"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

Margaret Mead

Review article

Evaluation of CyberKnife Radiosurgery for Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia


Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has evolved as an accepted treatment for medication resistant trigeminal neuralgia. Initial results are very good but follow-up over three to five years shows a gradual return of pain in up to 50% of treated patients, often requiring further treatment. The results with repeat SRS using the isocentric Gamma Knife (GK) (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden), especially in patients having initially good results, are very similar to the outcomes after the initial treatment although there is an increased risk of residual facial numbness secondary to the additional radiation dose to the trigeminal nerve. However, after 2000, non-isocentric SRS systems began to be used for treating trigeminal neuralgia including the CyberKnife (CK) (Accuray, Sunnyvale, California) as well as various linear accelerator (LINAC) based systems. This report specifically examines a series of recurrent trigeminal cases treated by the same group of physicians with the CK system. Similar doses and locations on the trigeminal nerve and/or the root entry zone were used for both initial and repeat SRS treatment regardless of system used. Although there are numerous series reporting the use of GK for recurrent treatment for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia, there are no series reviewing the results and long-term effectiveness using CK for repeat SRS for recurrent trigeminal pain. We reviewed 23 cases that had initial treatment for trigeminal neuralgia either surgically or with SRS with either the GK or CK and then a later second procedure only with CK. The follow-up after the second CK SRS ranged from three to 13 years found that the results are very similar to the multiple reports in the literature describing second or third SRS treatments with the GK. Results of repeat radiosurgery treatment of recurrent trigeminal neuralgia appear to be independent of the system used and are primarily based on proper target and dose to the trigeminal nerve.

Introduction & Background

Background of stereotactic radiation treatment of trigeminal neuralgia 

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has evolved as one of the main treatments for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) in combination with medical management. For almost 20 years, Gamma Knife, an isocentric Cobalt radiation unit (GK) (Elekta, Stockholm Sweden) was the initial radiosurgery method available for providing a highly focused isocentric radiation dose to a small target limited to four to six millimeters (mm) along the trigeminal nerve, labeled as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) [1-3]. The initial SRS experience reported, including follow-up results, has been extensively published and upgraded for over 30 years, and the range of initial treatment radiation dosages, targets, and results with one to 10 year follow-ups as well as the secondary effects, especially residual facial numbness, are well established [2,4,5]. The initial treatment dose is found to be an important factor, varying from 70 Gy to 90 Gy with a tendency to better relief but associated with a higher rate of numbness with the 90 Gy dose [1,4]. The accepted target is four to six mm along the trigeminal nerve, although some centers include one to two mm of the trigeminal root entry zone in the pons [6,7]. Some centers have found that higher initial dose to the trigeminal nerve and possibly early treatment also lead to better results [8,9]. The most common measurement scale to rate and access pain in trigeminal neuralgia is the Barrow Neurologic Institute (BNI) scale. This scale stages the patient from 0 to V using a combination of degree of residual pain and use of medication both before and after treatment. Excellent and good results are considered in the range of BNI 0-III indicating no pain or mild or intermittent pain controlled with medication. Post procedure follow-up results afterwards are similarly evaluated on the same scale [10].

Follow-up of treatment results in large series for initial treatment of trigeminal neuralgia using GK, at one year, show excellent to good results (BNI 0-II or even III a) between 72% to 86% of cases. Most large series have a small group with immediate pain relief within 48 hours of treatment but the majority of patients get results over the initial 30 days. Longer-term follow-up extending over three, five, and 10 years after GK SRS indicate that the results gradually deteriorate, resulting in residual excellent and good results (BNI 0-III) in only 44 to 50% five years after treatment [1,2,4]. There is a relationship between better long-term pain relief and development of mild post-procedure facial numbness, which is frequently related to extending the radiosurgical lesion one or two millimeters into the root entry zone [5,7,11-14].

