"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

Margaret Mead

Case report

Neurobrucellosis Complicated by Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Case Report


Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease. It is also one of the neglected infectious diseases and is less well-known compared to other diseases. It is acquired from infected animals (cattle, sheep, goats, camels, pigs, or other animals) through the consumption of unpasteurized dairy products or contact with tissues or fluids. Sensory neural hearing loss (SNHL) in neurobrucellosis had been described in the literature, mostly as an incidental finding that otolaryngologists should consider in any patient with fever and a history of travel to the Middle East, Central or South America, or other brucellosis-endemic countries. We present a neurobrucellosis case with profound bilateral SNHL that was treated with combination antibiotic therapy for long periods of time and highlight the clinical course of the patient.


Brucellosis is one of the most widespread zoonotic infections worldwide [1]. It is an endemic disease in Saudi Arabia [2]. Although the disease is found worldwide, the Mediterranean region, Middle East, Africa, and Latin America are the main areas of public health concern [2]. A study found that brucellosis annually infects over 500,000 people in sub-Saharan Africa [2]. It is caused by Brucella, a gram-negative, non-motile, non-spore-forming coccobacillus and a facultative intracellular organism [3]. There are approximately 12 species of Brucella, and the most common species causing brucellosis worldwide are Brucella melitensis (from sheep and goats), Brucella abortus (from cows), and Brucella canis (from dogs) [2].

Most infections are transmitted to the human population through direct contact with fluids from infected animals and consumption of their food products, including unpasteurized milk and cheese [3]. In addition, occupational or recreational exposure to infected animals and their products, such as in farmers or veterinarians, can increase the risk of brucellosis [1]. There is also evidence of transmission from mother to child via breastfeeding [4].

Brucellosis is a multisystemic infection that affects any organ in the body. Neurobrucellosis (NB) is the most severe yet uncommon complication of brucellosis. It can involve the central and peripheral nervous systems, with a prevalence of 1.7% to 10% of brucellosis worldwide [5]. This study aimed to describe a case of NB with a history of progressive bilateral hearing loss.

Case Presentation

This case was reviewed by biomedical ethics, and an exemption was received. A 35-year-old man who did not have any medical illness was referred to our institution complaining of rapidly progressing bilateral hearing loss for 18 months. It is associated with recurrent episodes of fever, sweating, fatigue, and walking difficulty. He also experienced headaches, back pain, and joint pain. He had no history of otorrhea, tinnitus, vertigo, weight loss, reduced appetite, or history of exposure to ototoxic medications or noise trauma. He had a history of raw cheese and milk consumption in Yemen three years ago for approximately two years. On examination, the patient was conscious and alert but was severely affected by bilateral hearing loss. His body weight was 50 kg, height was 160 cm, and vital signs were within normal limits.

On neurological examination, the power in the lower limbs was graded 4/5 with a normal tone. Symmetrically brisk deep tendon reflexes in the upper and lower limbs with a positive Babinski sign on the right side. Sensory examination results were normal. Gait was normal. A cranial nerve examination revealed bilateral sensory neural deafness. All other cranial nerves were normal. The meningeal signs were negative. His cardiovascular and respiratory systems were unremarkable. Pure tone audiometry revealed profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) with bilateral type A tympanograms (Figure 1).

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed, and perimesencephalic and cervical spinal cord leptomeningeal enhancement, as well as cranial nerve enhancement, was seen (Figure 2).

The brucellosis screening test revealed positivity for Brucella antibody with a titer of 340 (normal range < 80) and blood examination of hemoglobin was 13.5 gm/dl, white cell count was 3,500/mm with normal differential count, and C-reactive protein (CRP) level of 60 mg/L (normal range 0-3 mg/L). Renal and liver function tests were within normal limits. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis showed CSF WBC (white blood cell count) was 560 cells/cubic, RBC (red blood cells count) 18 cells/cubic, proteins 7.25 g/l, sugar 1.0 mmol/L (normal range 2.3-4.0). Brucella species was isolated in CSF. No other organisms were detected in the CSF Gram or acid-fast stains.

The patient was admitted to the hospital as a case of neurobrucellosis (NB) based on lumbar puncture (LP) analysis. The medical and infectious disease teams treated the patient with intravenous doxycycline, rifampicin, and ceftriaxone for six weeks. After six weeks, his symptoms, including fever, night sweats, fatigue, and walking difficulty, improved but his repeated audiogram remained unchanged. After nine months, multiple audiograms and an auditory brainstem response (ABR) test showed persistent profound bilateral SNHL (Figure 1). The patient was then referred to the cochlear implant program for cochlear implantation.


