Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy of the Right Hand following an Acute Traumatic Injury

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), formerly known as reflex sympathetic dystrophy, is a chronic neuropathic pain disorder with significant autonomic features. Recently, it has been recognized that CRPS is not simply a sympathetically mediated peripheral pain condition but rather a disease of the central nervous system as well. Herein, we present a case of a patient who presented with complaints of severe pain following a traumatic event, severing his extensor tendon of his right fifth finger.


Introduction
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a disorder of a particular region of a body, usually involving the distal extremities, characterized by pain, swelling, limited range of motion, vasomotor instability, skin changes, and patchy bone demineralization [1]. It is frequently triggered following a fracture, soft tissue injury, or surgery. The pain is not restricted to a specific nerve territory or dermatome and usually has a distal predominance of abnormal sensory, motor, sudomotor, vasomotor, and/or trophic findings [2]. This syndrome shows variable progression over time.

Case Presentation
A 62-year-old, healthy male presented to the occupational health office with a chief complaint of new-onset, gradually worsening, localized, right-hand pain that began while he was at work. He is an employee at a steel factory, alternatively using a vibratory pressure hammer to clean and thin metals and a grinder for approximately nine hours a day, for the past seven years. The patient noticed increased discomforting pain in his right hand while he was at work, rating it 5 on a pain scale of 10. At the office, he reported difficulty flexing his fourth and fifth fingers in his right hand, unable to make a complete fist. The patient reported associated mild numbness of his right fourth and fifth fingers. His symptoms were aggravated with movement and relieved with rest. He denied taking any over the counter non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents for pain relief. The patient denied any trauma or injury to his extremities. The patient denied knowledge of any other known contributing factors or events. The patient denied similar symptoms in his left hand. The patient reported that he was asymptomatic prior to this event. He denied any aches, pain, swelling or stiffness of his other joints. The patient reported unremarkable family and social history.
Upon physical examination, his vital signs were within normal limits. The patient was conscious, cooperative, well-developed, well-nourished, well-oriented in time, place and person. The patient had a full unrestricted range of motion of the left upper extremity. On evaluating his right hand and wrist, the patient had difficulty fully flexing his right fourth and fifth fingers, unable to make a complete fist. The patient had an unremarkable extension of his fingers. Capillary refill was less than two seconds bilaterally. The patient had unremarkable Tinel's and Phalen's signs, bilaterally.
The patient was diagnosed with work-related acute traumatic injury to his right hand. He was suspected to have a possible flexor tendon injury and hence was referred to occupational therapy and a hand-orthopedic surgeon for further evaluation. In the interim, he was recommended taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent, with food as needed for pain. The patient was educated and taught a gentle range of motion exercises. He was provided a work restriction of avoiding any lifting, pushing or pulling greater than 10 pounds or using any vibrating tools.
During his occupational therapy appointment, his symptoms had improved mildly in intensity; averaged his pain to be 2-5 on a pain scale of 10. The patient expressed his desired therapy goal would be to regain his ability to bend his finger like his other hand. After a thorough examination, therapy goal was established and continue following-up for therapy one time per week for four weeks ( Table 1).

Goals to be obtained at the end of occupational plan of care
Patient will be independent with his activities Decreased involved hand pain to 0 out of 10 Achieve active fingertip to palm composite flexion for resumption of small object grasp and hold and ½ inch diameter tool use (toothbrush, eating utensils) Achieve sufficient pinch/ dexterity Patient be able to lift 50 pounds from floor to waist with proper body mechanics to assist with lifting at work Patient be able to lift 10 pounds with proper body mechanics to assist with lifting overhead activities at work

TABLE 1: Occupational therapy goals
On evaluation by the hand-orthopedic surgeon, the patient was noted to have full flexion of his metacarpophalangeal joints in his right hand, including his right fifth finger, but there was no active flexion at his right fifth proximal or distal interphalangeal joints. He had full passive range of motion of his right fifth finger, but he could not hold his finger bend at all at his distal and proximal interphalangeal joints. Comparing his left hand, he was able to make a full fist on his left hand with full flexion of all his fingers. X-ray image of his hand was obtained ( Figure 1).