In the past 15 years, as extensive experience developed with GK, and as the use of radiosurgery for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia was becoming common, experience has also evolved with using alternative radiosurgery systems such as the non-isocentric robotic arm CyberKnife (CK) (Accuray, Sunnyvale, California) that were reported were equivalent in range to the results achieved using GK [15-20]. A recent report of 138 cases using the CyberKnife for initial treatment of trigeminal neuralgia with a mean dose of 75 Gy had an effective pain control rate (BNI class I-IIIa) at six months of 93.5%, 12 months 85.8%, 24 months 79.7%, and at 36 months 76% [15]. As both clinical experience and the planning software and computer movement controls of these CK or LINAC systems have improved, the results for initial treatment of trigeminal neuralgia using equivalent dosing and targets are almost similar to the much larger reported GK experience [21-23]. As treatment teams, including the neurosurgeon, radiation oncologist, and radiation physicist, became more familiar with the treatment target and dose for trigeminal neuralgia, there are reports using different non-isocentric LINAC systems for the initial treatment of trigeminal neuralgia that match that achieved with both GK and CK [22-27]. In previous studies using stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebral lesions and comparing dosing there has been no difference between GK and CK [28,29]. As different non-isocentric and isocentric stereotactic radio surgical systems have become available, the decision to initially treat trigeminal neuralgia with GK, CK or even LINAC based systems may be a result of machine proximity, insurance coverage or physician training on the various systems rather than because there is any significant difference in results. Dosimetric comparisons have been made allowing conversion of dosing parameters based on the isodose lines from one system to another [30].

The use of SRS for repeat treatment for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia

Trigeminal neuralgia is an often recurrent disease regardless of success of initial treatments with medications such as carbamezapine and gabapentin, SRS, radiofrequency rhizotomy, balloon compression, or microvascular decompression. In follow-up after initial SRS, the majority of patients continue with good relief up to the second or third year and then the results gradually deteriorate with pain recurrence [31]. There are many treatment options for recurrent pain after the initial treatment, whether it is SRS, radiofrequency trigeminal rhizotomy, balloon compression, or microvascular decompression [32,33]. Many patients, even though they do not have severe episodic pain, often need supplemental medication including or gabapentin after treatment [11]. This persistence or development of low grade discomfort in the trigeminal area has been speculated to be related to possible gradual remyelination of the trigeminal nerve after radiation damage [12,33]. When pain recurs after three or more years, many GK patients undergo repeat SRS treatment, and numerous series using GK show that the outcome of a second SRS treatment is similar to the initial treatment with 61% excellent or good results within the initial 24 months but with a higher incidence of residual facial numbness [34-42]. There are even case reports of third SRS treatments within the dose restraints of multiple treatments with a debate of the proper dose relative to risk of secondary effects on the adjacent brainstem and the trigeminal nerve and risk of increased facial numbness [42,43]. Although there are numerous reports of series of patients treated with recurrent pain with GK, there are no series reporting the use of CK for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after initial successful SRS treatment, which is the focus of this report.


There were 23 patients reviewed who underwent CK stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after previous radiosurgery. The cases came from a retrospective chart review at a single CyberKnifeR radiosurgery treatment center, referred by multiple neurosurgeons and neurologists over 10 years. The center was established in 2003 as an open staffing model. None of the physicians had any financial interest in the CK center except the director, a radiation oncologist, who was not a treating physician on any of the cases and whose role is explained in the financial disclosure section (JGS). All neurosurgeons had previous experience with GK radiosurgery. All radiation oncologists and physicists had worked with both GK as well as various types of radiation therapy units for cranial radiotherapy. Chart and patient review was made with patient consent when contacted as well as the consent of the treating neurosurgeon. The previous history and length of symptoms, medication used, BNI score if available, and previous treatments were tabulated including the original SRS dose and type of machine used. The interval from primary treatment to second treatment with CK was tabulated. The second treatment dose, total dose, and any side effects or symptoms were tabulated; the length of follow-up including any pain recurrence was determined directly through chart review or by phone contact (Table 1).

