"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

Margaret Mead

Original article

Automated Stereotactic Gamma Ray Radiosurgery to the Pituitary Gland in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients with Opioid Refractory Pain



We report our initial series of terminally ill cancer patients treated with radiosurgery to the pituitary gland to alleviate pain.


A fully automated rotating gamma ray unit was used to deliver a high dose of radiation (150Gy) using an 8 mm collimator to the neurohypophysis in 11 patients suffering from opioid-refractory pain deriving from cancer.


From November 2016 to November 2018, 11 patients were treated, and 10 were eligible for follow-up evaluation. Pain from bone metastases was present in 70%; others suffered from neuropathic and visceral pain. The median survival was 119.7 days (range: 32 to 370). The visual analogue scale (VAS) was nine (7-10) and standardized to 10; eight patients (80%) responded. The average VAS at the time of response was three (range: 1-6), and the average time to response was 2.8 days (range: 2-5). In the first week, 40% of the patients categorized the result as 'excellent', 30% deemed the result 'good', and 20% reported the result as 'poor'. One patient (10%) referred to the result as 'regular'. Those who responded were able to reduce their medications by at least 25%. The one-month average VAS score was five (range: 1-6), 60% reported a 'good' effect, 20% reported 'excellent' results, and 20% had no response. Of the study participants, 60% maintained their level of medicine consumption at lower than baseline. At the end of life, five patients (50%) presented substantial pain, two (20%) never had a therapeutic effect, and three (30%) died without substantial pain. There were no clinical complications that could be attributed directly to the treatment. 


Radiosurgery to the pituitary gland is effective and safe and warrants further investigation to understand its potential role in palliative care in cancer patients.


Pain derived from cancer represents a heavy burden on patients, their families, and healthcare systems worldwide; even in economically advanced countries, refractory oncological pain is a challenge for palliative care [1-2]. Although there is no strict definition of 'refractory pain', some authors agree that chronic refractory pain in cancer is the persistent physical signs and symptoms associated with phenomena where surgical interventions, radiation, nerve blocks, physiotherapy, and opioids have failed (and are either not feasible or tolerated) [3]. These are terminally ill patients who are usually bedridden or whose mobility, daily activities, and quality of life are severely impaired directly by pain, sedation [1], or by the side effects caused by pain management treatments. Limited resource settings (as experienced in most of the world) impose a further toll on this set of patients among whom moderate to severe pain has been reported in more than half the population [4-5].

Hypophysectomy or induced lesions to the pituitary gland and the stalk have historically demonstrated adequate pain reduction in advanced cancer patients. Initially performed to prolong survival in hormonodependent metastatic cancer patients, more contemporary indications were focused mainly on alleviating pain [6-11]. The use of radiosurgery for this procedure dates to the studies by Hayashi and others who report attempts to alleviate pain in oncological and non-oncological patients. High levels (70% to 90%) of pain relief have been reported with apparently low complication rates [12-13]. There are current attempts to resurge this technique and to create randomized controlled trials to further validate its efficacy [14].

We report the first series of terminally ill patients that were treated for refractory oncological pain using stereotactic radiosurgery with a fully automated rotating gamma ray unit in a country categorized as a limited resource setting.

Materials & Methods

Patient selection

We conducted a prospective non-randomized trial of radiosurgical hypophysectomy for patients in palliative care suffering from cancer pain, refractory to opioid therapy in whom no reasonable alternative intervention therapy (such as surgery, radiation, or pain medication) was feasible. The trial was approved by the hospital’s ethical committee in November 2016. The inclusion criteria were patients with cancer-related pain categorized as severe (scoring 7-10) on the visual analog scale (VAS) despite the best medical algology practice and optimal opioid dosing, were 18 years or older with a life expectancy under six months, and their pain could derive from bone metastases or other organs affected by the disease. The cases were reviewed and approved by an ad-hoc committee that included a palliative care specialist and an algologist, oncologist, and radiation therapy and neurosurgery staff. The main endpoints of the study were the reduction of the VAS score by at least 50% and a reduction in opioid or pain medicine consumption.

