Technical report
peer-reviewed
Abstract
Simulation has been shown to improve both learner knowledge and patient outcomes. Many emergency medicine training programs incorporate simulation into their curricula to provide learners with experiences that are rare to encounter in practice, yet performance with a high degree of competence is critical. One rare encounter, which is depicted in the report, is the management of a trauma patient who was hypothermic after falling from an expedition vessel into the cold Southern Ocean. The unique scenario presented in this technical report incorporates CanMEDS learning objectives including the communicator, health advocate, and collaborator roles. Using medical simulation facilities, marine performance simulation facilities, and a video, this scenario provides teaching that is uncommon in traditional emergency medicine training. As such, it is valuable for trainees who intend to practice rural, remote, or expedition medicine, or provide coverage for ships and marine installations.
Introduction
Simulation has been shown to improve both learner knowledge and patient outcomes [1]. Many emergency medicine training programs incorporate simulation into their curricula to provide learners with unique experiences incorporating both discipline-specific and CanMEDS learning objectives [2]. As such, the use of non-traditional simulation scenarios can be valuable for trainees who intend to practice rural, remote, or expedition medicine, or provide coverage for ships and marine installations.
Resource management is challenging in a limited environment such as a ship’s infirmary on the many passenger ships/cruises that frequent Antarctica. Antarctica is the coldest, windiest, and driest continent in the world [3]. It is difficult to provide patient care in the oceans that surround it. Still, tourists and researchers travel there in ever-increasing numbers. Ships’ logs report lists of accidents and injuries that are encountered in the region [4]. Based on this list, we have developed a trauma/hypothermia scenario that takes place in the pre-hospital setting aboard a ship off the coast of Antarctica. The scenario provides fundamental learning objectives that the learner should be able to attain upon completion. These objectives are as follows:
1. Assess and manage trauma in a limited marine environment
2. Considerations for transport to a more stable environment
3. Communicate with the Captain in preparation for transport to a land-based centre
From these objectives, the learner should gain valuable clinical pearls that are intrinsic to emergency medicine training. This scenario, while rare, provides simulated teaching and learning in an extremely challenging pre-hospital setting. This is important for learners who, after graduation, may practice in remote and rural settings that may greatly affect the level of care they are able to provide.
Technical Report
Providing emergency medical treatment onboard ships at sea can be difficult, depending on the severity of the injury, the available resources in the ship's infirmary, and the physician's experience. Ships transporting goods by sea generally carry a small number of trained crew-members, while large cruise ships have a mixture of seafaring crew, hotel crew (typically only minimum seafarer training), and passengers in large numbers (totaling over 8,000 for the largest ships). For the former, the onboard medical provider is usually the ship’s cook with advanced first aid training, while the latter may carry one or more physicians with a small team of nurses and a well-equipped onboard hospital.
Smaller expedition-style cruise ships traveling in remote polar regions tend to have just one ship’s doctor with a small infirmary. There is little advanced resuscitation equipment and often no investigative resources, a reality that challenges physicians who are trained to work in urban emergency departments [5].
Injured passengers and crew, on smaller vessels, face greater challenges in receiving emergency medical treatment than on large ships in less remote areas. This is related to the extreme polar environmental conditions, long distances to better-equipped health care facilities, and communications. In a medical emergency on land, the attending physician is in charge. At sea, however, medical management occurs within limits established by the Captain, as patient care is determined by factors including sea state, rescue options, and clinical stability. This unusual dynamic requires solid communication skills, as demonstrated in the learning objectives [6].
Given the impact this unique environment can have on the level of care provided, we decided to develop this scenario to utilize both a medical simulation lab and a marine simulation centre. We hope this realism will illustrate the limitations associated with marine polar environments, and the challenges of stabilizing a significantly ill patient for an extended period of time in a nontraditional environment. Many sites may not have access to a marine simulation centre. Therefore, this scenario can also be used in a standard simulation lab, using the video footage presented in this technical report in order to re-enact the patient’s fall into the Southern Ocean, his extraction from the water, and his transfer to the medical facility onboard the ship. The learner could then continue the simulation case in a standard simulation lab, beginning at the examination/management stage, using a high-fidelity manikin, a standardized patient, and confederates. The transfer conversation between physician and captain could also be simulated in a medical simulation lab.
Pre-Briefing
Prior to the start of the case, a formal pre-briefing session was held with all learners present. This session is a vital component in any simulation scenario as it sets the learner/teacher interaction. The purpose of the pre-briefing session is to establish a safe learning environment. It also introduces the fictional contract, which states the learner agrees to proceed as if the simulation was real while simultaneously acknowledging that it is not. Limitations of the simulation were also addressed, with particular attention to technical issues with the mannequin and the environmental setup. Finally, learners were advised that they would not be formally evaluated.
