Boswellia Serrata for Management of Radiation Necrosis after Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Benign Conditions and Brain Metastases



Abstract

Objectives:

Radiation necrosis (RN) is the dose limiting side-effect of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for both brain metastases as well as benign conditions. Oral corticosteroids continue to be the mainstay of management; however, they have multiple side effects and drug interactions. Boswellia serrata (BS) is an over-the-counter supplement used for its anti-inflammatory properties and has been recently shown to reduce cerebral edema after brain RT. We evaluated the response rates with BS in a series of patients with brain metastases or benign conditions who developed RN after SRS.

Methods:

We included patients who developed grade 1-3 RN after SRS and were treated with BS. Patients were prescribed over the counter BS 4.2-4.5g daily in divided doses. Follow-up MRI imaging was obtained every 2-3 months after starting BS. Response was assessed using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. Primary endpoint was overall response rate defined as RANO CR or PR or decrease in edema volume on T2-FLAIR MRI to ≥30% from baseline.

Results:

A total of 113 patients were included, of which 107 underwent SRS for brain metastases, 3 for arterio-venous malformations(AVM), 2 for vestibular schwannoma, 1 for meningioma and 1 for obsessive compulsive disorder(OCD). Patients had Grade 1-3 CTCAE v5.0 RN (G1=30.1%, G2=65.1%, and G3=4.8%).
For patients with brain metastases, median age was 62.8 years (range 36.9 – 50) and median RT dose was 24 Gy in 3 fractions. Median follow-up after starting BS was 7m and 91% patients had at least 1 follow up MRI available to evaluate response. The best response was complete response (CR) in 14% patients and partial response (PR) in 40.4% while 26.3% had stable disease (SD) and 10.5% had progressive disease, yielding an overall response rate of 59.6% (CR+PR) in eligible patients. Median time to best response was 3m (3-15m) and median duration of response was 8.5m (2-31m). Percentage of patients who had any response (CR or PR) at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months was 30.8%, 37.5%, 60.0% and 68.4%, respectively. At baseline, 56% patients presented with progressive neurologic symptoms of which 83% required steroid use, while only 44% of asymptomatic patients needed steroids. 18.9% patients on long-term steroids had a decreased steroid requirement after starting BS. No patients had any CTCAE grade 3 or higher toxicities. 12.3% had any adverse events of whom 7% had grade 1 and 5.3% had grade 2 gastrointestinal intolerance or diarrhea.
Among patients with benign conditions, 2 patients (28.6%) had a CR and 4 (57.1%) had a PR, with 1 patient having no available imaging for response assessment. Median age was 31.0 years (range 12 – 80). None of the patients had any adverse events. Specifically, 1 patient with OCD who underwent staged bilateral gamma knife ventral capsulotomy, developed early grade 2 RN (3 months post SRS) and subsequently steroid induced paranoid disorder (5 months post SRS). He was tapered off steroids and started on BS. He had a complete response with resolution of T2F edema and marked reduction in post-contrast enhancement 3 months after initiating BS, with no added toxicities.

Conclusion(s):

We observed response rates of 60% and 100% with the use of BS in our patients with RN after SRS for brain metastases and benign conditions respectively. It was safe with no significant additional side-effects or increased risk of hemorrhage in patients with AVMs. More than one-third of patients with RN were able to avoid long-term steroid use. BS is an easily available over-the-counter drug that appears to be a safe and promising treatment option for RN and can potentially decrease steroid dependence in these patients. Further prospective studies comparing BS with placebo are warranted.

Related content

abstract
non-peer-reviewed

Boswellia Serrata for Management of Radiation Necrosis after Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Benign Conditions and Brain Metastases


Author Information

Rituraj Upadhyay Corresponding Author

Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA

Ahmed Elguindy

Clinical Oncology, Ainshams university, Cairo, EGY

Sasha Beyer

Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, USA

Raju Raval

Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

Evan Thomas

Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, USA

Joshua D. Palmer

Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, USA


PDF Share