M 80 75 3 65 140
M 75 71.67* 5, 3 65 136.67
F 72 80* 6 70 150
M 82 75 1 65 140
M 79 75* 9 65 140
F 85 80* 6 62 142
F 79 75* 7 70 145
F 69 75 2 70 145
F 68 80* 2 60 140
F 71 70 4 65 135
F 53 75* 6 65 140
F 78 70 4 76 146
M 51 70 < 1 60 130
F 73 75 1 60 135
F 84 75 4 60 135
M 70 80* 3 60 140
F 86 75 2 65 140
M 92 80* 11 69.5 149.5
F 79 80*,40* 10 30 150
F 77 3 RF 2 60 60
F 64 RF & SX 3,1 76 76
F 65 SX 5 75 75
F 87 SX 18 75 75

The average age at the second treatment was 66.8 years. There were 17 females and six males. Nineteen of the 23 had either Gamma Knife or CyberKnife radiosurgery as the initial treatment for trigeminal pain. Of the 19 radiosurgery patients, seven had their initial treatment with the GK and 12 with the CyberKnife. One of the patients had the Gamma Knife treatment twice within six months; therefore, undergoing three total SRS treatments. The other four patients had either radiofrequency trigeminal rhizotomy or microvascular decompression as their initial treatment. All patients reviewed for this report had the second treatment for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia using the CyberKnife. The average interval of all patients until the second retreatment was 4.54 years. The interval before a second treatment after Gamma Knife SRS was 4.7 years and CyberKnife 4.45 years. Two radiosurgery patients had recurrent pain bilaterally at separate time intervals and had separate treatments for each side. The average initial SRS treatment dose was 70.9 Gy (ranging between 70 to 80 Gy). There was no dose difference in the initial SRS treatments between GK and CK. The average second dose with the CyberKnife was 63.76 Gy, 10% lower than the initial dose, ranging between 60 to 75 Gy. Review of the actual radiosurgery plans revealed that 18 of the 23 cases treated between four and six millimeters of the trigeminal nerve and only five of the 23 had any extension of the radiation field into the root entry zone of the adjacent pons (Figure 1).


The outcome and length of symptomatic pain relief after the second CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery was tracked in follow-up interviews and chart review. Six patients of the original 23 were lost to long-term follow-up because of age and extended time interval from repeat SRS to time of this review. However, chart information showed that they were pain free at least from two to three years after the repeat radiosurgery. The average trackable pain free interval of all repeat CK patients was 3.7 years. The shortest interval before a third treatment either with radiosurgery or radiofrequency trigeminal rhizotomy was six months. The longest follow-up pain free period was 12 years. Interestingly, all patients remained on baseline medication including either carbamazepine and/or gabapentin after the repeat SRS procedure. Although some patients were known to be clearly pain free after the second SRS, this retrospective review could not reveal if patients had episodic pain. As a result, since they remained on medication, they were classified as BNI III to IIIa after the second SRS with CK. Five patients of the 17, or 29%, that were trackable over two to 12 years had further repeat procedures for recurrent pain. Residual facial numbness was seen in four patients or 24% of the treated group. Three patients had later radiofrequency trigeminal rhizotomy rather than a third SRS treatment at three, four, and six years after the repeat procedure, one had a balloon compression and two patients were able to maintain pain control with peripheral trigeminal branch blocks. The small number of patients undergoing repeat CK SRS as a second treatment combined with a significant number lost to follow-up makes it impossible to perform statistical evaluation. However, the majority of patients where follow-up was available had at least a two to three year pain free interval. Over 12 years only 29% eventually had other procedures, which is consistent with what has been reported after repeat GK studies [1,5,33-40].


In this follow-up group, there appears to be no short or long term difference in patient response for repeat SRS treatment using the CyberKnife compared to the published reports with the Gamma Knife. This small retrospective review indicates that the precision of the target and dose are the determining parameters of pain relief for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia rather than the particular radiation unit used. Detailed pre-treatment radiographic studies and mapping of the trigeminal nerve complex are critical in defining the precise target of the trigeminal nerve within the basal cisterns especially when using contrast enhancement and 3.0 Tesla imaging [44]. Treatment of recurrent pain after successful SRS with the GK has been extensively reported in the literature and a PubMed search found over 450 cases of repeat SRS with the GK but there are no specific reports of recurrent stereotactic radiotherapy using CK or LINAC based systems except for anecdotal mention within articles on treating trigeminal neuralgia [19-21]. The return of pain within the first year after SRS treatment has been classified either as immediate or short term failure.