Prior to the session, a detailed scenario template and corresponding storyboard were developed and submitted to the medical and marine simulation labs technical staff (Table 1). A script was also prepared, based on the patient’s history and injuries, and submitted to the standardized patients in preparation for the scenario.
Two instructors were present during the simulation: one maintained overall control of the scenario, and the other observed and prepared for the subsequent debriefing.
Case
This case began with the learner receiving a distress call on a ship. The learner was a physician working on a tourism vessel operating out of Antarctica. The distress call detailed an injury sustained to a crew-member who was hit by a cable while working, and fell overboard. The learner received the call on the ship and was expected to manage and treat this patient.
A video showing a complete run-through of the scenario is included. It is intended to provide a step-by-step approach to the case (Video 1).
Debriefing
At the end of the scenario, a structured debriefing session was held. The debriefing was lead by an educator with experience in debriefing. The principles of good judgment and frame discovery were central to the process. The purpose of the session was for the learners to interact with the educators and to review the entire case, areas of concern, and specific learning topics. Immediate review of the case in a small, safe, and relaxed environment encouraged the learner to speak freely and gain the most from the experience. Points included in the debriefing session are included in Table 2.
Post Scenario Didactics
Predetermined education topics were discussed in the post-scenario didactic session. The didactic section allowed the educator to address individual knowledge gaps that were recognized throughout the simulation. Here, the educator was able to provide individualized teaching to help solidify new knowledge gained throughout the scenario. Points covered in the didactic session included principles of trauma management, effective communication, transport considerations, and handover. Learners were asked to identify ways to improve communication and inter-agency collaboration when preparing for transport.
Discussion
This scenario was designed to challenge postgraduate emergency medicine learners with a non-traditional trauma scenario. In this simulation, key learning objectives for trainees included:
1. Assess and manage trauma in a limited marine environment
2. Considerations for transport to a more stable environment
3. Communicate with the Captain in preparation for transport to a land-based centre
These learning objectives demonstrate that the environment in which the scenario is carried out plays an important role in the patient’s outcome. Trauma generally occurs outside typical emergency department settings; one has to work with what they have to stabilize a patient, know their capabilities and limitations, and arrange for transport to a higher-level facility.
The learner must recognize the need for transfer and appreciate that in remote regions, conditions may be prohibitive. For example, the weather might impede air evacuation. In polar regions like the Antarctic Peninsula (where most small expeditions travel), the nearest evacuation centre may be a small research station that has one physician. Research centres are not mandated to accept patient transfers from tourist expeditions, but in the spirit of international cooperation will generally do so in an emergency. Some airstrips in Antarctica are usable only in winter when the ice is stable. However, most small ship tours operate only in summer [7]. In these situations, the learner must realize their limitations while stabilizing a patient until the transportation is made possible. Such scenarios are not often encountered during a typical emergency medicine residency, as most training occurs in a tertiary academic setting.
Simulation has been used for decades as a tool to assess and strengthen various skills including communication, decision-making, leadership, task management, and patient monitoring. The benefits of simulation training are immediate formative feedback, ability to re-practice the scenario, and alter the level of difficulty for various learners [8].
The scenario developed in this case employed two types of simulation: medical and marine simulation augmented with a demonstrative video. One of the learning objectives was trauma management in a remote setting using limited tools. A marine simulation centre was therefore needed to develop realistic sea states, winds, waves, and ice to emphasize the environmental difficulties that could be encountered in such real life settings. While the entire case could have been executed in a medical simulation centre, using a standard mannequin and assuming there had been a trauma in cold water, much environmental significance would have been lost.
This scenario was recorded because access to a marine simulation centre is not commonly available. Instructors may play the recorded video either before the learner begins the examination, or afterwards during the debriefing session. The pre-recorded video will allow the learner to see and hear the real environment and its significance to the case.
Concomitant use of both kinds of simulation, augmented with a demonstration video, should enhance the learner’s experience of a unique scenario whose remote setting and harsh marine environment were essential to learning objectives. Such scenarios are not commonly encountered in the traditional tertiary care simulation syllabus. The experience is potentially valuable for rural and remote practising physicians and those who provide medical coverage for ships and oil installations, as well as for expedition physicians.
