"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

Margaret Mead
Original article

Citation Classics and Trends in the Field of Opioids: A Bibliometric Analysis



Bibliometric analysis is one of the emerging and latest statistical study type used to examine and keep a systemic record of the research done on a particular topic of a certain field. A number of such bibliometric studies are conducted on various topics of the medical science but none existed on the vast topic of pharmacology - opioids. Hence, we present a bibliometric analysis of the ‘Citation Classics’ of opioids.


The primary database chosen to extract the citation classics of opioids was Scopus. Top 100 citation classics were arranged according to the citation count and then analyzed.


The top 100 citation classics were published between 1957 and 2013, among which seventy-two were published from 1977 to 1997. Among all nineteen countries that contributed to these citation classics, United States of America alone produced sixty-three classics. The top three journals of the list were multidisciplinary and contained 36 citation classics. Endogenous opioids were the most studied (n=35) class of opioids among the citation classes and the most studied subject was of the neurosciences.


The subject areas of neurology and analgesic aspects of opioids are well established and endogenous and synthetic opioids were the most studied classes of opioids. However, the egregious issues of addiction and misuse of opioids were underrepresented in the citation classics. The pulmonary and gastrointestinal aspects of opioids are also marginalized among the citation classics.


Each year, extensive contributions are made to the medical science literature [1]. Bibliometric research provides quantitative analysis and extensive insight regarding the research conducted, the era in which the work is performed, and eminent authors, countries, and institutions; this approach also identifies aspects that remain to be examined [2], hence to monitor studies regarding a specific topic, practitioners refer to bibliometric researches. Although several bibliometric studies have been conducted in breast cancer [3], orthopedic surgery [4], epilepsy [5], thrombolytic therapy [6], and valvular heart diseases [7], our literature search revealed no such bibliometric analysis for opioids.

Opioids are the prototypical derivatives of opium, which is considered one of the world’s oldest drugs [8]. Opioids are extensively used as analgesics, antitussive agents, antidiarrheal drugs, and anesthetic agents for management of acute pulmonary edema and various other treatments [9]. Some opioids, such as heroin, are illegal [10]. Moreover, the abuse or overuse of opioids can result in adverse effects and opioid dependence [11].

To fill this gap, we conducted a bibliometric analysis on opioids. The paper presents the opioid citation classics, that is, articles that were cited more than 400 times [12], as well as the trends in recently published articles.

Materials & Methods

A citation search was conducted to identify the 100 most cited articles and citation classics in the available literature (see Appendix). Like other researchers [6,7], we chose Elsevier’s Scopus online database for our search, as Scopus provides 20% more coverage than Web of Science with more accurate citation counts than Google Scholar [13]. Full articles were accessed from PubMed, EMBASE (Excerpta Medica dataBASE), and Science Direct.

‘Opioids’, ‘opiates’, and ‘opium’ were our primary search keywords. To avoid bias and prevent missing relevant articles, we expanded our list to the names of individual opioids mentioned in Basic and Clinical Pharmacology [14]. The extended list included ‘buprenorphine’, ‘butorphanol’, ‘codeine’, ‘diphenoxylate’, ‘fentanyl’, ‘heroin’, ‘levorphanol’, ‘loperamide’ ‘methadone’, ‘meperidine’, ‘morphine’, ‘naloxone’, ‘nalbuphine’, ‘nalmefene’, ‘naltrexone’, ‘oxycodone’, ‘propoxyphene’, ‘pentazocine’, ‘tramadol’, and ‘tapentadol’. All electronic database searches were performed on October 9th, 2017. Keywords were searched in ‘article titles’, ‘abstracts’, and ‘keywords’. Relevant articles were retrieved and sorted by the option of ‘Cited by’, which yielded a list of articles arranged in descending order of their number of citations. No filters of language, time, human studies, subject area, territory, or affiliations were used. Abstracts and full texts of the articles were read from the sorted list and irrelevant articles were excluded from the analysis.

All article types, other than those requiring manual searching, telephone access, guidelines, and non-PubMed indexed articles, were included. The dataset was further evaluated by title, first and senior author, institution, department of the first author, topic, source, year of publication, and country of origin. In contrast with other researchers [6,7], we used CiteScore [15], Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP), and SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) to rank the journals. Some articles were cited more frequently than others, due to differences in the time since publication. We adjusted for this error by determining citation index for each article.