In all large series, after initial success between 75 to 93%, the failure rate gradually increases with continued follow-up over three, five, and 10 years after the initial treatment, so that up to 50% of the patients with initial good results based on the BNI scale are faced with the need for possible retreatment [1,3-5]. Retreatment options and results after acute and short term failure are different than retreatment after sustained pain relief for many years [8,11]. Although repeat stereotactic treatment is used, patients with short-term failure often require radiofrequency rhizotomy or microvascular decompression [33-40]. Experience with GK has identified the issues affecting treatment and retreatment including the initial pain response, time interval after initial treatment for recurrence, the target, the dose/nerve volume treated and whether the radiosurgery target was the trigeminal nerve alone, the length of nerve treated and if the target was combined with 1-2 mm of the dorsal root entry zone, and the strength of the initial dose [6-8]. These same parameters apply to the treatment with second dose as much as the initial dose [12,33].

Development of numbness in the face is often listed as a complication but is more a secondary effect and many studies find that numbness after treatment correlates positively with good to excellent pain response [12,13,44]. The dose exposure of the adjacent brainstem is a critical factor in repeat SRS and related to post procedure facial numbness [45]. The total cumulative dose to the brainstem and cumulative doses to adjacent structures such as the temporal lobe must be carefully calculated [46,47]. Normally, the initial SRS dose with either GK or SRS varies between 70 to 90 Gy with most centers using a dose of 75 Gy [1,5]. However, the reported retreatment dose using the GK from large centers reporting hundreds of cases of trigeminal neuralgia varies from a low of 45 Gy to a high of 90 Gy combined with a determination to extend the target to the root entry zone in the second treatment if not done initially. Treating a longer segment of the trigeminal nerve may also allow lower dosing to be equally effective with less risk of facial numbness since radiation effect is dose and volume related [46]. The higher dose, both for initial and repeat treatment, is associated with a higher incidence of residual facial numbness varying from 12 to 30% [1,5,13,14]. There are reports of even third SRS treatments and a more individualized plan, especially targeting sections of the trigeminal nerve not in the original radiation plan in cases with recurrent pain [42,47,48]. Experience with treating multiple brain metastatic disease clearly demonstrates the feasibility of multiple repeat SRS treatments [49]. In repeat trigeminal SRS, the reported maximum combined dose limit appears to be 180 Gy with many centers favoring equivalent or higher dosing for the second treatment as long as the patient is aware of the increased risk of facial numbness, which parallels good pain relief [13,14,20]. It is possible with careful evaluation of the dosing to the adjacent brainstem, temporal lobe, cornea, and other critical structures that additional treatment beyond the second SRS can be tolerated with recurrent trigeminal neuralgia [41,42,48].


The original experience using repeat stereotactic radiosurgery to treat recurrent trigeminal neuralgia was reported using the isocentric Gamma Knife and this series reviewed patients treated using the non-isocentric CyberKnife but using the same dose range and targets on the trigeminal nerve and the adjacent root entry zone. The results demonstrate similar effectiveness with excellent and good results in the immediate two to three years after the second SRS being about 60%. The longest pain free interval in follow-up after the repeat treatment was 12 years. The percentage of persistent facial numbness after the second procedure was also similar to that reported with GK. Interestingly, in this group, despite successful treatment with repeat radiosurgery, all patients were kept on at least a baseline dosage of carbamazepine or gabapentin to prevent pain recurrence. Although the use of medication classifies the patients after treatment as a BNI III or IIIa, the treating neurosurgeons felt it was beneficial to reduce the long-term risk of further pain recurrence. In this small group, only 26% of patients followed up to 15 years had further procedures after the second radiosurgery treatment, which may be related to the continued use of medication after the repeat SRS. In this series, the second treatment used an overall slightly lower average target dose than the initial stereotactic treatment. However, an extensive review of more recent literature regarding repeat SRS definitely supports the use of potentially higher doses for retreatment. Reports in the literature also indicate it is possible to even perform a third SRS treatment, as long as the patient is aware of an increased risk of residual or new facial numbness, the potential risk of developing malignant tumors in surrounding tissues, such as the temporal lobe. The dose spread to the brainstem and temporal lobe must be kept within accepted tolerance limits. This long-term follow-up series of a small group of patients receiving a second SRS treatment with CK after a previous SRS with either GK or CK demonstrates that CK is equally effective as the previous reports of repeat SRS using GK. Most importantly, it is the target and dose to the trigeminal nerve, with or without including the root entry zone, that is the key factor in obtaining effective pain relief in patients with recurrent trigeminal neuralgia rather than the particular radiosurgical system used.