Conclusions
Trauma resuscitations are challenging, particularly in remote marine environments. We present a marine trauma simulation that uses medical and marine simulation centres, and a video. It provides valuable training for those who intend to practice rural, remote, or expedition medicine, or provide coverage for marine ships and installations. It allows for the individuals to grasp the impact one’s environment can have on the practice of medicine and patient outcomes.
References
- Ilene JS, Sherwin J, Cook DA: Technology-enhanced simulation in emergency medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2013, 20:117–127. 10.1111/acem.12076
- CanMEDS 2015 physician competency framework. (2015). Accessed: December 4, 2016: http://canmeds.royalcollege.ca/uploads/en/framework/CanMEDS%202015%20Framework_EN_Reduced.pdf.
- McGonigal D, Woodworth L: Antarctica: The Blue Continent. Firefly Books, Ontario; 2003.
- Lugg DJ: Antarctic medicine. JAMA. 2000, 283:2082–2084. 10.1001/jama.283.16.2082
- Renouf T, Pollard M: Emergency medicine in remote regions. Cureus. 2016, 8:e774. doi:10.7759/cureus.774
- Renouf T, Alani S, Whalen D, et al.: City mouse, country mouse: a mixed-methods evaluation of perceived communication barriers between rural family physicians and urban consultants in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. BMJ Open. 2016, 6:e010153. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010153
- Renouf T: Voyage to Antarctica. CJEM. 2003, 5:171–174. 10.1017/S1481803500006576
- Walker ST, Sevdalis N, McKay A, et al.: Unannounced in situ simulations: integrating training and clinical practice. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013, 22:453–458. 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000986
Related articles
Technical report
peer-reviewed
Trauma and Hypothermia in Antarctica: An Emergency Medicine Marine Simulation Scenario
Ethics Statement and Conflict of Interest Disclosures
Conflicts of interest: The authors have declared that no conflicts of interest exist.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University for providing the following resources: The Tuckamore Simulation Scholarship and Research Collaborative. Richie Perez from the Office of Professional Development, for providing his expertise and time to make this video possible and the Clinical Learning and Simulation Centre for providing simulation technology and expertise. In addition, we would like to acknowledge the Marine Institute’s Offshore Safety and Survival Centre and the Centre for Marine Simulation. More specifically, Joe Shanahan, Captain Chris Hearn, Greg Harvey and Tim Woodworth for volunteering their time to participate in the role-playing of this video.
Article Information
DOI
10.7759/cureus.1341
Cite this article as:
Horwood C, Williams K, Skinner T, et al. (June 12, 2017) Trauma and Hypothermia in Antarctica: An Emergency Medicine Marine Simulation Scenario. Cureus 9(6): e1341. doi:10.7759/cureus.1341
Publication history
Received by Cureus: May 03, 2017
Peer review began: May 31, 2017
Peer review concluded: June 05, 2017
Published: June 12, 2017
Copyright
© Copyright 2017
Horwood et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 3.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
License
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Technical report
peer-reviewed
Trauma and Hypothermia in Antarctica: An Emergency Medicine Marine Simulation Scenario
Figures etc.
-.-
Technical report
peer-reviewed
Trauma and Hypothermia in Antarctica: An Emergency Medicine Marine Simulation Scenario
Abstract
Simulation has been shown to improve both learner knowledge and patient outcomes. Many emergency medicine training programs incorporate simulation into their curricula to provide learners with experiences that are rare to encounter in practice, yet performance with a high degree of competence is critical. One rare encounter, which is depicted in the report, is the management of a trauma patient who was hypothermic after falling from an expedition vessel into the cold Southern Ocean. The unique scenario presented in this technical report incorporates CanMEDS learning objectives including the communicator, health advocate, and collaborator roles. Using medical simulation facilities, marine performance simulation facilities, and a video, this scenario provides teaching that is uncommon in traditional emergency medicine training. As such, it is valuable for trainees who intend to practice rural, remote, or expedition medicine, or provide coverage for ships and marine installations.
Introduction
Simulation has been shown to improve both learner knowledge and patient outcomes [1]. Many emergency medicine training programs incorporate simulation into their curricula to provide learners with unique experiences incorporating both discipline-specific and CanMEDS learning objectives [2]. As such, the use of non-traditional simulation scenarios can be valuable for trainees who intend to practice rural, remote, or expedition medicine, or provide coverage for ships and marine installations.