Citation analysis of the extracted articles was conducted both by using Scopus and by manually screening the articles. Articles were further classified into two broad categories: 1) major subject area and 2) class of opioids. Tables and charts were created using Microsoft Excel 2016 (Microsoft Corporation, Washington, US). IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, New York, US) was used to apply the Pearson product moment correlation co-efficient to evaluate the relationship between citation times, CiteScore, and citation density. Chi-square test was applied to observe significant difference between the categorical values and Non-parametric tests, such as the Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test, were applied to evaluate any significant difference between categorical and numerical data. P-value < 0.05 was considered significant in all cases.


Trends of citation classics

Top citation classics were published from 1957 to 2013. Most were original articles (n=80), while the remainder were review articles (n=17), conference papers (n=1), and letters to the editor (n=2). The citations of those articles summed to 92,413, ranging from 545 to 3,149, with a median of 762.5 and a mean of 924.13. Approximately 4% were self-cited and 3.6% were book citations, reducing the original citations to 85,482. Citation density (citations per year) ranged from 10.53 to 147.63, with a median of 33.06 and a mean of 38.97. A moderately positive correlation was found between citation count and citation density (r=0.511), while no significant correlation was found between citation count and year of publication. There was no significant difference between the citations of original articles and other article types (p= 0.311). Figure 1 shows the overall trend of total citations by year, with the peak citations in 1988.

Origins, institutions and authorships

The citation classics were produced by nineteen different countries. Figure 2 shows major contributors to the top 100 citation classics, with the leading contribution from the United States (n= 58).

In addition, 160 different institutions contributed to the top cited articles list, with almost 40 institutions having two or more articles in the list. The University of Michigan (n=15) and VA Medical Center (n=7) had the most citation classics of all institutions on the list. The third most-cited institution, University of Cagliari (n=5), is in Italy. 

Five hundred authors contributed to the citation classics, with a median of four authors and mean of five authors. The number of authors per article ranged from 1 to 21. Details of authors with more than two citation classics are shown in Table 1.

Author Number of Articles             Author Position Author Affiliations    H index Primary topic of interest     Fields of           Interest Years Highest Citation
First Last Others Corresponding
Akil, H 6 1 1 4 0 Molecular & Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, University Michigan Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, United States 101 Receptors/ Anatomy Neuroscience, Genetics and Biochemistry 1984-1995 1,006
Watson, SJ 5 0 4 1 0 Molecular & Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, University Michigan Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, United States 108 Receptors/ Anatomy Neuroscience, Genetics and Biochemistry 1984-1995 954
Di Chiara, G 4 2 2 0 2 Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Institute of Neuroscience, Roma, Italy 78 Addictions and Drug abuse Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Biochemistry 1988-1997 3,149
Mansour, A 4 4 0 0 4 Pharmaco Genesis, United States 40 Receptors/ Anatomy Neuroscience, Genetics and Biochemistry 1987-1995 954
Hughes, J 3 2 0 1 2 The Neuroscience Research Centre, Harlow, United Kingdom 40 Drug interaction and pharmacology Neuroscience, Medicine and Pharmacology 1975-1977 2,677
Imperato, A 3 0 2 1 0 Sanofi S.A., Neurodegenerative Disease Program, Gentilly, France 44 Addictions and Drug abuse Drug interaction and pharmacology Neuroscience, Genetics and Biochemistry 1988-1999 3,149
Kalso, E 3 1 0 2 0 Helsinki University Central Hospital, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Helsinki, Finland 64 Pain Management Neuroscience, Medicine and Pharmacology 2001-2004 969
Kosterlitz, HW 3 0 2 1 0 University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom 101 Receptors/ Anatomy, Pharmacology Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Genetics 1975-1983 2,677
Ling, N 3 0 1 2 0 Neurocrine Bioscience, Department of Peptide Chemistry, San Diego, United States 96 Pharmacology and endorphins Neuroscience, Medicine and Biochemistry 1976-1977 1,101
Roques, BP 3 1 0 2 1 Pharmaleads, Paris, France 82 Pharmacology and opiums Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Biochemistry 1980-1999 1,139
Vassart, G 3 0 0 3 0 Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie Humaine et Moléculaire (IRIBHM), Brussels, Belgium 90 Receptors/ Anatomy Biochemsitry, Medicine and Pharmacology 1994-1999 1,636
Bloom, F 3 1 2 0 1 Scripps Research Institute, San Diego, United States 117 Pharmacology and endorphins Neuroscience, Genetics and Biochemistry 1976-1988 1,606


The citation classics were published in 40 journals. The CiteScore of these journals ranged from 2.45 to 29.6, with a median of 8.67 and a mode of 7.87. More than half of the articles (n= 62) were published in nine journals (Table 2). Weak positive correlations were found between CiteScores of the journals and the number of articles published (r=0.255), total citations of the journals (r=0.253), citation count of the articles (r=0.080), citation density (r=0.085), and years of publication (r=0.086). There was no significant difference between CiteScore by subject area (p=0.432), classification of opioids (p=0.076), or type of article (p=0.267).