  1. Regis J, Tuleasca C, Ressequier N, Carron R, Donnet A, Gaudetart J, Levivier M: Long-term safety and efficacy of gamma knife surgery in classical trigeminal neuralgia: a 497 patinet historical cohort study. J Neurosurg. 2016, 124:1079-87. 10.3171/2015.2.JNS142144
  2. Verheul JB, Hanssens PE, Lie ST, Leenstra S, Piersma H, Beute GN: Gamma knife surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: a review of 450 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg. 2010, 113:160-167.
  3. Singh R, Davis J, Sharma S: Stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: A retrospective multi-institutional examination of treatment options. Cureus. 2016, 8:e554. 10.7759/cureus.554
  4. Dhople AA, Adama JR, Maggio WW, Naqvi SA, Regine WF, Kwok Y: Long-term outcomes of gamma knife radiosurgery for classic trigeminal neuralgia: implications of treatment and critical review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 2209, 111:351-8. 10.3171/2009.2.JNS08977
  5. Tuleasca C, Carron R, Resseguier N, et al.: Patterns of pain-free response in 497 cases of classic trigeminal neuralgia treated with gamma knife surgery and followed up for least 1 year. J Neurosurg. 2012, 117:181-8.
  6. Xu Z, Schlesinger D, Moldovan K, et al.: Impact of target localion on the response of trigeminal neuralgia to stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg. 2014, 120:716-724. 10.3171/2013.10.JNS131596
  7. Zhang P, Brisman R, Choi J, Li X: Where to locate the isocenter? The treatment stategy of repeat trigeminal neuralgia radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005, 82:35-43. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.09.005
  8. Lee JY, Sandhu S, Miller D, Solberg T, Dorsey JF, Alonso-Basanta M: Higher dose rate gamma knife radiosurgery may provide earlier and longer-lasting pain relief for patients with trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg. 2015, 123:961-8. 10.3171/2014.12.JNS142013
  9. Young B, Shivazad A, Kryscio RJ, St Clair W, Bush HM: Long-term outcome of high-dose gamma knife surgery in treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg. 2013, 119:1166-75. 10.3171/2013.1.JNS12875
  10. Mousavi SH, Niranjan A, Huang MJ, et al.: Early radiosurgery provides superior pain relief for trigeminal neuralgia patients. Neurology. 2015, 85:2159-65. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002216
  11. Lee JY: Measurement of trigeminal neuralgia pain: penn facial pain scale. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2016, 27:327-36. 10.1016/j.nec.2016.02.003
  12. Massanger N, Murata N, Tamura M, Devriendt D, Levivier M, Regis J: Influence of nerve radiation dose in the incidence of trigeminal dysfuntion after trigeminal neuralgia radiosurgery. Neursosurgery. 2007, 60:681-688. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000255393.77538.75
  13. Sharim J, Lo W-L, Kim W, Chivukula S, Tenn S, Kaprealian T, Pouratian N: Radiosurgical target distance from the root entry zone in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017, 7:221-227. 10.1016/j.prro.2016.12.006
  14. Wolf A, Tyburczy A, Ye JC, Fatterpekar G, Silverman JS, Kondlziolka D: The relationship of dose to nerve volume in predicting pain recurrence after stereotactic radiosurgery in trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg. 2017, 19:1-6. 10.3171/2016.12.JNS161862
  15. Romanelli P, Heit G, Chang SD, Martin D, Pham C, Adler J: Cyberknife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2003, 81:105-109. 10.1159/000075112
  16. Kurup G: CyberKnife: a new paradign in radiotherapy. J Med Phys. 2010, 35:63-64. 10.4103/0971-6203.62194
  17. Farisrelli L, Marras C, De Santis M, Marchetti M, Milanesi I, Broggi G: CyberKnife radiosurgery as a first treatment for isiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. Neursosurgery. 2009, 64:96-101. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000341714.55023.8F
  18. Villavicencio AT, Lim M, Burneilkiene S, et al.: CyberKnife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia treatment: a preliminary multicenter experience. Neurosurgery. 2008, 62:647-55. 10.1227/01.neu.0000317313.46826.dc
  19. Lazzara BM, Ortiz O, Bordia R, Witten MR, Haas JA, Katz AJ, Brown JA: Cyberknife radiosurgery in treating trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurointerv Surg. 2013, 5:81-5. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010125