Radiosurgical technique

Patients fasted six hours on the day of the procedure and were prepared for sedation by the anesthesiologist using local anesthesia. An Infini stereotactic frame (Masep Medical Company, Shenzhen, China) was placed by a neurosurgeon, and the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition was performed with a 1.5-tesla Avanto (Siemens Corporation. Erlangen, Germany). Normally, only one volumetric T1 of 1 mm to 1.5 mm slice thickness with no spacing of the head (apex to foramen magnum) was acquired; a contrast was added in one patient where metastatic lesions to the brain were also found. Images were transferred to the treatment planning station (TPS; Superplan; Masep Medical Company, Shenzhen, China). The organs at risk, which included the visual pathway and the brainstem, were contoured by neurosurgery; a single 8 mm collimator shot was placed to focus the isocenter of the shot on the neurohypophysis. Due to safety mechanisms specific to Superplan and the use of the prescribed high dose, we needed to place two shots in the same coordinates. The prescribed dose of 150 Gy to Dmax was administered to all patients with a gamma angle regularly fixed at 70°. The target was moved anteriorly or inferiorly as needed to comply with the organs at risk restrictions as stated by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 101 Report [15] (Figures 1-3).

Patients did not receive more than 8 Gy as a threshold dose to more than 0.2 cc of the visual pathway. Patients did not receive a maximum point exceeding 10 Gy, nor did they receive over 10 Gy as a threshold dose to more than 0.5 cc of the brainstem or a maximum point exceeding 15 Gy.

Patient follow-up

Patients were contacted 72 hours after the procedure and every 15 days until the time of death. The VAS was standardized with patients and caregivers to 10 on the day of treatment to facilitate registry. Expected complications such as severe electrolytic variations, increased urine output, or visual disturbances were explained to caregivers as reasons to consult in case of an event. We used Wilcox signed rank test to determine p-values.


From November 2016 to November 2018, 11 patients were enrolled and treated with radiosurgical hypophysectomy for intractable pain (Table 1); four patients had prostate cancer, four had breast cancer, two had cervicouterine cancer, and one had lung cancer. Eight study participants (72%) had multiple lesions and pain mainly emerging from bone, two had visceral pain from peritoneal shedding, and one had intractable combined neuropathic pain from brachial plexus involvement and metastatic disease. None of the patients were receiving any form of active treatment for their cancer given their advanced disease staging made them ineligible for treatment. One patient was lost to follow-up. Thus, the results from the remaining 10 were registered. All patients were receiving opioids (80% morphine injections, 20% opiate derivatives) at the time of treatment with a mean of daily medicine intake for pain at 12.5 times per day (range: 10 to 15 times per day), including antidepressants, neuromodulators benzodiazepine, and non-steroidal regular pain medicine.

Patient Primary cancer Bone metastases Age (years) VAS at treatment VAS at response Time elapsed for pain reduction (days) Perception of treatment effect Reduction of medicine and “pain rescue” at least 25% VAS at one month Perception of treatment effect at one month Reduction of medicine and “pain rescue” at least 25% at one month Died with pain Pain recurrence before death Time from treatment to death (days)
1 Prostate Yes 78 10 2 2 Excellent Yes 1 Excellent Yes No 0 38
2 Prostate Yes 49 10 3 3 Good Yes 5 Good Yes Yes Last weeks 125
3 Breast Yes 66 10 5 4 Regular Yes 6 Good Yes No 0 34
4 Prostate Yes 67 10 1 2 Good Yes 3 Good No Yes Last weeks 113
5 Cervix No 58 10 10 0 Poor No 10 Poor No Yes Never went away 87
6 Lung No 57 10 10 0 Poor No 10 Poor No Yes Never went away 93
7 Breast No 44 10 2 2 Excellent Yes 4 Good No Yes Last days 128
8 Prostate Yes 74 10 4 5 Good Yes 5 Good Yes Yes Last weeks 370
9 Breast Yes 62 10 2 3 Excellent Yes 1 Excellent Yes Yes Last days 108
10 Prostate Yes 92 10 3 3 Excellent Yes 4 Good Yes No 0 30
Median   70% 64 10 3 3   80% 5   60% 70%   119.7