SOURCE TITLE Number of Articles CiteScore Highest CiteScore Percentile SNIP SJR % review %cited Total citations CiteScore Rank Subject Area
Science 14 14.39 99th 13.53 7.68 10.83 34.83 13,914    1/77 Multidisciplinary
Nature 12 13.33 98th 8.04 18.13 2.02 42.97 12,720    2/77 Multidisciplinary
Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of America 10 8.56 96th 2.63 6.32 1.16 15.76 9,883    3/77 Multidisciplinary
Anesthesiology 6 3.01 91st 2.27 2.12 7.88 51.45 4,373    2/23 Anesthesiology and Pain medicine
Pain 5 4.58 97th 1.94 2.84 8.09 27.75 5,437 3/115 Anesthesiology and Pain medicine
Journal Of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics 4 3.9 85th 1.16 1.76 3.54 19.52 4,689 43/299 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
JAMA Journal of American Medical Association 4 6.67 98th 9.16 6.86   48% 3,557 23/2156 Medicine
New England Journal Of Medicine 4 12.82 99th 14.68 15.76 10.12 54.74 3,850 7/2156 Medicine
Brain Research 3 2.75 78th 0.82 1.26 19.53 29.61 1,942 69/322 Neurology

Subject areas and topical distribution

Citation classics belonged to four major subject areas: neurosciences, anesthesiology and pain management, gastroenterology, and general medicine. Figure 3 shows the number of articles published each year by specific subject area. The distribution of citation count was same in all subject areas (p=0.260). No significant difference was found between subject areas and citation density (p=0.136) and year of publication (p=0.105).

Forty-six of the citation classics primarily discussed opioids’ mechanism of action, followed by adverse effects (n=24), clinical uses (n=13), pharmacokinetics (n=4), basic sciences (n=3), and opioid tolerance (n=2). The remaining seven discussed various other topics.

Classes of opioids 

Citation classics were distributed among four major opioid classes and a miscellaneous topics category. Thirty-five articles discussed endogenous opioids, followed by synthetic opioids (n=30), opium (n=8), and semi-synthetic opioids (n=4). The remaining 23 citation classics discussed opioids in general. Significant differences were observed between classes of opioids and years of publication (p=0.037), citation count (p=0.000), and citation density (p=0.000). Figure 4 shows the number of articles on classification of opioids published in each subject area. There was no significant difference between articles published on different classes of opioids and subject areas (p=0.491).


The use of Opium dates back to the commencement of the Greek era [16]; opioids are opium derivatives [17]. The oldest opioid articles available on PubMed were published in 1945. The fact that none of these pioneer articles is a citation classic suggests that the quality of the work plays a greater role in citation number than does the number of years for which the article has been a part of the literature [12]

Trends of citation classics

Citation classics ranged over 53 years of publication, with zero to seven articles per year. Seventy-two of the citation classics were published from 1977 to 1997. The most-often cited article in the list was published in 1988. In contrast with previous studies [7], our graph of the total article citations over time (Figure 1) showed several peaks and troughs. After 1995, a gradual decrease in citations occurred, followed by a rapid decrease in 1997. Only 24 of all articles published after 1997 were citation classics. This finding supports the idea that some topics undergo intense study at certain times during which extensive research is performed, and after which the topic ceases to be of broad and current interest [18]. There was no significant difference between the citations of original research articles and review articles (p=0.310), contradicting the belief that review articles are more often cited [7]. Interestingly, only two articles had a citation density greater than one hundred, and the article ranked seventeenth had the highest citation density of 147.63 by Chou R et al. 

Origins, institutions and authorships

Sixty-three of the citation classics came from the United States (Figure 1). Campbell explains this major contribution from the USA by stating that reviewers and authors from the USA show bias towards local papers [19]. The United Kingdom produced the second-highest number of citation classics (n=13), followed by France (n=10). Thirteen of the citation classics were produced through the contributions of researchers in multiple countries.

