Comparison of Handmade Endoloop Versus Polymeric Endoclip for Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy

Background Stump closure is an important stage of laparoscopic appendectomy. This study aimed to establish whether the handmade endoloop or polymeric endoclip method was more effective for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy. Methods The study included 76 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy between October 2017 and January 2019. Patients’ demographic characteristics, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and any complications were retrospectively recorded from files. Patients were divided into two groups according to stump closure method as polymeric endoclip and handmade endoloop. Results Among the patients, 59.2% (n = 45) were male and 40.8% (n = 31) were female. For stump closure, the polymeric endoclip method was used in 37 patients (48.7%) and the handmade endoloop method in 39 patients (51.3%). The two groups were not significantly different in terms of age and appendix diameter ( p=0.408, p=0.218). A total of four patients (5.3%) developed wound infection, including three from the handmade endoloop group and one from the polymeric endoclip group. One patient (1.3%) in the polymeric endoclip group developed ileus. The two groups were also not significantly different in terms of complications (p = 1.000). Conclusion We conclude that both stump closure methods are safe, and the more easily accessible handmade endoloop method can be performed reliably in all hospitals, including secondary healthcare facilities such as small hospitals.


Introduction
Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of emergency surgical intervention. Diagnosis is usually established based on patient history and physical examination and confirmed by laboratory and imaging methods [1][2]. Ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen are imaging methods commonly used for diagnosis [3][4]. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is an alternative to open appendectomy with increasing application in Europe and the United States. The European Endoscopic Surgery Association recommends LA [5].
Laparoscopic appendectomy has several advantages over open appendectomy, including reduced length of hospital stay, pain, wound infection, and better cosmetic outcomes [6]. The risk of appendiceal stump leak and subsequent abdominal sepsis are feared complications of LA [7]. Various stump closure techniques have been described in LA; the most common include endoloop, suture, stapler, and endoclip methods. As of yet, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment method [5].
This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the handmade endoloop and polymeric endoclip methods that we commonly employ in our clinic for stump closure in LA.

Materials And Methods
The study included patients who underwent LA in the general surgery clinic of a secondary public hospital in 1 1 Turkey between October 2017 and January 2019. Patients' demographic characteristics, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and any complications were retrospectively recorded from files. Patients were divided into two groups according to stump closure method as polymeric endoclip and handmade endoloop. For the handmade endoloop, a 2/0 Vicryl (polyglactin) suture was used. All operations were performed by the same surgical team. All patients were preoperatively administered 1 g of i.v. cefazolin for prophylaxis. In all operations, the mesoappendix was dissected using LigaSure (Covidien, Dublin, Ireland).
Patients aged <18 years and those with perforated appendicitis were excluded from the study.

Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0 (Released 2012; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Conformity of the data to normal distribution was evaluated by the Shapiro-Wilk test. The data were not normally distributed; therefore, numerical data were expressed using medians and interquartile range (IQR) and categorical data were expressed using numbers and percentages. The two groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney test for numerical data and the chi-square test for categorical data. Values of p<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results
The study included 76 patients (45 men and 31 women

TABLE 2: Comparison of treatment methods by imaging method
The two groups were not significantly different in terms of age and appendix diameter measured radiologically (p=0.408, p=0.218) (

Discussion
In LA, various stump closure techniques have been described, including intra-and extracorporeal knots, staplers, polymeric endoclips, and endoloops. Numerous studies compared these techniques to establish an ideal method [8]. Endo staplers are preferable for stump closure when the stump is wide and necrotic; however, this method is not always feasible due to the high cost and requirement of a wide trocar [9].
Studies show that LA is more costly than open appendectomy. Therefore, researchers have investigated alternatives to reduce the costs and reported that this was possible with alternative stump closure methods such as the handmade endoloop technique [10]. In their study of 98 patients, Yıldız et al. reported that stump closure with a handmade endoloop was cost-effective and safe [11].
Antoniou et al. reported that stump closure by suture was superior to other methods in terms of wound infection [5]. In our study, three patients (7.7%) from the handmade endoloop group and one patient (2.7%) from the polymeric endoclip group developed wound infection. We did not find the two methods to be statistically different in terms of wound infection.
Nadeem et al. compared extracorporeal suture and metallic endoclip in terms of postoperative ileus and found no statistically significant difference between the two groups. One patient in the metallic endoclip group and two patients from the extracorporeal suture group developed ileus [12]. In our study, one patient from the polymeric endoclip group developed ileus.
Şimşek et al. compared a polymeric endoclip and an endoloop in stump closure in LA and reported that the polymeric clip facilitated the surgical technique and reduced operation time [8].
Partecke et al. stated that the Hem-o-lok clip is safe and practical, but if the appendiceal stump is inflamed and wide, closure safety may be problematic [13]. The length of hospital stay was similar for the two groups, and there was no statistically significant difference in terms of complications [16].
In our study, the polymeric endoclip and handmade endoloop groups were not different in terms of duration of operation (p = 0.307), hospital stay (p = 0.597), or postoperative complications (p = 1.000).
The limitations of our study are its retrospective nature and the relatively small number of patients due to being conducted in a small medical center.

Conclusions
We conclude that both stump closure methods were safe. Moreover, the more easily accessible and costeffective handmade endoloop method can be performed reliably in all hospitals, including secondary healthcare facilities such as small hospitals. In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.