Cureus | Modified Muscle Transposition Procedure for a Case of Inferior Rectus Muscle Aplasia
SIQ
-
Rate article
What's this?
Case Report

Modified Muscle Transposition Procedure for a Case of Inferior Rectus Muscle Aplasia

Shinji Makino, Kozue Hozawa, Reiko Kondo, Mika Kanai, Haruko Suto, Go Mawatari, Kanako Ito

Published:

DOI: 10.1159/000371508

License: Copyright © 2015 by S. Karger AG, Basel2015This is an Open Access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC) (www.karger.com/OA-license), applicable to the online version of the article only. Users may download, print and share this work on the Internet for noncommercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited, and a link to the original work on http://www.karger.com and the terms of this license are included in any shared versions.

Abstract

PurposeWe report a case of inferior rectus muscle aplasia in a 65-year-old woman.MethodsImages were obtained using ocular motility photography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and operative findings were analyzed.ResultsA 65-year-old woman presented with marked right hypertropia. The right eye also had microcornea, iris coloboma, and completely restricted downward movement. MRI showed absence of the inferior rectus muscle in both eyes. During surgery, it was confirmed that the right inferior rectus muscle was absent. The patient underwent a muscle transposition procedure without tenotomy or muscle splitting. A superior rectus muscle tenotomy was also performed. Postoperatively, the right eye showed hypotropia and improved downward movement.ConclusionMuscle transposition without tenotomy or tendon splitting is a surgical option for the unusual abnormality presented in this paper.


View Full Article  
Share

What's SIQ™?

Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. SIQ™ assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. All registered users are invited to contribute to the SIQ™ of any published article. (Authors cannot rate their own articles.)

High ratings should be reserved for work that is truly groundbreaking in its respective field. Anything above 5 should be considered above average. While all registered Cureus users can rate any published article, the opinion of domain experts is weighted appreciably more than that of non-specialists. An article’s SIQ™ will appear alongside the article after being rated twice and is recalculated with each additional rating.

Visit our SIQ™ page to find out more.

Close

Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™)

Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. SIQ™ assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. All registered users are invited to contribute to the SIQ™ of any published article. (Authors cannot rate their own articles.)

Already have an account? Sign in.

Cancel Join Now

Share this article with your colleagues. Each email address must be separated by a comma.

Later

Download Cureus Media Kit