 (59.85%)
II. Hyponatremia Yes = 34 (24.8%)
No = 103 (75.18%)
III. Leakage of CSF Yes = 22 (16%)
No = 115 (84%)
IV. Cranial Nerve Palsy Yes = 17(12%)
No = 120 (88%)
V. Hypocortisolism Yes = 73 (53%)
No = 64 (47%)
VI. Hypothyroid Yes = 78 (57%)
No = 59 (43%)
VII. Sex Hormone Replacement Yes = 37(27%)
No = 100 (73%)
19. Postoperative Mortality (within 8 weeks) Yes = 2 (1%)
No = 135 (99%)
20. Residual Tumor Yes = 58 (43%)
No = 77 (57%)
21. Tumor Recurrence/Regrowth Yes = 17 (22%)
No = 60 (78%)
22. First Repeat Surgery Yes = 29 (39%)
No = 46 (61%)
23. Second Repeat Surgery Yes = 9 (31%)
No = 20 (69%)
24. External Radiation Therapy Yes = 13 (17%)
No = 62(83%)
25. Cyber/Gamma Knife Yes = 10 (16%)
No = 52(84%)

Discussion

NFPAs are complex in their presentation and management outcomes in our region, and more NFPAs were observed in males with a mean age of 48 years at initial clinical presentation. Our data regarding gender and age distribution at the time of initial presentation are consistent with a recent study in an Irani population [10]. Most of our study participants presented with visual field defects (77%) and headache (55%), consistent with most of the published series to date [11].

Pituitary hormone deficiency at the time of presentation was less common than what has been reported in some other studies [12,13]. Only 11% of our total study participants presented with symptoms of hypothyroid, 6% with symptoms of hypocortisolism and gonadotrophic deficiency, and only 1% had symptoms of growth hormone deficiency. Pituitary apoplexy was the presenting feature in 10% of our patients, a prevalence near that reported in other series [14].

Two-thirds of our patients had macroadenoma on first MRI scan, a slightly larger portion than that reported in the literature. It may be because of delay in health-seeking and poverty; as people with fewer resources may ignore their usual symptoms like headache and may not seek timely medical attention. Another factor contributing to delayed proper care is the unavailability of specialized healthcare like endocrine, neurosurgery and radiology setups in many cities of our country.

We observed decreased pituitary function after TSS, similar to a report from Korea [15]. However, the overall literature regarding the recovery of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis function after surgical resection of NFPAs is conflicting [16,17]. Several studies report a variable degree of improvement in pituitary gland function, whereas other studies could not demonstrate significant improvement in the function of the pituitary gland. We observed transient DI in 31% of the population, which is similar to that reported in the literature 20% to 30% [18]. Permanent diabetes insipidus was seen in 9%, which is a higher incidence compared to previous reports (up to 5%) [19]. This decrease in the pituitary function and higher incidence of DI in our study may be due to the large tumor size and presentation with compressive symptoms which may have cumulatively resulted in aggressive tumor resections.

The success of tumor resection surgery varies and depends directly on the experience and skills of the surgeon and inversely with the diameter and consistency of the tumor, its adhesion, and invasion [17,20]. The total tumor resection rate in the literature is highly variable from 20% to 83% with mean approximately 50% of patients having residual disease after surgery, as also observed in our study (43%) [9]. The reason for this high residual disease and decreased pituitary function after TSS in our study could be because of the large size of the tumor and the male majority of our study population as these two factors have been reported to be associated with high residual burden [21].

The recurrence/regrowth of the adenoma in our study was 22%, which falls within the reported 10% to 40% recurrence rate in other studies, depending on whether adjunctive radiotherapy was used or not [22,23].

TSS remained the treatment of choice in most study centers, especially in patients with visual symptoms and apoplexy because, through this treatment modality, immediate decompression of the optical pathways can be done. Improvement in vision has been observed in up to 80% of patients, which is slightly higher than what we found in our study (69%) [24].

Our results align with previous studies that indicate tumor resection through TSS has very low mortality and a low rate of major complications when performed by skilled neurosurgeons [25].

This was the first clinical report on NFPAs from a Pakistani population on patient presentation, management, and outcomes after surgery. Findings from this study allow for a comparison of the differences in management and outcomes of NFPAs with the other countries in this region due to variations in the availability of resources. Our study has some limitations due to the retrospective nature of the data collection, and in that, it was a single-center patient cohort and, therefore, not a true representation of the entire population. Also, serum antidiuretic hormone and immunohistochemical staining of surgical specimens were not available in our institute, which would have given a robust platform to analyze the study further.

Conclusions

In Pakistan, patients with NFPAs are more likely to present during a later stage with larger adenomas and compressive symptoms compared to patients in developed countries. TSS, if well planned, can be safe and efficacious for most patients with NFPAs, even in developing countries. For the detection of residual disease and tumor recurrence, close screening and a multidisciplinary approach are needed in the post-surgery period.