  20. Karam S, Tai A, Snider J, et al.: Refractory trigeminal neuralgia treatment outcomes following CyberKnife radiosurgery. Radiat Oncol. 2014, 9:257. 10.1186/s13014-014-0257-8
  21. Romanelli P, Conti A, Bianchi L, Bergantin A, Martinotti A, Beltramo G: Image-guided robotic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia . Neurosurgery. 2017, nyx571. 10.1093/neuros/nyx571
  22. Smith ZA, Gorgulho AA, Bezrukiy N, McArthur D, Agazaryan N, Seich MT, De Salles AA: Dedicated linear accelerator radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: a single center experience in 179 patients with varied dose prescriptions and treatment plans. Int J Radiol Oncol Biol Phys. 2011, 81:225-31. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.058
  23. Shields L, Shanks T, Shearer A, et al.: Frameless image-guided radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia. Surg Neurol Int. 2017, 8:87. 10.4103/2152-7806.207119
  24. Pokhrel D, Sood S, McClinton C, et al.: Linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of refractory trigeminal neuralgia: detailed description of SRS procedure and reported clinical outcomes. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017, 18:136-43. 10.1002/acm2.12057
  25. Kerolus MG, Sen N, Mayekar S, et al.: Truebean radiosurgery for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: preliminary results at a single institution. Cureus. 2017, 16:e1362. 10.7759/cureus.1362
  26. Parikh RR, Goodman RR, Rhome R, Sudentas E, Trichter F, Harrison LB, Choi W.: Linear accelerator-based flattening-filter-free stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: Feasibility and patient-reported outcomes. . Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016, 6:e1-7. 10.1016/j.prro.2015.09.001
  27. Graff AE, Thomas AS, Reed AD, et al.: Frameless stereotactic radiosurgery, a feasible alternative to the frame-based technique for the treatment of refractory trigeminal neuralgia. Cureus. 2016, 8:e571. 10.7759/cureus.571
  28. Descovich M, Sneed PK, Barbaro NM, et al.: A dosimetric comparison between Gamma Knife and CyberKnife treatment plans for trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg. 2010, 113:199-206.
  29. Kalash R, Pifer PM, Beriwal S, et al.: Exceptional eight-year response to stereotactic radiosurgery monotherapy for multiple brain metastases. Cureus. 2017, 9:e2001. 10.7759/cureus.2001
  30. Sio T, Jang S, Lee SW, Curran B, Pyakuryal A, Sternick E: Comparing Gamma knife and Cyber knife in patients with brain metastases. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014, 15:14-27. Accessed: May 9, 2018: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i1.4095
  31. Lucas JT, Nida AM, Isom S, et al.: Predictive nomogram for the durability of pain relief from gamma knife radiation surgery in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014, 89:120-6. Accessed: May 9, 2018: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.01.023
  32. Han I, Shin D, Chang J, Kim K,Chang J, Huh R, Chung S: Effect of various surgical modalities in recurrent or persistent trigeminal neuralgia. J Med Phys. 2010, 88:156-62. 10.1159/000303530
  33. Bakker N, Van Dijk M, Immenga S, Wagemakers M, Metzemaekers J: Repeat microvascular decompression for recurrent idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg. 2014, 121:936-939. 10.3171/2014.7.JNS132667
  34. Dvorak T, Finn A, Price LL, Mignano JE, Fitzek MM, Wu JK, Yao KC: Retreatment of trigeminal neuralgia with Gamma knife radiosurgery: is there an appropriate cumulative dose?. J Neurosurg. 2009, 111:359-64.
  35. Kimball BY, Sorenson JM, Cunningham D: Repeat gammaknife surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: long-term results. J Neurosurg. 2010, 113 :178-83.
  36. Park KJ, Kondziolka D, Berkowitz O, et al.: Repeat gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery. 2012, 70:295-305. 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318230218e
  37. Aubuchon AC, Chan MD, Lovato JF, et al.: Repeat Gamma Knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia. Int J Radiot Oncol Biol Phys. 2011, 81:1059-65. Accessed: May 9, 2018: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.010