Brucellosis is considered a major health issue in countries in the Middle East, including Saudi Arabia. It is the most common zoonotic infection worldwide [2]. However, the disease is highly neglected by the World Health Organization (WHO) and World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) [6,7]. It is endemic to Saudi Arabia, with an infection rate of approximately 70 per 100,000 people [2,8]. We reviewed several studies conducted in various regions of Saudi Arabia. Human brucellosis is considered one of the most commonly reported cases, especially in Riyadh [1]. In the southern region of Saudi Arabia, a study was conducted among 4,900 patients; 2.3% had active disease and 19.2% had serological evidence of brucella antigen exposure [1]. While in a study of 1,733 patients conducted in Riyadh, the prevalence of brucellosis was 8.8% [1]. The principal causative factors in this region are unpasteurized raw milk intake and interaction with contaminated animals due to the common practice of drinking raw milk mainly from sheep and camels [9,10].

There is no consensus on the exact diagnosis of NB because it has neither a conventional clinical picture nor clear CSF findings [11,12]. Therefore, the diagnostic criteria suggested in the literature [5,13,14] are as follows:

1) The presence of consistent clinical symptoms, either with meningitis or meningoencephalitis

2) Consistency of typical CSF findings with meningitis (protein concentrations > 50 mg/dL, leukocytes > 10/mm3 and glucose to serum glucose ratios < 0.5)

3) Positive bacterial culture or serological test results for brucellosis in blood specimens (positive Rose Bengal test and serum tube agglutination with a titer ≥ 1/160), CSF (positive Rose Bengal test or serum tube agglutination with any titer), or positive bone marrow culture

 4) Findings in cranial computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Brucellosis has a variable clinical appearance owing to its broad systemic involvement during contamination. Involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) is an uncommon but severe complication of the disease course. It may often be the only sign of human brucellosis, with a prevalence of 1.7% to 10% worldwide [5]. Meningitis, which can be acute or chronic, is the most common presentation of NB, accounting for 17% to 74% of all cases. Other neurological manifestations include encephalitis, meningoencephalitis, radiculitis, myelitis, peripheral and cranial neuropathies, subarachnoid hemorrhage, psychiatric manifestations, brain abscesses, and demyelinating syndrome [12,15].

Cranial nerve (CN) involvement is common in brucellosis, particularly in the sixth, seventh, and eighth CNs. The acoustic nerve was identified as the cranial nerve most frequently involved [16,17]. When Brucella toxin enters the labyrinth, it affects the cochlear system, causing damage and hearing loss [18]. According to Thoma et al., there is no adequate literature on NB cases with sensorineural hearing loss. As a result, otolaryngologists were unaware of this [18]. In NB, SNHL is usually bilateral and mainly affects high frequencies, and our patient had profound bilateral SNHL affecting all frequencies.

In NB, rifampicin, doxycycline, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole are effective for long periods. These chemotherapeutics penetrate the central nervous system and exert synergistic effects. Ceftriaxone can be added as a fourth agent to this protocol [19,20]. Our patient received doxycycline, rifampicin, and ceftriaxone for six weeks.

Brucellosis-induced CN paralysis usually improves without residual effects following antibiotic administration [21]. Chronic CNS infections, on the other hand, often result in permanent neurologic deficits. In our patient, after six weeks of antibiotics, the audiograms remained unchanged and inconsistent with the case report of Thomas et al. [18], which presented a one-year history of bilateral SNHL at a high frequency and received tetracycline and rifampicin for a total of six weeks with no improvement in hearing. On the other hand, CN paralysis completely improved after treatment, according to Ucmak et al. [22].

There are only sporadic reports of SNHL as a complication of NB. One of the early reports was by Bucher et al. [23], who diagnosed SNHL in a patient with severe chronic NB. Thereafter, Thomas et al. [18], Bedur et al. [24], Cagatay et al. [25], and Sengoz et al. [26] all reported similar outcomes in patients with NB developing SNHL. Interestingly, all reported cases (including our case) had suffered ataxia and gate-related issues in addition to SNHL, indicating cerebellar involvement [18,23-26].

Therefore, prevention is an essential aspect of disease control, and vector management is crucial when dealing with zoonotic infections. Pasteurizing milk and handling raw meat safely are essential preventive measures. In addition, animals should be examined and vaccinated regularly. Finally, an educational program for healthcare workers and veterinary and cattle owners should be considered [1,2].


Otolaryngologists should not overlook NB as a cause of hearing loss. It should be investigated in any patient presenting with hearing loss, especially when other differential diagnoses have been ruled out or if habitual or demographic history puts the patient at a higher risk of acquiring NB.