The average treatment time was 68.9 minutes (range: 63 to 89 minutes). One patient’s treatment lasted 159 minutes as multiple posterior fossa metastases where treated. The median survival was 119.7 days (range, 32 to 370 days). Mean VAS before treatment was nine (range: 7-10) and was standardized to 10 on the day of treatment. Eight patients (80%) presented a reduction of at least 50% of their initial pain, and the average VAS at the time of response was three (range: 1-6; p=0.013). The average time to response was 2.8 days (range: 2-5 days) after treatment, and 40% of the series categorized their result as 'excellent' (i.e., with minimal to no pain), 30% considered the treatment as 'good' (i.e., pain was adequately managed with medications), and 20% rated the treatment as 'poor' (no response). One patient (10%) referred to the treatment as 'regular' because the pain was alleviated less than 50% and there was significant pain despite the medications. Of those who responded, all reduced medications to five daily intakes (range, five to thirteen times per day; p=0.013) by at least 25% (actual reduction, 60%).

After 30 days, the VAS was five (range: 1-6; p=0.014), and 60% categorized the effect as 'good'. Among participants, 20% reported 'excellent' results, and 20% did not respond. At that time, 60% of the patients maintained their level of medicine consumption lower than baseline (mean: 7.3 times per day; range: 4-13 times per day; p=0.014) from the time of treatment, with at least a 25% reduction and an actual reduction from baseline at 41% for one month (Figure 4).

At the end of life, five patients (50%) presented substantial pain (VAS 7-10), three of these patients presented it during the last days before death, two during the last weeks, two (20%) never had a therapeutic effect, and three (30%) patients died without substantial pain according to caregivers (Figure 5). 


Lesions to the pituitary gland to alleviate intractable pain have a long neurosurgical tradition, and the surgical technique has evolved to reduce morbidity [7-12]. Radiosurgery has developed into a noninvasive, safe, and effective technique that can attain results similar to more traditional surgical techniques. Although the underlying biological mechanism of the procedure remains unknown, Ramirez [11] argues that hormonal effects at the hypothalamus most likely explain the effect of pain relief. There is evidence that other surgical procedures such as oophorectomy and orchiectomy also provide pain relief, adding further support to the hormonal effect in pain perception or the elimination of hormonal feedback and its effect on pain-suppression at the hypothalamus [11]. Ramirez and others studied the effect of surgical hypophysectomy and the effect on the hypothalamic region, but such findings do not seem to explain how radiosurgery works. The quick-acting effect on pain relief after radiosurgical hypophysectomy goes beyond the eventual tumor response to hormonal alterations and pose even more complex questions as to the likely radiobiological effect of radiosurgery; it also possibly supports the idea of 'radiomodulation,' as the clinical effects are much faster than what is expected of tissue response or ablation to a high dose of radiation [16]. Our center directs the highest isodose towards the neurohypophysis. given that it stores oxytocin. High doses of radiation may redirect the oxytocin towards the dorsal horns of the spinal cord and supraspinal levels which have clear implications on pain modulation of neuropathic and inflammatory origin [17-19], and that could also explain the transitory pain relief effects on non-oncological pain such as thalamic pain and orofacial pain [20].

Refractory pain in cancer patients during their terminal phase is surely underrated worldwide but especially so in geographical settings with limited resources [4-5]. At best, where more efficient health and palliative care is available, patients are mainly managed by opiates that produce sedative states [1] or incur other well-known side effects [21] without necessarily producing an optimal pain control in some patients. Revitalizing well-known noninvasive techniques such as radiosurgical hypophysectomy could align with the palliative armamentarium to improve end-stage quality of life in selected patients. In the present series, a significant portion of the patients who survived past one month died with different degrees of pain and needed obvious support from regular pain management schemes as further investigation is warranted to identify factors associated with improved durability of pain. The patient that survived the longest (over one year) had prolonged pain control and only experienced pain in the weeks before his death. This patient and one other experienced opioid deprivation symptoms as they suspended their chronic use after feeling pain-free in the first week after treatment.