In total, 160 institutions contributed to our citation classics. Forty institutions had more than two articles among the citation classics. Thirty-five of the citation classics had multi-institutional origins. Of these, 13 papers were also multinational, suggesting that international collaborations produce high-quality output that greatly benefits the scientific community [7].

A total of 500 authors contributed to the citation classics. Each of the top 12 authors contributed to at least three articles. Bloom F, although 12th in rank, had the highest H-index, followed by Watson SJ, Kosterlitz HW, and Akil H. Authors with a high H-index not only have a greater chance of having their work accepted, but are also more likely to get promotions and become reviewers [20].


As the results indicated, the citation classics were published in 40 journals. The top three journals were multidisciplinary and contained 36 citation classics. Sixteen were neurosciences-based journals with 23 citation classics. Seven were medicine journals with 13 citation classics. Similarly, pharmacology-based journals (n=7) had 12 citation classics, and anesthesiology journals had 11 citation classics. Among the multidisciplinary journals, Science had the highest CiteScore of 14.39 and the highest number of citation classics. Both top CiteScore journals had only one article each in the top hundred. Among the neuroscience-based journals, Annual Review of Neuroscience had the highest CiteScore of 16.43, followed by Trends in Neurosciences, with the CiteScore of 10.37. The top citation classic was published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, a multidisciplinary journal with a CiteScore of 8.56. This journal had ten articles in the list of citation classics (Table 2). Physiological Reviews, a medicine-based journal, had the highest CiteScore (29.60) overall, but only one citation classic was published in it.

According to the Bradford law, our top three multidisciplinary journals that had the highest citations are Zone 1 or core journals [21]. Similarly, the journals belonging to the categories of neurosciences and medicine are Zone 2 and Zone 3 journals, respectively. This trend indicates that although opioids are part of the field of pharmacology, citation classics on opioids were primarily published in multidisciplinary and neurology-based journals, which contradicts an established concept that highly cited articles are published in field-specific journals [13]. We used multiple analytical parameters to rank our journals, including CiteScore, SJR, and SNIP, to reduce bias [22]. CiteScore is a metric similar to a journal’s Impact Factor that gives us a comprehensive view of the journal’s effect on the scientific community.

Subject area and topical distribution

Neurosciences seemed to be the most studied subject area, as half of the citation classics covered topics in neurology, psychology, cognitive sciences, and psychiatry. This finding is similar to previous reports [23]. The most likely explanation is that the mechanism of action, clinical uses, tolerance, and addiction involve the neural system. Thirty-one of the citation classics addressed anaesthesiology and pain management, demonstrating the major role of opioids in this subject area. Even though opioids have major effects on the gastrointestinal tract [24], we observed that gastroenterology articles were underrepresented among the opioid citation classics. The work in various subject areas was uniformly distributed among years of publication.

As mentioned above, citation classics primarily discussed the opioid mechanism of action, covering the structure, saturation, availability, binding sites, and location of opioid receptors in various organs. Although deaths due to opioid overuse and addiction continue to skyrocket [25], 24 articles focused on the adverse effects of opioids. In these articles, drug dependence, abuse, and addiction were highlighted. Only one article among the citation classics examined prescription protocols.

Classes of opioids

Opioids are classified as endogenous, opium alkaloids, synthetic opioids, and semi-synthetic opioids [16]. Endogenous opioids, which include endorphins, enkephalins, and dynorphins, were most-studied. Twenty of the 35 citation classics regarding endogenous opioids fell under the subject area of neurology (Figure 4). The second most cited class was synthetic opioids. Thirteen of these 30 citation classics fell under the subject area of neurology. 

Some limitations must be considered. Possible citation bias, including in-house citations, negative citations, and incomplete citations is a major limitation. In addition, the use of one database to extract the list may have overlooked articles that were not recognized by Scopus, and excluded textbooks. Scopus has been reported to miss older citations, which results in omissions of research conducted and published before 1980 [26, 27]. Our list may have missed some citation classics; this can be explained as ‘obliteration by incorporation’ [12], which in simple terms states that the content of some classic articles has become such common knowledge that they no longer require citation.


We conclude that the neurologic and analgesic aspects of opioids are well established in the top 100 citation classics. Endogenous and synthetic opioids were the most studied. Although addiction and misuse of opioids is a worldwide menace to health and economy, this concern was underrepresented in the citation classics. We would also like to draw attention to the pulmonary and gastrointestinal aspects of opioids, which are marginalized among the citation classics. Similarly, quality papers on opium alkaloids, semi-synthetic opioids, and substance abuse are needed.


