12-Month Outcomes and Toxicities of Dose-Escalated Template-Based High Dose Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy Boost via a Single Application for Locally Advanced Gynecologic Malignancies



Abstract

Purpose/Objective(s): Current guidelines from the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommend increasing the achieved dose to the target to a D90 goal >80Gy EQD210, with a goal as high as 85-95Gy for cervical cancer patients. However, achieving a D90 goal of >80Gy EQD210 via a single template-based interstitial application is not possible with the fractionation schemes suggested by ABS. Our institution has used a dose-escalated regimen of 28Gy in 4 fractions via a single Syed application. This retrospective study reports disease control rates and toxicity of patients treated with this regimen.

Materials/Methods: In total, 46 patients were analyzed from 8/2019-3/2024 who met the following inclusion criteria: received (1) definitive-intent external beam radiotherapy (RT), (2) concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy, (3) High dose rate (HDR) Syed interstitial brachytherapy boost using 28Gy in 4 fractions (using twice-a-day treatments with ≥6h between fractions), and (4) ≥3 months of follow up. Patients who did not complete RT as prescribed and those who received re-irradiation were excluded. A retrospective review was conducted for late toxicities using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Disease outcomes with recurrence rates, recurrence location, and vital status were collected. A one-sample t-test was used to compare the sample to established control and toxicity rates in the literature.

Results: Median follow up was 13 months (range 3-50). Median age at diagnosis was 51 years (range 20-85). Most patients were treated for a cervical primary, followed by endometrial cancer recurrence, endometrial primary, and vaginal primary (78%, 10%, 9%, 2% respectively). 13% of patients initially presented as FIGO stage I, 7% stage II, 67% stage III, and 13% stage IV. Median cumulative D90 was 87.06Gy EQD210 (range 79.96-105.71). Significant late toxicities include 4/46 (9%) G3 urinary incontinence, 2/46 (4%) G3 urethral stricture, 1/46 (2%) G3 GI bleeding, 1/46 (2%) G3 diarrhea. Crude vaginal stenosis rates were 21/46 (46%), with 8/46 (17%) being G3. Overall, 9/46 (20%) patients developed rectovaginal or vesicovaginal fistula. Of these patients, 8/46 (17%) were G3. After censoring for initial involvement of bladder/rectosigmoid, 5/46 (11%) of patients developed G3 fistula. No late G4-G5 toxicities were seen. In total, 16 patients (34.8%) developed recurrence (median 5 months; range 1-34) with the majority being distant failures (11/16, 69%). Four of the 5 patients deceased at the time of review died due to their malignancies. Median time from treatment completion to death was 7.5 months (range 6-38). Late toxicity, patterns of recurrence, and survival were similar to historically published outcomes (all p>0.05).

Conclusion: In this high-risk patient cohort, dose-escalated template-based HDR interstitial brachytherapy boost using 28Gy in 4 fractions via a single Syed application appears safe and tolerable with disease outcomes similar to historical data.

Related content

abstract
non-peer-reviewed

12-Month Outcomes and Toxicities of Dose-Escalated Template-Based High Dose Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy Boost via a Single Application for Locally Advanced Gynecologic Malignancies


Author Information

Christian B. Rock Corresponding Author

Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA

Stockton H. Rock

Radiation Oncology, Joe R and Teresa Lozano long School of Medicine, University of Texas, San Antonio, USA

Shraddha M. Dalwadi

Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA

Eloise C. Lienert

Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA

Margaret A. Walsh

Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA

Karl H. Rasmussen

Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA

Christien A. Kluwe

Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA

Mohamad Fakhreddine

Radiation Oncology, West Michigan Cancer Center, Kalamazoo, USA

Mark D. Bonnen

Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA

Gary D. Lewis

Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA


PDF Share