Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy to the Prostate Bed: Toxicity Profile and Patient-Reported Outcomes in the POPART Multicentric Prospective Study



Abstract

Objectives:

While Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer has become a valuable option as a radical treatment, limited data support its use in the postoperative setting. Here, we report the updated results of the multicentric POst-Prostatectomy Ablative Radiation Therapy (POPART) trial, investigating possible predictors of toxicities and patient-reported outcomes.

Methods:

Patients with PSA levels between 0.1–2.0 ng/mL after radical prostatectomy underwent Linac-based SBRT treatment to the prostate bed, delineated according to the Francophone Group of Urological Radiotherapy (GFRU) guideline. SBRT was delivered in five fractions every other day for a total dose of 32.5 Gy (EQD2 1.5 =74.3 Gy). Late toxicity was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5 (CTCAE v.5) scale. Quality of life (QoL), including sexual, rectal and urinary domains, and biochemical control have been evaluated through EPIC-CP, ICIQ-SF, IIEF 5 questionnaires and PSA serum levels, respectively. Paired t-test was used to compare pre-treatment and post-treatment questionnaire scores, with minimally important differences (MID) established as a change in the questionnaire scores of > 0.5 pooled standard deviation (SD) from the baseline. A logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate potential associations between specific patient/tumor/treatment factors and outcome deterioration.

Results:

From April 2021 to April 2023 a total of 50 patients were enrolled and treated. Median age at the time of SBRT was 70 (52-83) years. Median follow-up was 12.2 (3-27) months. No late ≥G2 gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity was registered. Late G1 urinary and rectal toxicities were documented in 44% and 4% of patients, respectively. The MID analysis of overall QoL outcome for the 47 patients completing all EPIC-CP domains indicated clinical worsening in four (9%) patients. A deterioration in the IIEF 5 questionnaire was found in eleven (26%) patients. A significant correlation was observed between the decline in erectile function and the dose received by 2% of the PTV (OR, 2.560; 95% CI, 1.186-4.335; P=0.032). At multivariate analysis, only bladder wall D10cc (OR, 1.250; 95% CI, 1.017-1.537; P=0.034) independently correlated with late G1 GU toxicity incidence. Median post-treatment PSA nadir was 0.04 ng/mL (0.00 – 0.84). At the last follow-up, six patients presented with biochemical failure, including two nodal relapses.

Conclusion(s):

Our findings show that post-prostatectomy SBRT did not result in increased toxicity nor a significant decline in QoL measures, thus showing that it can be safely extended to the postoperative setting. Long-term follow-up and randomized comparisons with different radiotherapy schedules are needed to validate this approach.

Related content

abstract
non-peer-reviewed

Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy to the Prostate Bed: Toxicity Profile and Patient-Reported Outcomes in the POPART Multicentric Prospective Study


Author Information

Valeria Faccenda Corresponding Author

Physics, University of Milan, Milan, ITA

Federica Ferrario

School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, ITA

Ciro Franzese

Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, ITA

Suela Vukcaj

Radiation Oncology, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, ITA

Raffaella Lucchini

Radiation Oncology, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, ITA

Denis Panizza

Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, ITA

Alessandro Magli

Radiation Oncology, AULSS 1 Dolomiti, Veneto, ITA

Marta Scorsetti

Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, ITA

Elena De Ponti

Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, ITA

Stefano Arcangeli

School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, ITA


PDF Share