  1. Regehr G: Trends in medical education research. Acad Med. 2004, 79:939-947.
  2. Ellegaard O, Wallin JA: The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: how great is the impact?. Scientometrics. 2015, 105:1809-1831. 10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
  3. Glynn RW, Scutaru C, Kerin MJ, Sweeny KJ: Breast cancer research output, 1945-2008: a bibliometric and density-equalizing analysis. Breast Cancer Res. 2010, 12:108. 10.1186/bcr2795
  4. Kelly J, Glynn R, O'Briain D, McCabe JP: The 100 classic papers of orthopaedic surgery: a bibliometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010, 92:1338-1343. 10.1302/0301-620X.92B10.24867
  5. Ibrahim GM, Carter Snead O, Rutka JT, Lozano AM: The most cited works in epilepsy: trends in the “citation classics”. Epilepsia. 2012, 53:765-770. 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03455.x
  6. Siddiqi TJ, Usman MS, Khan MS, et al.: The 100 most influential papers in the field of thrombolytic therapy: a bibliometric analysis. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2017, 17:319-333. 10.1007/s40256-017-0227-2
  7. Usman MS, Siddiqi TJ, Khan MS, Fatima K, Butler J, Manning WJ, Khosa F: A scientific analysis of the 100 citation classics of valvular heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2017, 120:1440-1449. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.035
  8. Manglik A, Kruse AC, Kobilka TS, et al.: Crystal structure of the [micro]-opioid receptor bound to a morphinan antagonist. Nature. 2012, 485:321-326. 10.1038/nature10954
  9. Brunton LL, Chabner BA, Knollman BC : Goodman and Gilman’s: The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. Mc Graw-Hill Education, New York ; 2011.
  10. "Opioids." National Institute on Drug Abuse. Accessed: October 29, 2017: https://www.drugabuse.gov/drugs-abuse/opioids.
  11. Benyamin R, Trescot A, Datta S, et al.: Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician J. 2008, 11:S105-120.
  12. Garfield E: 100 citation classics from the journal of the american medical association. JAMA. 1987, 257:52-59. 10.1001/jama.1987.03390010056028
  13. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Paappas G: Comparison of pubMed, scopus, web of science, and google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008, 2:338-342. 10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
  14. Schumacher MA, Basbaum AI, Way WL: Opioid Analgesics & Antagonists. Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. Mc Graw-Hill Education, New York; 2012. 543-564.
  15. Zijlstra H, McCullough R: CiteScore: a new metric to help you track journal performance and make decisions. Elsevier. 2016, Accessed: October 29, 2017: https://www.elsevier.com/editors-update/story/journal-metrics/citescore-a-new-metric-to-help-you-choose-the-right-jou....
  16. Pathan H, Williams J: Basic opioid pharmacology: an update. Br J Pain. 2012, 6:11-16. 10.1177/2049463712438493
  17. Duarte DF: Opium and opioids: a brief history (in Spanish). Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2005, 55:135-146. 10.1590/S0034-70942005000100015
  18. Paladugu R, Schein M, Gardezi S, Wise L: One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals. World J Surg. 2002, 26:1099-1105. 10.1007/s00268-002-6376-7
  19. Campbell FM: National bias: a comparison of citation practices by health professionals. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1990, 78:376-382.
  20. Stossel TP: Volume: papers and academic promotion. Ann Intern Med. 1987, 106:146-149. 10.7326/0003-4819-106-1-146
  21. Nash-Stewart CE: Does Bradford’s law of scattering predict the size of the literature in cochrane reviews?. J Med Libr Assoc. 2012, 100:135-138. 10.3163/1536-5050.100.2.013
  22. La Torre G, Sciarra I, Chiappetta M, Monteduro A: New bibliometric indicators for the scientific literature: an evolving panorama. Clin Ter. 2017, 168:65-71.
  23. Flam F: Neuroscience Offers Insights Into the Opioid Epidemic. Bloomberg View. 2017, Accessed: October 29, 2017: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-07-21/neuroscience-offers-insights-into-the-opioid-epidemic.
  24. Camilleri M, Lembo A, Katzka DA: Opioids in Gastroenterology: Treating Adverse Effects and Creating Therapeutic Benefits. Clin Gastroenterol. Hepatol, 2017:1338-1349. 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.05.014
  25. American society of addiction medicine: opioid addiction 2016 facts and figures. (2016). Accessed: October 29, 2017: https://www.asam.org/docs/default-source/advocacy/opioid-addiction-disease-facts-figures.pdf.
  26. Brandt JS, Downing AC, Howard DL, Kofinas JD, Chasen ST: Citation classics in obstetrics and gynecology: the 100 most frequently cited journal articles in the last 50 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010, 203:355-1. 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.025
  27. Bakkalbasi N, Bauer K, Glover J, Wang L: Three options for citation tracking: google scholar, scopus and web of science. Biomed Digit Libr. 2006, 3:7. 10.1186/1742-5581-3-7