References

  1. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Liao P, et al.: CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007-2011. Neuro Oncol. 2014, 16:1-63. 10.1093/neuonc/nou223
  2. Day PF, Loto MG, Glerean M, Picasso MF, Lovazzano S, Giunta DH: Incidence and prevalence of clinically relevant pituitary adenomas: retrospective cohort study in a Health Management Organization in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2016, 60:554-561. 10.1590/2359-3997000000195
  3. Ntali G, Wass JA: Epidemiology, clinical presentation and diagnosis of non-functioning pituitary adenomas. Pituitary. 2018, 21:111-118. 10.1007/s11102-018-0869-3
  4. Delgado-Lopez P, Pi-Barrio J, Duenas-Polo M, Pascual-Llorente M, Gordón-Bolaños MC: Recurrent non-functioning pituitary adenomas: a review on the new pathological classification, management guidelines and treatment options. Clin Transl Oncol. 2018, 20:1233-1245. 10.1007/s12094-018-1868-6
  5. Huang W, Molitch ME: Management of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFAs): observation. Pituitary. 2018, 21:162-167. 10.1007/s11102-017-0856-0
  6. Wass JA, Reddy R, Karavitaki N: The postoperative monitoring of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011, 7:431-4. 10.1038/nrendo.2011.54
  7. Park P, Chandler WF, Barkan AL, Orrego JJ, Cowan JA, Griffith KA, Tsien C: The role of radiation therapy after surgical resection of nonfunctional pituitary macroadenomas. Neurosurgery. 2004, 55:100-106. 10.1227/01.neu.0000126885.71242.d7
  8. Lillehei KO, Kirschman DL, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Ridgway EC: Reassessment of the role of radiation therapy in the treatment of endocrine-inactive pituitary macroadenomas. Neurosurgery. 1998, 43:432-438. 10.1097/00006123-199809000-00020
  9. Cortet-Rudelli C, Bonneville JF, Borson-Chazot F, et al.: Post-surgical management of non-functioning pituitary adenoma. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2015, 76:228-238. 10.1016/j.ando.2015.04.003
  10. Najmaldin A, Malek M, Madani NH, et al.: Non-functioning pituitary macroadenoma: surgical outcomes, tumor regrowth, and alterations in pituitary function—3-year experience from the Iranian Pituitary Tumor Registry. Hormones. 2019, 18:1-9. 10.1007/s42000-019-00109-5
  11. Yildirim AE, Sahinoglu M, Ekici I, et al.: Nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas are really clinically nonfunctioning? clinical and endocrinological symptoms and outcomes with endoscopic endonasal treatment. World Neurosurg. 2016, 85:185-192. 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.08.073
  12. Carosi G, Malchiodi E, Ferrante E, et al.: Hypothalamic-pituitary axis in non-functioning pituitary adenomas: focus on the prevalence of isolated central hypoadrenalism. Neuroendocrinology. 2015, 102:267-273. 10.1159/000430815
  13. Molitch ME: Diagnosis and treatment of pituitary adenomas: a review. JAMA. 2017, 317:516-524. 10.1001/jama.2016.19699
  14. Vargas G, Gonzalez B, Ramirez C, et al.: Clinical characteristics and treatment outcome of 485 patients with nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas. Int J Endocrinol. 2015, 2015:756069. 10.1155/2015/756069
  15. Kim JH, Lee JH, Lee JH, Hong AR, Kim YJ, Kim YH: Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery outcomes in 331 nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma cases after a single surgeon learning curve. World Neurosurg. 2018, 109:409-416. 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.194
  16. Jahangiri A, Wagner JR, Han SW, et al.: Improved versus worsened endocrine function after transsphenoidal surgery for nonfunctional pituitary adenomas: rate, time course, and radiological analysis. J Neurosurg. 2016, 124:589-95. 10.3171/2015.1.JNS141543
  17. Roelfsema F, Biermasz NR, Pereira AM: Clinical factors involved in the recurrence of pituitary adenomas after surgical remission: a structured review and meta-analysis. Pituitary. 2012, 15:71-83. 10.1007/s11102-011-0347-7
  18. Chen L, White WL, Spetzler RF, Xu B: A prospective study of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: presentation, management, and clinical outcome. J Neurooncol. 2011, 102:129-138. 10.1007/s11060-010-0302-x
  19. Anagnostis P, Adamidou F, Polyzos SA, Efstathiadou Z, Panagiotou A, Kita M: Non-functioning pituitary adenomas: a single center experience. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2011, 119:314-319. 10.1055/s-0030-1267991
  20. Swearingen B: Update on pituitary surgery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012, 97:1073-1081. 10.1210/jc.2011-3237
  21. Brochier S, Galland F, Kujas M, et al.: Factors predicting relapse of nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas after neurosurgery: a study of 142 patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2010, 163:193-200. 10.1530/EJE-10-0255
  22. Dekkers O, Hammer S, De Keizer R, et al.: The natural course of non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007, 156:217-224. 10.1530/eje.1.02334
  23. Bradley K, Wass J, Turner H: Non‐functioning pituitary adenomas with positive immunoreactivity for ACTH behave more aggressively than ACTH immunonegative tumours but do not recur more frequently. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2003, 58:59-64. 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2003.01674.x
  24. Raverot G, Vasiljevic A, Jouanneau E: Prognostic factors of regrowth in nonfunctioning pituitary tumors. Pituitary. 2018, 21:176-182. 10.1007/s11102-017-0861-3
  25. Nomikos P, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R: The outcome of surgery in 668 patients with acromegaly using current criteria of biochemical 'cure'. Eur J Endocrinol. 2005, 152:379-387. 10.1530/eje.1.01863
Original article
peer-reviewed

Presentation, Management, and Outcomes of Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas: An Experience from a Developing Country


Author Information

Bhagwan Das Corresponding Author

Endocrinology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK

Sumera Batool

Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK

Adeel Khoja

Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK

Najmul Islam

Endocrinology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK


Ethics Statement and Conflict of Interest Disclosures

Human subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve human participants or tissue. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.


Original article
peer-reviewed

Presentation, Management, and Outcomes of Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas: An Experience from a Developing Country


Figures etc.

SIQ
7.5
RATED BY 3 READERS
CONTRIBUTE RATING

Scholary Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. Learn more here.