Resource management is challenging in a limited environment such as a ship’s infirmary on the many passenger ships/cruises that frequent Antarctica. Antarctica is the coldest, windiest, and driest continent in the world [3]. It is difficult to provide patient care in the oceans that surround it. Still, tourists and researchers travel there in ever-increasing numbers. Ships’ logs report lists of accidents and injuries that are encountered in the region [4]. Based on this list, we have developed a trauma/hypothermia scenario that takes place in the pre-hospital setting aboard a ship off the coast of Antarctica. The scenario provides fundamental learning objectives that the learner should be able to attain upon completion. These objectives are as follows:
1. Assess and manage trauma in a limited marine environment
2. Considerations for transport to a more stable environment
3. Communicate with the Captain in preparation for transport to a land-based centre
From these objectives, the learner should gain valuable clinical pearls that are intrinsic to emergency medicine training. This scenario, while rare, provides simulated teaching and learning in an extremely challenging pre-hospital setting. This is important for learners who, after graduation, may practice in remote and rural settings that may greatly affect the level of care they are able to provide.
Technical Report
Providing emergency medical treatment onboard ships at sea can be difficult, depending on the severity of the injury, the available resources in the ship's infirmary, and the physician's experience. Ships transporting goods by sea generally carry a small number of trained crew-members, while large cruise ships have a mixture of seafaring crew, hotel crew (typically only minimum seafarer training), and passengers in large numbers (totaling over 8,000 for the largest ships). For the former, the onboard medical provider is usually the ship’s cook with advanced first aid training, while the latter may carry one or more physicians with a small team of nurses and a well-equipped onboard hospital.
Smaller expedition-style cruise ships traveling in remote polar regions tend to have just one ship’s doctor with a small infirmary. There is little advanced resuscitation equipment and often no investigative resources, a reality that challenges physicians who are trained to work in urban emergency departments [5].
Injured passengers and crew, on smaller vessels, face greater challenges in receiving emergency medical treatment than on large ships in less remote areas. This is related to the extreme polar environmental conditions, long distances to better-equipped health care facilities, and communications. In a medical emergency on land, the attending physician is in charge. At sea, however, medical management occurs within limits established by the Captain, as patient care is determined by factors including sea state, rescue options, and clinical stability. This unusual dynamic requires solid communication skills, as demonstrated in the learning objectives [6].
Given the impact this unique environment can have on the level of care provided, we decided to develop this scenario to utilize both a medical simulation lab and a marine simulation centre. We hope this realism will illustrate the limitations associated with marine polar environments, and the challenges of stabilizing a significantly ill patient for an extended period of time in a nontraditional environment. Many sites may not have access to a marine simulation centre. Therefore, this scenario can also be used in a standard simulation lab, using the video footage presented in this technical report in order to re-enact the patient’s fall into the Southern Ocean, his extraction from the water, and his transfer to the medical facility onboard the ship. The learner could then continue the simulation case in a standard simulation lab, beginning at the examination/management stage, using a high-fidelity manikin, a standardized patient, and confederates. The transfer conversation between physician and captain could also be simulated in a medical simulation lab.
Pre-Briefing
Prior to the start of the case, a formal pre-briefing session was held with all learners present. This session is a vital component in any simulation scenario as it sets the learner/teacher interaction. The purpose of the pre-briefing session is to establish a safe learning environment. It also introduces the fictional contract, which states the learner agrees to proceed as if the simulation was real while simultaneously acknowledging that it is not. Limitations of the simulation were also addressed, with particular attention to technical issues with the mannequin and the environmental setup. Finally, learners were advised that they would not be formally evaluated.
Prior to the session, a detailed scenario template and corresponding storyboard were developed and submitted to the medical and marine simulation labs technical staff (Table 1). A script was also prepared, based on the patient’s history and injuries, and submitted to the standardized patients in preparation for the scenario.
Two instructors were present during the simulation: one maintained overall control of the scenario, and the other observed and prepared for the subsequent debriefing.
Case
This case began with the learner receiving a distress call on a ship. The learner was a physician working on a tourism vessel operating out of Antarctica. The distress call detailed an injury sustained to a crew-member who was hit by a cable while working, and fell overboard. The learner received the call on the ship and was expected to manage and treat this patient.
A video showing a complete run-through of the scenario is included. It is intended to provide a step-by-step approach to the case (Video 1).
Debriefing
At the end of the scenario, a structured debriefing session was held. The debriefing was lead by an educator with experience in debriefing. The principles of good judgment and frame discovery were central to the process. The purpose of the session was for the learners to interact with the educators and to review the entire case, areas of concern, and specific learning topics. Immediate review of the case in a small, safe, and relaxed environment encouraged the learner to speak freely and gain the most from the experience. Points included in the debriefing session are included in Table 2.