Rank Title Citation Citation density Most Cited (Year)
1 Drugs abused by humans preferentially increase synaptic dopamine concentrations in the mesolimbic system of freely moving rats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1988 3149 108.59 2014
2 Identification of two related pentapeptides from the brain with potent opiate agonist activity. Nature, 1975 2677 63.74 1977
3 The effects of morphine-and nalorphine-like drugs in the nondependent and morphine-dependent chronic spinal dog. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 1976 2336 56.98 1982
4 A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychological Review, 1987 2077 69.23 1999
5 Endogenous opioid peptides: multiple agonists and receptors. Nature, 1977 1928 48.2 1982
6 The formalin test: a quantitative study of the analgesic effects of morphine, meperidine, and brain stem stimulation in rats and cats. Pain, 1977 1843 46.08 2011
7 A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury: results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. The New England Journal of Medicine, 1990 1820 67.41 2002
8  Drugs of abuse: anatomy, pharmacology and function of reward pathways. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 1992 1729 69.16 1998
9  Isolation and structure of the endogenous agonist of opioid receptor-like ORL1 receptor. Nature, 1995 1636 74.36 2000
10 Cellular and molecular mechanisms of drug dependence. Science, 1988 1606 55.38 2000
11 A neuropeptide that activates an opioidlike G protein-coupled receptor. Science, 1995 1592 72.36 2000
12 Intrathecal morphine in mice: a new technique. European Journal of Pharmacology, 1980 1433 38.73 2013
13 The self-medication hypothesis of addictive disorders: focus on heroin and cocaine dependence. In: The Cocaine Crisis: Springer; 1987 1413 44.16 2011-2012
14 Opiate receptor: demonstration in nervous tissue. Science, 1973 1367 31.07 1981
15 The formalin test in mice: dissociation between inflammatory and non-inflammatory pain. Pain, 1987 1355 45.17 2011;2014
16 Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. Jama, 2000 1291 75.94 2014
17 Clinical guidelines for the use of chronic opioid therapy in chronic noncancer pain. The Journal of Pain, 2009 1181 147.63 2011
18 Loss of morphine-induced analgesia, reward effect and withdrawal symptoms in mice lacking the mu-opioid-receptor gene. Nature, 1996 1139 54.24 2001
19 beta-Endorphin and adrenocorticotropin are selected concomitantly by the pituitary gland. Science, 1977 1101 27.53 1982
20 A potent and selective endogenous agonist for the mu-opiate receptor. Nature, 1997 1082 54.1 1999
21 Cloning of a delta opioid receptor by functional expression. Science, 1992 1028 41.12 1994
22 P-glycoprotein in the blood-brain barrier of mice influences the brain penetration and pharmacological activity of many drugs. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1996 1020 48.57 2004
23 Opioids excite dopamine neurons by hyperpolarization of local interneurons. Journal of Neuroscience, 1992 1014 40.56 2011
24 Chronic parkinsonism secondary to intravenous injection of meperidine analogues. Psychiatry Research, 1979 1011 26.61 1986
25 Inhibition of morphine tolerance and dependence by the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801. Science, 1991 1006 37.26 1996
26 Bispectral analysis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology, 1997 989 49.45 2006
27 Placebo and opioid analgesia--imaging a shared neuronal network. Science, 2002 969 64.6 2009
28 Unresponsiveness to cannabinoids and reduced addictive effects of opiates in CB1 receptor knockout mice. Science, 1999 960 53.33 2005
29  Anatomy of CNS opioid receptors. Trends in Neurosciences, 1988 954 32.9 1994
30 Opioid-receptor mRNA expression in the rat CNS: anatomical and functional implications. Trends in Neurosciences, 1995 936 42.55 1999;2000
31 Endogenous opioids: biology and function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 1984 916 27.76 1988
32 Common precursor to corticotropins and endorphins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1977 913 20.83 1980
33 Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1999 911 50.61 2016
34 Dynorphin is a specific endogenous ligand of the kappa opioid receptor. Science, 1982 906 25.89 1983
35 Opioid and nonopioid components independently contribute to the mechanism of action of tramadol, an 'atypical' opioid analgesic. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 1992 898 35.92 2011
36 ORL1, a novel member of the opioid receptor family: cloning, functional expression and localization. FEBS letters, 1994 897 39 2000
37 Management of pain in elderly patients with cancer. Jama, 1998 896 47.16 2006
38 Role of unconditioned and conditioned drug effects in the self-administration of opiates and stimulants. Psychological Review, 1984 895 27.12 1989