While there is a historical association between the best effects and patients with bone metastases, our series included patients without bone metastases because data for non-oncological pain and the initial efficacy described [20] could be potentially useful in patients with pain derived from cancer yet not emerging from diffuse bone involvement. The numbers in the present series are too small to dismiss this technique in such patients, but we must caution that two of the three patients without bone involvement were the two patients who never responded.

The present study was merely descriptive in a clinical sense. None of the patients had follow-up MRIs pretreatment or posttreatment hormonal measurements. Apart from potential clinically derived complications expected from high-dose radiation to the pituitary stalk (e.g., diabetes insipidus or frank visual alterations), we could not use hormonal screening to detect more subtle alterations that may result in potential adverse effects. Given this study limitation, further investigations warrant adequate laboratory studies attributed to opioid function and, eventually, posttreatment imaging.

Although rotating gamma ray units as a technique are lesser known than their original counterpart, the Gamma Knife, dosimetry studies have proven them to be equivalent [21]. These studies provided confidence for the safe delivery of a high dose of radiation close to sensitive, at-risk organs (e.g., the visual pathway and the brainstem) making radiosurgical hypophysectomy a clinical alternative for pain management in patients facing refractory oncological pain.


This is the first series to describe the clinical results of radiosurgical hypophysectomy using a fully automated rotating gamma ray unit. The results as described by previous authors seem useful as an ancillary technique in the palliative care setting where every other alternative to alleviate pain is not viable. This procedure seems safe, and its effect over pain seems prolonged enough until weeks or days before death. Therefore, pain specialists should work closely with palliative care specialists to provide optimal care for these patients.


  1. Ziegler S, Schmid M, Bopp M, Bosshard G, Puhan MA: Using sedative substances until death: a mortality follow-back study on the role of healthcare settings. Palliat Med. 2019, 33:213-220. 10.1177/0269216318815799
  2. Cherny NI: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of refractory symptoms at the end of life and the use of palliative sedation. Ann Oncol. 2014, 25:143-152. 10.1093/annonc/mdu238
  3. Tennant F, Herman L: Intractable or chronic pain - there is a difference. West J Med. 2000, 173:306.
  4. Ahmedzai SH, Bautista MJ, Bouzid K, et al.: Optimizing cancer pain management in resource-limited settings. Support Care Cancer. 2018, 21:10.1007/s00520-018-4471-z
  5. Namukwaya E, Leng M, Downing J, Katabira E: Cancer pain management in resource-limited settings: a practice review. Pain Res Treat. 2011, 2011:393404. 10.1155/2011/393404
  6. Cobb N, Scoville W: Hypophysectomy for palliation of breast cancer—with especial reference to surgical technique. Calif Med. 1959, 90:261-263.
  7. Luft R, Olivecrona H: Hypophysectomy in the treatment of malignant tumors. Cancer. 1957, 10:789-794.
  8. Bronson S, Olof H: Pearson hypophysectomy in the treatment of advanced cancer of breast. Ann Surg. 1956, 144:394-403. 10.1097/00000658-195609000-00009
  9. Smith J, Eyre H, Roberts T, Middleton R: Transsphenoidal hypophysectomy in the management of carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer. 1984, 53:2385-2387.
  10. Tindall G, Payne N, Nixon D: Transsphenoidal hypophysectomy for disseminated carcinoma of the prostate gland: results in 53 patients. J Neurosurg. 1979, 50:275-282. 10.3171/jns.1979.50.3.0275
  11. Ramirez L, Levin A: Pain relief after hypophysectomy. Neurosurgery. 1984, 14:499-504. 10.1227/00006123-198404000-00021
  12. Hayashi M, Taira T, Ochiai T, et al.: Gamma knife surgery of the pituitary: new treatment for thalamic pain syndrome. J Neurosurg. 2005, 102:38-41. 10.3171/jns.2005.102.s_supplement.0038
  13. Hayashi M, Taira T, Chernov M, et al.: Role of pituitary radiosurgery for the management of intractable pain and potential future applications. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2003, 81:75-83. 10.1159/000075108
  14. Castinetti F, Donnet A, Guedj E, et al.: An open-label, analgesic efficacy and safety of pituitary radiosurgery for patients with opioid-refractory pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Neurosurgery. 2018, 83:146-153. 10.1093/neuros/nyx363
  15. Benedict SH, Yenice KM, Followill D, et al.: Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group 101. Med Phys. 2010, 37:4078-4101. 10.1118/1.3438081
  16. Sun W, Zhou Q, Ba X, et al.: Oxytocin relieves neuropathic pain through GABA release and presynaptic TRPV1 inhibition in spinal cord. Front Mol Neurosci. 2018, 17:248. 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00248
  17. Erfanparast A, Tamaddonfard E, Seyedin S: Involvement of central opiate receptors in modulation of centrally administered oxytocin-induced antinociception. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2018, 21:1275-1280. 10.22038/ijbms.2018.26302.6449
  18. Goodin B, Ness T, Robbins M: Oxytocin - a multifunctional analgesic for chronic deep tissue pain. Curr Pharm Des. 2015, 21:906-913. 10.2174/1381612820666141027111843
  19. Roberts DG, Pouratian N: Stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of chronic intractable pain: a systematic review. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2017, 13:543-551. 10.1093/ons/opx095
  20. McNicol E: Opioid side effects and their treatment in patients with chronic cancer and noncancer pain. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2008, 22:270-281. 10.1080/15360280802537225
  21. Lovo E, Campos F, Caceros V, Minervini M, Reyes W: Dosimetry and treatment descriptions using the first completely automated stereotactic intracranial radiosurgery rotating gamma ray unit in America. Cureus. 2018, 10:2542. 10.7759/cureus.2542