Post Scenario Didactics
Predetermined education topics were discussed in the post-scenario didactic session. The didactic section allowed the educator to address individual knowledge gaps that were recognized throughout the simulation. Here, the educator was able to provide individualized teaching to help solidify new knowledge gained throughout the scenario. Points covered in the didactic session included principles of trauma management, effective communication, transport considerations, and handover. Learners were asked to identify ways to improve communication and inter-agency collaboration when preparing for transport.
Discussion
This scenario was designed to challenge postgraduate emergency medicine learners with a non-traditional trauma scenario. In this simulation, key learning objectives for trainees included:
1. Assess and manage trauma in a limited marine environment
2. Considerations for transport to a more stable environment
3. Communicate with the Captain in preparation for transport to a land-based centre
These learning objectives demonstrate that the environment in which the scenario is carried out plays an important role in the patient’s outcome. Trauma generally occurs outside typical emergency department settings; one has to work with what they have to stabilize a patient, know their capabilities and limitations, and arrange for transport to a higher-level facility.
The learner must recognize the need for transfer and appreciate that in remote regions, conditions may be prohibitive. For example, the weather might impede air evacuation. In polar regions like the Antarctic Peninsula (where most small expeditions travel), the nearest evacuation centre may be a small research station that has one physician. Research centres are not mandated to accept patient transfers from tourist expeditions, but in the spirit of international cooperation will generally do so in an emergency. Some airstrips in Antarctica are usable only in winter when the ice is stable. However, most small ship tours operate only in summer [7]. In these situations, the learner must realize their limitations while stabilizing a patient until the transportation is made possible. Such scenarios are not often encountered during a typical emergency medicine residency, as most training occurs in a tertiary academic setting.
Simulation has been used for decades as a tool to assess and strengthen various skills including communication, decision-making, leadership, task management, and patient monitoring. The benefits of simulation training are immediate formative feedback, ability to re-practice the scenario, and alter the level of difficulty for various learners [8].
The scenario developed in this case employed two types of simulation: medical and marine simulation augmented with a demonstrative video. One of the learning objectives was trauma management in a remote setting using limited tools. A marine simulation centre was therefore needed to develop realistic sea states, winds, waves, and ice to emphasize the environmental difficulties that could be encountered in such real life settings. While the entire case could have been executed in a medical simulation centre, using a standard mannequin and assuming there had been a trauma in cold water, much environmental significance would have been lost.
This scenario was recorded because access to a marine simulation centre is not commonly available. Instructors may play the recorded video either before the learner begins the examination, or afterwards during the debriefing session. The pre-recorded video will allow the learner to see and hear the real environment and its significance to the case.
Concomitant use of both kinds of simulation, augmented with a demonstration video, should enhance the learner’s experience of a unique scenario whose remote setting and harsh marine environment were essential to learning objectives. Such scenarios are not commonly encountered in the traditional tertiary care simulation syllabus. The experience is potentially valuable for rural and remote practising physicians and those who provide medical coverage for ships and oil installations, as well as for expedition physicians.
Conclusions
Trauma resuscitations are challenging, particularly in remote marine environments. We present a marine trauma simulation that uses medical and marine simulation centres, and a video. It provides valuable training for those who intend to practice rural, remote, or expedition medicine, or provide coverage for marine ships and installations. It allows for the individuals to grasp the impact one’s environment can have on the practice of medicine and patient outcomes.
References
- Ilene JS, Sherwin J, Cook DA: Technology-enhanced simulation in emergency medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2013, 20:117–127. 10.1111/acem.12076
- CanMEDS 2015 physician competency framework. (2015). Accessed: December 4, 2016: http://canmeds.royalcollege.ca/uploads/en/framework/CanMEDS%202015%20Framework_EN_Reduced.pdf.
- McGonigal D, Woodworth L: Antarctica: The Blue Continent. Firefly Books, Ontario; 2003.
- Lugg DJ: Antarctic medicine. JAMA. 2000, 283:2082–2084. 10.1001/jama.283.16.2082
- Renouf T, Pollard M: Emergency medicine in remote regions. Cureus. 2016, 8:e774. doi:10.7759/cureus.774
- Renouf T, Alani S, Whalen D, et al.: City mouse, country mouse: a mixed-methods evaluation of perceived communication barriers between rural family physicians and urban consultants in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. BMJ Open. 2016, 6:e010153. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010153
- Renouf T: Voyage to Antarctica. CJEM. 2003, 5:171–174. 10.1017/S1481803500006576
- Walker ST, Sevdalis N, McKay A, et al.: Unannounced in situ simulations: integrating training and clinical practice. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013, 22:453–458. 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000986