39 The delta-opioid receptor: isolation of a cDNA by expression cloning and pharmacological characterization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1992 881 35.24 1994
40 Intrathecal and epidural administration of opioids. Anesthesiology, 1984 837 25.36 1989
41 Lack of analgesic effect of opioids on neuropathic and idiopathic forms of pain. Pain, 1988 826 28.48 2003
42  COMT val158met genotype affects µ-opioid neurotransmitter responses to a pain stressor. Science, 2003 820 58.57 2009
43 Endogenous pain control mechanisms: review and hypothesis. Annals of Neurology, 1978 793 20.33 1984
44 Molecular cloning and functional expression of a mu-opioid receptor from rat brain. Molecular Pharmacology, 1993 788 32.83 1996
45 Morphine, gabapentin, or their combination for neuropathic pain. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2005 787 65.56 2011
46 Single-nucleotide polymorphism in the human mu opioid receptor gene alters β-endorphin binding and activity: possible implications for opiate addiction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1998 783 41.21 2013
47 Stereospecific binding of the potent narcotic analgesic [3H] etorphine to rat-brain homogenate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1973 770 17.5 1981
48 Bis-penicillamine enkephalins possess highly improved specificity toward delta opioid receptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1983 767 22.56 1991
49 Cannabinoid and heroin activation of mesolimbic dopamine transmission by a common µ1 opioid receptor mechanism. Science, 1997 757 37.85 2007
50 Autoradiographic differentiation of mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors in the rat forebrain and midbrain. Journal of Neuroscience, 1987 748 24.93 1994
51 U-50,488: a selective and structurally novel non-Mu (kappa) opioid agonist. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 1983 732 21.53 1991
52 Opposite effects of mu and kappa opiate agonists on dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens and in the dorsal caudate of freely moving rats. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 1988 723 24.93 1997
53 Dynorphin-(1-13), an extraordinarily potent opioid peptide. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1979 722 19 1982
54 Dissociable deficits in the decision-making cognition of chronic amphetamine abusers, opiate abusers, patients with focal damage to prefrontal cortex, and tryptophan-depleted normal volunteers: evidence for monoaminergic mechanisms. Neuropsychopharmacology, 1999 721 40.06 2005
55 Opioids in chronic non-cancer pain: systematic review of efficacy and safety. Pain, 2004 719 55.31 2010
56 Opposing tonically active endogenous opioid systems modulate the mesolimbic dopaminergic pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1992 713 28.52 2012
57 Opiate analgesics inhibit substance P release from rat trigeminal nucleus. Nature, 1977 702 17.55 1984
58 Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Model Development. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, 1997 699 34.95 2013;2014
59 Progressive ratio schedules in drug self-administration studies in rats: a method to evaluate reinforcing efficacy. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 1996 698 33.24 2015
60 The Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS): psychometric properties of the SDS in English and Australian samples of heroin, cocaine and amphetamine users. Addiction, 1995 696 31.64 2016
61 Mechanisms of hyperalgesian and morphine tolerance: a current view of their possible interactions. Pain, 1995 694 31.55 2005
62 The effects of psychosocial services in substance abuse treatment. Addictions Nursing Network, 1993 691 28.79 2004
63 Morphine and alternative opioids in cancer pain: the EAPC recommendations. British Journal of Cancer, 2001 688 43 2011
64 A medical treatment for diacetylmorphine (heroin) addiction: a clinical trial with methadone hydrochloride. Jama, 1965 679 13.06 1971
65 Tolerance of locus coeruleus neurones to morphine and suppression of withdrawal response by clonidine. Nature, 1978 675 17.31 1996
66 Immunohistochemical localization of enkephalin in rat brain and spinal cord. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 1978 673 17.26 1983
67 Autoradiographic localization of opiate receptors in rat brain. Spinal cord and lower medulla. Brain Research, 1977 665 16.63 1982
68 Opioid therapy for chronic pain. The New England Journal of Medicine, 2003 659 47.07 2010
69 Isolation of an endogenous compound from the brain with pharmacological properties similar to morphine. Brain Research, 1975 657 15.64 1977
70 Opioid-induced hyperalgesia: a qualitative systematic review. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, 2006 648 58.91 2012
