The Use of PSMA PET/CT in a Prospective, Multicentre Registry for Patients with Recurrent Prostate Cancer – PREP Registry


Abstract

Purpose: Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) can have positive findings for patients with prostate cancer, even when conventional imaging (CI) is negative.

Materials and Methods: PREP is a prospective registry open at five Ontario centres. Enrollment is according to six clinical cohorts: 1) Node positive disease or persistently detectable prostate specific antigen (PSA) post-radical prostatectomy (RP); 2) biochemical failure (BCF) after initial RP; 3) BCF after initial RP and adjuvant or salvage radiation therapy (RT); 4) BCF after RP and salvage ADT; 5) BCF after prior PSMA PET lesion-directed therapy; and 6) BCF (per Phoenix definition) after definitive RT. All PSMA PET/CTs used 18F DCFPyL as a radiotracer. CI was required for all patients initially (PREP1), but this has been modified (PREP 2) to require CI only when PSA is greater than 10 ng/mL. The primary endpoint is overall detection rate, with secondary endpoints including detection rate by clinical cohort, patterns of recurrence and change in planned management based on PSMA PET/CT results.

Results: From December 2018 to March 2022, 3967 PSMA PET/CT studies were completed; 348 (12%) were repeat scans. Median age (Interquartile range (IQR)) for all cohorts was 71 (66–76) years. For cohorts 2, 3, and 6 (BCF after local therapy)[GB1] [AD2] , the median PSA (IQR) was 0.33 (0.2–0.93) ng/mL, 1.0 (0.45–2.57) ng/mL, and 4.4 (3.1–7.5) ng/mL. For these cohorts, the overall detection rate was 49, 72 and 90%, with limited (pelvic only or oligometastatic) disease detected in 45, 61, and 71% of scans and extensive metastatic disease detected in 4, 11, and 19% of scans. When grouped by initial PSA, the overall, limited disease and extensive disease detection rates in all six cohorts were the following: for PSA less than 0.1 ng/mL, 12, 12, and 0%; PSA between 0.1–0.3 ng/mL, 38, 37, and 1%; PSA between 0.3–0.5 ng/mL, 55, 52, and 3%; PSA between 0.5–1.0 ng/mL, 67, 62, and 5%; and for PSA greater than 1.0 ng/mL, 88, 68, and 20%. In all cohorts, when PSA was less than 10 ng/mL, the overall detection rates, with or without CI, were similar (64 vs 70%), as were changes in management (59 vs 50%). For cohorts 2, 3, and 6, the PSMA PET/CT changed management in more than half of cases: 26, 32, and 32% of cases changed management to local salvage; 11, 18, and 25% changed management to systemic therapy; and 6, 6, and 6% changed management to observation.

Conclusions: PREP is a multicentre registry of patients with recurrent prostate cancer who received PSMA PET/CT. The detection rate increased with increasing PSA levels; half of scans with PSA greater than 0.3 ng/mL had positive findings. The omission of CI in patients with PSA less than 10 ng/mL did not dramatically change patterns of disease detection or management change. A change in management were seen in most men after PSMA PET/CT.

Poster
non-peer-reviewed

The Use of PSMA PET/CT in a Prospective, Multicentre Registry for Patients with Recurrent Prostate Cancer – PREP Registry


Author Information

Aneesh Dhar Corresponding Author

Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, CAN

Glenn Bauman

Radiation Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program - London Health Sciences Centre, London, CAN

Antonio Finelli

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, CAN

Joseph Chin

Surgery - Division of Urology, Western University, London, CAN

Girish Kulkarni

Urology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, CAN

Irina Rachinsky

Medical Imaging, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, London, CAN

Robert Wolfson

Nuclear Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, CAN

Laurence Klotz

Urology, University of Toronto, Toronto, CAN

Katherine Zukotynski

Nuclear Medicine, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, CAN

Anil Kapoor

Urology, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, CAN

Bobby Shayegan

Urology, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, CAN

Eugene Leung

Nuclear Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, CAN

Luke Lavallee

Urology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, CAN

Chris Morash

Urology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, CAN

Marlon Hagerty

Radiation Oncology, Thunder Bay Hospital, Thunder Bay, CAN

Jonathan Boekhoud

Nuclear Medicine, Thunder Bay Hospital, Thunder Bay, CAN

Walid Shahrour

Urology, Thunder Bay Hospital, Thunder Bay, CAN

Victor Mak

Urology, Ontario Health - Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, CAN

Deanna Langer

NA, Ontario Health - Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, CAN

Pamela Maccrostie

NA, Ontario Health - Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, CAN

Catherine Hildebrand

Department of Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, CAN

Ur Metser

Nuclear Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, CAN


PDF Share