FIGURE 1: X-ray image of the right hand (two views)
Findings: X-rays of the right hand demonstrate a mild hypertrophic change of the head of the first metacarpal (red arrow). Mild narrowing was evident at the proximal interphalangeal joints, with mild associated hypertrophic changes (yellow arrow).
Impression: Mild early osteoarthritic changes; no evidence of fracture or dislocation The surgeon suspected rupture of his flexor digitorum profundus tendon to his right fifth finger. His palmaris longus tendon was intact, which was helpful to know for a possible reconstruction surgery in the future. To further investigate the cause of his symptoms, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of his right hand was ordered ( Figure 2).

FIGURE 2: MRI scan of the right hand without contrast
Impression: Complete tear involving the flexor digitorum profundus and superficialis tendons to the fifth digit located at the level of the mid-fifth metacarpal (red arrow). The proximal tendon stumps are not well visualized in the field-of-view. If further evaluation more proximally is clinically indicated, 2019  MRI of the wrist with the inclusion of the proximal metacarpals could be considered. There is some mild strand-like elevated transverse plane (T2) signal near the distal remaining tendons which may be due to edema or bruising (red circle). There is some strand-like elevated T2 signal in the subcutaneous tissues around the fifth digit which may be due to edema or bruising.
The rheumatologist reviewed the patient's history in detail with him. He denied any autoimmune conditions or gout in his family. On physical examination, the patient had 1+ swelling of right hand with tenderness on palpation. He had mildly increased warmth of his right hand without erythema. He could make a fist with his right hand only by 30 degrees.
The rheumatologist concluded that the patient presented with active synovitis of his right hand. The differential diagnosis for his symptoms included inflammatory arthropathy, autoimmune arthropathy, Lyme's disease, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, or gout. Laboratory tests were ordered, along with a nuclear medicine bone scan (NMBS) to evaluate the bone activity in his right hand (Table 2, Figure 3).

Component Latest Reference, Range and Unit Result
White

FIGURE 3: NMBS of the right hand
Findings: The flow study indicates subtle increased flow diffusely throughout the visualized distal right forearm, wrist and hand. There is normal flow through the distal left forearm wrist and hand (Image A). In the blood pool images corresponding to the flow images, there is diffusely increased radiotracer throughout the soft tissues of the distal right forearm, wrist, and hand. There is normal uptake of the radiotracer in the left distal forearm wrist and hand (Image B). The delayed scan showed asymmetric diffusely increased periarticular uptake of joints of the wrist, carpometacarpal joints, metacarpophalangeal joint, and interphalangeal joints of the right hand. There is normal uptake of the visualized portions left upper extremity (Image C).
Impression: Three-phase radiotracer uptake of the right distal forearm, wrist, and hand with diffuse periarticular delayed uptake of the wrist and hand. Findings are compatible with reflex sympathetic dystrophy.

NMBS, nuclear medicine bone scan
Following the NMBS results, the patient was referred to pain management for further treatment, in anticipation of a possible stellate ganglion nerve block. The patient showed slow symptomatic improvement while he continued following-up with occupational therapy, and was recommended to avoid repetitive vibratory or jarring activities.
The patient deferred undergoing stellate ganglion nerve block procedure for pain relief. He successfully completed his occupational therapy sessions with mild symptomatic improvement. He was further referred to physical therapy in anticipation of desensitization therapy and started on Gabapentin 300 milligram capsules three times daily to help manage his pain.