  1. Al Anazi M, AlFayyad I, AlOtaibi R, Abu-Shaheen A: Epidemiology of brucellosis in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2019, 40:981-8. 10.15537/smj.2019.10.24027
  2. Bakheet HG, Alnakhli H: Brucellosis in Saudi Arabia: review of literature and epidemiology. Southeast Asian J Trop Med. 2019,
  3. Rossi M, Tascini C, Carannante N, Di Caprio G, Sofia S, Iacobello C: Neurobrucellosis: diagnostic and clinical management of an atypical case. New Microbiol. 2018, 41:165-7.
  4. Patil S, Narkhede M: Neurobrucellosis: a case report. Int J Res Med Sci. 2014, 1:353-7. 10.5455/2320-6012.ijrms20140271
  5. Maji S, Manjunath N, Bahubali VH, et al.: Neurobrucellosis: a neglected entity? An update from tertiary care neurocentre of South East Asia. J Neurol Sci. 2020, 411:116683. 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116683
  6. Franc KA, Krecek RC, Häsler BN, Arenas-Gamboa AM: Brucellosis remains a neglected disease in the developing world: a call for interdisciplinary action. BMC Public Health. 2018, 18:125. 10.1186/s12889-017-5016-y
  7. Zhang N, Zhou H, Huang DS, Guan P: Brucellosis awareness and knowledge in communities worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 79 observational studies. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019, 13:e0007366. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007366
  8. Elfaki MG, Alaidan AA, Al-Hokail AA: Host response to Brucella infection: review and future perspective. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2015, 9:697-701. 10.3855/jidc.6625
  9. Hafez SM: The impact of uncontrolled animal importation and marketing on the prevalence of brucellosis in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med. 1986, 6:15-8.
  10. Pappas G, Papadimitriou P, Akritidis N, et al.: The new global map of human brucellosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006, 6:91-9. 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70382-6
  11. Fincham R, Sahs A, Joynt R: Protean manifestations of nervous system brucellosis. Case histories of a wide variety of clinical forms. JAMA. 1963, 184:269-75. 10.1001/jama.1963.03700170061009
  12. Nagarathana S, Rajeshwari S, Veenakumari H, et al.: Neurobrucellosis -a clinical masquerade in an Indian scenario; review of 12 cases by correlative diagnostic approach. International Journal of Biological & Medical Research. 2015, 6:5143-7.
  13. Erdem H, Kilic S, Sener B, et al.: Diagnosis of chronic brucellar meningitis and meningoencephalitis: the results of the Istanbul-2 study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013, 19:E80-6. 10.1111/1469-0691.12092
  14. Guven T, Ugurlu K, Ergonul O, et al.: Neurobrucellosis: clinical and diagnostic features. Clin Infect Dis. 2013, 56:1407-12. 10.1093/cid/cit072
  15. Bouza E, García de la Torre M, Parras F, Guerrero A, Rodríguez-Créixems M, Gobernado J: Brucellar meningitis. Rev Infect Dis. 1987, 9:810-22. 10.1093/clinids/9.4.810
  16. Gul HC, Erdem H, Bek S: Overview of neurobrucellosis: a pooled analysis of 187 cases. Int J Infect Dis. 2009, 13:e339-43. 10.1016/j.ijid.2009.02.015
  17. Bayazit YA, Namiduru M, Bayazit N, Ozer E, Kanlikama M: Hearing status in brucellosis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002, 127:97-100. 10.1067/mhn.2002.125761
  18. Thomas R, Kameswaran M, Murugan V, Okafor BC: Sensorineural hearing loss in neurobrucellosis. J Laryngol Otol. 1993, 107:1034-6. 10.1017/s0022215100125198
  19. Skalsky K, Yahav D, Bishara J, Pitlik S, Leibovici L, Paul M: Treatment of human brucellosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2008, 336:701-4. 10.1136/bmj.39497.500903.25
  20. McLean DR, Russell N, Khan MY: Neurobrucellosis: clinical and therapeutic features. Clin Infect Dis. 1992, 15:582-90. 10.1093/clind/15.4.582
  21. Ceran N, Turkoglu R, Erdem I: Neurobrucellosis: clinical, diagnostic, therapeutic features and outcome. Unusual clinical presentations in an endemic region. Brazilian J Infect. Dis. 2011, 15:52-9. 10.1016/S1413-8670(11)70140-4
  22. Ucmak H, Kokoglu O, Kirecci E, Yildirim Y, Oguzhan O: Hearing loss and accompaning disturbance of neurobrucellosis cases. Pak J Med Sci. 2012, 28:556-9.
  23. Bucher A, Gaustad P, Pape E: Chronic neurobrucellosis due to Brucella melitensis. Scand J Infect Dis. 1990, 22:223-6. 10.3109/00365549009037906
  24. Badur H, Celik MA, Erbay A, et al.: Two cases of neurobrucellosis with 7th and 8th cranial nerve involvement. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2001,
  25. Cagatay A, Karadeniz A, Ozsut H, et al.: Hearing loss in patient with neurobrucellosis. South Med J. 2006, 99:1305-6.
  26. Sengoz G, Yasar KK, Yildirim F, Nazlican O: Sensorineural hearing loss in neurobrucellosis. Neurosciences. 2008, 13:299-301.

Case report

Neurobrucellosis Complicated by Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Case Report

Author Information

Bayan Mirza

Department of Medicine and Surgery, College of Medicine, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah, SAU

Hala M. Kanawi

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU

Talal Alkhatib

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU

Afnan F. Bukhari

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU

Faisal Zawawi Corresponding Author

Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU

Ethics Statement and Conflict of Interest Disclosures

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. King Abdulaziz University Hospital institutional ethics review board issued approval N/A. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Case report

Neurobrucellosis Complicated by Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Case Report

Figures etc.


Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. Learn more here.