Point Dose Verification in Delivery Quality Assurance for Gyroscopic Radiosurgery System



Abstract

Objectives:

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of patient-specific delivery quality assurance (PS-DQA) using the Semiflex®3D ionization chamber within the ZAP-X gyroscopic radiosurgery system.

Methods:

PS-DQA measurements were performed on 110 patients with 184 lesions treated using the ZAP-X system. Target volumes ranged from 11 mm³ to 63,044 mm³, with a mean of 4,321 mm³. Treatment plans were developed using the ZAP-X Treatment Planning System (TPS), which utilizes a ray-tracing algorithm for dose calculation. PS-DQA was conducted using a water-equivalent spherical phantom and the Semiflex®3D ionization chamber. The phantom was scanned with 0.625 mm CT slice thickness, and treatment plans were recalculated on the phantom’s CT dataset. The percentage differences between measured and planned doses were analyzed, focusing on different target volume categories and the use of small collimators (4 mm and 5 mm). Statistical analysis assessed the significance of observed differences.

Results:

Most PS-DQA measurements (84%) showed discrepancies between -5% and +5% compared to planned doses. However, smaller target volumes (0-500 mm³) exhibited significantly higher percentage differences, highlighting challenges in dose measurement accuracy for these fields. Greater dose discrepancies were also observed when small collimators were extensively used, particularly when their usage exceeded 75% of total isocenters. Tukey HSD tests confirmed statistically significant differences between groups based on target volume and collimator size.

Conclusion(s):

The study confirms the feasibility of PS-DQA with the Semiflex®3D ionization chamber in the ZAP-X system while highlighting challenges with small target volumes and extensive use of small collimators.

Related content

abstract
non-peer-reviewed

Point Dose Verification in Delivery Quality Assurance for Gyroscopic Radiosurgery System


Author Information

Yagiz Yedekci Corresponding Author

Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey, Ankara , TUR

Huseyin Kivanc

Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey, Ankara , TUR

Fatih Biltekin

Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey, ankara, TUR

Demet Yildiz

Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, TUR

Gozde Yazici

Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, TUR

Gokhan Ozyigit

Radiation Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, TUR


PDF Share