Original article

Automated Stereotactic Gamma Ray Radiosurgery to the Pituitary Gland in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients with Opioid Refractory Pain

Author Information

Eduardo E. Lovo Corresponding Author

Radiosurgery, International Cancer Center, Diagnostic Hospital, San Salvador, SLV

Fidel J. Campos

Radiosurgery, International Cancer Center, Diagnostic Hospital, San Salvador, SLV

Victor E. Caceros

Radiosurgery, International Cancer Center, Diagnostic Hospital, San Salvador, SLV

Mario Minervini

Neurosurgery, International Cancer Center, San Salvador, SLV

Claudia B. Cruz

Pain Management, International Cancer Center, San Salvador, SLV

Juan C. Arias

Pallative Care, International Cancer Center, San Salvador, SLV

William A. Reyes

Radiosurgery, International Cancer Center, Diagnostic Hospital, San Salvador, SLV

Ethics Statement and Conflict of Interest Disclosures

Human subjects: Consent was obtained by all participants in this study. Hospital de Diagnostico and Centro Internacional de Cancer Ethics Committee issued approval N/A. The ethics committee of the Centro Internacional de Cancer and Hospital de Diagnostico in the month of june of 2016 approved the PROMESA protocols (Protocols in Radiosurgery Oncology Metastases Epilepsy Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and Analgesia) in the understanding that these are very complex diseases to treat and that the protocols in PROMESA are based on proven radiosurgical procedures of know expected results and complications. We here by certify that the protocol under "A" for Analgesia involving high doses of radiation to the hypophysis in terminally ill oncological patients in an attempt to alleviate refractory pain was approved by the ethics committee of our radiation center and hospital, all safety precautions were meet for adequate patient selection and radiation protocols were in accordance for what has been described guaranteeing the doses at organs at risk would be compliant with international standards. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.


We acknowledge PROMESA and Brito-Mejia Pena for the support given to patients and families as well as making these treatments a reality for them.

Original article

Automated Stereotactic Gamma Ray Radiosurgery to the Pituitary Gland in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients with Opioid Refractory Pain

Figures etc.


Scholary Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. Learn more here.