Discussion
Older alternative names for CRPS in the literature include reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD), algodystrophy, causalgia, Sudeck atrophy, transient osteoporosis, and acute atrophy of bone. Upper extremity involvement following the stroke or myocardial infarction was sometimes referred to as the "shoulder-hand syndrome." In the modern era, these disorders are grouped under the single heading of CRPS.
There are two families of classification of CRPS; based on the presence or absence of nerve injury and based on skin temperature during the onset of symptoms (  Evidence for inflammation in the presence of an increased level of cytokines interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1 beta (1β), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) from the venous blood samples of the involved versus uninvolved extremity in the acute phase suggesting a local inflammatory process [5]. Another possible explanation for pain and allodynia in CRPS involves central sensitization, whereby increased activity in nociceptive afferents due to peripheral noxious stimuli, tissue damage, or nerve injury leads to increased synaptic transmission at somatosensory neurons in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord [6].
The main clinical symptoms of CRPS are pain, sensory changes, motor impairments, autonomic symptoms, and trophic changes in the affected limb [7]. The onset of symptoms occurs generally within four to six weeks of the inciting event. The most common inciting events leading to CRPS are fractures, crush injuries, sprains, and surgery.
There is no "gold-standard" test or method for confirming the diagnosis. However, some investigators assert that certain investigations are useful for the diagnosis of CRPS, particularly three-phase bone scintigraphy showing increased radiotracer uptake in joints distant from the trauma site. Other tests with some possible utility include side-by-side radiographs (e.g., both hands imaged on the same radiograph) showing spotty bone decalcification, and long-term or repetitive skin temperature measurements showing >1 °C difference for the affected versus unaffected side [7]. There is no clear role for MRI or computed tomography (CT) scanning in the evaluation of suspected CRPS, nor is there any role for the response to sympatholysis to confirm the diagnosis of CRPS. The Budapest consensus criteria have been described for the clinical diagnosis of CRPS ( Table 4) [8].
Budapest consensus criteria for clinical diagnosis of complex regional pain syndrome 1. Continuing pain, which is disproportionate to any inciting event 2. The patient must report at least one symptom in three of the following four categories: Sensory: Reports of hyperesthesia and/or allodynia vasomotor: Reports of temperature asymmetry and/or skin color changes and/or skin color asymmetry Sudomotor/edema: Reports of edema and/or sweating changes and/or sweating asymmetry Motor/trophic: Reports of decreased range of motion and/or motor dysfunction (weakness, tremor, dystonia) and/or trophic changes (hair, nail, skin) 3. The patient must display at least one sign* at the time of evaluation in two of the four following categories: Sensory: Evidence of hyperalgesia (to pinprick) and/or allodynia (to light touch and/or temperature sensation and/or deep somatic pressure and/or joint movement) Vasomotor: Evidence of temperature asymmetry (>1°Celsius) and/or skin color changes and/or asymmetry Sudomotor/edema: Evidence of edema and/or sweating changes and/or sweating asymmetry Motor/trophic: Evidence of decreased range of motion and/or motor dysfunction (weakness, tremor, dystonia) and/or trophic changes (hair, nail, skin) 4. There is no other diagnosis that better explains the signs and symptoms * A sign is counted only if it is observed at the time of diagnosis  Management of CRPS should include a multidisciplinary approach. The most vital intervention in the management of CRPS is inclusion of patient education and early introduction of physical and occupational therapy. The therapeutic management goal is to allow active participation in the rehabilitation regimen and restore movement and strength of the affected limb. Clinical based therapeutic interventions have been summarized in (Table 6) [10].

Recommendation Note
Pharmacological approach  Vitamin C has been recommended to reduce the prevalence of CRPS in patients with wrist fracture [11]. The prognosis of chronic regional pain syndrome is highly variable, depending on the patient's symptomatic complaints. The incidence of recurrence is low and more than 50% of the recurrences of chronic regional pain syndrome are spontaneous in origin, especially in younger patients [12].

Conclusions
CRPS is a multifactorial complex disorder of the extremities, with regional pain disproportionate to the mechanism or extent of the injury. It is a chronic neuropathic pain (burning, hyperalgesia, and allodynia) associated with local edema and autonomic changes inclusive of altered sweating, skin temperature or skin color. The diagnosis is based on history and physical examination, and the multidisciplinary approach to symptomatic patient management with CRPS should be initiated.