  38. Tuleasca C, Carron R, Resseguier N, et al.: Repeat Gamma knife surgery for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia: long-term outcomes and systemic review. J Neurosurg. 2014, 121:210-21.
  39. Gellner V, Kruschel, Kriel, Holl EM, Ofner-Kopeinig, Unger F: Recurrent trigeminal neuralgia: long term outcome of repeat gamma knife radiosurgery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych. 2008, 79:1405-7. 10.1136/jnnp.2007.142794
  40. Helis CA, Lucas JT, Bourlan JD, Chan MD, Tatier SB, Laxton AW: Repeat radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery. 2015, 77:755-61. 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000915
  41. Jones GC, Elaimy A, Demekas J, et al.: Feasibility of multiple repeat Gamma knife radiosurgeries for trigeminal neuralgia: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Med. 2011, 2011:258910. Accessed: May 9, 2018: 10.1155/2011/258910
  42. Temprel ZJ, Chivukula S, Monaco EA, et al.: The results of a third Gamma knife procedure for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg. 2015, 122:169-79. 10.3171/2014.9.JNS132779
  43. Daugherty E, Bhavsar S, Hahn SS, Bassano D, Hall W: A successful case of multiple stereotactic radiosurgeries for ipsilateral recurrent trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg. 2015, 122:1324-1329. 10.3171/2014.9.JNS13959
  44. Yousry I, Moriggl B, Schmid U, Naidich T, Yousry T: Trigeminal ganglion and its divisions: detailed anatomic MR imaging with contrast-enhanced 3D constructive inteference in the steady state sequences. Am J Neuroradiol. 2005, 26:1128-1135.
  45. Borchers J, Yang HJ, Sakamoto GT, Howes G, Gupta G, Chang S, Adler J: Cyberknife stereotactic radiosurgical rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia: anatomic and morphological considerations. Neurosurgery. 2009, 64:A91-95. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000340795.87734.70
  46. Zhang M, Lamsam LA, Schoen M, et al.: Brainstem dose constraints in nonisocentric radiosurgical treatment planning of trigeminal neuralgia: a single-institution experience. World Neurosurg. 2018, 113:e399-e407. 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.042
  47. Mousavi S, Niranjan A, Akpinar BA, et al.: A proposed plan for personalized radiosurgery in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg. 2018, 128:452-459. 10.3171/2016.10.JNS16747
  48. Zhang M, Schoen M, Lamsam L, Appelboom G, Soltys S, Adler J, Chang S: 205 optimizing outcomes with permissive brainstem dosing and anatomic considerations in the radiosurgical treatment of trigeminal neualgia. Neurosurgery. 2017, 64:255-256. 10.1093/neuros/nyx417.205
  49. Yuan J, Lee R, Dusenbery KE, Lee CK, Mathew D, Sperduto P, Watanabe Y: Cumulative doses to brain and other critical structures after multisession gammaknife sterotactic radiosurgery for treatment of multiple brain metastatic tumors. Front Oncol. 2018, 13:10.3389/fonc.2018.00065

Review article

Evaluation of CyberKnife Radiosurgery for Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia

Author Information

Aldo Berti

Department Neurosurgery, University of Miami Hospital, Miami, USA

George Ibars

Neurosurgery, South Miami Hospital, Cyberknife Center of Miami

Xiaodong Wu

Innovative Cancer Institute, Innovative Cancer Institute, Cyberknife Center of Miami

Alex Sabo

Neurology, Pain Management, Nova Southeast/larkin Community Hospital

Michelle Granville Corresponding Author

Miami Neurosurgical Center, University of Miami Hospital, Miami, USA

Gail Suarez

Cyberknife Center, Miami, FIU

James G. Schwade

Cyberknife Center of Miami, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine

Robert E. Jacobson

Miami Neurosurgical Center, University of Miami Hospital, Miami, USA

Ethics Statement and Conflict of Interest Disclosures

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: James Schwade MD
Gail Suarez
declare(s) employment and (ownership share) James Schwade MD from Cyberknife Center of Miami. James G Schwade is center director and was not a treating radiation oncologist for any patient. Gail Suarez is administrative chief radiation technician for the center. She has NO financial interest in the center. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Review article

Evaluation of CyberKnife Radiosurgery for Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia

Figures etc.


Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. Learn more here.