71 The action of morphine and related substances on contraction and on acetylcholine output of coaxially stimulated guinea‐pig ileum. British Journal of Pharmacology, 1957 632 10.53 1980
72 Acute opioid tolerance intraoperative remifentanil increases postoperative pain and morphine requirement. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, 2000 630 37.06 2015
73 Intravenous cocaine, morphine, and amphetamine preferentially increase extracellular dopamine in the" shell" as compared with the" core" of the rat nucleus accumbens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1995 624 28.36 1999
74 A new method for receptor autoradiography: [3 H] opioid receptors in rat brain. Brain Research, 1979 620 16.32 1985
75 Organization of endogenous opiate and nonopiate pain control systems. Science, 1982 609 17.4 1986
76 Impulsivity as a vulnerability marker for substance-use disorders: review of findings from high-risk research, problem gamblers and genetic association studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2008 608 67.56 2014
77 Neurobiology of relapse to heroin and cocaine seeking: a review. Pharmacological Reviews, 2002 608 40.53 2005
78 Opioid and nonopioid mechanisms of stress analgesia. Science, 1980 606 16.38 1983
79 Cellular and synaptic adaptations mediating opioid dependence. Physiological Reviews, 2001 604 37.75 2006
80 Crystal structure of the [micro]-opioid receptor bound to a morphinan antagonist. Nature, 2012 594 118.8 2013
81 The enkephalinase inhibitor thiorphan shows antinociceptive activity in mice. Nature, 1980 594 16.05 1989
82 Endorphins: profound behavioral effects in rats suggest new etiological factors in mental illness. Science, 1976 587 14.32 1979
83 Halothane–morphine compared with high-dose sufentanil for anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in neonatal cardiac surgery. The New England Journal of Medicine, 1992 584 26.55 2001
84 Control CfD, Prevention: Vital signs: overdoses of prescription opioid pain relievers - United States, 1999 - 2008. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2011 582 97 2016
85 Immunohistochemical studies using antibodies to leucine-enkephalin: initial observations on the nervous system of the rat. Neuroscience, 1976 577 14.07 1980
86 The neostriatal mosaic: compartmentalization of corticostriatal input and striatonigral output systems. Nature, 1984 571 17.3 1989
87 Cloning and sequence analysis of cDNA for porcine β-neo-endorphin/dynorphin precursor. Nature, 1982 571 16.31 1986
88 Classification of opioid receptors. 1983. 570 16.76 1986
89 Pain relief by intrathecally applied morphine in man. Survey of Anesthesiology, 1979 570 15 1982
90 Addictive drugs and brain stimulation reward. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 1996 569 27.1 2005
91 Self-administration of psychoactive substances by the monkey. Psychopharmacology, 1969 566 11.79 1976
92 Efficacy of oxycodone in neuronathic pain: a randomized trial in postherpetic neuralgia. Neurology, 1998 565 29.74 2003
93 Clinical pharmacology of tramadol. Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2004 563 43.31 2016
94 Multiple opiate receptors. Enkephalins and morphine bind to receptors of different specificity. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1979 563 14.82 1982
95 International Union of Pharmacology. XII. Classification of opioid receptors. Pharmacological Reviews, 1996 561 26.71 1999
96 Cloning and functional comparison of kappa and delta opioid receptors from mouse brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1993 561 23.38 1996
97 Mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptor mRNA expression in the rat CNS: an in situ hybridization study. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 1994 557 24.22 1999
98 Intrathecal morphine inhibits substance P release from mammalian spinal cord in vivo. Nature, 1980 551 14.89 1988
99 Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician Journal, 2008 545 60.56 2016
100 Neurobiological similarities in depression and drug dependence: a self-medication hypothesis. Neuropsychopharmacology, 1998 544 28.63 2002
Original article

Citation Classics and Trends in the Field of Opioids: A Bibliometric Analysis

Author Information

Hira F. Akbar Corresponding Author

Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK

Khadijah Siddiq

Civil Hospital Karachi, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, PAK

Salman Nusrat

Gasteroenterology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, USA

Ethics Statement and Conflict of Interest Disclosures

Human subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve human participants or tissue. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Original article

Citation Classics and Trends in the Field of Opioids: A Bibliometric Analysis

Figures etc.


Scholary Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. Learn more here.