Urdu Translation and Linguistic Validation of the Bladder Cancer Index Questionnaire

Background This study aimed to translate the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI) questionnaire to Urdu and validate it to assess the quality of life of patients with bladder cancer. Material and methods After forward and backward translation of the BCI questionnaire into Urdu, content validity was calculated using the content validity index (CVI) based on input from five health experts regarding the clarity and relevance of the questionnaire. Construct validity was measured by comparing the inter-scale domains and subdomains of BCI and by comparing BCI with Short Form 36 (SF-36) using correlations. For assessment of reliability, Cronbach’s alpha was calculated to measure internal consistency and for test-retest reliability, the questionnaire was re-administered four weeks later and the correlation of responses at baseline and at a four-week time point was evaluated. Results The questionnaire has good content validity for clarity (0.91) and relevance (0.87). The construct validity of BCI was also adequately displayed by moderate to high correlation between different subdomains of BCI (Pearson’s r: urinary - 0.62, bowel - 0.78, sexual function - 0.43) and low to moderate correlation between responses of BCI compared with SF-36 (Pearson’s r mostly >0.45). Test-retest reliability was excellent (Pearson’s r 0.90-0.98), and there was good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.79-0.92) in the different domains of the questionnaire. Conclusion The Urdu-translated BCI is a valid and reliable tool to measure the impact of bladder cancer on the quality of life of patients.


Introduction
Bladder cancer (BC) is the seventh most commonly diagnosed cancer in the male population, and it is the second most common urological malignancy worldwide [1]. In Pakistan, it is the eighth most common cancer diagnosed among males [1].
A major proportion of bladder cancers (up to 75%) are non-invasive, requiring long-term follow-up with cystoscopy and surveillance [2]. This may significantly affect the quality of life. On the other hand, the muscle-invasive disease requires extensive surgery such as radical cystectomy with the formation of a neobladder, continent catheterizable pouch, or ileal conduit. This may particularly affect physical and social functioning. Bladder cancer, whether invasive on non-invasive, puts a high toll on the patient in terms of both quality of life and finances. BC patients experienced a statistically significant decline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) in all domains. For evaluating the impact of a certain disease process as well as monitoring the side effect and benefits of the treatment, HRQOL is an important outcome [3]. Quality of life in bladder cancer patients can be measured by the different quality of life questionnaires [4]. Qualitative measures are routinely used, however, quantitative measures have also been validated in this patient population. A number of HRQOL questionnaires have been developed either by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) or the American organization for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT). The EORTC-QLQ-BLS24 and FACT-bladder modules measure the quality of life in noninvasive bladder cancer while the EORTC-QLQ-BLM 30 and FACT Vanderbilt cystectomy index are commonly used for muscle-invasive bladder cancer [5][6][7].
The Bladder Cancer Index (BCI) questionnaire was developed in 2007 by Gilbert et al. to assess the quality of life of patients with bladder cancer (Appendices). It is a comprehensive questionnaire that is neither treatment nor gender-specific and is applicable to patients suffering from either muscle-invasive or noninvasive bladder cancer [8].
This questionnaire has earlier been translated and validated in the Spanish, Arabic, Dutch, Hungarian, Japanese, and French dialects [9][10][11][12][13][14]. However, to date, no validated Urdu version of this questionnaire is available to assess the quality of life of bladder cancer patients. Although Short Form 36 (SF-36) is similar to BCI, it is not as comprehensive or specific as BCI (Appendices) [9].

Development of the Urdu version of the BCI questionnaire
We used the standard translation and back-translation methods. Two urologists with experience in diagnosing and treating men with bladder cancer individually translated the original English version of the BCI questionnaire into Urdu (Appendices). To further refine translation, a pilot study among four patients (three patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and one with muscle-invasive) was done by carrying out cognitive debriefing interviews to assess understandability and to highlight any discrepancies with the original version. As the translated version was quite understandable, only minor changes were made, and a backward translation from Urdu to English was performed to ensure that during the reverse translation, there was no major discrepancy with the original version.

Validity
Content validity was calculated by recording the responses of five health experts. The finalized Urdu version of the questionnaire was sent to five health experts, and they were requested to assess every item on a 4point Likert scale (1 = not relevant, 2 = only relevant if the phrasing is strongly adjusted, 3 = relevant with some adjustment to phrasing, 4 = very relevant). The content validity index (CVI) was calculated by dividing the average score given by experts by the maximum score possible.

Construct validity was assessed by comparing different BCI subdomains and by comparing them with SF-36.
Hypothesized results were a moderate to high correlation between function (measuring severity) and bother (impact) of symptom, and a moderate to low correlation between BCI and SF-36. Correlations of <0.45 were considered low, 0.45-0.70 moderate, and >0.70 high [15].

Reliability
To investigate test-retest reliability, the BCI questionnaire was administered twice, once at baseline and once again four weeks later, and the responses were compared. Internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach's alpha for all the domains and subdomains of the BCI questionnaire.

Data collection
After ethical review committee (ERC) approval, all patients fulfilling inclusion criteria were enrolled from July 2020 till December 2020, and informed consent was taken. Data were collected for demographics, including age, gender, comorbid conditions, marital status, educational level, smoking history, and cancerrelated factors.
HRQOL was assessed before and one month after treatment. A total of three questionnaires were filled out by each patient. At the initial presentation, patients were asked to fill both the Urdu version of the BCI questionnaire as well as SF-36 to calculate the correlation between different domains of the BCI and SF-36 questionnaires. The BCI questionnaire was again administered four weeks later to assess the retest reliability.
Between July 2020 and December 2020, 40 patients were enrolled, with a mean age of 56.43±.13.20 years. The mean tumor size was 17.47 ± 1.8mm. The mean number of tumors was 1.7±0.22. The majority (38/40) of the patients were male, with 67.5% having a history of smoking. Ninety percent (90%; 36/40) of patients had a non-muscle invasive (Ta/T1) disease on histopathology following transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). Four (10%) patients underwent radical cystectomy, all with muscle-invasive bladder cancer on TURBT. No variant pathology was noted. All but four out of 40 patients received a single instillation of a chemotherapeutic agent (Mitomycin C). Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) was administered to 13/40 (42.5%) of patients (

Content validity
Based on responses from five experts, the CVI was calculated for relevance and clarity. The CVI for relevance was 0.87, and for clarity, it was 0.91, with the universal agreement of the experts on 16 questions for relevance and 21 questions for clarity.

Construct validity
To test the construct validity, the BCI questionnaire was compared to the SF-36 questionnaire using a multimethod matrix of correlation. When the function was correlated with a bother for individual domains, there was a moderate correlation between the Urinary (0.62) and Bowel (0.78) function and bother. However, a weak correlation was observed in the Sexual domain between function and bother (0.43).
When compared to SF-36, there was predominantly a weak correlation, with most correlation coefficients below 0.6. Exceptions included a correlation between the physical symptoms of SF-36 and the Bowel (0.63) and Sexual function (0.70) on the BCI scale (

Reliability
There was good internal consistency in all domains as demonstrated by a high Cronbach's alpha (0.79-0.92) with variations observed at the subdomain level (0.40-0.94) ( Table 2).
Test-retest at four weeks demonstrated a very strong correlation ranging between 0.90 and 0.98. On comparing different subdomains, a weak correlation was observed between all the subdomains of BCI at baseline and at four weeks except for bowel bother at baseline and bowel function at four weeks (0.76) and bowel function at baseline and bowel bother at four weeks (0.77) (

Discussion
BCI is a comprehensive questionnaire that assesses the severity of symptoms and their impact on quality of life. It has three domains: Urinary, Bowel, and Sexual. Each domain is further subdivided into a functional and bothers subdomain. It was translated into Urdu and validated for its use in bladder cancer patients. Validation was done using content and construct validity, and reliability was evaluated by measuring internal consistency and test-retest reliability.
Similar to the Arab and Dutch studies, content validity was very good, with a reported CVI of 0.87 and 0.91 for relevance and clarity, respectively [13][14]. Construct validity was investigated by comparing the Pearson coefficients of the BCI domains and subdomains to a comparable questionnaire, SF-36. Since bother directly reflects the impact of symptoms on function, the two are expected to have a moderate to high correlation. A high correlation was seen in the Bowel (r=0.73) and moderate in Urinary (r=0.62) domains. However, a low correlation was reported in the Sexual domain (r=0.43). This is in line with a study conducted earlier, except reporting high correlation in the Bowel domain as opposed to moderate correlation reported previously [9]. When the subdomains of BCI were compared to SF-36, mostly moderate to low correlations were reported. Low correlations were mainly reported when comparing the Mental domain of SF-36 to the subdomains of BCI. This differs from the low correlations reported by Schmidt S et al. when comparing both the domains of SF-36 with those of BCI [9].
We found that the BCI is a useful tool that can be used to assess symptoms and quality of life in patients with bladder cancer, including those undergoing radical cystectomy. As there is a lack of questionnaires in the Urdu language to be used specifically for this population, we could only compare it with a relatively generic SF-36 questionnaire to assess validity. However, despite these limitations and limited sample size, we can confidently state that this questionnaire can be used for patients with bladder cancer to assess the Urinary, Bowel, and Sexual domains.

Conclusions
A validated Urdu version of the quality of life measure is much needed for bladder cancer patients in our part of the world, where Urdu is the standard medium of communication. The BCI is a multidimensional measure of bladder cancer-specific health-related quality of life. It can assess the health outcome across a range of treatments available for bladder cancer patients.